VZCZCXRO4641
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2036/01 2060103
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 240103Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6040
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 1367
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 8993
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 2723
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 7199
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 9576
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4507
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0497
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0891

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 002036 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/24/08 
 
Index: 
 
Defense and security affairs: 
1) Former LDP Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa speaking at 
sea-power symposium proposes a "rebuilding" of the U.S.-Japan 
alliance to allow leadership  (Yomiuri) 
2) Suspicions that a Japanese or foreign submarine rammed a Japanese 
fishing boat off Chiba: U.S. denies any connection with incident 
(Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
Informal Six-Party Talks: 
3) Secretary Rice, in a meeting with Foreign Minister Koumura in 
Singapore promotes regional security body; Komura wants 
denuclearization first  (Mainichi) 
4) Japanese, North Korean foreign ministers meet in Singapore, with 
Koumura making pitch for resolution of abduction issue  (Nikkei) 
5) U.S. pressed by others in informal six-party talks to postpone 
the removal of the DPRK from the terror list, as Japan reiterates 
its concerns and doubts  (Yomiuri) 
6) Japan alarmed by mood of progress toward North Korea 
denuclearization at the informal six-party talks in Singapore 
(Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
7) Government to expand number of refugees to be accepted in Japan 
(Asahi) 
 
8) WTO negotiations might be extended in order to give more time for 
finding a breakthrough on key issues  (Yomiuri) 
 
Political agenda: 
9) Calls for Diet dissolution either late this year or early next 
year coming from the ruling camp  (Nikkei) 
10) LDP election tsar Koga sees coalition winning 180-200 single 
seats in the next Lower House election  (Sankei) 
 
11) Fiscal 2009 tax reform: Ruling parties to postpone hike on 
consumption tax in order to avoid voter backlash in the next Lower 
House election  (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
Articles: 
 
1) Nakagawa proposes rebuilding Japan-U.S. alliance at maritime 
symposium 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
The second Japan-U.S. Sea Power Dialogue, a symposium to explore 
Japan-U.S. cooperation in the development of marine resources and 
maritime security, was held at a Tokyo hotel on July 22-23 under the 
auspices of the Ship & Ocean Foundation, Center for New American 
Security, and Yomiuri Shimbun. In a meeting after the symposium on 
July 23, former LDP Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa asserted that 
the two countries should display strong leadership in resolving 
maritime issues. 
 
Touching on dropping fish catches and submerging islands due to 
rising sea levels, Nakagawa said: "Oceans have serious issues that 
threaten the very existence of mankind. Japan and the United States 
must demonstrate leadership. Close cooperation in science and 
technology and the environment in addition to security would help 
rebuild the Japan-U.S. alliance on the maritime front. China has 
 
TOKYO 00002036  002 OF 010 
 
 
begun paying attention to the sea. It is important to engage that 
country in the maritime order we envision." 
 
2) Japan's waters crowded with subs 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 24) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
Late last month, a Japanese fishing boat capsized and sank off Chiba 
Prefecture's Cape Inubo. In this incident, the Suwa Maru No. 58, a 
round haul netter, is rumored to have collided with a submarine. The 
truth is still unknown. The question, however, is how many 
submarines and which country's submarines are in the sea around 
Japan. The Tokyo Shimbun interviewed experts. 
 
Shunji Taoka, a journalist on military affairs, suspects that the 
Suwa Maru No. 58 might have collided with a submarine. Taoka pointed 
out this possibility shortly after the incident. 
 
"The waves and winds were normal at that time. One of the Suwa Maru 
No. 58's crewmen said he felt two shocks to the starboard within 
several seconds and then leaned to the right. Judging from this 
account, it's unlikely that the Suwa Maru No. 58 sank in the 
chopping waves. When we think of this incident in a process of 
elimination, the most conceivable cause is (colliding with) a 
submarine." 
 
According to Taoka, the U.S. Navy deploys 27 nuclear-powered 
submarines in the Pacific Ocean, Russia stages 23 submarines (10 
immobile), China has 62 submarines (including 34 old subs), South 
Korea has 10, and Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force has 18. "A 
ship at sea cannot see a submarine," Taoka said. "So," he added, 
"the submarine must go around them." 
 
A nuclear-powered submarine normally navigates at a depth of about 
100 meters but sometimes surfaces to a periscope depth of about 20 
meters for radio communication or other reasons. Then, that 
submarine uses its sonar to check its environs for engine sounds, 
propeller cavitation, or other situational changes. However, a 
submarine cannot detect a ship that has stopped its engine like the 
Suwa Maru No. 58. In this case, the submarine's periscope, for 
instance, could hit that ship, according to Taoka. 
 
"It's not so unusual for submarines to collide with other ships," 
Taoka said, adding: "There were at least five accidents involving 
Japanese ships, and there were such accidents in South Korea as 
well." 
 
Kazuhisa Ogawa, an analyst on military affairs, is cautious about 
determining what caused the accident. "I didn't see the Suwa Maru 
No. 58's damage, so I don't know if the Suwa Maru No. 58 collided 
with a submarine," Ogawa said. 
 
Ogawa added: "Some suspect the Suwa Maru No. 58 might have collided 
with a submarine. If that is the case, I would say the countries 
that can operate in the waters where the accident took place are 
Japan, the United States, China, and Russia." 
 
The MSDF, however, ruled out the possibility of one of its own 
submarines being involved in the accident. "There's no report of a 
collision from the submarines that returned to port on or after June 
23 (when the Suwa Maru No. 58 sank off Cape Inubo)," the MSDF staff 
 
TOKYO 00002036  003 OF 010 
 
 
office's public relations division told the Tokyo Shimbun. 
 
Meanwhile, U.S. Naval Forces Japan headquarters gave a similar 
answer, with its public affairs division stating that no U.S. 
military submarines were involved in the accident. 
 
Then, the remaining countries are Russia and China. However, Ogawa 
notes that Russia is not conducting such naval activities at 
present. 
 
Ogawa is negative about the possibility of China's involvement, 
saying: "In November 2004, a PLA submarine entered Japan's 
territorial waters near the Sakishima Islands in Okinawa Prefecture. 
After that, China's military forces on the front were told not to 
conduct activities that can be taken as reckless. Moreover, the 
Beijing Olympics is near at hand. I wonder if they would try to do 
anything that can be called into question." 
 
Another journalist on military affairs also said: "In the Cold War 
days, Russia was squaring off with the United States in the sea 
around Japan. After that, however, the operation rate of their 
submarines went down. In recent years, it has recovered with 
economic stability. Even so, I can't think that is likely. China has 
a large number of submarines and is now going to have a blue-water 
navy. However, China is focusing on the vicinity of Hainan Island 
and the Taiwan Strait." 
 
North Korea's submarines are now very old. It is therefore 
unrealistic for them to operate in the Pacific Ocean. South Korean 
and Taiwanese submarines also have little reason for coming all the 
way to Japanese waters, according to the journalist. 
 
At any rate, it is a surprising fact that there are so many 
submarines around Japan. 
 
3) U.S. proposes developing six-party talks into regional security 
mechanism; Japan disapproves of idea, saying denuclearization should 
come first 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura held a meeting with U.S. Secretary 
of State Condoleezza Rice in Singapore on July 23. Based on progress 
on North Korea's denuclearization issue, Rice announced a plan to 
develop the six-party talks into a Northeast Asia security body over 
the long run, saying, "I would like to discuss the principles of a 
Northeast Asia peace and security mechanism." Koumura balked at the 
idea of advancing discussions at a time when the verification of the 
North's nuclear declaration remains incomplete, saying, "Exchanging 
views is good, but it is extremely important to monitor progress on 
the denuclearization process." 
 
Rice's statement that effectively presented the post-six party talks 
vision before North Korea completely abandons its nuclear programs 
is likely to have an impact on the future course of the six-party 
talks as well. Koumura, on the other hand, effectively made Japan's 
stance clear that unless the North's denuclearization becomes 
certain, the six-party talks must not move on to the next stage, 
including a regional security mechanism. 
 
Koumura, explaining that the North's promised reinvestigation into 
 
TOKYO 00002036  004 OF 010 
 
 
the abduction issue has yet to take shape, asked Secretary Rice to 
urge North Korea to make progress in its relations with Japan. In 
response, Rice simply said: "I will convey the message clearly to 
North Korea." 
 
4) Brief contact made between Japanese, North Korean foreign 
ministers; No progress made on abduction issue; Koumura calls for 
settlement 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Abridged slightly) 
July 24, 2008 
 
Singapore 
 
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura, meeting briefly with his North 
Korean counterpart Pak Ui Chun after an informal six-party foreign 
ministerial on July 23, urged the North to bring progress to the 
issue of Japanese nationals abducted by North Korea in the past. 
Nevertheless, with the United States scheduled to officially delist 
North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism on August 11, there are 
no prospects for the resumption of Japan-DPRK talks to break the 
deadlock regarding the abduction issue. 
 
After the foreign ministerial, Koumura said to Pak, who was sitting 
next to him: "We would like to move Japan-DPRK relations forward by 
resolving outstanding issues." In response, Pak simply said: "I 
see." The conversation ended there without escalating into a 
penetrating discussion, as was expected by Japan. 
 
In the six-party foreign ministerial, Koumura explained that a 
reinvestigation into the abduction issue, which was promised by the 
North in working-level talks in June, has not begun, saying: "We are 
at the stage of promise for promise. We would like to move on to the 
stage of action for action early." 
 
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said: "Abduction is a 
dreadful act. North Korea must clear up the truth through an 
investigation and take action for the settlement of the issue." 
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, too, indicted the need to settle 
this humanitarian issue. 
 
Pyongyang seems to have concluded that exhibiting a confrontational 
stand toward Japan is inadvisable until the United States takes 
North Korea off its list of terrorism-sponsoring nations. 
 
Nevertheless, China and South Korea have openly expressing 
dissatisfaction with Japan's policy of not joining energy aid to the 
North unless there is progress on the abduction issue. The six-party 
foreign ministerial took place in defiance of Japan's opposition to 
it. Japan finds itself in a difficult position. 
 
5) Informal Six-Party Talks: U.S. being pressed to reconsider 
decision to remove North Korea from terrorist-sponsor list; Foreign 
Minister Koumura makes appeal, but Japan continues to be in 
difficult position 
 
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Excerpts) 
July 24, 2008 
 
An informal meeting of the Six-Party Talks was held in Singapore 
yesterday, but with the start of verification of North Korea's 
nuclear declaration having slipped due to North Korea not taking a 
 
TOKYO 00002036  005 OF 010 
 
 
concrete stance on beginning that process soon, there is growing 
possibility that doubt will spread about whether the Bush 
administration will be able to remove as planned North Korea's name 
from the list of states sponsoring terrorism. However, if delisting 
is put off, the talks themselves could stall over North Korea's 
sharp reaction, so the U.S. seems to be facing an agonizing choice. 
(Singapore dispatch) 
 
"Well, these are informal talks anyway," said Foreign Minister 
Koumura as he headed toward the hotel where the talks were being 
held, stressing a business-as-usual feeling about them. The Japanese 
government is alarmed that the foreign ministers meeting would be 
overvalued. 
 
The specific method of verifying North Korea's nuclear declaration 
has yet to be set, and the way leading to the North's abandoning its 
nuclear programs remains unclear. At this stage, though, with the 
holding of the foreign ministers' meeting, the impression being 
given to the world is that there is progress being made on the North 
Korea nuclear problem. There is fear that even without any 
substantive progress, negotiations on such issues as energy 
assistance will continue at North Korea's pace. In fact, the 
Japanese government from the start was reluctant to hold the 
informal talks. There also was concern that the understanding of the 
participants toward Japan's abduction issue would decline. 
 
The government therefore designated the foreign ministerial as a 
forum for once more making the appeal to the other countries about 
the pending issues of nuclear weapons and the abductions, with one 
senior Foreign Ministry official characterizing it as, "a place to 
transmit a political message." Foreign Minister Koumura repeatedly 
stressed two points as crucial: 1) verification of North Korea's 
nuclear declaration; and 2) resolving pending issues between Japan 
and the DPRK, including the abduction cases. 
 
The Foreign Minister in referring to Japan-DPRK relations stressed: 
"We would like to quickly move from the pledge-for-pledge state 
(based on words) to the action-for-action stage. He appealed to 
North Korea to implement its pledges, such as the reinvestigation of 
the abduction issue that has yet to be carried out. With his series 
of statements, Foreign Minister Koumura aimed at raising alarm bells 
toward the mood of conciliation toward North Korea in the 
international community. 
 
6) Six-party talks: Japan alarmed about "progress-has-been-achieved" 
atmosphere generating; Gap in views of abduction issue highlighted 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
Foreign Minister Koumura at an informal meeting of foreign ministers 
of members of the six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear issue, 
held on July 23, called for an early verification of that nation's 
nuclear report. Japan is alarmed that a growing mood of seeing 
progress on the nuclear issue is spreading, even though specific 
steps for verification have yet to be set and there is no prospect 
for North Korea to fulfill its pledge to reinvestigate abduction 
cases involving Japanese nationals. 
 
Perception gap over abduction issue highlighted 
 
Emerging from the foreign ministerial, Koumura told reporters, "It 
 
TOKYO 00002036  006 OF 010 
 
 
is necessary to move Japan-North Korea relations, including the 
abduction issue, forward. The process still remains on the 
pledge-for-pledge phase. We must move it to an action-for-action 
stage." 
 
The Japanese government's basic policy is to achieve progress on 
Japan-North Korea relations, including the abduction issue, as well 
as on the nuclear arms program issue. The first foreign ministerial 
has taken place to discuss the nuclear issue. However, North Korea 
has made no response to Japan's call for reinvestigation into 
abduction cases. 
 
Among Japanese government officials, there had been views skeptical 
about the meaning of holding the foreign ministerial from the 
beginning, as one senior Foreign Ministry official noted that since 
a meeting of top envoys to the six-party talks, which serves as a 
venue for prior coordination, was not held, the foreign ministerial 
meeting this time is an extra event, where nothing specific would be 
decided. 
 
Japan has been worried that by holding a foreign ministerial before 
specific verification procedures have been set, the result would be 
taken by North Korea as progress on the nuclear issue. If a mood of 
seeing progress on the nuclear issue spreads widely, other countries 
could point an accusing finger at Japan for its rejection of 
extending energy aid to North Korea on the grounds that the 
abduction issue has yet to be settled. 
 
According to Koumura, some foreign ministers at the ministerial 
called for progress on Japan-North Korea relations, with U.S. 
Secretary of State Rice stating that the U.S. strongly supports 
Japan on the abduction issue. 
 
However, Rice during a Japan-U.S. foreign ministerial meeting held 
prior to the six nations' foreign ministerial asked Koumura, who had 
just asked for U.S. mediation, "Does nothing ever occur between 
Japan and North Korea?" Though Rice has pledged U.S. cooperation, 
her question gave the impression that a gap in interests over the 
abduction issue is gradually widening even between Japan and the 
U.S. 
 
7) Government to expand acceptance of refugees 
 
ASAHI (Page 1) (Slightly abridged) 
July 24, 2008 
 
The government has decided to introduce a "third-country settlement 
system" to accept on a constant basis refugees living in camps in 
neighboring countries after fleeing overseas from conflict in their 
own countries. The government will come up with concrete measures, 
including the number of refugees it will accept, before the end of 
the year, after relevant ministries and agencies work out the 
arrangements. If all goes smoothly, Japan will accept about 30 
refugees in fiscal 2010. As the first test case in Asia, the new 
development will likely mark a tuning point for Japan's refugee 
policy, which has been called "closed" by domestic and international 
audiences "closed." 
 
Although Japan in 1981 joined the United Nations Convention relating 
to the Status of Refugees, it has annually accepted only several to 
several dozen refugees. The United States and European countries, 
which host large population of refugees, have criticized Japan for 
 
TOKYO 00002036  007 OF 010 
 
 
not accepting more refugees, while just providing money. In 2007, 14 
countries, including the United States and European nations, which 
have introduced the third-country settlement system, accepted about 
75,000 refugees from Burma (Myanmar), Iraq and other countries. 
 
With an eye on the introduction of a third-country settlement 
system, senior officials from 11 ministries and agencies, including 
the Justice Ministry, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Cabinet 
Secretariat, will hold a meeting on July 29 to arrange to submit the 
plan to a cabinet meeting later this year. Several ministries are 
expected to include expenditures in their budgetary requests for 
fiscal 2009. They also will work out specifics such as standards for 
accepting refugees, the number of refugees to be accepted, and 
training facilities. Reportedly, the possibility is high that Japan 
will first accept Burmese refugees who are now living in Thailand. 
 
8) WTO talks likely to be extended: Breakthrough to be explored at 
meeting of small number of countries 
 
YOMIURI (Page 9) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
An informal cabinet-level meeting of the multilateral trade 
liberalization talks (Doha Round) sponsored by the WTO yesterday 
held a second day of discussions. Many developing countries 
expressed dissatisfaction with the U.S. plan to cut subsidies for 
domestic agriculture. The reaction among industrialized countries to 
a delay in talks on mined and manufactured products is becoming 
stronger. As such, the talks, which are scheduled to end on July 26, 
will most likely be extended. 
 
The U.S. prior to a plenary meeting indicated a compromise plan to 
cut domestic agricultural subsidies to reduce the upper limit of 
subsidies to 15 billion dollars a year (approximately 1.6 trillion 
yen). However, Brazilian Foreign Relations Minister Amorim on the 
evening of July 22 sought a further cut, noting, "The U.S. has 
thrown the ball, but the ball has not gone far enough." 
 
In the meantime, industrialized countries blamed developing 
countries over the mined and manufactured products area. Trade chief 
Mandelson of the European Union (EU), which is ready to make 
concessions on cuts in tariffs on farm products, criticized 
developing countries, saying, "It is clear that cutting tariffs on 
mined and manufactured products is way behind. If a consensus is to 
be reached, it is necessary to strike a balance between agriculture 
and the mining and manufacturing industries." 
 
In an effort to find a breakthrough in the deadlocked situation, a 
meeting of cabinet ministers from seven major countries, including 
Japan, the U.S., the EU, India and Brazil, was held on the afternoon 
of July 23. Agriculture Minister Wakabayashi prior to the meeting 
said, "My responsibility is heavy." Economy, Trade and Industry 
Minister Amari noted, "What each country wants to protect is subtly 
different. However, it is important to ultimately bring back 
something positive." 
 
Japan's original plan was to have more than 10 PERCENT  of all farm 
products (about 1,300) approved as key items, including rice, sugar, 
and butter, for which high tariffs can be imposed as exceptions. 
Wakabayashi made a concession on this in Geneva, saying, "I want to 
secure at least 8 PERCENT ." However, the dominant view at a meeting 
on July 22 was that discussions will go nowhere unless the number 
 
TOKYO 00002036  008 OF 010 
 
 
proposed by the chairman -- between 4 PERCENT  and 6 PERCENT  -- is 
adopted. Views calling for the adoption of a tariff cap limiting 
tariffs on farm products to a designated level are also persistent. 
Chances are that Japan might be urged to make more concessions at 
the meeting of cabinet ministers. 
 
9) LDP's Koga, Suga and New Komeito share view that Lower House 
should be dissolved at year's end or beginning of next year 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Slightly abridged) 
July 24, 2008 
 
A series of statements came out of the ruling Liberal Democratic 
Party (LDP) yesterday on the possibility of dissolution of the House 
of Representatives at the end of the year or beginning of next 
year. 
 
Election Strategy Council Chairman Makoto Koga in a speech yesterday 
in Tokyo stated: 
 
"Our party's life is at stake depending on how we deal with the tax 
system debate and the budget compilation later this year. I can't 
think of anything but the beginning of next year as the timing for 
Lower House dissolution and a snap election." 
 
Election Strategy Council Deputy Chairman Yoshihide Suga said in 
speech in Fukuoka: "The timing should be the end of this year or the 
beginning of next year." 
 
Koga revealed his view that the next extraordinary Diet session 
should be convened in September as usual. He stated: 
 
"There are gaps on views on the law on refueling in the Indian Ocean 
in the ruling coalition and the public opinion is divided. In a bid 
to pass a law extension bill through the Diet, we should be cautious 
about making a decision on the convocation of the extra session. 
 
Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki, however, has called for convening 
the extra session in late August. 
 
Koga and Suga share the same view on the timing of Lower House 
dissolution and convocation of extra session with the New Komeito, 
the LDP's junior coalition partner. 
 
LDP lawmakers will likely pay attention to the remarks by Koga, one 
of the four LDP executives, and Suga. 
 
A senior New Komeito member pointed out yesterday: 
 
"Last year, the Maritime Self-Defense Force personnel returned to 
Japan for three months (when the old Antiterrorism Special Measures 
Law expired). There will be no problem to extend the refueling law 
in the next regular Diet session." 
 
The same New Komeito member took a cautious stance toward convening 
the extra Diet session in late August. 
 
10) LDP's Koga: 180-200 seats to be secured in electoral districts 
in next Lower House election 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
TOKYO 00002036  009 OF 010 
 
 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Election Strategy Council Chairman 
Makoto Koga in a speech yesterday in Tokyo revealed his view that 
the next extraordinary Diet session should be convened in September. 
He stated: 
 
"There are differences in the ruling coalition on enacting an 
amended Antiterrorism Special Measures Law, and public opinion also 
is divided. In order to enact a bill by a two-thirds lower chamber 
overriding vote, we should carefully set the Diet schedule." 
 
Referring to the timing of Lower House dissolution, Koba 
underscored: 
 
"Our party's life is at stake depending on how we deal with the tax 
system debate and the budget compilation later this year. After 
finishing up those tasks, we should then decide on the timing of 
Lower House dissolution. It is impossible to dissolve the Diet 
before the end of the year." 
 
Koga also commented on the next Lower House election: "Unless the 
ruling coalition secures 180 to 200 seats in the electoral district 
races, it will be difficult for us to hold a majority in the Lower 
House." 
 
Regarding the possibility of a cabinet shuffle, Koga said: "It might 
be a good chance to build a new base for the country. The Prime 
Minister is the person to make the decision on that." 
 
Meanwhile, Election Strategy Council Deputy Chairman Yoshihide Suga 
said in a speech yesterday in the city of Fukuoka: 
 
"(The Lower House should be dissolved) either at the end of the year 
or early next year. The Lower House should not be dissolved from the 
end of June through July next year (since the Tokyo Metropolitan 
assembly election is scheduled then)." 
 
 Suga, commenting of the eight electoral districts in which the LDP 
has yet to field its candidates, said: "We will be able to decide 
that by the end of August." 
 
11) Tax code revision for fiscal 2009: Ruling camp decides to put 
off consumption tax hike to stave off impact on next Lower House 
election 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full) 
July 24, 2008 
 
The ruling camp on July 23 decided to put off a hike in the 
consumption tax in revising the tax code for fiscal 2009. The 
decision is based on the dominant view that a consumption tax hike 
at a time when there is only about a year to go until the term of 
office of members of the Lower House expires would affect the next 
Lower House election. 
 
A senior official of the Tax System Research Commission of the 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on the 23rd pointed out, "Considering 
the impact of a consumption tax hike on the economy, the current 
situation does not permit such a hike." This official indicated his 
view that a three-year road map for a consumption tax hike should be 
mapped out to seek understanding from the public. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002036  010 OF 010 
 
 
Yuji Tsushima of the LDP Tax System Research Commission at a 
subcommittee meeting of the panel on July 23 noted, "Even though a 
proposed tax hike is good in theory, it could not be implemented 
smoothly unless the public accepts it." He indicated that it would 
be difficult to raise the consumption tax at the present stage. 
 
Policy Research Council Chairman Sadakazu Tanigaki, who had made a 
positive statement for a consumption tax hike, in a speech given in 
Kitakyushu City on July 18 said that it would be difficult to raise 
the consumption tax before the Lower House election. He said, "Since 
the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) is bound to oppose 
our bill raising the consumption tax, it could not be enacted. No 
measures can be taken on the consumption tax hike issue before the 
Lower House election." 
 
The consumption tax issue has been the major focal point in the 
fiscal 2009 tax code revision. However, Prime Minister Fukuda on 
June 23 had hinted at a possibility of putting off the plan, saying, 
"I will consider about it from an overall perspective. However, it 
will be something to be handled in the future." 
 
ZUMWALT