VZCZCXRO6931
OO RUEHJO
DE RUEHKI #0422/01 1200713
ZNR UUUUU ZDF
O 300713Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY KINSHASA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9537
INFO RUEHXR/RWANDA COLLECTIVE
RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KINSHASA 000422 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS PHUM PREF CG
SUBJECT:  MEETING WITH NEW CNDP LEADERSHIP 
 
REF:  KINSHASA 406 
 
KINSHASA 00000422  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
¶1.  (SBU) Summary:  We recently met with members of the new CNDP 
leadership who, while remaining generally patient with the 
government, nevertheless displayed some anxiety and distrust over 
certain aspects of the new dynamics in North Kivu.  This was 
displayed primarily in their continued antipathy towards the Amani 
program and their condemnation of the recent ceremony heralding the 
end of the integration process in North Kivu.  End summary. 
 
Members of the Leadership Team 
------------------------------ 
 
¶2.  (SBU) The CNDP team was composed of three representatives: 
Desire Kamanzi, Jean Munyampenda, and Jean Baptiste Gasominari. 
Kamanzi, the President, is a Masisi-born Tutsi, who claims to be a 
founding member of CNDP, but acknowledges he has spent most of his 
time "in the diaspora."  He mentioned his time in South Africa, but, 
significantly, not his time in Rwanda, where he has actually spent 
the majority of the past 15 years. Munyampenda, the Executive 
Secretary, is a Tutsi and self-proclaimed "rebel of 13 years," 
having been with the AFDL, RCD, and also as a founding member of the 
CNDP.  Gasominari, whose position is unclear, is a Tutsi and was 
among the delegation to the Goma Conference and the Nairobi talks. 
 
GDRC-CNDP Agreement 
------------------- 
 
¶3.  (SBU) The CNDP team said that there has been no progress since 
March 23 due to total GDRC inaction.  The monitoring committee to 
the agreement has not even been created, although the CNDP has 
submitted all their lists and recommendations as agreed.  However, 
they appeared untroubled by this inaction, putting it down to 
"standard GDRC incompetence" and the Kamerhe troubles.  Indeed, they 
made a point of underlining their confidence in the GDRC's 
"continued good faith." 
 
¶4.  (SBU) During the meeting, the following points related to the 
agreement's key elements emerged: 
 
-- Police de Proximite (Local Police Force):  The CNDP is willing to 
accept that those who staff these units come from outside the Kivus. 
 However, they must be "properly versed in local affairs," including 
being able to speak the local language, e.g. Kinyarwanda, and must 
remain in the same community throughout their career (Comment:  This 
means in effect that only locals are likely to meet or be willing to 
meet these conditions.  End comment). 
 
-- Return of refugees:  Unsurprisingly, this was mentioned several 
times as a priority.  However, the team referred only to the 
refugees in Rwanda (vast majority Tutsi) and did not mention those 
in Uganda (vast majority Hutu). 
 
-- Division of North Kivu ("Decoupage"):  Unprompted, Munyampenda 
said the CNDP opposes this division and apparently, although for 
reasons unknown, decentralization in general. 
 
Integration 
----------- 
 
¶5.  (SBU) When pushed, Kamanzi acknowledged that some CNDP fighters 
have not yet been integrated into the FARDC.  However, he insisted 
that the remainder were ready and willing.  Some integrated CNDP 
fighters are unhappy because of the lack of pay and food, although 
the leadership is encouraging them to be patient. 
 
¶6.  (SBU) The CNDP representatives, however, denounced the recent 
ceremony (reftel) declaring an end to the integration process in 
North Kivu, citing a number of reasons.  The first was that since 
they already handed over total control of their forces to the GDRC 
on January 16, the ceremony was irrelevant (Comment:  This ceremony, 
however, was intended to mark the end of the integration process for 
all armed groups in North Kivu, not just the CNDP.  End comment). 
 
¶7.  (SBU) The second and much more important reason was that the 
ceremony included several references to the Amani program and its 
upcoming second phase, consisting of reconciliation and 
stabilization.  While there was no explicit commitment by any of the 
armed groups to participate in the program, the ceremony - unlike 
the March 23 agreement - did place the CNDP alongside the other 
North Kivu armed groups, as the Amani program did. The CNDP 
officially left Amani last year and so it rejects any concept of its 
continued involvement in this program (Comment:  "Amani" to the CNDP 
is code for them being lumped in with all the other armed groups. 
Complaining about it now reveals that beneath their proclaimed 
confidence in the GDRC's good faith they are anxious that the GDRC 
 
KINSHASA 00000422  002 OF 002 
 
 
may renege on its commitments and are alert to any government 
backsliding. End comment). 
 
 
Nkunda 
------ 
 
¶8.  (SBU) Kamanzi gave the now official CNDP line on January's 
change of leadership: Nkunda's approach had only led to further 
fighting, and had failed to deal with the root causes of the 
problems in North Kivu.  Change was needed. Nkunda resisted, so he 
had to be removed by force. 
 
¶9.  (SBU) Comment:  Several aspects of the meeting hinted at ongoing 
tensions within the movement.  Notably, Munyampenda led the 
conversation, clearly articulating his views.  Kamanzi appeared 
measured, somewhat hesitant and meek; he introduced himself as first 
and foremost a member of the CNDP and only secondarily as its 
President.  Our impression was that this was for Munyampenda's 
benefit, and a tacit recognition of his own outside status, as many 
perceive that Kigali imposed him on the CNDP leadership. 
Munyampenda made several significant declarations which bear on the 
Rwandophone agenda and possible resistance to it within the CNDP: 
the CNDP apparently opposes the division of North Kivu; the CNDP is 
concerned with life in the DRC, not the DRC-Rwanda rapprochement; 
and the CNDP may be Rwandophones, but they are not 
"Rwandophonistes," i.e., bent on Rwandophone supremacy.  End 
comment. 
 
GARVELINK