Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08BERLIN1605, GERMAN RESPONSE TO DEMARCHE ON PAKISTAN DONORS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BERLIN1605.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08BERLIN1605 2008-12-02 10:30 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Berlin
VZCZCXRO3796
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRL #1605 3371030
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 021030Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2744
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 0158
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0660
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0987
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0726
RUEHDO/AMEMBASSY DOHA PRIORITY 0121
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 0477
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR PRIORITY 0095
RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT PRIORITY 0117
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0418
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 0245
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0559
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1598
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0249
UNCLAS BERLIN 001605 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR SCA/PB(TOWNSWICK), EUR/AGS(SCHROEDER), 
EEB/IFD/ODF AND IO/EDA 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN PREL GM PK
SUBJECT: GERMAN RESPONSE TO DEMARCHE ON PAKISTAN DONORS 
CONFERENCE 
 
REF: A. STATE 124618 
     B. BERLIN 1548 
 
1. On December 1, Econoff met with Gudrun Sraega, Head of 
Division, South Asia, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to 
encourage German participation in the proposed December 16 
Pakistan Donors Conference in New York (ref A).  Other than a 
recent inquiry by the Japanese, Sraega said she had not been 
aware of plans for such a conference.  In response to her 
question, Econoff explained that the proposed event was 
unrelated to the activities of the Friends of Pakistan or the 
Frontier Trust Fund.  Sraega was very curious as to the level 
of U.S. participation.  She also requested more details on 
the guest list and organization of the event, which Econoff 
subsequently provided. 
 
2. As Sraega only learned of the conference through the 
demarche, she was unable to provide details of Germany's 
participation in the event or planned contribution.  Citing 
his busy schedule, she said she doubted Foreign Minister 
Steinmeier would be able to attend, though she did not rule 
it out.  She noted that Germany would in any event send a 
representative, but was unsure whether representation would 
come from the Foreign Ministry or Development Ministry.  She 
was pessimistic Germany would be able to make a significant 
contribution at such short notice, beyond what it has already 
committed to provide in other fora (ref B). 
 
3. Demarche points were also shared with contacts at the 
Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development. 
TIMKEN JR