Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08USUNNEWYORK692, UN - UNAMI COMPOUND TO BE CONSIDERED BY GENERAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USUNNEWYORK692.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08USUNNEWYORK692 2008-08-01 22:23 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED USUN New York
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0692 2142223
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 012223Z AUG 08
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4734
INFO RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD 0682
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000692 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: IZ PGOV PREL UNGA
SUBJECT: UN - UNAMI COMPOUND TO BE CONSIDERED BY GENERAL 
ASSEMBLY DURING FALL SESSION 
 
REF: A. RASHKOW-ABRAHAMS EMAILS 07-30-08 
     B. BAGHDAD 002133 
     C. STATE 070826 
     D. BAGHDAD 001425 
     E. STATE 046440 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED  -  PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY 
 
1.  (U)   This is an action request.  See paragraph 4. 
 
2.  (SBU)   As reported REFTELS B-E, despite several 
demarches, we have not been successful in obtaining a firm 
commitment from the Government of Iraq (GOI) regarding the 
size of the contribution they will provide to build the 
proposed new UN Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) UN 
integrated compound in Baghdad.  The SYG,s revised proposal 
(in A/62/828 - preliminary cost estimate of $98.6 million) to 
build the compound at a new site, formerly known as the 
Al-Sijud Palace, will be considered by the Fifth Committee of 
the GA during the main part of the 63rd GA in the Fall. 
Mission reiterates its view that there is a high risk that 
both the ACABQ and the Fifth Committee will not approve (or 
will defer action on) the project without a commitment from 
the GOI to fund a significant part of the costs involved - at 
least 50 percent. 
 
3.  (SBU)  As noted in REF A, the Department has been asked 
by the French whether the USG could support a proposal that 
the GOI should assume full responsibility for constructing 
the new compound and in turn lease the facilities to the UN. 
As anticipated by the Mission, the UN, at the working level, 
has indicated that it does not favor such a proposal because, 
in their view, it would significantly delay the project and 
risk undermining the security aspects of the project.  As we 
understand, part of the concern driving the French proposal 
was its fear that the UN was not capable of delivering on the 
project in a timely manner.  Their concern may be assuaged by 
the recent UN report on the project referred to above. 
 
4.  (SBU)  If the timely construction of the UNAMI compound 
remains a high priority for the USG, Mission recommends we 
consult further with the French stressing the UN's 
reservations and ask them to work with us and the UK to 
secure GOI agreement to fund a significant part of the 
project.  Mission also recommends we continue to seek a firm 
commitment of the GOI to fund a significant part of the 
project, at least 50 percent, as soon as possible, in order 
to facilitate GA approval of the project in the Fall. 
Wolff