Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08ANKARA1142, TURKEY: MOJ SAYS COURT ERRED IN FIRST ARTICLE 301

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08ANKARA1142.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08ANKARA1142 2008-06-19 09:53 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
VZCZCXRO3092
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHAK #1142 1710953
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190953Z JUN 08 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6622
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHDA/AMCONSUL ADANA 3023
RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 4369
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5//
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEUITH/TLO ANKARA TU
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU
UNCLAS ANKARA 001142 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL OSCE TU
SUBJECT: TURKEY: MOJ SAYS COURT ERRED IN FIRST ARTICLE 301 
CONVICTION FOR INSULTING TURKISHNESS 
 
REF: ANKARA 833 
 
1. (U) Summary and comment: In the first high-profile verdict 
to be handed down since parliament amended 
controversial Penal Code Article 301 (insulting 
"Turkishness"), an Istanbul court sentenced  Armenian-British 
publisher Ragip Zarakolu to pay a fine of 1400 YTL (USD 
1100), for publishing a book discussing the 1915 mass-killing 
of Armenians.  Zarakolu vowed to appeal.  A senior Justice 
Ministry official disagreed with Turkish and international 
press commentary that the result demonstrates recent 
amendments to Article 301 would be ineffective.  He told us 
the court erred by not complying with the amended law's 
mandate to have all prosecutions (new and active) authorized 
by the MOJ; he predicted higher courts would reverse the 
Zarakolu decision.  End summary and comment. 
 
------------------------------------- 
Publisher Convicted Under Article 301 
------------------------------------- 
2. (U) Istanbul prosecutors initiated the case against 
Zarakolu four years ago under TPC Article 159 -- Article 
301's precursor -- for publishing the Turkish translation of 
Armenian-British writer George Jerjian's "The Truth Will Set 
Us Free," a story of the writer's family in 1915, and how a 
Turkish soldier protected his grandmother from the Armenian 
massacres.  The court suspended the case numerous times, most 
recently in early 2008 while Parliament debated Article 301 
reforms passed on April 30 (reftel).  The court sentenced 
Zarakolu June 17 to five months' imprisonment, but commuted 
his sentence to a 1400 YTL judicial fine (USD 1100). 
 
3. (U) After the decision, Zarakolu said such rulings had 
silenced many writers in Turkey but he would continue to 
challenge the restrictions.  "I was partly expecting this 
result.  But it is a struggle for the truth and it will go 
on.  I do not consider myself convicted.  This is a 
conviction for official history and for denial," he said. 
 
4. (U) In reporting the result, most media interpreted the 
court's decision as evidence the amended Article 301 would be 
ineffective.  The news coverage asserted that revising 
Article 301 from insulting "Turkishness" to the "Turkish 
state" had no impact on the court's decision.  Media also 
noted the court did not abide by Article 301's new 
requirement that all cases be sent to the MOJ for review and 
authorization to prosecute. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
MOJ Disagrees With Court's Interpretation 
----------------------------------------- 
5. (SBU) Ministry of Justice DG Aykut Kilic told us the court 
inaccurately concluded it did not need to send the case to 
the MOJ because MOJ reviewed the file when the case was 
opened under Article 159.  Amended Article 301 requires 
courts to send both pending and newly filed cases to the MOJ 
for review and authorization to prosecute, a requirement 
Kilic noted that will increase the workload of the ministry's 
Penal Department.  (Note:  There were over 1,500 Article 301 
cases opened in 2006, according to MOJ statistics.)  He 
insisted the department is sufficiently equipped to handle 
the task, having performed the same duty under Article 159. 
Kilic cautioned us to watch for higher-court rulings on the 
Zarakolu case, which he predicted would overturn the ruling 
and require the court to submit the case to the MOJ for 
review. 
 
 
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Turk ey 
 
WILSON