Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09STOCKHOLM141, SPECIAL 301 FOR SWEDEN: POST RECOMMENDATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STOCKHOLM141.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09STOCKHOLM141 2009-03-02 13:57 2011-08-29 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Stockholm
VZCZCXRO6778
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHSM #0141/01 0611357
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 021357Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4176
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STOCKHOLM 000141 
 
STATE FOR EEB/TPP/IPE:TIMOTHY R MCGOWAN 
 
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JENNIFER CHOE GROVES 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KIPR ECON ETRD PGOV SW
SUBJECT: SPECIAL 301 FOR SWEDEN: POST RECOMMENDATION 
 
REF: A) STATE 8410; B) 08 STATE 45106 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  Embassy Stockholm recommends that Sweden 
continues to be placed in the Special 301 Initiative, and not be on 
the Watch List for 2009.  We are aware of the differing 
recommendations of the International Intellectual Property Alliance 
(IIPA) and PhRMA.  Post recommendation is based on: 
 
-- The progress made by the Government of Sweden (GOS) in five out 
of the six items identified in the Special 301 Initiative Action 
plan we communicated to the GOS last year; and 
 
-- The sensitive domestic politics that the GOS needs to manage in 
order to step up internet piracy enforcement in Sweden.  The GOS 
struggles, with good intentions, against a very negative media 
climate and against a vocal youth movement.  For example, we want to 
highlight the risk that negative media attention on the file sharing 
issue gives the Pirate Party a boost in the EU Parliamentary 
elections in June 2009. 
 
2.  (SBU)  This cable reviews the progress Sweden has made on the 
Special 301 Initiative Action plan which we presented to the GOS at 
the conclusion of the Special 301 review 2008 (Ref B).  Post 
continues to engage very constructively with the GOS, and has good 
access and a good working relationship with key senior and working 
level GOS officials.  The actions taken since last year's review 
strengthen the legislative framework and provide better enforcement 
tools for combating piracy.  The Pirate Bay trial is currently being 
heard in the district court in Stockholm.  The last day of the trial 
is March 4, and the verdict can be expected on or about March 25. 
 
3.  (SBU)  Embassy Stockholm believes it would be counter-productive 
to watch list Sweden at this point.  Likely negative political and 
media reaction to a watch listing must be taken into account.  The 
Justice Ministry, with primary responsibility for this issue, is 
fully on board and well aware of what is at stake.  It is currently 
battling with the Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communication 
about the next appropriate steps to curb internet piracy.  Now that 
the Enforcement Directive implementation will finally enter into 
force on April 1, and there will soon be a first District court 
decision in the Pirate Bay case -- the Justice Ministry will turn 
its attention to other key issues, primarily the ISP liability issue 
and extra resources to investigative capabilities.  The GOS (led by 
the Justice Ministry) has to conduct a delicate balancing act, 
advancing this issue shortly before Sweden assumes the Presidency of 
the EU, in the early days of the Obama administration, and in the 
budding election campaign for the EU Parliamentary elections. 
 
End summary. 
 
Background 
---------- 
 
4.  (U) The International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) has, 
in its yearly Special 301 submission to USTR, identified widespread 
internet piracy and difficulties in achieving effective enforcement 
against criminal copyright infringement as problems in Sweden, and 
has requested that Sweden be placed on the Special 301 Watch List 
for 2009.  Sweden was not placed on the Watch list in 2008, despite 
industry's demands, but was rather placed in the relatively recent, 
middle step, named Special 301 Initiative.  As part of the 
Initiative, post conveyed a Special 301 Action plan to the GOS, 
covering six items where the USG hoped to see progress during 2008. 
 
Review of progress on action plan 
--------------------------------- 
 
5.  (U) The Special 301 Initiative Action plan 2008 contained 
recommendations in six specific areas.  The GOS has acted, in 
various degrees, in five of those areas.  A review of progress in 
the six areas follows in paras 6-11: 
 
6.  (SBU) Industry consultations/ISP liability:  The GOS held a 
series of industry consultations in the summer/fall of 2008, with 
the explicit aim to discuss a voluntary industry agreement involving 
ISPs and right-holders organizations.  Industry contacts reported 
that the ISP's were not willing (they claim they are not able) to 
take on any action on a voluntary basis.  The first round of 
consultations was concluded without results during the fall of 2008. 
 The Justice Ministry is currently working internally in the GOS to 
get acceptance for a second round with a clear incentive for 
progress, i.e. threatening with legislation in the absence of a 
voluntary agreement.  There is some resistance in the Center party 
led Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communications, and 
negotiations are on-going at senior GOS-levels. 
 
7.  (U) Injunctive relief:  The one item without any progress is 
 
STOCKHOLM 00000141  002 OF 003 
 
 
Action plan item 2, Injunctive relief.  The GOS maintains that there 
are adequate provisions currently on the books in Sweden, and does 
not intend to introduce new legislation.  (Note that industry claims 
to the contrary were supported by the recommendations of the Renfors 
Commission, a government study commissioned to look into the file 
sharing issue.  The GOS has declared that it will not further 
implement Renfors' recommendations.  End note.) 
 
8.  (U) Implementation of the Enforcement Directive: The bill was 
approved by Parliament on February 25, and the new provisions will 
enter into force on April 1, 2009.  The political sensitivities made 
the final handling of the Bill very delicate for the Alliance 
government.  Much of the debate and negotiations have been done in 
public, and there has been tremendous pressure put on individual 
MPs.  The passage of the implementing legislation is therefore a 
much greater victory for the GOS than it might appear.  Major 
changes, compared to the original proposal, are: 
 
-- the law will not be retroactive, i.e. only for copyright 
infringements committed after the law has entered into force can a 
court order that the identity behind an IP-number be handed out. 
 
-- The court will make a proportionality assessment, i. e. weigh the 
need of the rights-holder to get access to the personal identity 
against integrity aspects of the person behind the IP number.  The 
law now stipulates that a certain scale of infringement will be 
needed for the court to decide that the information should be handed 
out.  Normally, that would be the case when the infringement 
consists of up-loading a single film or musical piece -- since that 
typically incurs significant damage to the rights-holder.  The same 
judgment will be made for a significant scale of down-loading 
copyright protected material. The law establishes that if the 
infringement is the down-loading of only a "few pieces", then 
normally the court's assessment should be that the integrity 
interest must take precedence and the information must not be handed 
out. 
 
-- The law includes provisions that the GOS intends to observe and 
assess how the law is used, to ensure that the law is indeed used to 
go after significant cases of copyright infringements.  This 
monitoring will commence immediately once the law has entered into 
force. 
 
9.  (U) Granting police and prosecutors the right to identities 
behind IP numbers of individuals potentially implicated in copyright 
crimes of lower dignity, i.e. fines rather than prison sentences: 
The Justice Ministry has also worked towards the goal of changing 
legislation so that police and prosecutors can get access to 
information about identities behind IP numbers in cases where the 
crime could lead to a fine (rather than a prison sentence).  The 
usual Swedish term for this type of crime (punishable by fine, not 
prison) is "crime of lower dignity."  At present, law enforcement 
officials are only allowed to get such information if the 
infringement could lead to a prison sentence.  The GOS has agreed to 
change the legislation, and it was made part of a study commissioned 
to propose the steps needed to implement such a change.  The 
proposed changes were recently separated out from the rest of the 
study, and were reported in advance to Justice Minister Ask late 
January 2009.  Although the slow legislative process is 
disappointing, the GOS has already agreed on the necessary changes 
that will strengthen the investigative tools of enforcement 
officials. 
 
10.  (SBU) Police and prosecutors:  There are now two full-time 
prosecutors dedicated to IPR/copyright issues.   Police officers 
have been trained, but we understand that they are not allowed to 
devote attention to IPR/copyright issues.  They are back in their 
regular line of duty in their districts, where there are conflicting 
priorities.  We have understood that the prosecutors have alerted 
that this is a problem for their work - they are "stuck" with a 
backlog of old errands and without the support of investigative 
officers.  The prosecutors ask for investigative officers that are 
exclusively devoted to IPR issues, today there are no such 
investigative capacities.  The Justice Ministry has repeatedly asked 
the Head of the Swedish Police for information about how he plans to 
come to terms with the investigation deficiencies.  Although the GOS 
recognizes the needs, the budget bill for next year will likely not 
contain significant increases for law enforcement, given the harsh 
economic conditions.  This is an area where post can work with the 
GOS and industry to highlight the significant impact additional 
resources in this area might have. 
 
11. (SBU) Public education: In the fall of 2008, the GOS released a 
new information material, primarily aimed for youth, which will be 
broadly distributed in Swedish schools.  Justice Minister Ask's 
staffers are currently considering the pros and cons of engaging 
Cabinet members in the public debate.  Given all the negative 
 
STOCKHOLM 00000141  003 OF 003 
 
 
attention around the Enforcement directive and the Pirate Bay trial, 
the determination thus far has been to keep a low profile.  The GOS 
recognizes that there is a real risk that the window of opportunity 
was lost already several years ago -- when leadingQticians 
didn't take the debate.  How to engage at this point is a delicate 
matter. 
 
Pirate Bay 
---------- 
 
12.  (U) After the raid on Pirate Bay on May 31, 2006, the issue of 
internet piracy was fiercely debated in Sweden.  Press coverage was 
largely, and still is, unfavorable to the positions taken by 
rights-holders and the USG.  The Pirate Bay raid was portrayed as 
the GOS caving to USG pressure.  The delicate situation made it 
difficult, if not counter-productive, for the Embassy to play a 
public role on IPR issues.  Behind the scenes, the Embassy has 
worked well with all stakeholders.  After 18 months of 
investigation, the prosecutor filed indictments against four 
individuals for contribution to copyright infringement because of 
their activities administrating the Pirate Bay bit torrent webpage. 
The case is currently being heard in the district court in 
Stockholm, and the trial is scheduled to be completed on March 4. 
The sentence is expected on or about March 25, i.e. before the 
conclusion of the Special 301 review process.  However, we fully 
expect that any outcome will be appealed to a higher court, which 
means that the final verdict will not be known for several years. 
 
PhRMA's drug pricing issue 
-------------------------- 
 
13.  (U)  PhRMA has also requested that Sweden be put on thQ 
Special 301 Watch List.  The request is based on the GOS decision to 
de-regulate the pharmacy market in Sweden and the alleged plans to 
reduce prices of patented pharmaceuticals on the Swedish market with 
the aim to finance the redesign.  The price cut is believed to be as 
high as 10 percent. 
 
14.  (U)  According to the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social 
Affairs, the GOS does not plan to impose a general price cut on 
patented pharmaceuticals, but rather has the intention of 
maintaining a model for a value based pricing system.  TLV, the 
Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency, a central government 
agency, has been assigned to suggest principles for pharmacy mark-up 
and to suggest how the profitability in the pharmacy market will be 
assessed and followed up.  TLV will present its proposals to the GOS 
on April 1 this year. 
 
15.  (U)  As of March 2 there is no decision, nor anything in 
writing, that confirms that the GOS is actually proposing a 10 
percent general price cut on patented pharmaceuticals.  Therefore 
the Embassy does not recommend that Sweden be put on the 2009 
Special 301 Watch List as concerns the de-regulation of the Swedish 
pharmacies.  However, should the GOS as a result of the April 1 TLV 
report reach a decision to impose a general 10 percent price cut on 
patented pharmaceuticals, the Embassy will engage in high-level 
advocacy with the GOS on the issue again. 
 
SILVERMAN