VZCZCXYZ0003
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1129/01 3380002
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030002Z DEC 08
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5460
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHLGB/AMEMBASSY KIGALI PRIORITY 0299
RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA PRIORITY 1667

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001129 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO UNSC XA BY CG
SUBJECT: MONUC AT UN: GIVE US CLEAR DIRECTIONS FOR DRC-AND 
AN MNF 
 
REF: USUN 1096 
 
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY:  SRSG Alan Doss asked the Security Council 
on November 26 for clear operational guidelines for MONUC, 
especially regarding use of force.  He also said a temporary 
stabilization force is sorely needed as we await the 
additional MONUC troops the Council recently authorized.  He 
said the DRC army's unreliability in the east greatly 
complicates MONUC's dealings with the DRC government. 
Council members agreed protection of civilians is MONUC's 
priority and supported Special Envoy Obasanjo, who did not 
participate in the session.  The PermReps from the DRC and 
Rwanda exchanged accusations in the chamber as to who was at 
fault.  Obasanjo briefed the P3   Belgium and South Africa on 
November 25 on his diplomatic efforts, and said Rwanda was 
willing to supply troops to fight the FDLR in the DRC.  The 
Belgian Foreign Minister held an Arria meeting November 25 to 
highlight the humanitarian crisis and the role natural 
resource exploitation plays in supporting armed groups.  The 
December mandate renewal process, deciding whether MONUC 
should become an offensive force, is expected to be 
contentious.  END SUMMARY. 
 
DOSS WANTS CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS FOR MONUC... 
 
¶2. (SBU) MONUC's SRSG Alan Doss briefed the Security Council 
on November 26 in the chamber and in consultations.  Doss 
called for a clearly defined mandate when MONUC is renewed 
next month, especially regarding rules for MONUC engagement 
of belligerents.  He said the current mandate has become 
confused in that it directs MONUC to support the DRC army 
(FARDC), whereas FARDC has become "non-existent" in the east. 
 He asked the Council to delineate whether MONUC should 
become an offensive force.  Doss also asked for guidance on 
how MONUC should respond when it witnesses the FARDC 
committing atrocities. 
 
...AND AN MNF (OR RAPID REACTION FORCE) 
 
¶3. (SBU) Doss asked the Council to help identify a 
multinational force to bridge the time it takes for the 3,000 
newly authorized troops (see reftel) to deploy, protect 
civilians, and enforce humanitarian corridors.  He said (in 
closed consultations following the open session) it would 
take two months or longer for troops to be identified and get 
to the DRC.  (NOTE: In a private discussion with Ambassador 
DiCarlo on November 25, Doss said it could take four to six 
months for the troops to arrive. END NOTE). Doss worried the 
current configuration of MONUC would not let it address any 
additional crisis. 
 
DRC THINKS MONUC IS THERE TO TAKE OUT CNDP; LRA A THREAT 
 
¶4. (SBU) Doss said the DRC government believed MONUC's role 
was to eliminate the CNDP and the DRC was frustrated MONUC's 
troops had not completed that task.  Doss did not want MONUC 
to take the place of the DRC's security forces.  He also 
called for a complete review of MONUC's rules of engagement. 
He said the DRC needed to reform its army, police force, and 
judiciary to be able to assume responsibility for internal 
matters, as the DRC currently lacked capacity in all these 
areas.  He warned the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) was still 
a serious threat in the north, and was concerned MONUC's 
redeployment to the Kivus could create a power vacuum in 
places MONUC departs. 
 
MINERALS - CORRUPTION GOES HIGH UP 
 
¶5. (SBU) Doss warned the level of corruption regarding 
mineral extraction was very high in both the DRC military and 
political ranks.  He thought a system similar to the 
Kimberley Process' way to track diamonds might be helpful in 
verifying legal trade in DRC minerals. 
 
U.S.- DEPLOY FORCES QUICKLY; POLITICAL SOLUTION ONLY WAY 
 
¶6. (SBU) In the open session, Ambassador DiCarlo urged Member 
States to ensure rapid deployment of the authorized 
additional forces.  She stressed the training and equipment 
the U.S. is giving all African units deployed to MONUC to 
enhance the current force structure.  DiCarlo said there was 
no military solution to this conflict, called for all parties 
to honor previous agreements, and welcomed the appointment of 
former Nigerian President Obasanjo as an envoy to the region. 
 
 
U.S. ASKS HOW TO TACKLE FDLR AND CNDP WITH NO FARDC 
 
¶7. (SBU) In the closed session, DiCarlo asked how MONUC could 
 
 
address both the FDLR and the CNDP simultaneously, as Doss 
has suggested, when there was no effective FARDC with which 
to partner.  Doss replied that MONUC's mandate, which calls 
for "voluntary" disarmament of the FDLR, needed to be updated 
and clarified.  He said a massive military operation against 
the FDLR was not practicable but added that "force may be 
part of the answer".  Rather, he said sanctions should be 
wide-ranging, and the economic assets of the FDLR should be 
targeted.  He also wanted to offer incentives to the "rank 
and file" FDLR to draw them into disarming and reintegrating. 
 
UK OFFERS DEPLOYMENT HELP, FRANCE WANTS MONUC DEFENSIVE OPS 
 
¶8. (SBU) UK Deputy PermRep said two months for deploying the 
additional forces was "too leisurely," and said London would 
offer equipment, command and intelligence assistance, and 
help in deploying troops.  France's PermRep said the mandate 
must be clarified and said MONUC should be able to conduct 
defensive operations. 
 
DRC PERMREP SPARS WITH RWANDAN PERMREP IN SC CHAMBER 
 
¶9. (SBU) Invited to participate in the Council discussion, 
the DRC PermRep said efforts to improve relations with Rwanda 
had yet to yield results.  He said, apparently referring to 
Nkunda, a "warlord" had defied "with impunity for six years" 
calls for peace and was now proceeding as an occupying force. 
 The Rwandan PermRep warned of "fallacious assertions" and 
advised the Council the only cause for this conflict was the 
ex-interahamwe Tutus. 
 
OBASANJO:  KABILA OK TO TALK TO NKUNDA; RWANDA OFFERED TROOPS 
VS. FDLR 
 
¶10. (SBU) Special Envoy for the Great Lakes Olusegun Obasanjo 
told representatives of France, the UK, South Africa, 
Belgium, and the U.S. on November 25 what Nkunda wanted: 
dialogue with the DRC government; security for all ethnic 
groups; and integration of CNDP into the FARDC.  Obasanjo in 
meeting with DRC President Kabila, said Kabila expected 
Obasango to meet with Nkunda and that Kabila himself was not 
opposed to speaking with Nkunda.  Obasanjo did not 
participate in the November 26 session. 
 
¶11. (SBU) Obasanjo said Rwandan President Kagame told him 
that Rwanda was willing to supply troops to the DRC to 
address the FDLR.  Obasanjo said he shared this information 
with one of Kabila's advisors, intending to then share it 
with Kabila.  The advisor told him "don't go that way," so 
Obasanjo said he decided to not share that offer with Kabila. 
 
BELGIAN FM: STOP ILLEGAL MINERAL TRADE-IT FUNDS THE BAD GUYS 
 
¶12. (SBU) Belgian FM Karel De Gucht chaired an Arria-formula 
meeting on November 25 for Council members, other nations, 
and relief agencies concerned with the situation in the Great 
Lakes.  De Gucht called for MONUC to play a more active role 
in controlling the illegal exploitation of natural resources. 
 He said MONUC should broadly interpret its mandate to 
inspect air, land, and sea cargo to stop illicit trade.  De 
Gucht lobbied for a comprehensive plan to prohibit armed 
groups from funding themselves through illegal mineral sales. 
 All Arria participants called for MONUC to prioritize 
humanitarian protection. 
 
¶13. (SBU) COMMENT:  MONUC's mandate renewal most likely will 
be contentious.  While all support protecting civilians, 
South Africa, Costa Rica, and other voices for 
troop-contributing countries are expected to lobby for a 
continuation of a defensive mandate, in the belief that MONUC 
cannot effect a military victory any more than can any of the 
parties.  While most acknowledge FDLR is a root cause of the 
conflict and must be addressed, there is no consensus on how 
best to respond or remove the FDLR.  Neither is there 
agreement on how to deal with the CNDP.  Belgium will push 
for stronger action against illegal mineral trade.  MONUC 
needs clear directions, but Member States have shown little 
capacity to provide them.  END COMMENT. 
Wolff