Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09PRETORIA832, SADC MISSION DECLARES SOUTH AFRICAN ELECTION FREE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PRETORIA832.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09PRETORIA832 2009-04-24 14:39 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Pretoria
VZCZCXRO8467
RR RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHGI RUEHMA RUEHMR RUEHPA RUEHRN RUEHTRO
DE RUEHSA #0832/01 1141439
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 241439Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8260
INFO RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE
RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEHUJA/AMEMBASSY ABUJA 1345
RUEHTN/AMCONSUL CAPE TOWN 6782
RUEHDU/AMCONSUL DURBAN 0895
RUEHJO/AMCONSUL JOHANNESBURG 9124
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PRETORIA 000832 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KDEM ASEC SF PGOV
SUBJECT: SADC MISSION DECLARES SOUTH AFRICAN ELECTION FREE 
AND FAIR 
 
PRETORIA 00000832  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
------- 
Summary 
------- 
 
1. (U)  The Southern African Development Community (SADC) 
concluded that South Africa's national and provincial 
election on April 22 was "peaceful, free, fair, and 
transparent."  SADC's delegation, which comprised 108 
observers from the region, was led by Swaziland's Minister of 
Agriculture Clement Dlamini.  Despite the mission's 
statements that the election results reflect the will of the 
people, the SADC delegation did investigate some concerns 
from stakeholders about the pre-election environment and 
offered some suggestions and recommendations for future 
elections.  End Summary. 
 
--------------------- 
"Free and Fair" . . . 
--------------------- 
 
2. (U)  A SADC delegation of 108 observers from the region 
held a press conference on April 25 and described the 
national and provincial election on April 22 as "peaceful, 
free, fair, and transparent."  Swaziland's Minister of 
Agriculture Clement Dlamini told a crowd in Pretoria that 
"political parties followed relevant legislation to address 
election-related issues affecting them with the electoral 
commission." 
 
------------------------ 
. . . With Some Concerns 
------------------------ 
 
3. (U)  SADC also noted some areas of concern regarding the 
election.  Observers pointed out that voting by South 
Africans living overseas proved to be one of the areas of 
most concern for the election's credibility.  The delegation 
noted that there was a lack of a clear legal framework to 
regulate voter registration overseas.  The SADC mission also 
said the involvement of the Department of Foreign Affairs at 
voting stations overseas was an issue because diplomats often 
are seen as political agents of the ruling party.  A second 
area of concern focused on logistical issues.  The mission 
said that in some areas voting stations ran out of ballots 
and ballot boxes.  (Note:  The U. S. Mission's own observer 
teams also noticed that some voting stations were running 
short of ballots and ballot boxes.  End Note.)  The third 
area of concern focused on issues of political freedom, 
noting that in some areas political parties set up stands 
inside the perimeter of voting stations -- e.g., too close to 
Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) polling stations. 
They also said there was singing, dancing, and shouting of 
political slogans outside stations as well as party agents 
wearing party colors.  (Note:  Some of the U. S. Mission's 
observing teams saw parties outside of voting stations with 
music blaring out of expensive cars near party supporters 
waving huge party flags.  End Note.) 
 
------------------------------- 
SADC Offers Few Recommendations 
------------------------------- 
 
4. (U)  The SADC observer mission suggested the IEC should 
enhance its logistical support in the provision, development, 
printing, transportation, storage, and management of voting 
materials.  The delegation also noted that improved supplying 
of transparent ballot boxes at all voting stations was needed 
in the future -- especially ballot papers.  Moreover, SADC's 
officers said that the amendment of electoral laws was 
necessary to prohibit political activities within the 
vicinity of voting stations. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
5. (U)  SADC's observer mission seemed largely satisfied that 
the April 22 election in South Africa reflected the will of 
Qthe April 22 election in South Africa reflected the will of 
the people.  Although generally positive, the regional 
observers pointed out some isolated areas where the IEC may 
have fallen short and some areas that the SAG could improve. 
The question will be how many of the recommendations the IEC 
takes onboard and how South Africa's electoral commission 
 
PRETORIA 00000832  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
evolves ahead of the 2011 local election. 
LA LIME