Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BERLIN188, GERMAN CONCERNS ABOUT INFO SHARING IN THE LEAD-UP

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERLIN188.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BERLIN188 2009-02-13 15:33 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Berlin
VZCZCXRO1917
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHRL #0188 0441533
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 131533Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3314
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 2014
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0704
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1439
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS BERLIN 000188 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: TSPA PREL TSPL GM
SUBJECT: GERMAN CONCERNS ABOUT INFO SHARING IN THE LEAD-UP 
TO THE SATELLITE COLLISION 
 
REF: SECSTATE 12948 
 
1. (U) This is an action request.  Please see paragraphs 4 
and 5. 
 
2. (SBU) Political and Global Affairs officers delivered Ref 
points simultaneously to interlocutors at the Ministries of 
Foreign Affairs and Economics on February 12.  While 
expressing appreciation for receipt of the information, 
contacts noted that the collision of the Russian and Iridium 
satellites again provide a strong incentive to develop a code 
of conduct for non-military use of space. 
 
3. (SBU) On February 13, GA Officer received a call from Mr. 
Joachim Marschall, MFA Office Director for International 
Research, Technology, and Space Policy (Division 405). 
Marschall said he will be briefing Foreign Minister 
Steinmeier (possibly today) on the satellite collision.  He 
is interested in more information on the incident and USG 
mechanisms to inform their foreign partners on space 
situational awareness activities. 
 
4. (SBU) Specifically, Herr Marschall would like to know:  A) 
What is the present USG policy on space surveillance and 
mechanisms for informing USG partners (Germany)?  B) How is 
this policy institutionalized within the USG?  C) Is this 
policy centralized in the Executive branch and then 
distributed?  D) Which USG entity has primary responsibility 
on informing global partners on incidents such as the 
satellite collision or policy updates?  NOTE: Post believes 
Marschall was hinting that Germany, or more specifically the 
MFA, was not informed of this incident before it happened 
while assuming that the USG had been tracking this for some 
time. END NOTE. 
 
5. (SBU) Action Request: Post would appreciate any 
information State can provide to offer greater transparency 
on this situation as soon as possible.  Please contact 
officers Shane Petersen, Ken Kero, or Donald Brown who will 
follow up with the USG response. 
 
Koenig