VZCZCXRO6280
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0074/01 0140759
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 140759Z JAN 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9996
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4173
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1823
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5611
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 9727
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2382
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7197
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3210
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 3252

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 16 TOKYO 000074 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 01/14/09 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties (Asahi) 
 
(2) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties (Yomiuri) 
 
(3) Predicament continues for Aso administration: Second extra 
budget clears Lower House (Mainichi) 
 
(4) Pall cast over quick implementation of economic stimulus package 
(Nikkei) 
 
(5) Japan should pursue a benevolent kind of capitalism, reflecting 
on the failure of U.S. unilateralism (Yomiuri) 
 
(6) Japan-U.S. alliance under Obama administration: Japanese 
politics to be tested over redefinition (Mainichi) 
 
(7) Japan hijacked by the Murayama Statement (Sankei) 
 
(8) Post-Iraq challenges (Part B): Air Self-Defense Force Air 
Support Command commander Kunio Orita -- Public support 
indispensable for overseas dispatch of SDF (Yomiuri) 
 
(9) Editorial: Let's make an increase in grant aid the first step 
for ODA reform (Mainichi) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties 
 
ASAHI (Page 2) (Full) 
January 13, 2009 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures shown in percentage, rounded off. Figures in parentheses 
denote the results of the last survey conducted Dec. 6-7, 2008.) 
 
Q: Do you support the Aso cabinet? 
 
Yes 19 (22) 
No 67 (64) 
 
Q: Which political party do you support now? 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 24 (27) 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 24 (23) 
New Komeito (NK) 2 (2) 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2 (2) 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1 (1) 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 (0) 
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) 0 (0) 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0 (0) 
Other political parties 0 (0) 
None 40 (38) 
No answer (N/A) + don't know (D/K) 7 (7) 
 
Q: Do you think the House of Representatives should be dissolved as 
early as possible for a general election, or do you otherwise think 
there is no need to hurry? 
 
Dissolve as early as possible 54 (51) 
 
TOKYO 00000074  002 OF 016 
 
 
No need to hurry 35 (40) 
 
Q: If you were to vote now in a general election for the House of 
Representatives, which political party would you vote for in your 
proportional representation bloc? 
 
LDP 25 (28) 
DPJ 38 (36) 
NK 3 (3) 
JCP 4 (3) 
SDP 1 (2) 
PNP 0 (0) 
RC 0 (0) 
NPN 0 (0) 
Other political parties 1 (1) 
N/A+D/K 28 (27) 
 
Q: Would you like the current LDP-led coalition government to 
continue, or would you otherwise like it to be replaced with a 
DPJ-led coalition government? 
 
LDP-led coalition 24 (29) 
DPJ-led coalition 44 (43) 
 
Q: Which one between Prime Minister Aso and DPJ President Ichiro 
Ozawa do you think is more appropriate for prime minister? 
 
Mr. Aso 26 (30) 
Mr. Ozawa 35 (35) 
 
Q: The government has presented a supplementary budget to the Diet. 
This extra budget includes a plan to hand out a total of 2 trillion 
yen in cash benefits to each household. Do you think it would be 
better to carry out this cash payout as planned by the government? 
 
Yes 28 
No 63 
 
Q: Do you think the cash handout plan is an effective economic 
measure? 
 
Yes 18 
No 71 
 
Q: The government, according to its draft budget for the new fiscal 
year, is expected to sustain a tax revenue decrease of 7 trillion 
yen. Meanwhile, the budget plan earmarks a spending increase of 5 
trillion yen, thereby switching from fiscal reconstruction to the 
policy of fast-tracking economic measures. Do you appreciate this 
policy? 
 
Yes 33 
No 41 
 
Q: Do you have expectations for Prime Minister Aso's economic 
measures? 
 
Yes 24 
No 70 
 
Q: The government has decided to raise the consumption tax in three 
years with economic recovery as a precondition. Do you support this 
 
TOKYO 00000074  003 OF 016 
 
 
decision? 
 
Yes 32 
No 56 
 
Q: In the wake of discontinuing contracts with temporary workers, 
there is an opinion saying the manufacturing industry should be 
prohibited from using temporary labor and should directly hire them 
instead. Meanwhile, there is also an opinion saying such a 
restriction on temporary labor will result in fewer job 
opportunities. Do you support the idea of prohibiting temporary 
labor in the manufacturing industry? 
 
Yes 30 
No 46 
 
Q: To what extent are you concerned about your own or your family's 
job and income? (One choice only) 
 
Very concerned 33 
Somewhat concerned 44 
Not very concerned 17 
Not concerned at all 5 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Jan. 10-11 over the 
telephone on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis. 
Respondents were chosen from among the nation's voting population on 
a three-stage random-sampling basis. Valid answers were obtained 
from 2,138 persons (58 PERCENT ). 
 
(2) Poll on Aso cabinet, political parties 
 
YOMIURI (Page 6) (Full) 
January 12, 2009 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures shown in percentage) 
 
Q: Do you support the Aso cabinet? 
 
Yes 20.4 
No 72.3 
Other answers (O/A) --- 
No answer (N/A) 7.3 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the foregoing question) 
Pick only one from among the following reasons for your approval of 
the Aso cabinet. 
 
Something can be expected of its policy measures 19.7 
The prime minister has leadership 10.2 
There's something stable about the prime minister 6.6 
His cabinet's lineup is good 8.8 
Because it's a coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and the New 
Komeito 45.2 
O/A 2.3 
N/A 7.2 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the foregoing question) Pick 
only one from among the following reasons for your disapproval of 
the Aso cabinet. 
 
 
TOKYO 00000074  004 OF 016 
 
 
Nothing can be expected of its policy measures 36.0 
The prime minister lacks leadership 28.5 
There's nothing stable about the prime minister 24.7 
His cabinet's lineup is not good 1.1 
Because it's a coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and the New 
Komeito 8.8 
O/A --- 
N/A 0.9 
 
Q: Which political party do you support now? 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 29.3 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 26.2 
New Komeito (NK) 3.3 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2.1 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1.3 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.3 
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) --- 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) --- 
Other political parties --- 
None 35.7 
N/A 1.6 
 
Q: When comparing Prime Minister Aso and DPJ President Ozawa, who do 
you think is more appropriate for prime minister? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 26.8 
DPJ President Ozawa 38.8 
N/A 34.5 
 
Q: Do you appreciate the government's economic stimulus measures in 
its draft budget for fiscal 2009? 
 
Appreciate very much 4.6 
Appreciate somewhat 17.8 
Don't appreciate very much 38.7 
Don't appreciate at all 25.6 
N/A 13.3 
 
Q: Do you think the DPJ has come up with a counterproposal of 
effective economic stimulus measures? 
 
Yes 19.6 
No 66.6 
N/A 13.9 
 
Q: Prime Minister Aso has proposed raising the consumption tax rate 
in fiscal 2011 to secure financial resources for social security, 
making it a precondition to see an economic turnaround. Do you 
appreciate this policy proposal? 
 
Appreciate very much 8.5 
Appreciate somewhat 27.8 
Don't appreciate very much 23.4 
Don't appreciate at all 35.7 
N/A 4.6 
 
Q: The second supplementary budget for the current fiscal year 
includes a plan to hand out cash benefits to each and every 
household. Concerning this cash handout plan, there is an opinion 
saying the government should call it off and use the money for job 
and social security. Do you support this opinion? 
 
TOKYO 00000074  005 OF 016 
 
 
 
Yes 66.9 
Yes to a certain degree 11.2 
No to a certain degree 6.2 
No 10.5 
N/A 5.1 
 
Q: The DPJ will not cooperate in the extra budget's early passage 
through the Diet unless the government crosses out the cash handout 
plan. Do you appreciate this stance? 
 
Appreciate very much 17.5 
Appreciate somewhat 26.1 
Don't appreciate very much 24.6 
Don't appreciate at all 22.8 
N/A 9.0 
 
Q: Do you think the LDP and its coalition partner, the New Komeito, 
and the DPJ and other opposition parties should confront or 
compromise in the current Diet session? 
 
Confront 29.2 
Compromise 62.7 
N/A 8.1 
 
Q: Prime Minister Aso is not thinking about dissolving the House of 
Representatives for a general election until the fiscal 2009 budget 
and relevant bills clear the Diet. Do you appreciate this judgment? 
 
Appreciate very much 14.7 
Appreciate somewhat 20.4 
Don't appreciate very much 22.2 
Don't appreciate at all 35.3 
N/A 7.4 
 
Q: When would you like the House of Representatives to be dissolved 
for a general election? 
 
Right away 32.8 
Around this spring 35.9 
Sometime before the current membership's expiry 28.3 
N/A 3.0 
 
Q: If an election were to be held now for the House of 
Representatives, which political party would you like to vote for in 
your proportional representation bloc? 
 
LDP 24.4 
DPJ 39.2 
NK 4.8 
JCP 3.5 
SDP 1.8 
PNP 0.3 
RC --- 
NPN 0.1 
Other political parties --- 
Undecided 21.6 
N/A 4.3 
 
Q: What form of government would you like to see after the next 
election for the House of Representatives? 
 
 
TOKYO 00000074  006 OF 016 
 
 
LDP-led coalition government 11.6 
DPJ-led coalition government 21.7 
LDP-DPJ grand coalition government 24.3 
Government under new framework after political realignment 37.6 
O/A --- 
N/A 4.8 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Jan. 9-10 across the 
nation on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis. 
Households with one or more eligible voters totaled 1,685. Valid 
answers were obtained from 1,056 persons (62.7 PERCENT ). 
 
(Note) In some cases, the total percentage does not become 100 
PERCENT  due to rounding. 
 
(3) Predicament continues for Aso administration: Second extra 
budget clears Lower House 
 
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Full) 
January 14, 2009 
 
Voting on the fiscal 2008 second extra budget, which took place on 
January 13, reflected a situation where Prime Minister remains 
unable to find a prospect for turning the tide and going on the 
offensive. Although the bill was adopted by a majority approval by 
the ruling parties, not only former State Minister for 
Administrative Reform Yoshimi Watanabe, who has just quit the 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), but also former Cabinet Office 
Parliamentary Secretary Kenta Matsunami abstained from the vote. It 
was an unexpected incident for the party executive, which had been 
showing confidence in containing party rebellion. Chances are that 
even more LDP members may shift support from Aso with an eye on a 
revote on related bills in the Lower House. The future of the 
administration, which seems to be skating on thin ice, is 
increasingly becoming murky. 
 
Lingering disgruntlement over fixed-sum cash benefit scheme, 
consumption tax hike 
 
Matsunami during the Lower House plenary session on the evening of 
January 13 walked up to Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Jun Matsumoto 
and abruptly told him, "I will leave the session now." Surrounded by 
reporters outside the chamber, Matsunami said, "It would not be 
advantageous for the LDP to move away from the will of the people 
over the cash benefit issue. It was a difficult decision for me." He 
denied the possibility of his quitting the party. However, he 
criticized policy debate in the LDP, saying, "There have been no 
discussions by rank-and-file members." 
 
A sense of relief had been permeating the LDP, following the 
departure of Watanabe, who had been repeatedly criticizing the 
administration, with one senior member saying, "I feel good now that 
a string of uproars has been settled." The LDP supposedly was fully 
prepared for the plenary session with the party malcontent having 
quit the party. However, the executive is apparently shocked by the 
rebellion in the plenary session with Secretary General Hiroyuki 
Hosoda saying, "It is very regrettable." 
 
Due to the unexpected rebellion by Matsunami, Diet steering by the 
government and the ruling parties has become even harsher. The 
government intends to submit the fiscal 2009 budget as well as the 
second extra budget bill to the Diet possibly on the 19th. In order 
 
TOKYO 00000074  007 OF 016 
 
 
to have related bills to implement those two budgets enacted, it 
will become necessary to take a revote on them to secure approval by 
a majority of two-thirds or more of the members present either after 
the Upper House voted them down or 60 days after they were sent to 
the Upper House. 
 
Due to the departure of Watanabe, it is now impossible to take a 
revote if 16 more ruling party members rebel. Criticism of the 
flat-sum cash benefit scheme totaling 2 trillion yen as scattering 
about of pork-barrel largesse is still lingering in the LDP. Many of 
mid-ranking and junior members who voted for the bills approved them 
in a passive manner with Lower House member Koichi Yamauchi saying: 
"I am not totally in favor of those bills. However, I approve them 
from a comprehensive viewpoint." Among bills related to the fiscal 
2009 budget bill, one related to the tax code could become another 
source of contention. The government plans to include a sales tax 
hike three years later in an additional clause of that bill. 
However, former Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa and some other 
members are strongly opposing the idea, with one saying, "If such a 
policy is included, the next Lower House election would become a tax 
hike election." Diet steering is being buffeted within the ruling 
camp. 
 
Parliamentarians' leagues critical of the Aso administration on the 
13th resumed their activities. Members of the Group of Volunteers 
Seeking Immediate Realization of Policies, such as former Chief 
Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki and former State Minister for 
Administrative Reform, held a meeting in Tokyo. Referring to their 
future activities, one key member of the group said: "The 
consumption hike issue could split the party in two. We want to 
replace Mr. Aso, instead of allowing the party to be split." 
 
The New Komeito is increasingly unhappy with the situation in which 
cabinet support ratings stand at about 20  PERCENT  and ruling party 
members are unable to stand together over the budget bill. One party 
executive on the evening of the 13th told reporters, "If our party 
keeps itself at arm's length with the administration under a 
circumstance like this, major havoc could occur. We are putting up 
with the situation. And yet, LDP members are making selfish 
statements. It is infuriating." 
 
DPJ cautious about total confrontation 
 
DPJ members walked out of the plenary session, opposing the forcible 
passage of the bills. The party is determined to explore the best 
timing for returning to Diet deliberations, while checking the 
ruling parties' moves. It has not taken a totally confrontational 
stance, because it believes that boycotting deliberations would not 
be wise in terms of public opinion. It is also caught on the horns 
of a dilemma that the further it drives the Aso administration into 
the corner, the further Lower House dissolution will be put into the 
future. It will likely straddle the fence in its Diet strategy. 
 
It was not until immediately before the voting that it decided to 
have its members walk out of the session, because it had intended to 
decide its approach, depending on the outcome of polls to be 
released by various dailies on the weekend. Many thought that 
cabinet support ratings did not drop as expected, as one mid-ranking 
member revealed. In the end, DPJ members expressed their protest, by 
storming the chairman's seat at the Budget Committee meeting. One 
Budget Committee director said, "We wanted to avoid giving the 
impression that the DPJ boycotted Diet deliberations." 
 
TOKYO 00000074  008 OF 016 
 
 
 
The image of boycotting deliberations will be received unfavorably. 
It will also have an adverse effect on Upper House deliberations. 
After the voting in the plenary session, the DPJ along with the 
Social Democratic Party and the People's New Party (PNP) vowed to 
submit an amendment bill for separating the cash benefit scheme from 
the bill. The DPJ will enter informal talks with the possibility of 
returning to deliberations from the 14th. Its stance is that if the 
ruing parties put off a plan to start deliberations on the budget on 
the 19th, it will take part in deliberations. 
 
Behind the DPJ's stance of avoiding a total confrontation with the 
ruling parties is its hope to see many more LDP members follow 
Watanabe, who has just quit the party, as it sees that a main battle 
will occur in March or later, when related laws will be brought to a 
second vote. DPJ members walked out of the session along with 
Watanabe by prearrangement, when the bills were brought to a vote. 
DPJ President Ozawa gave high scores to Watanabe, saying, "We can 
share a political stance with Mr. Watanabe." 
 
(4) Pall cast over quick implementation of economic stimulus 
package 
 
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Full) 
January 11, 2009 
 
There is concern mounting among government officials that it might 
become difficult to implement at an early date an economic stimulus 
package incorporated in the fiscal 2009 budget bill. That is because 
although the government plans to submit a bill related to the 
package adopted last year to the Diet as early as before the end of 
this month, it cannot determine when it can be enacted due to the 
ongoing turmoil in the divided Diet session. If Diet deliberations 
come to an impasse, the expanded distribution of unemployment 
benefits and the establishment of emergency reserves worth 1 
trillion yen, which the government plans to implement in April, 
could be delayed. Some government agencies have begun considering 
putting on hold the submission of bills due to the unclear Diet 
situation. 
 
The fiscal 2008 second supplementary budget, which incorporates a 
flat-rate cash handout program costing 2 trillion yen, will likely 
clear the Lower House possibly early next week (TN: Cleared on Jan. 
13). The government believes that the second supplementary budget 
can most probably be put into force before the end of the fiscal 
year. However, there is concern about the implementation of measures 
connected with the fiscal 2009 budget bill. As such, there is no 
knowing whether the seamless implementation of economic stimulus 
measures as Prime Minister Aso noted is possible or not. 
 
For instance, there is an employment measure slated to be 
implemented in April. The measure is intended to shorten an expected 
contribution period from more than a year to more than six months so 
that nonpermanent workers will find it easier to contribute to 
employment insurance. It will also extend the duration of the 
payment of unemployment benefits for some types of employment 
insurance schemes. The employment insurance premiums, now split 
between the employers and the employees, will be lowered by 0.4 
PERCENT  to 0.8  PERCENT . Preconditions for these proposals are an 
amendment to the employment insurance law. However, what approach 
the Democratic Party of Japan will make is unclear at the present 
stage. 
 
TOKYO 00000074  009 OF 016 
 
 
 
The future course of related laws to secure revenues is also the 
focus of attention. Revenues sources for the emergency reserve fund 
worth 1 trillion yen to prepare for a sudden change in economic 
conditions are the rate fluctuations reserve fund in the 
government's fiscal investment and loan program account. However, 
that reserve fund cannot be used until a special exemption bill 
stipulating a transfer of funds in the fiscal investment and loan 
program to the general account is enacted. Since funds from that 
reserve fund are also used to cover an increase in local tax grants, 
there is a possibility of possible derailment of the allocation 
program could affect local finances. 
 
The government has begun looking into measures to cope with a case 
in which Diet deliberations reach an impasse. It is possible to 
apply tax cuts, going back to the beginning of the year. In lowering 
the employment insurance rate, the government is planning such 
measures as to return over-charged portions later. 
 
Policy management in fiscal 2008 was thrown into chaos due to the 
confrontation between the ruling and opposition parties caused by 
the divided Diet. The budget was enacted by the end of March 2008. 
However, the passage of a bill amending the special tax measures 
bill and a special exemption bill for the issuance of public funds 
public bonds to secure revenues was carried over to the end of 
April. Following the expiration of the provisional tax rate applied 
to the gas tax expiring, a decline in revenues incurred by the state 
alone reached approximately 140 billion yen. Some bills, such as one 
for increasing the state contribution to the basic pension in 
stages, failed to secure Diet approval. 
 
The government plans to submit more than 20 budget-related bills to 
the regular Diet session. However, some ministries and agencies will 
decide whether to submit their bills or not after carefully 
determining the Diet situation. The Internal Affairs Ministry had 
been looking into submitting an amendment to the Radio Law intended 
to clarify government expenditures for the introduction of a digital 
terrestrial broadcasting system. However, it has now begun 
considering putting the plan on hold. A senior official of a certain 
economy-related agency said, "There could be a general election 
anytime soon. If there is the possibility of bills we submit being 
killed, we would be better off not to submit them." A somber mood is 
spreading in Kasumigaseki. 
 
(5) Japan should pursue a benevolent kind of capitalism, reflecting 
on the failure of U.S. unilateralism 
 
YOMIURI (Page 1 & 2) (Full) 
January 11, 2009 
 
By Yasuhiro Nakasone, former prime minister 
 
The world has been at a historic major turning point since the start 
of the 21st century. At such a time, a financial crisis has assailed 
the world. 
 
The U.S.-triggered financial crisis has exposed the weaknesses of 
U.S. capitalism and the principle of focusing on market mechanisms. 
As a result, the U.S. has begun to take policies deviating from its 
conventional laissez-faire approach, as seen from the U.S. 
government's decision to provide the Big Three automakers with 
massive funds in a bid to avoid their collapse. The government's 
 
TOKYO 00000074  010 OF 016 
 
 
intervention in the market is expected to increase in the future. 
 
I expect the incoming administration of the President-elect Barack 
Obama to bid farewell to the Bush administration's unilateralism and 
adopt multilateralism. The U.S. played a leading role in the postwar 
world, but the financial crisis has undermined its leadership 
ability. With a change in the way the world assesses the U.S., major 
countries in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Latin America can be 
expected to have a stronger voice. The international community might 
begin to place emphasis on the specific characteristics of the 
various regions of the world. 
 
The laissez-faire principle used by the U.S. in its economic policy 
lacks humanity. In other words, it was a sort of heartless 
capitalism. Now that the capitalism's limits was revealed in the 
wake of the financial crisis, European countries, Japan, and China 
should adopt policies and measures based on their own histories, 
cultures and traditions, I think. 
 
The issue of unfair dismissal of temporary workers is a result of 
the liberalization of the labor market that was part of then Prime 
Minister Koizumi's structural reforms, which were in line with the 
U.S.' laissez-faire principle. The lifetime employment system had 
long been preferred by Japanese society. I think Japan will revive a 
kind of "benevolent capitalism" over time. Japanese-style capitalism 
will return. 
 
Japanese politicians and business leaders have been too preoccupied 
with the challenge of how to end the ongoing economic crisis. But 
they should work out measures to deal with crises based on a new 
approach in a new age. 
 
To cope with the current economic crisis, political leaders must 
study hard and elaborate plans. Then, they must prepare a strategy 
to implement bold measures and allocate the right persons to the 
right positions. 
 
Politicians eager to become leaders should form a group of 
academics, business leaders and other intellectuals and draw up 
domestic and foreign policies or strategies. Although I do not know 
how eagerly incumbent politicians are making such preparations, this 
is the cardinal point in politics. 
 
Among current Japanese politicians, many are of limited caliber. In 
the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the Democratic Party of Japan 
(DPJ), many members hold hereditary Diet seats. The scope of 
candidates for the Diet has been narrowed down, so even people with 
much talent now find it difficult to enter politics. 
 
The single-seat election system for the House of Representatives has 
also produced unfavorable effects. Under the medium-sized election 
district system, various types of politicians were produced and 
debates on wide-ranging issues were conducted. Under the single-seat 
system, however, candidates take up only backyard matters in narrow 
electoral districts in the election campaign, setting aside such 
long-term issues as how Japan should deal with the global upheaval 
and what policies the government should take, eyeing a Japan 30 
years or 50 years from now. As a result, Japanese politics has 
become small-scale. 
 
Political parties come up with their respective views, but they are 
also required to discuss international relations and key domestic 
 
TOKYO 00000074  011 OF 016 
 
 
issues from a broad point of view and to act in concert. But such a 
situation is unlikely before the next House of Representatives 
election, which is to take place sometime before September. 
 
It is quite natural for the public to call for an early general 
election so that a strong new government can address the current 
crisis. I think the Lower House will be dissolved during a period 
from May through July in the last phase of the ordinary Diet 
session. In view of the difference in the number of seats held by 
the LDP and the DPJ, the LDP may be able to remain as the leading 
party, but it is more likely, I think, that the two parties will 
stand side by side. In this case, the two parties should work 
together to deal with the economic crisis, as well as diplomatic and 
security issues. 
 
In the U.S., the Obama administration will be inaugurated on Jan. 
¶20. Japan in a sense is also in a stage of developing new politics. 
Now that the U.S. finds itself overwhelmed by the financial crisis, 
this should be a good opportunity for Japan to have its say and take 
action from a higher perspective. 
 
The ongoing financial crisis has prompted the world to shift from a 
structure that relies heavily on the U.S. to a multipolar system 
that does not. The world is becoming more aware of the need for 
closer cooperation among countries both politically and 
economically. This awareness brought about the financial summit held 
recently by 20 countries and region. 
 
In order for Japan to protect its national interests and make 
international contributions under such a circumstance, politicians 
must map out a global strategy and pull together. 
 
The financial crisis has seriously damaged the U.S. and Europe, but 
Japan and China are said to have been damaged only slightly. Japan 
has massive personal assets. Leaders in the political and business 
worlds must take action after pondering how to make use of this 
advantageous position and overcome the global crisis. 
 
(6) Japan-U.S. alliance under Obama administration: Japanese 
politics to be tested over redefinition 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
January 14, 2009 
 
Next year will mark the 50th anniversary of the conclusion of the 
Japan-U.S. Security Treaty. Some have suggested that the government, 
taking this opportunity, should redefine the Japan-U.S. alliance and 
the Japan-U.S. security arrangements. 
 
In Japan, former Defense Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi and others have 
insisted on that necessity, given changes in the security 
environment with diversifying threats, such as international 
terrorism. Some might take the view that the U.S. government's 
delisting of North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism has 
undermined the Japan-U.S. alliance. 
 
Some in the U.S. also take the view that the U.S.'s involvement in 
the Asia-Pacific region and its policies toward the region became 
less substantial under the Bush administration. Included among those 
taking this view is former Assistant Secretary of Defense Joseph 
Nye, a member of the foreign policy team of President-elect Barack 
Obama. He has been unofficially nominated as ambassador to Japan. He 
 
TOKYO 00000074  012 OF 016 
 
 
was one of the advocates for redefining the alliance in the 1990s. 
 
The Japanese Foreign Ministry has cited environment contamination, 
poverty, infectious diseases, and other global issues as themes to 
be tackled jointly by Japan and the U.S.  Nye has proposed a change 
to "smart power," a combination of military "hard power" and "soft 
power" including political power and cultural influence as a 
diplomatic tool. Japan will certainly be able to tackle such themes 
jointly with the incoming Obama administration. 
 
Even so, the focus in discussing specifics for redefinition will 
inevitably be on measures to strengthen cooperation in the security 
and military areas. Nye, former Deputy Secretary of State Armitage, 
and others called on Japan in their past reports to change the 
Japanese government's interpretation of the Constitution, which 
prohibits the use of the right to collective self-defense. 
 
The past redefinition process was completed with a review of the 
Guidelines for Defense Cooperation in 1997, based on the 1996 
Japan-U.S. Joint Declaration on Security. Afterward, Japan enacted 
legislation to enable Self-Defense Force troops to offer rear 
support for the U.S. military and started international 
contributions in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the U.S. 
As it stands, the regions and contents of SDF activities have 
expanded during this period. But Japan cleared discussions on the 
interpretation of the Constitution on logistic support by defining 
combat zones and combat zones and avoided discussions on the right 
to collective self-defense by specifying its cooperation in the War 
in Afghanistan as participation in the international war on terror. 
 
The focus of discussion in the next redefinition process will 
avoidably be on the exercise of the right to collective 
self-defense. 
 
But the government of the Liberal Democratic Party and the New 
Komeito has put this issue on the backburner. In the next general 
election, which will be carried out this year, a change of 
government might take place. The Democratic Party of Japan has not 
revealed its view about the right to collective self-defense. 
 
Defense and foreign officers were involved in the redefinition 
process in the 1990's. Dr. Ezra Vogel, who pushed ahead with the 
work with Nye, said that a senior Defense Agency official had 
proposed holding a discussion only among bureaucrats without 
politicians. 
 
Politicians must take the lead in redefining the Japan-U.S. 
alliance, which will affect the foundation of security policy. The 
political party that will come into power in the next general 
election will be tested over the challenge of redefinition. 
 
(7) Japan hijacked by the Murayama Statement 
 
SANKEI (Page 13) (Abridged slightly) 
January 14, 2009 
 
The furor over the controversial essay written by former Air 
Self-Defense Force Chief of Staff Toshio Tamogami has escalated. 
There is now a review going on of the selection of the instructors 
for courses on historical and state views started during Tamogami's 
tenure as head of Joint Staff College. The lecture courses in 
question are extra courses at the college, a training institute for 
 
TOKYO 00000074  013 OF 016 
 
 
Self-Defense Force brass officers. The (Japanese Communist Party's 
organ daily) Akahata and the like have persistently charged that the 
college was slanted toward selecting conservative individuals to 
teach the courses. 
 
In reaction to the accusation, Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada said 
on Nov. 21: "It is difficult to conclude that the selection of the 
lecturers was appropriate. We would like to review the courses." 
Admiral Takashi Saito, Chief of Staff, Joint Staff, also told on 
Dec. 16 members of the Upper House Foreign and Defense Affairs 
Committee who had toured the college: "Some courses lack a sense of 
balance. We must consider the selection of the lecturers and the 
contents of the lectures." 
 
In addition to the selection of lecturers in courses for 
rank-and-file SDF members, the contents of those courses, and even 
the courses at the National Defense Academy are being examined to 
determine if they are in line with the Murayama Statement (of 
apology for World War II). Reportedly, leftist political parties 
eager to scrutinize the matter are examining the selection of all 
writers for SDF-related magazines and newspapers and what they 
wrote. 
 
The Defense Ministry and the SDF are being taken over by the 
Murayama Statement. Under such circumstances, will SDF personnel be 
able to maintain their morale? 
 
I am concerned that such a trend might spread to public education, 
as well. The Basic Education Law that was revised two years ago 
stipulates to "cultivate a mind that respects tradition and culture 
and that loves the nation and homeland that have fostered them." The 
teaching guidelines were revised, albeit insufficiently, in March 
¶2008. 
 
Once the Murayama Statement ties the hands of the government 
bureaucracy, children at public school would have to be taught that 
"during a certain period in the not too distant past, Japan, 
following a mistaken national policy, advanced along the road to 
war, only to ensnare the Japanese people in a fateful crisis, and, 
through its colonial rule and aggression, caused tremendous damage 
and suffering to the people of many countries, particularly in 
Asia." This would naturally be reflected in the textbook screening 
process, as well. 
 
What the Basic Education Law calls for might turn into pie in the 
sky. The ideal could turn into mere shell as a result of the 
Murayama Statement taking precedence over the Basic Education Law. 
 
Even if the Constitution is amended in the near future and the SDF 
is defined properly, the SDF would by analogy remain in line with 
the Murayama Statement as long as it is upheld. Such a body would be 
a far cry from the national army of a normal country. 
 
Even though the Murayama Statement's origin raises some issues, the 
statement is the government's view. Under the banner of the Murayama 
Statement, specific forces press the government and related 
organizations to underpin the government's view. Because it is the 
government's view, people cannot openly object to the Murayama 
Statement even thorough they know that it has some problems. They 
have to back down. 
 
In Japan, there are principles that are convenient for specific 
 
TOKYO 00000074  014 OF 016 
 
 
forces. The Kono Statement on the so-called comfort women issue, the 
neighboring country clause of school textbook screening, the 
Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Basic Law for a 
Gender-Equal Society are some examples. (Specific forces) present 
their assertions by pushing those principles to the forefront. 
 
The origins and the bases of those principles, including the 
Murayama Statement, present problems, and government-connected 
people are aware of that. Because all those principles were 
authorized by the government, people connected with the government 
must back down when those principles are put forward. The series of 
problems deriving from the Tamogami essay has made clear that such 
exist. 
 
As long as such principles exist, amendments to the Basic Education 
Law and the Constitution would be subject to them. Oddly enough, 
those principles, taking precedence over the Constitution and the 
Basic Education Law, would turn themselves into dead letters. 
 
To prevent that, there is no other way but to make those principles 
relative. The only way to prevent the country's education, 
administration, diplomacy, and education from being taken over by 
those principles is to make clear that the roots and the bases of 
the principles which specific forces are putting up as their banners 
have some problems and to reexamine them fundamentally. Those 
principles must not be monopolized by specific forces. 
 
(8) Post-Iraq challenges (Part B): Air Self-Defense Force Air 
Support Command commander Kunio Orita -- Public support 
indispensable for overseas dispatch of SDF 
 
YOMIURI (Page 12) (Full) 
January 9, 2009 
 
Interviewed by Hidemichi Katsumata, senior writer 
 
Sixteen years since (Japan's first) peacekeeping operations 
(occurred) in Cambodia, the Self-Defense Forces have finally passed 
a practical test, having accomplished overseas duties that can only 
be performed by a military organization. With five year of 
experience in carrying out a mission in Iraq, I think the "new 
driver sticker" has been removed from the SDF's international 
cooperation activities. (The SDF) can now perform with confidence 
the level of duties other countries regard as natural. But there 
still remain many challenges. 
 
One of them is the continued argument that the SDF must be 
dispatched to safe areas out of fear, since the Cambodia mission 
(when a policeman was killed) that SDF troops might become embroiled 
in battles overseas. 
 
Although the areas in Iraq to which the Ground and Air Self-Defense 
Forces were dispatched were called non-combat zones, troops of the 
two forces at times felt their lives were in danger. The argument to 
send the SDF only to safe places must be altered in accordance with 
reality. 
 
Another is that unless national opinion supports the dispatch of the 
SDF to areas that are not safe, Japan's international contributions 
might collapse. 
 
During the U.S. presidential campaign, Senator Barack Obama objected 
 
TOKYO 00000074  015 OF 016 
 
 
to the Iraq war on the one hand and continued to say that he would 
pray for the safe return of troops on the other, and the public 
supported that. While in Japan, people chanted slogans against the 
deployment of SDF troops to Iraq at the camps and bases where those 
troops and their families lived. SDF personnel do not voluntarily 
join overseas missions. What are the objectives for sending SDF 
troops to international cooperative operations? They must be clearly 
defined in relation to the country's security policy. 
 
In a speech, (President-elect Barack) Obama said: "To those who 
would tear the world down, we will defeat you." As seen from this, 
he has strong feeling toward the war on terror in Afghanistan. To 
accomplish the mission there, he is expected to ask Japan, a U.S. 
ally, for contributions. 
 
Now that Japan has passed the test and no longer carries a "new 
driver sticker," our country is expected to be asked for 
transporting (supplies) to Afghanistan's capital of Kabul. Such a 
mission would be less difficult than the activities in Iraq. 
Nevertheless, as was in Iraq, the mission would be carried out by a 
C-130 transport unit, so there is a question of their mental 
health. 
 
If Japan is to join the war on terror in Afghanistan, the government 
must spell out its objectives and significance and the public must 
support it. Otherwise, SDF personnel might say: Not again! 
 
Former U.S. Ambassador to Japan Michael Armacost once said: "An 
alliance is like a garden. Without constant care, the garden will 
fall into ruin." As they expended sweat (with foreign troops) in 
Iraq, SDF troops must go when the government says so in order to 
maintain a sense of solidarity. That is why public support and 
understanding are essential. 
 
In Iraq, Japan relied heavily on the United States on everything 
from intelligence to the emergency rescue setup. In Afghanistan, as 
well, Japan would have to depend on the United States in order to 
carry out operations. It is important to become aware of one's own 
weaknesses. The pragmatism of utilizing the good offices of the 
United States is also necessary. 
 
(9) Editorial: Let's make an increase in grant aid the first step 
for ODA reform 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
January 10, 2009 
 
A change appeared in the government's official development 
assistance (ODA) budget request for fiscal 2009. In it, the 
government has increased for the first time in nine years the 
initial budget request for grant assistance and technical 
cooperation, which is carried out by the Japan International 
Cooperation Agency (JICA). The budget for ODA projects has been 
expanded by 1.3 percent from the previous year, rising from 1.5724 
trillion yen in the initial budget for fiscal 2008 to 1.8 trillion 
yen. 
 
Japan pledged to boost its ODA budget in the Fourth Tokyo 
International Conference on African Development (TICAD IV) held at 
the end of last May, as well as in the Group of Eight (G-8) Summit 
held in Hokkaido last July. 
 
 
TOKYO 00000074  016 OF 016 
 
 
Until 2000, Japan was the largest aid donor in the world. However, 
the total that Japan spent for ODA projects in 2007 saw it ranked 
fifth in the world. This is because Japan has slashed the ODA budget 
along with other budgets based on its fiscal reconstruction policy, 
ever though the United States and European countries have increased 
their aid budgets. 
 
In compiling the budget for fiscal 2009, the ODA budget will be cut 
by four percent or 672.2 billion yen from the initial budget for 
fiscal 2008. As such, there is no change in the government policy of 
reducing ODA spending. 
 
How was the government able to raise the amount of grant aid for 
Africa and other countries? Will it really be possible to increase 
the number of ODA projects? The biggest reason for the increase in 
the amount of grant aid is a remarkable boost in the rate of 
collection of reimbursable aid (yen loans), one resource for the ODA 
program, which now accounts for about 50 percent of the ODA budget. 
In fiscal 2009, a total of 380 billion yen, which is up 60 billion 
yen from the amount for fiscal 2008, has been allocated to yen 
loans. Since the funds for the fiscal investment and loan program 
(FILP) have increased, funds for yen loans paid out of the general 
account could be drastically slashed. The total project scale will 
be raised by 50 billion yen or from 770 billion yen to 820 billion 
yen. 
 
ODA is Japan's main tool for making international contributions. 
Therefore, it is not desirable for Japan to reduce ODA projects and 
fall farther down the list of donors. It would be safe to say that 
it is an improvement that the government has made it a policy to 
maintain all planned ODA projects in the budget. 
 
However, Japan still cannot boast about its ODA program. The ratio 
of Japan's ODA to its gross national income remains at a low level, 
similar to the situation the United States is in. 
 
Moreover, the scale of ODA projects at the budget stage remains but 
a projection. Since it takes a long time for an ODA project using 
yen loans to reach the implementation stage, results cannot be seen 
soon. In order for Japan to raise its ranking on the list of aid 
donors, it must secure adequate funding for several years. To that 
end, it will need to increase disbursements from the general account 
budget, as well. 
 
It is safe to say that the international presence of Japan's aid has 
been low for the last few years. The reason is that Japan has not 
extended assistance in accordance with the size of its economy. It 
is only natural also to improve the quality of aid, but aid in 
quantitative terms and projects should be increased. 
 
In a bid to reform the ODA program, the increase in grant aid for 
fiscal 2009 should not be one-time only. Japan needs measures to 
boost the entire ODA budget for fiscal 2010. 
 
SCHIEFFER