Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08PARIS2146, FRENCH ENVIRONMENT NEGOTIATOR UNDERSTANDS US ENGAGEMENT IN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08PARIS2146.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08PARIS2146 2008-11-24 10:37 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
VZCZCXRO7790
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDF RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHMA
RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHTM
DE RUEHFR #2146 3291037
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 241037Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4911
INFO RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUCNMUC/EU CANDIDATE STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS PARIS 002146 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV ENRG KGHG EU FR
SUBJECT: FRENCH ENVIRONMENT NEGOTIATOR UNDERSTANDS US ENGAGEMENT IN 
DECEMBER NEGOTIATIONS 
 
REF:  A) State 119282 
 B) State 99217 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: French climate negotiator Brice Lalonde told EMIN 
that he understands that the new administration will need time to 
organize and he looks forward to working with Under Secretary 
Dobriansky in Poznan.  EMIN also explained our position on the EU 
Renewable Fuels Directive, especially biofuels.  End summary. 
 
2. (SBU) On November 21, Brice Lalonde, the French principal climate 
negotiator, told EMIN and ESTH Counselor that he understands the 
background conveyed in REF A.  Lalonde suggested that the new 
administration use new words, such as those used in the 
president-elect's comments to the bipartisan governors' conference, 
to create an atmosphere in which the other nations would be more 
willing to make concessions. Lalonde said that Poznan will be most 
important for laying out a work agenda leading to the Copenhagen 
conference.  UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is said to want two or 
three heads of state meetings on climate change to provide 
authoritative guidance to negotiators.  The GOF believes that the 
USG should host the final ministerial before Copenhagen.  Some are 
speculating that the US may want to first pass domestic legislation 
before committing to an international agreement.  Finally, Lalonde 
hopes that the Major Economies Meetings (MEM) will continue to be 
convened during the year.  Lalonde asserted that "China is key" to a 
Copenhagen protocol, and in an economic downturn, European industry, 
already fatigued, will not agree to indirectly subsidize Chinese 
industry. 
 
4.  (SBU) EMIN closed by explaining the US position on the proposed 
EU Renewable Fuels directive, especially the section on the criteria 
for biofuels, where trade barriers might be erected against some 
kinds of foreign biofuels by using non-scientific criteria.  Lalonde 
was familiar with OECD work in this area, and hoped that the EU 
domestic politics would facilitate a scientifically-based 
directive. 
 
Stapleton