VZCZCXRO9464
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW
RUEHLA RUEHLH RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNEH RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHPW RUEHROV
RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHTA #2407/01 3401153
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 051153Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY ASTANA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4044
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE 0900
RUCNCLS/SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0302
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 1007
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFAAA/DIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC 0467
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC 0382
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RHMFIUU/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ASTANA 002407 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR SCA/CEN, DRL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM SOCI KDEM KZ
SUBJECT:  KAZAKHSTAN:  WAS THAT AN INSULT?  OPPOSITION NEWSPAPER 
FACES FIVE COURT PROCEEDINGS 
 
¶1.  (U) Sensitive but unclassified.  Not for public Internet. 
 
¶2.  (SBU) SUMMARY:  On December 1, Charge d'Affaires met with 
Yermurat Bapi, Editor-in-Chief of Taszhargan newspaper.  Taszhargan 
is a weekly opposition paper printed in Russian and Kazakh with a 
total circulation of 72,000.  Bapi reported that since September 
2008, the newspaper has experienced many judicial problems and is 
currently involved in five lawsuits.  Bapi said he did not think 
that all five cases involved the highest levels of political power 
in Kazkahstan, but he suspected that some emanated from State 
Secretary Saudebayev's level.  In his opinion, the country's 
leadership "would not have behaved this way" before Kazakhstan was 
granted chairmanship of the OSCE.  Bapi doubted that President 
Nazarbayev was aware of the cases, since he did not think the 
President would risk the reputation of the country "just to defend 
one Member of Parliament."  END SUMMARY. 
 
CASE NO.1:  INSULT TO A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT 
 
¶3.  (SBU) The first case involves Member of Parliament Romin 
Madinov.  A story printed in Taszhargan this spring referred to 
Madinov as a "latifundist," which roughly translates to "land baron" 
in English.  Shortly after the story was run, Madinov wrote a 
response letter, which the newspaper printed in full.  Bapi thought 
the matter was resolved until Madinov filed a civil lawsuit against 
Taszhargan claiming approximately $3 million in moral compensation 
for the alleged insult.  Bapi said "the word itself was not an 
insult and he told the court as much."  A decision in this case is 
expected in January 2009. 
 
CASE NO. 2:  INSULT TO THE LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 
 
¶4.   (SBU) Bapi also told the Charge that earlier this year, four 
policemen from the Almaty oblast police approached Taszhargan to 
report that their superiors were taking bribes.  The policemen asked 
to remain anonymous.  Bapi claims the paper followed up by speaking 
with other police officers from the department and with those who 
had been fired recently.  Bapi says the paper heard similar stories 
from other policemen in the oblast and ran a series of articles on 
corruption and the abuse of power in the oblast police department. 
The police department is now claiming approximately $416,000 in 
compensation for insulting the dignity and honor of the police 
department, though Bapi's defense is that the articles reported on 
specific corrupt individuals and not the department as a whole. 
Therefore, in Bapi's opinion, the department cannot sue the paper. 
The trial in this case began on December 2. 
 
CASES NOS. 3 AND 4:  INSULTS TO THE KAZAKH NATIONAL IDENTITY 
 
¶5.  (SBU) The third and fourth cases involve an inter-ethnic 
incident in Malybai village in Almaty oblast during which two ethnic 
Uighurs killed an ethnic Kazakh.  According to Bapi, Taszhargan 
reported the facts of the incident without any commentary.  However, 
the journalist who wrote the story quoted a local resident using a 
pejorative word for ethnic Kazakhs, "manqa qazaq," which roughly 
translates to "snotty Kazakh" in English.  As a result, Bapi says 
the Deputy Governor of the region has accused the paper of 
undermining the dignity and reputation of ethnic Kazakhs.  However, 
Bapi claims the paper was just reporting on the events of an 
incident and that the pejorative word was expressed by a local 
resident and not the journalist.  Two suits were filed relating to 
this incident, of which the first is an administrative case against 
the paper and the second is a criminal case against the journalist. 
A ruling is expected on these cases in mid-December.  (NOTE: 
Kazakhstan's legal code places strict restrictions on speech that 
connotes racial, ethnic, or religious discord.  In a somewhat 
similar case, the courts ruled to suspend temporarily the activities 
of a website for failing to monitor pejorative comments in one of 
its online articles.  In the Kazakh context, this may equate to 
"hate speech."  END NOTE.) 
 
CASE NO.5:  INSULTS TO A KAZAKH NATIONALIST MOVEMENT 
 
¶6.  (SBU) The final case involves a dispute between the opposition 
party Azat and the leaders of the Kazakh national movement that 
carries the same name.   (NOTE:  The Azat Kazakh movement was active 
in the early 1990s but has grown dormant in recent years.  In 2008, 
the True Ak Zhol political party renamed itself "Azat," which 
 
ASTANA 00002407  002 OF 002 
 
 
translates to "liberty" in English.  END NOTE.)  According to Bapi, 
leaders of the nationalist movement wanted to know why True Ak Zhol 
decided to take the name of their movement.  In response, Taszhargan 
ran a story stating the Azat movement had done nothing in the past 
ten years and should be happy the name had been revived.  The 
article stated the nationalist movement was "like a dead body being 
revived."  The Azat Kazakh nationalist movement has filed a 
defamation case against the paper. 
 
¶7.  (SBU) When asked why so many lawsuits were being filed against 
Taszhargan, Bapi cited the following reasons:  1) the paper's 
coverage of "Kazakhgate" (Giffen) bribery case in the United States; 
2) Taszhargan's publication of transcripts of phone conversations 
between high-level government officials provided by the President's 
former son-in-law Rakhat Aliyev; and 3) the possibility that certain 
members of President Nazarbayev's inner circle want to please the 
President by punishing the paper.  (NOTE:  While other papers 
published excerpts of the Rakhat Aliyev tapes, only Taszhargan 
published the full transcripts.  These tapes were derived from 
national security committee (KNB) wire taps allegedly stolen by 
Aliyev associates when he was Deputy Director of the KNB (2000-01). 
END NOTE). 
 
¶8.  (SBU) When queried about the Government of Kazakhstan's response 
to the publication of the Rakhat Aliyev tapes, Bapi said that 
approximately one month ago, he received a warning from the court to 
stop printing "a criminal's story."  Bapi states the paper stopped 
publishing the Aliyev stories after this call and noted two of the 
five court cases were filed after the Aliyev tapes were published. 
(NOTE:  Aliyev has been tried and convicted in absentia for various 
crimes, including kidnapping and treason.  END NOTE). 
 
¶9.  (SBU) Bapi told the Charge that in 10 years of the paper's 
existence, there have been six attempts to close Taszhargan.  He 
also informed the Charge of other recent problems.  For example, he 
alleged that shots have been fired at the Taszhargan offices twice, 
the paper's employees have been under surveillance, and that in May, 
Bapi's car exploded.  Bapi has been convicted three times, including 
one conviction under Article 318 of Kazakhstan's criminal code, 
which prohibits insulting the dignity and honor of the President. 
He received one year of probation and one year in prison, but was 
given amnesty due to the 10th anniversary of parliament.  After the 
third conviction, he was banned from serving as an Editor-in-Chief 
of any newspaper, therefore Bapi refers to himself as the 
"Reader-in-Chief" of Taszhargan. 
 
¶10.  (SBU) Bapi claimed that one of "the tricks that the Government 
of Kazkahstan uses against the mass media is to employ a variety of 
laws to prosecute newspapers and journalists, including the 
defamation codes and civic, criminal, and administration laws."  The 
fifth case is being tried under the defamation codes of Kazakhstani 
law. 
 
¶11.  (SBU) NOTE:  Bapi originally had said that he would ask the 
Ambassador to intervene on his behalf.  He told Charge, however, 
that he now will appeal to Vice President-elect Biden after the 
inauguration.  Bapi stated that he has met twice previously with 
Biden at meetings arranged by Akezhan Kazhegeldin.  Kazhegeldin is a 
former Prime Minister reportedly in exile in London who has been 
convicted in absentia of corruption.  It is widely believed that 
many Kazakhstani leaders from the immediate post-independence period 
were involved in some level of corruption.  END NOTE. 
 
¶12.  (SBU) COMMENT:  This case illustrates the existing freedom, and 
limitations, of the Kazazkhstani press.  There is a lively print 
media, which frequently criticizes the government.  On the other 
hand, editors understand that there are red lines they cannot cross. 
 The Aliyev case, and particularly the wire tap tapes, are one of 
these lines.  It is interesting that Bapi has been able to continue 
publishing, despite coming very close to -- if not crossing - these 
lines.  This method of using legal pressure is exemplary of a more 
nuanced way to communicate those limits to the press.  It is 
interesting that even Bapi felt that this pressure did not come 
directly from the President, but rather from "bad advisors." END 
COMMENT. 
 
MILAS