Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO3541, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 12/31/08

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO3541.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO3541 2008-12-31 03:42 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7532
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3541/01 3660342
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 310342Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9782
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4012
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1659
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5446
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 9582
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2221
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7032
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3047
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 3103
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 TOKYO 003541 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 12/31/08 
 
INDEX: 
(1) Yomiuri-Waseda joint opinion poll: LDP seen as strong on 
economic and foreign policies, while DPJ has the edge on social 
security issues (Yomiuri) 
 
(2) China to start building aircraft carriers as symbol of being a 
major power (Asahi) 
 
(3) Shaky alliance-5 years on the battlefield (Part 3): Court rules 
hard task unconstitutional, shocks SDF members, families (Yomiuri) 
 
(4) TOP HEADLINES 
 
(5) EDITORIALS 
 
(6) Prime Minister's schedule, December 30, 2008 (Nikkei) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Yomiuri-Waseda joint opinion poll: LDP seen as strong on 
economic and foreign policies, while DPJ has the edge on social 
security issues 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
December 25, 2008 
 
According to a joint opinion survey (face-to-face interviews, Dec. 
6-7) carried out by the Yomiuri Shimbun and Waseda University that 
focused on whether the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) or Democratic 
Party of Japan (DPJ) was preferred in the next Lower House election, 
voters took the view that in the economic and foreign affairs areas, 
an LDP administration would be better able to implement policy, 
while the DPJ would do better at carrying out policy in the 
social-security area. Especially in the foreign diplomacy area, the 
gap between the LDP and the DPJ was great. The public has great 
anxiety about the DPJ in that area. 
 
Regarding economic, foreign, and social welfare policies, the 
question was asked which party, the LDP or the DPJ would be able to 
bring about better policies. On economics, the LDP received a 41 
PERCENT  approval rating, while the DPJ picked up 31 PERCENT . On 
foreign affairs, the LDP was favored by 55 PERCENT  of the 
electorate, compared to an 18 PERCENT  approval rating for the DPJ. 
On social security issues, such as pensions -- seen as 
disadvantageous to the government and ruling camp -- the DPJ picked 
up 42 PERCENT  approval to the LDP's 29 PERCENT . 
 
 In the survey, if we look only at the 50 PERCENT  who answered, 
"The DPJ has the capability of being in charge of the government," 
those who answered that the DPJ was better at implementing foreign 
policy only reached 29 PERCENT , far less than the 45 PERCENT  who 
thought the LDP better in this area. The respondents seemed to be 
saying that in order for the DPJ to be evaluated higher in its 
potential to be the party in power, it would first have to shift to 
a more pragmatic foreign policy. 
 
On the question - "Which administration would be better politically 
in reflecting the will of the people?" - the DPJ garnered 43 PERCENT 
, outpacing the LDP with its 26 PERCENT  rating. Even on the 
question, "Which administration would be able to properly implement 
its pledges to the public?", the DPJ was favored by 30 PERCENT , 
while the LDP took 25 PERCENT  of the tally. The evaluation of the 
 
TOKYO 00003541  002 OF 005 
 
 
DPJ has increased in terms of its stance of directly communicating 
with the public. 
 
The poll was carried out jointly with Professor Aiji Tanaka of the 
Political and Economic Department of Waseda University. Targeted 
were 3,000 eligible voters nationwide, of which 1,747 responded 
(Response rate of 58.2 PERCENT ). 
 
(2) China to start building aircraft carriers as symbol of being a 
major power 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Slightly abridged) 
December 31, 2008 
 
(Beijing, Kenji Minemura) 
 
China will soon start building an aircraft carrier, a desire the 
nation has cherished for 20 years. Huge expenses and high-level 
technology are needed for building a carrier, but China has decided 
to launch the project. Behind the decision is its growing awareness 
of being a major power, reflecting its strengthened economic 
presence and the success of the Beijing Olympics. Meanwhile, the 
nation is trying to dispel concerns among its neighbors about its 
being a threat. 
 
A specialized Chinese newspaper that is close to the military 
recently carried an article expressing a strong desire for acquiring 
aircraft carriers. The article said: "In the face of such imminent 
issues as disputes over the East China Sea, the Senkaku Islands 
(called the Diaoyutai Islands), and the South China Sea, it is 
absolutely necessary for our nation to build aircraft carriers. 
Foreigners will no longer despise us if we protect the lives of 
overseas Chinese on our own." 
 
Aircraft carriers are taken as a symbol of being a major power, as 
Colonel Lee of the Navy's research institute said in a TV program in 
the spring 2007: "Aircraft carriers are a reflection of a nation's 
overall strength." China began earnestly tackling the construction 
plan just after the Beijing Olympics in August, based on this 
judgment: "We now find it easier to obtain support from the people, 
because they have been animated by a spirit of patriotism and have 
became more confident through the Olympics," said a researcher at a 
military think-tank. 
 
Many believe that aircraft carriers are indispensable for China to 
secure energy. About 70 PERCENT  of the oil that China imports from 
the Middle East and Africa go through the Indian Ocean, which falls 
under the influence of the U.S. Navy. In the Chinese military, there 
is fear that the U.S. military might block the sea lanes in the 
event of a military conflict in Taiwan." 
 
China has been at odds with Southeast Asian countries over the 
Spratly Islands. In this conflict, China has the problem of its 
fighters' insufficient cruising distance, but this problem will be 
settled once China acquires aircraft carriers. Some observers 
speculate that China might be aiming to carry forward negotiations 
to its advantage. 
 
The recent moves of China will inevitably cause the "China as a 
threat" argument to grow stronger. Northern Command Adm. Commander 
Keating said in December: "If China seeks to develop an aircraft 
carrier, we will carefully keep watch on its moves." 
 
TOKYO 00003541  003 OF 005 
 
 
 
China is trying to show "consideration to the U.S.," according to a 
military source, by deploying aircraft carriers not at the squadron 
responsible for waters around Taiwan but at the one in charge of the 
South China Sea if the nation acquires carriers. 
 
There are still unresolved issues in building aircraft carriers. 
High-level technology is needed. In addition, huge costs are needed. 
A diplomatic source in Beijing said: "The U.S. might be encouraging 
China to possess aircraft carriers with the aim of having China 
wastefully spend money on its military." Some in the military also 
say that submarines are more effective." A Chinese national defense 
professor commented: "Traditional aircraft carriers are no longer 
mainstream equipment in an age of information war." As it stands, 
many are still negative about the idea of China building aircraft 
carriers 
 
(3) Shaky alliance-5 years on the battlefield (Part 3): Court rules 
hard task unconstitutional, shocks SDF members, families 
 
YOMIURI (Page 1) (Full) 
December 21, 2008 
 
The Self-Defense Forces was put to the test in Iraq. In July 2006, 
the Ground Self-Defense Force pulled out of Samawah. At the time, 
the United States asked the Air Self-Defense Force to extend its 
airlift activities in Iraq to Baghdad and other areas for 
multinational forces. 
 
"We thought to ourselves that we would be able to help the Iraqi 
people with reconstruction through the Ground Self-Defense Force's 
activities. However, our new task was totally different." With this, 
Col. Atsushi Nishino recalled his Iraqi days when he was commanding 
a Kuwait-based ASDF detachment tasked with airlift activities in 
Iraq. The primary purpose of the SDF's activities in Iraq was to 
provide humanitarian and reconstruction assistance to the Iraqi 
people. This purpose was going to be changed to the role of backing 
up the multinational forces. Young ASDF members sent there were 
upset. "For what are we going to run the risk? This question came 
from among them. 
 
Lt. Gen. Kunio Orita, who heads the Air Support Command, a unit in 
charge of commanding ASDF activities in Iraq, hurried to Kuwait, 
where he was pressed by ASDF members there. "That's not what we've 
heard," one of them said to Orita. 
 
Orita thought there that he had to show something convincing to them 
who were "suddenly ordered to fly to Baghdad." He said: 
 
"Japan cannot defend the nation by itself alone. We need to have a 
firm grasp on the United States. We should back up the United States 
when it is in need. That's the way the alliance should be. Without 
this sense of solidarity, the alliance is just a piece of paper. You 
guys work so hard to defend the Senkaku islands and the Sea of 
Japan." 
 
Right before that time, North Korea, pushing for its nuclear 
development, launched seven ballistic missiles. In November 2004, a 
Chinese nuclear-powered submarine violated Japan's territorial 
waters. Japan was surrounded with the serious threats. Orita 
justified the new task for a closer alliance with the United 
States. 
 
TOKYO 00003541  004 OF 005 
 
 
 
It was convincing enough to many of the ASDF members there, Orita 
says. The government, however, told the ASDF not to disclose how 
many U.S. military and multinational force soldiers the ASDF carried 
on its C-130 cargo planes. That was partly because the government 
did not want the ASDF to spill the beans about military operations 
conducted by the U.S.-led multinational forces. In point of fact, 
however, the government probably did not want to be criticized as 
"blindly following" the United States. 
 
The ASDF has only one C-130 unit. That is the 1st Tactical Airlift 
Division, which is assigned to the ASDF's Komaki base in Aichi 
Prefecture. The task in Iraq was on a four-month rotating basis. 
However, pilots and maintenance service crewmen are specialist 
personnel. Many of them were therefore sent on the Iraq mission as 
often as four or five times. There are also 16 ASDF members who 
could not be by their parents' bedside when they died. 
 
All the more for the foregoing reason, ASDF members on the Iraq 
mission and their families at home were shocked at the Nagoya High 
Court's ruling this spring that the ASDF airlift activities in Iraq 
are unconstitutional. There was another shock to them. The leading 
opposition Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto) presented a bill 
seeking to repeal a law under which the ASDF was tasked with the 
airlift activities in Iraq. There were a number of demonstrations 
near the Komaki base against the Iraq mission. "What I'm doing might 
be wrong." So saying, one ASDF pilot left the service. 
 
Last month, there was a message from U.S. Secretary of Defense 
Gates. In the delivered message, the Pentagon chief expressed his 
gratitude to the families of ASDF members sent on the Iraq mission 
for their devoted support of those ASDF members. "I was thankful," a 
senior Defense Ministry official recalls. However, Japan is split 
over the alliance and its importance. Japan's international 
cooperation-which depends solely on the SDF personnel's sense of 
mission-could go under sooner or later. 
 
(4) TOP HEADLINES 
 
Asahi: 
Violent global changes: There is no escape from chain of crisis 
 
Mainichi, Nikkei, Sankei & Tokyo Shimbun 
Tokyo stocks suffer record loss of 42 PERCENT  in 2008 
 
Yomiuri: 
Nishimatsu Construction suspected of offering illegal donations to 
politicians, including Ozawa, Mori 
 
Akahata: 
Labor unions' battle producing great achievements 
 
(5) EDITORIALS 
 
Asahi: 
(1) Reform public corporations to strengthen civilian power 
(2) Tibet issue: Now is good time for dialogue 
 
Mainichi: 
(1) Review of 2008: Cracks appearing in national systems 
 
Yomiuri: 
 
TOKYO 00003541  005 OF 005 
 
 
(1) Promote Futenma relocation plan as agreed on between Japan, 
U.S. 
(2) Chinese economic slowdown causing social unrest 
 
Nikkei: 
(1) Make use of record low stock prices as step to redesign life 
plan 
(2) Proposal by seven LDP, DPJ members on pension system 
significant 
 
Sankei: 
(1) China's 2008 Charter calling for end of JCP regime: Political 
reform unavoidable 
(2) Thorough debate needed on status of limitations, with rescission 
in mind 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
(1) Take financial crisis as turning point 
 
Akahata: 
(1) Strengthen solidarity and support in the new year 
 
(6) Prime Minister's schedule, December 30, 2008 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
December 31, 2009 
 
09:30 
Took a walk around his private residence in Kamiyama-cho. 
 
12:00 
Met with New Komeito Vice President Junji Higashi at a Chinese 
restaurant in the Hotel Okura. 
 
14:06 
Arrived at his private office in Nagata-cho. 
 
18:00 
Arrived at his private residence. 
 
18:31 
Met friends from the time of his studying in the U.S., with his wife 
at a Chinese restaurant in Minami-Aoyama. 
 
21:48 
Returned to his private residence. 
 
ZUMWALT