Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden 00. Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Jordan Yemen Thailand

Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05 2011/06 2011/07 2011/08

Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08JAKARTA1896, ENGAGING INDONESIA ON RUSSIAN-SPONSORED UNGA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08JAKARTA1896.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08JAKARTA1896 2008-10-10 08:49 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Jakarta 
VZCZCXRO3159
PP RUEHCHI RUEHCN RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHJA #1896 2840849
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 100849Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY JAKARTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0302
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0970
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5477
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 3141
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 1358
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 1331
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0615
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 2315
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2589
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 3154
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
 
UNCLAS JAKARTA 001896 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EAP, EAP/MTS, EAP/MLS, IO/UNP, INR/IRE (CYBER TEAM) 
NSC FOR E.PHU 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PARM PINS UNGA ID
SUBJECT: ENGAGING INDONESIA ON RUSSIAN-SPONSORED UNGA 
RESOLUTION ON CYBER-SECURITY 
 
REF: STATE 107427 
 
1.  (U) This message is Sensitive but Unclassified -- Please 
handle accordingly. 
 
2.  (SBU) SUMMARY:  Mission reviewed reftel points with the 
GOI, urging it to reject the proposed Russian UNGA First 
Committee resolution on telecommunications and international 
security.  Department of Foreign Affairs contact promised to 
review the USG position and provide us any substantive 
reaction.  Mission will also review the matter with GOI 
agencies that handle telecommunications and cybersecurity 
issues and report any reaction by septel.  END SUMMARY. 
 
3.  (SBU) Poloff presented reftel demarche and nonpaper to 
Andy Rachmianto, Deputy Director for International Security 
and Nonproliferation at the Department of Foreign Affairs 
(DEPLU), on October 10.  Poloff noted that the proposed 
Russian resolution would establish an ineffective mechanism 
for addressing cyberthreats to international security.  The 
resolution would also allow repressive regimes to block the 
free flow of ideas across national boundaries.  As a country 
committed to democracy and openness, Indonesia should oppose 
the resolution. 
 
4.  (SBU) Rachmianto said that Indonesia did not yet have a 
position on the issue.  He promised that GOI officials would 
review USG views and get back to us with any substantive 
reaction. 
 
5.  (SBU) Mission will also review the matter with GOI 
agencies that are responsible for telecommunications and 
information technology issues and report any substantive 
reaction by septel. 
 
HUME