VZCZCXRO2932
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1694/01 1710821
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 190821Z JUN 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5247
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 0848
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 8473
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 2196
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 6731
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 9058
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4006
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0002
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0418

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 001694 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/19/08 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Japan, China reach ambiguous agreement on gas field development, 
shelving border issue (Nikkei) 
 
(2) Arguments on whether to hike sales tax or not will likely 
accelerate (Asahi) 
 
(3) U.S. courts-martial opened to Japanese press (Asahi) 
 
(4) Former Marine Commander defines Guam relocation plan as failure 
(Okinawa Times) 
 
(5) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new healthcare system 
for elderly, civil service reform, censure motion against premier 
(Yomiuri) 
 
(6) Prime Minister's schedule, June 18 (Nikkei) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Japan, China reach ambiguous agreement on gas field development, 
shelving border issue 
 
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Full) 
June 19, 2008 
 
Japan and China have reached an agreement to jointly develop gas 
fields in the East China Sea while pushing the thorny issue of 
setting a border between their respective exclusive economic zones 
(EEZ) backstage. But the agreement contains many ambiguous parts, 
and details will be worked out in future negotiations. It is 
uncertain whether the joint development will be a model case for 
Japan and China to jointly exploit natural resources as expected by 
Japan. 
 
Shirakaba: Degree of involvement not be determined yet 
 
Japan was particularly eager for an agreement on the joint 
development of the Shirakaba (Chunxiao in Chinese) gas field. 
Although the Shirakaba field is located on the Chinese side of the 
median line between Japan and China, Japan was concerned that China 
might pump up natural gas in waters on the Japanese side. 
 
Ignoring Japan's request, China began to independently develop the 
Shirakaba field. A government source called the field "the very 
symbol in the gas field dispute between Japan and China." Given 
this, China was taking a tough stance about the joint development of 
the Shirakaba field, as a Chinese Foreign Ministry official said: 
"It should be separated from joint development." In the end, China 
agreed on Japan's investment in the project. 
 
Some have highly evaluated the specification of how the Shirakaba 
field should be handled in the agreement itself." But it is still 
unknown to what extent Japan's involvement will be admitted. 
According to a news statement, the agreement specifies that 
investment by Japanese companies in the Shirakaba-development 
project should be in accordance with Chinese laws, demonstrating 
China's leadership. On the ratio of investment to be discussed in 
future negotiations, as well, it is unlikely that Japan's ratio will 
be larger than China's. 
 
 
TOKYO 00001694  002 OF 010 
 
 
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura said in a press briefing last 
evening: "We were able to solicit an agreement on Japan's capital 
participation in the Chinese development of a gas field." Whether it 
is called joint development or not is a matter of no importance. 
 
Gas fields near Asunaro for joint development yet to be picked 
 
In the agreement on the joint development in the northern part of 
the East China Sea, specifics on many items have yet to be 
determined. Japan and China will pick exact sites for joint 
development within the area after conducting a joint investigation 
of resources. The two countries will distribute profits earned from 
the project to them in a ratio reflecting their respective 
investment. Japan and China expect to split the joint development 
costs on a 50-50 basis in principle, but specifics will be discussed 
from now. 
 
Japan was calling for the two countries to jointly develop an area 
that straddles the median line. This call was reflected in the 
agreement. According to a source related to Japan-China relations, 
however, the site agreed on for joint development covers a wider 
area on the Japanese side from the median line than that on the 
Chinese side, placing China at an advantage. 
 
The Asunaro (Longjing in Chinese) gas field, which is viewed as a 
promising field, is not covered by the joint-development agreement. 
Japan has been calling for joint development of four gas fields, 
including the Shirakaba and Asunaro fields, near the median line, 
but the remaining two - the Kashi (Tianwaitian) and Kusunoki 
(Duanqiao) fields - are outside the agreement. The two countries 
have decided to continue negotiations on the three gas fields. But 
China may insist on its independent development of the fields. 
 
Some government officials voice apprehension that while Japan is 
engaged in investigation related to joint development and in 
negotiations, China could promote the development of other gas 
fields in earnest. 
 
Uncertain profitability 
 
The joint development of gas fields is in accordance with Japan's 
policy of diversifying its source of energy supply. In order to 
transport the produced gas to Japan, though, Japan will have to 
build a pipeline by a huge investment. It remains to be seen whether 
the project will pay or not. 
 
According to China, it confirmed through test drilling that the gas 
fields in the East China Sea have 18 billion barrels of gas reserves 
in total. This figure is about 5 PERCENT  of the production in the 
Sakhalin-2 project in Russia, in which Japanese companies have 
invested. It also accounts for less than 10 PERCENT  of the annual 
demand of oil and natural gas in Japan. Of the 18 billion barrels, 
64 million barrels of gas lies in the Shirakaba field. As Economy, 
Trade and Industry Minister Akira Amari said: "We have not expected 
too much of the amount of gas reserves there," Japan sees that its 
contribution to Japan stable energy supply will be limited. 
 
In the case of maritime gas fields, production costs are higher than 
those in ground gas fields. To transport the produced gas to Japan, 
it will cost several hundreds billion yen to construct a pipeline 
and a platform to liquefy gas. Japanese petroleum companies and 
trading houses are expected to invest in the project in the future, 
 
TOKYO 00001694  003 OF 010 
 
 
but the project is likely to be unprofitable. Many therefore view it 
practical to send the product to China through the pipeline China is 
now constructing. In such a case, Japan will receive profits in 
accordance with the ratio of its investment. 
 
Teikoku Oil Co., under the wings of Inpex Holdings, holds concession 
rights for gas fields in the areas on the Japanese side from the 
median line between Japan and China. The company is interested in 
the project, as President Masatoshi Sugioka saying: "We want to 
deepen cooperative relations with China." The company intends to 
decide on whether to invest in the project while analyzing its 
profitability. 
 
(2) Arguments on whether to hike sales tax or not will likely 
accelerate 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Full) 
June 19, 2008 
 
Prime Minister Fukuda's remark referring to a consumption tax hike 
will likely accelerate discussions on the issue in the Liberal 
Democratic Party (LDP). Aware of an anticipated next Lower House 
election, a cautious view toward such a hike is deep-rooted in the 
party. Voices calling for using revenues from an increased tax rate 
to cover ballooning social security expenses are growing. It is now 
clear that the consumption tax issue will become the central issue 
in the year-end tax code revision. 
 
Those positive about raising consumption tax: Some motivated by 
desire to keep road budget intact 
 
Former Chief Cabinet Secretary Kaoru Yosano, who places a priority 
on fiscal reconstruction, welcomed the prime minister's statement, 
noting, "The prime minister's statement is very reasonable." The LDP 
Fiscal Reform Study Group, chaired by Yosano, on June 11 compiled a 
set of proposals for the management of fiscal policy for the 
immediate future, based on the premise that the consumption tax rate 
should be raised to at least 10 PERCENT  by the middle of the 
2010's. The panel is also looking into measures to reduce wasteful 
spending. The panel thus can be characterized as a fiscal 
reconstruction force. 
 
In the meantime, there is a possibility of pressure for boosting 
spending gaining ground, backed by the prime minister's statement. 
 
Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki in a speech made last month said, 
"The prime minister will do what should be done without hesitating. 
In return for that, he would openly ask the people to consider a 
possible consumption tax. His stance is that it would be unavoidable 
for the prime minister to raise the consumption tax in order to 
place his policy imprint.  In other words, he is an advocate of a 
balanced expansion. 
 
The road policy clique is also in favor of hiking the consumption 
tax. Election Committee Chairman Makoto Koga in a speech on the 
reallocation of special-purpose road construction revenues given in 
May said, "I cannot possibly tolerate a road funds grab-bag game 
among welfare, education and environment lobby members. Serious 
discussion, including discussion on the reallocation of road funds, 
is necessary." Koga aims at boosting revenues for road construction 
so that the reallocation of road funds will not squeeze the road 
construction budget. 
 
TOKYO 00001694  004 OF 010 
 
 
 
The LDP Tax System Research Commission, chaired by Yuji Tsushima, 
will start considering a consumption tax hike starting in July with 
eye on the drastic reform of the tax code at year's end. Chief 
Cabinet Secretary Machimura at a press conference on June 18 pointed 
out, "It is necessary to pursue discussion on the consumption tax 
hike issue by the end of the year." Some members have already made a 
bullish remark with a senior Policy Research Council member saying, 
"We want the panel to come up with a policy direction, such as that 
at least an increase of such and such percentage would be 
necessary." 
 
Those cautious about tax hike alert to possible setback stemming 
from such a hike in run-up to general election 
 
Regarding the prime minister's remark, an aide to him said, "The 
prime minister always says what he thinks." However, no prospects 
have been obtained for the government to increase the consumption 
tax under a circumstance where the next general election could be 
held by the next fall at the latest. 
 
Former Secretary General Tsutomu Takebe at a meeting on the 18th 
said, "It is impossible to pursue a tax hike discussion under a 
circumstance where scandals involving public servants are 
continuing." He made this remark out of consideration to the 
first-term lawmakers elected riding on the strength of the 
popularity of then Prime Minister Koizumi, because they are 
vulnerable to the impact of setbacks. 
 
Furthermore, the so-called rising-tide force that attaches 
importance to economic growth, including former Secretary General 
Hidenao Nakagawa, is continuing to criticize moves of those who are 
in favor of a consumption tax hike. Nakagawa said, "The prevailing 
view among the public is that there should not be a tax increase 
without a substantive personnel cuts at Kasumigaseki (bureaucratic 
center) and Nagatacho (political center). 
 
Former Prime Minister Abe in a speech given on the 18th underscored, 
"It is not possible to gain understanding of a consumption tax hike 
from the people unless wasteful spending is abolished. Further 
efforts are needed." 
 
The prime minister wants to determine how the public will respond, 
as he said during a press conference on the 17th: "I am now thinking 
hard about what response the public will make." He was quick to 
check the argument calling for a consumption tax hike from leading 
the way, telling reporters on the 18th: "I will do away with 
administrative waste. I must also determine the outcome of social 
security discussion. There is also the road funds reallocation 
issue. Since the tax issue comes after those issues, it will take 
still more time to discuss what to do about the consumption tax." 
 
(3) U.S. courts-martial opened to Japanese press 
 
ASAHI (Page 37) (Abridged slightly) 
June 19, 2008 
 
Two recent U.S. military courts-martial, one held recently in 
Yamaguchi and the other in Okinawa, that tried U.S. servicemen for 
sexual violence against Japanese women were both opened to the 
press. What is a court-martial, a military court, like? Why did the 
U.S. military in Japan open the courts-martial to the press, a rare 
 
TOKYO 00001694  005 OF 010 
 
 
move? 
 
On June 10, a court-martial was held at the U.S. Marine Corps' 
Iwakuni Air Station in Yamaguchi Prefecture for Gunnery Sgt. Carl M. 
Anderson, 40, who had been indicted on 19 charges, including rape 
and conspiracy to kidnap. On each charge, the judge carefully asked 
Anderson, "You were not forced by anyone to admit to the charge, 
were you?" and, "Do you understand the meaning of the provision?" 
 
The sergeant admitted to seven charges, including illicit sexual 
intercourse with a woman other than his wife and indecent acts in 
front of other service members. In fact, nine charges, including 
rape, had been dropped as a result of plea-bargaining ahead of the 
court-martial. 
 
In October 2007, a 19-year-old woman was raped in the city of 
Hiroshima. The Hiroshima prefectural police sent to prosecutors 
papers on four U.S. Marines on suspicion of gang-raping the woman. 
The Hiroshima District Public Prosecutors Office decided not to 
prosecute the four, citing insufficient evidence. Anderson is one of 
them. 
 
Under the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement specifying criminal 
procedures stipulates that in the event Japan does not indict a U.S. 
service member suspected to have committed a crime in Japan, 
jurisdiction over the case shifts to the U.S. military. The 
Yamaguchi case falls in this category. 
 
The U.S. military independently conducted an investigation into the 
case and indicted the four members in violation of the U.S. Uniform 
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which corresponds to the criminal 
code. The U.S. military has court-martialed the four one by one 
since May. 
 
Courts-martial held earlier for two others and for a Marine 
allegedly sexually assaulted a middle school girl in Okinawa ended 
between one and four days as they also entered into plea-bargains. 
 
According to Surugadai Law School Professor Shinichi Shima, entering 
plea-bargain is more common in courts-martial than in regular 
criminal courts. Shima explained the reason this way: "A 
court-martial is held even at the battlefield. In order to return 
soldiers to their original duties, the military needs to finish up 
courts-martial speedily." 
 
According to the Justice Ministry, there were four cases in 2007 -- 
one injury and three theft cases -- in which U.S. service members 
were court-martialed because Japanese investigative organs did not 
press charges against the suspects. The courts-martial found the 
person involved in the injury case not guilty and the ones involved 
in thefts guilty. 
 
Courts-martial are convened to try members of the U.S. military or 
civilian employees of the U.S. military who are suspected to have 
violated the UCMJ. There are three types of courts-martial -- 
general, special and summary. Opened to the press in Iwakuni and 
Okinawa were general courts-martial that try rape, murder, and other 
cases. 
 
A court-martial consists of a military judge, trial counsel, and 
defense counsel who have passed the bar examination and have 
undergone a military education. A suspect has the right to hire a 
 
TOKYO 00001694  006 OF 010 
 
 
private defense counsel. 
 
As is the case with a trial in Japan, a U.S. court-martial is opened 
to the public in principle. In reality, Japanese people cannot sit 
in courts-martial because U.S. bases in Japan are off-limits to the 
Japanese public. 
 
So why did the U.S. military open the two courts-martial to the 
Japanese press? 
 
An officer of the US Forces Japan Command explained: "We opened the 
courts-martial in order to demonstrate that the United States never 
overlooks any crime." The officer also indicated that the United 
States would open future courts-martial on a "case-by-case basis" -- 
an ambiguous explanation. 
 
Surugadai University Professor Emeritus Hiroshi Honma, who is an 
expert on the SOFA, said: "Behind the opening of the courts-martial 
lies the issue of realigning US forces in Japan. The step reflects 
the U.S. military's desire that Iwakuni residents accept the 
transfer of a carrier-based air wing. Distrust (in the U.S. 
military) is also mounting in Okinawa due to a growing number of 
crimes committed by U.S. military personnel. The U.S. military is 
trying to seek Japanese understanding by showcasing its stance of 
trying crimes strictly." 
 
Over the last several years, the U.S. military has severely dealt 
with crimes committed by its members in the wake of global criticism 
of torture at Abu Ghraib in Iraq that came to light in 2004. 
 
The UCMJ was amended in October 2007, and the types of sexual crimes 
have now increased from two -- rape and other sexual misconduct -- 
to 14. The Iwakuni court-martial also handed down a sentence for a 
newly established crime. 
 
(4) Former Marine Commander defines Guam relocation plan as failure 
 
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 1) (Full) 
June 18, 2008 
 
(Honolulu) 
 
Former Commander of Marine Forces Pacific retired Lt. Gen. Henry 
Stackpole said: "I think that the agreement reached between the U.S. 
and Japan to transfer Marines from Okinawa to Guam was a failure." 
As main reasons for this view, he cited the limited space available 
for training, and the difficulty in financing the procurement of 
high-speed transport vessels that can travel between Guam and 
Okinawa. He also disclosed that in 1993, the U.S. Pacific Command 
had studied plans to halve the number of U.S. Marines in Okinawa. 
 
In an interview with the Okinawa Times at the University of Hawaii, 
Stackpole stated this about the Guam relocation plan: "There is the 
problem of Marines being unable to travel freely. There is no 
problem in the case of the Air Force or the Navy establishing bases 
there, given their flexibility. But the Marine Corps has not 
deployed its own transport vessels in Guam. Relocating Marines to 
Guam is an unsatisfactory plan." 
 
When negotiations on the realignment of U.S. forces in Japan were 
underway, Stackpole was chief of the Research Institute for 
Asia-Pacific Regional Strategy, a think-tank affiliated to the 
 
TOKYO 00001694  007 OF 010 
 
 
Defense Department in Honolulu. In this position, he was giving 
advice to the Pacific Command on the Okinawa issue and was attending 
meetings of officers responsible for negotiations with Japan. He 
also served as Okinawa Area Coordinator, so he is well versed in 
issues related to Okinawa bases. 
 
Observers think that the retired officer's severe view represents 
the dissatisfaction smoldering among Marines. 
 
According to Stackpole, the Pacific Command had produced in 1993 a 
report specifying that it was possible to reduce the number of 
Marines in Okinawa from the 21,000 at that time to 10,000 - the size 
of a brigade - as a result of studying the experience of dispatching 
troops to participate in the Gulf war. At that time, he was looking 
into how appropriately troops should be deployed. 
 
Stackpole reportedly said in recent realignment talks: "If the 
number of troops in Okinawa is reduced to the size of a brigade, it 
will become possible for them to respond to various situations 
promptly, with no obstacles to their operations." In the plan to 
transfer Marines to Guam, he has also the size of a brigade in 
mind. 
 
(5) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new healthcare system 
for elderly, civil service reform, censure motion against premier 
 
YOMIURI (Page 11) (Full) 
June 17, 2008 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures shown in percentage. Parentheses denote the results of a 
survey taken in May.) 
 
Q: Do you support the Fukuda cabinet? 
 
Yes 25.1 (26.1) 
No 63.4 (64.7) 
Other answers (O/A) 2.7 (2.2) 
No answer (N/A) 8.8 (7.0) 
 
Q: Which political party do you support now? Pick only one. 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 26.0 (28.5) 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 20.5 (18.4) 
New Komeito (NK) 2.8 (2.1) 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2.6 (1.3) 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 0.9 (1.3) 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.3 (0.2) 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) --- (---) 
Other political parties 0.1 (---) 
None 46.0 (47.6) 
N/A 0.7 (0.7) 
 
Q: When would you like the House of Representatives to be dissolved 
for a general election? 
 
As early as possible 33.0 
Within this year 24.8 
At an early date next year 8.9 
Before the current term of office ends in September next year 25.0 
N/A 8.3 
 
 
TOKYO 00001694  008 OF 010 
 
 
Q: If an election were to be held now for the House of 
Representatives, which political party would you like to vote for in 
your proportional representation bloc? 
 
LDP 25.1 
DPJ 27.5 
NK 3.1 
JCP 3.1 
SDP 1.7 
PNP 0.5 
NPN 0.1 
Other political parties 0.1 
Undecided 37.7 
N/A 1.2 
 
Q: The government has now introduced a new healthcare system, under 
which elderly people are also asked to shoulder the burden of 
insurance premiums so that young generations will not be 
overburdened. Do you appreciate this system? 
 
Appreciate very much 8.0 
Appreciate somewhat 27.6 
Don't appreciate very much 32.6 
Don't appreciate at all 28.2 
N/A 3.6 
 
Q: The government and ruling parties will basically maintain this 
healthcare system but plan to amend this system so as to lighten the 
burden of insurance premiums on those in lower income brackets. Do 
you appreciate this course of action? 
 
Appreciate very much 17.9 
Appreciate somewhat 41.1 
Don't appreciate very much 22.8 
Don't appreciate at all 15.3 
N/A 2.9 
 
Q: The DPJ and other opposition parties insist on restoring the 
previous healthcare system for old people, reasoning that elderly 
people are heavily burdened under the new healthcare system. Do you 
appreciate this opposition standpoint? 
 
Appreciate very much 17.4 
Appreciate somewhat 35.9 
Don't appreciate very much 29.4 
Don't appreciate at all 12.1 
N/A 5.2 
 
Q: Prime Minister Fukuda laid emphasis on a legislative measure to 
reform the nation's civil service personnel system in the current 
Diet session. The Diet has now enacted the legislation into law, 
with Prime Minister Fukuda complying with the DPJ's request for 
substantial amendments to the bill. Do you appreciate this response 
of the prime minister? 
 
Appreciate very much 16.0 
Appreciate somewhat 42.4 
Don't appreciate very much 21.7 
Don't appreciate at all 9.4 
N/A 10.5 
 
Q: Do you think the civil service personnel system will be reformed 
 
TOKYO 00001694  009 OF 010 
 
 
under the enacted law? 
 
Yes 30.4 
No 58.8 
N/A 10.8 
 
Q: The government plans to create a consumer agency. Do you think 
the government will implement even more consumer-oriented 
administration as a result? 
 
Yes 45.9 
No 45.7 
N/A 8.4 
 
Q: Do you think the Diet has functioned during its current session 
to decide on important policies for Japan? 
 
Yes 17.2 
No 73.2 
N/A 9.6 
 
Q: The House of Councillors passed a motion censuring Prime Minister 
Fukuda with a majority of votes from the DPJ and other opposition 
parties. However, a censure motion in the House of Councillors, 
unlike a no-confidence motion against the government in the House of 
Representatives, has no legal force. Do you think the censure motion 
was meaningful as it clarified the House of Councillors' will, or do 
you otherwise think it was meaningless because it has no legal 
force? 
 
Meaningful 36.2 
Meaningless 50.2 
N/A 13.5 
 
Polling methodology 
Date of survey: June 14-15. 
Subjects of survey: 3,000 persons chosen from among all eligible 
voters throughout the country (at 250 locations on a stratified 
two-stage random sampling basis). 
Method of implementation: Door-to-door visits for face-to-face 
interviews. 
Number of valid respondents: 1,827 persons (60.9 PERCENT ). 
 
(6) Prime Minister's schedule, June 18 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
June 19, 2008 
 
08:01 
Departed Kantei on GSDF helicopter for Iwate and Miyagi prefectures 
to inspect earthquake-stricken areas. 
 
09:43 
Viewed by helicopter quake-hit areas in Kurihara City, Miyagi 
Prefecture, and in Ichinoseki City, Iwate Prefecture. 
 
10:08 
Arrived at parking lot of Zuisenkaku Inn in Ichinoseki City. Gave 
words of encouragements to residents at earthquake evacuation 
shelter, elementary school. 
 
11:02 
 
TOKYO 00001694  010 OF 010 
 
 
Arrived in Kurihara City on GSDF helicopter. Met with Miyagi Gov. 
Murai and Kurihara Mayor Sato. Afterwards met victims of the 
earthquake. Responded to interview by the press. 
 
11:48 
Left Kurihara City. 
 
13:21 
Arrived at Kantei. 
 
13:26 
Returned to his official residence. 
 
15:58 
Met at Kantei with 2008 G8 Summit NGO Forum representative Hoshino. 
 
17:35 
Attended Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters meeting. 
 
18:20 
Met with Chief Cabinet Secretary Machimura. 
 
18:46 
Returned to his official residence. 
 
SCHIEFFER