Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON327, NEW ZEALAND AND THE SERBIAN ICJ RESOLUTION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON327.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08WELLINGTON327 2008-10-06 04:10 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHWL #0327 2800410
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 060410Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5460
INFO RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PRIORITY 0002
RUEHPS/AMEMBASSY PRISTINA PRIORITY 0004
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 0107
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0140
C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000327 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/ANP AND EUR/SCE 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/06/2018 
TAGS: PREL KJUS NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND AND THE SERBIAN ICJ RESOLUTION 
 
REF: STATE 105796 
 
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires, David J. Keegan, Reason:  1.4 (b) and 
 (d) 
 
1.  (C)  In an October 6 meeting with Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs and Trade Deputy Secretary Caroline Forsyth and 
European Affairs Division policy officer Rob Little, Charge 
d'Affaires Keegan summarized the points in reftel.  He noted 
that the USG position remains that referring the question of 
Kosovo independence to the the International Court of Justice 
(ICJ) is a distraction and that ultimately, the independence 
declaration will be deemed legally sound.  The USG will vote 
no on the UNGA resolution, and he asked the MFAT officials if 
the GNZ had taken a decision on this matter. 
 
2.  (C)  Forsyth responded that the GNZ is still developing 
its position but warned that a no vote would be highly 
unlikely.  She promised, however, that USG points would 
receive full consideration.  The GNZ supports the rule of 
law, the machinery of the United Nations and the ICJ, and 
does not necessarily view ICJ consideration of the case as a 
negative, offered Forsyth.  She opined that the ICJ is 
capable enough to recognize the pitfalls surrounding the 
issue, its ramifications beyond Kosovo, and would not paint 
itself into a corner.  The Charge asked about Serbian 
government contacts with the GNZ and possible motivations. 
Forsyth responded that the Serb President had written to the 
Prime Minister on the subject, and Serbian Ambassador based 
in Canberra had approached the New Zealand mission.  The 
Charge noted that ICJ review of the matter will delay 
Kosovo's integration in the international community.  Forsyth 
responded that the GNZ was aware of the significance of the 
issue, but saw that placing the matter with the ICJ offered 
the Serbian government a certain amount of political cover. 
Rob Little offered that the Serbian position, as explained to 
the GNZ, rested on Belgrade's desire to ensure that Kosovo's 
unilateral declaration was consistent with UNSCR 1244. 
KEEGAN