Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08AITTAIPEI835, MEDIA REACTION - CROSS-STRAIT TALKS, TAIWAN-JAPAN DISPUTE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08AITTAIPEI835.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08AITTAIPEI835 2008-06-16 10:53 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0007
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0835/01 1681053
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 161053Z JUN 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9176
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8368
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 9599
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000835 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION - CROSS-STRAIT TALKS, TAIWAN-JAPAN DISPUTE 
 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies June 14-16 gave 
extensive coverage to the rising diplomatic row between Taiwan and 
Japan over a collision between a Taiwan fishing boat and a Japanese 
frigate in the disputed waters around the Tiaoyutai Islands last 
Tuesday.  News coverage also focused on agreements signed between 
Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and China's Association 
for Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) in Beijing last 
Thursday, following a decade-long hiatus in talks between SEF and 
ARATS.  The mass-circulation "Apple Daily" ran a banner headline on 
page four on June 14 reading "For the First Time Hu [Jintao] Has 
Given Orders to Speed up Negotiations over Taiwan's [Elbow] Room in 
the International Community." 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, an editorial in the 
pro-independence "Liberty Times" criticized the agreement signed 
between SEF and ARATS in Beijing and said it will jeopardize 
Taiwan's arms procurement with the Unitd States, its foreign 
relations and eventually, Taiwan's sovereignty.  An editorial in the 
centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" praised the talks between SEF 
and ARATS and urged Ma's administration to get ready as cross-Strait 
relations enter a new phase.  A separate "China Times" op-ed said 
the resumption of dialogue between SEF and ARATS has been 
successful, but both Taiwan and China have to be aware that the 
challenges lying ahead might have an impact on improved cross-Strait 
relations.  An op-ed in the pro-independence, English-language 
"Taipei Times" said Taiwan's expectations for greater international 
space cannot simply rely on China's goodwill.  With regard to the 
dispute between Taiwan and Japan over the Tiaoyutai Islands, a 
"Liberty Times" op-ed discussed the United States' role in the 
Tiaoyutai Islands controversy and said Taiwan's remarks about going 
to war with Japan over the Tiaoyutai Islands indicated that it would 
not hesitate to declare war against the "U.S.-Japan alliance."  An 
editorial in the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" cited the 
controversy over the Tiaoyutai Islands and cautioned the Ma 
administration to maintain balance in its relations with Washington, 
Tokyo and Beijing and not to become lopsided toward China.  A "China 
Times" op-ed urged the Ma administration to carefully handle the 
controversy over the Tiaoyutai Islands and take the U.S.-Japan 
security alliance and cross-Strait relations into consideration. 
End summary. 
 
3. Cross-Strait Talks 
 
A) "The SEF-ARATS Beijing Agreement Is the Start of Taiwan Opening 
Its Door and Inviting the Thief in" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 720,000] 
editorialized (6/14): 
 
"... What is more noteworthy is that the peaceful atmosphere 
deliberately created for the white-glove meetings between the 
governments of both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] has generated 
immediate and evidently unfavorable results for Taiwan.  Big 
countries in the international community, such as the United States, 
Japan and the European Union, have all expressed positive responses 
to the cross-Strait talks.  But since the situation across the 
Taiwan Strait has alleviated, China has naturally taken advantage of 
[the current situation] and requested that the United States 
permanently cease its arms sales to Taiwan.  Not only did some 
scholars in the United States assert that Washington should postpone 
the sales of advanced weaponry, such as the F-16 fighter jets, to 
Taiwan for a year, but also there were messages from Washington 
officials saying that the major U.S. arms sales to Taiwan will be 
postponed and determined only after the new U.S. president is 
elected.  What is more absurd is that a recent 'Washington Post' 
report said the Taiwan side has privately asked the U.S. government 
not to send the notifications [of the arms procurement package to 
Taiwan] in the next few weeks so as not to affect Taiwan's 
negotiations with China.  The Ma administration must clarify this 
'evil deed' that it has committed upon itself in the pursuit of 
unpractical economic interests.  Also, similar [negative] 
consequences from the international community included [reports 
saying that] given Taiwan's proactive efforts to reconcile with 
China, Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Latin America, such as 
Nicaragua, are concerned and closely monitoring the change of 
attitude on Taiwan's part and may adjust [its relations with Taiwan] 
accordingly. 
 
"In addition to the impact on [Taiwan's] arms deals and foreign 
relations caused by the false impression that the island is 
reconciling with China, the Taiwan people's weakened alertness 
[against China] is another serious price Taiwan has to pay.  Even 
though the idea of a new, straighter air route [across the Taiwan 
Strait] was not included in the SEF-ARATS talks in Beijing this 
time, the mentality behind such an idea is debatable.  The idea of 
adopting a new, straighter air route across the Taiwan Strait is 
akin to putting the shortened time of flight ahead of Taiwan's air 
defense needs, a move that will surely and evidently reduce the time 
for Taiwan to react to air threats from China.  Such a mentality of 
 
paying attention to only minor benefits but turning a blind eye to 
[the island's] national security will likely result in the 
consequence that Taiwan's sovereignty will eventually become 
expendable. ..." 
 
B) "Looking Forward to Seeing Both Sides of the Strait Walk on the 
New Road of Stable Interaction Starting Now" 
 
The centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 400,000] 
editorialized (6/14): 
 
"... Another level of 'pragmatism' is visible, judging from the 
level of representatives sent by both sides of the Strait.  During 
the negotiation ten years ago, [Taiwan's] Mainland Affairs Council 
(MAC) officials all stayed behind and had to concentrate on waiting 
for [Taiwan's] Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) representatives' 
reports.  As a result, during the negotiations, not only 
representatives of both sides across the Strait had to face off, but 
also SEF and MAC had to wrestle back and forth.  Nowadays, MAC 
officials all sit at the negotiation table in the capacities of 
advisor or experts.  Negotiations this time were no different from 
'official negotiations' except for the capacities of representatives 
of both sides of the Strait.  Once the mode of 'officials 
negotiating in their capacities of civilians' is assured, the future 
mode of dialogue across the Strait is decided.  The mode of 
negotiations from both sides of the Strait in the future will be a 
quasi-official dialogue with SEF as the base, and will transcend the 
mode of using SEF as a cover-up, as was done in the old days. ..." 
 
C) "A Small Step for SEF and ARATS, but a Big Step for Cross-Strait 
Relations" 
 
Chao Chun-shan, a Professor of the Graduate Institute of China 
Studies at Taiwan's Tamkang University, opined in the centrist, 
KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 400,000] (6/14): 
 
"In terms of the international community, the attitudes of the 
United States and Japan have decisive influence [on the development 
of cross-Strait relations].  They expect both sides of the Strait to 
hold dialogue to assure peace and security in the region.  However, 
based on their individual interests, neither [the United States nor 
Japan] want to see the development of a cross-Strait relationship 
derailed from a track under their control.  There is a delicate 
change in the trilateral relations among Taiwan, Japan and China 
because of the incident in which a Taiwan fishing boat was hit by a 
Japanese frigate and sank off the waters around the Tiaoyutai 
Islands....The controversy [over the collision in the Tiaoyutai 
Island waters], which involved the issue of sovereignty, is 
difficult to put aside for now because it happened unexpectedly. 
..." 
 
D) "Don't Leave Our Future in Hands of Beijing" 
 
Chiang Huang-chih, an Associate Professor at National Taiwan 
University's College of Law, opined in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 30,000] (6/15): 
 
"... Cross-strait relations is an important issue that must be dealt 
with. China has delivered 'goodwill' messages on Taiwan's WHO 
membership bid, but it would be premature and unwise to examine and 
discuss Taiwan's diplomatic issues within a cross-strait framework 
because of this single case.  If Taiwan's international 
participation should be decided by China, our so-called 
'international space' would be nothing more than a 'cage' within a 
'one China' framework, even if the 'motherland' was considering the 
interests of Taiwanese.  Hong Kong and Macau are good examples: 
Would Taiwanese be happy to see that happen here? 
 
"If Taiwan gave up its diplomatic efforts and failed to accumulate 
bargaining chips on the international space issue, urgent 
negotiations with China on diplomatic issues and the hope for 
seeking international space and dignity with China's goodwill would 
be nothing but capitulation, or a plea for mercy." 
 
4. Taiwan-Japan Dispute 
 
A) "Declaring War on the U.S.-Japan Alliance?" 
 
Lai I-chung, former director of the DPP's International Affairs 
Department, opined in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" 
[circulation: 720,000] (6/14): 
 
"... Anyone with common knowledge of international affairs is aware 
that even though the United States will not step into the dispute 
between Taiwan and Japan over the Tiaoyutai Islands, it acknowledges 
that the islands are currently under Japan's jurisdiction.  Such an 
attitude is clearly included in the U.S.-Japan defense treaty and 
was emphasized [by Washington] in 2004.  [The remarks about Taiwan] 
not ruling out the possibility of going to war with Japan indicated 
 
that [Taiwan] would not hesitate to declare war on the 'U.S.-Japan 
alliance' over the Tiaoyutai Islands.  This is the main reason why 
the Beijing government has been taking great efforts in restraining 
its people from acting provocatively over the [controversial] 
Tiaoyutai Islands issue.  Doesn't Ma's administration, which claimed 
that it has experts specializing in Japanese affairs, know that?" 
 
B) "Walking on a Tight Role with Balance" 
 
The mass-circulation "Apple Daily" [circulation: 520,000] 
editorialized (6/16): 
 
"... The controversy [over the Tiaoyutai Islands] will soon vanish 
like a tempest in a teapot.  But the chronic changes in the long run 
may be more worrisome.  It appears that Taiwan is slowly tilting 
toward China from its [close] relations with the United States and 
Japan.  [Taiwan's] postponement of the arms procurement package has 
long annoyed the United States.  President Ma has been dodging and 
shirking the issue since he assumed office, and [his practice] has 
not only upset Washington but also vaguely implied that because 
Taiwan is tilting toward China it no longer needs to buy that many 
weapons.  Taiwan's intense reactions during the recent controversy 
over the Tiaoyutai Islands seemed to indicate that the island no 
longer cares about the harm [Taiwan's reactions] would do to its 
relations with Japan.  Some people even suggested that Taiwan join 
hands with China to counterbalance Japan.  Does this imply that 
Taiwan is alienating itself from Japan and starting slowly to tip in 
favor of China? 
 
"In fact, it is because of Taiwan's special relations with the 
United States and Japan that China cares so much about Taiwan.  The 
Ma administration's policy of engaging with China is moving in a 
correct direction, but the precondition [for such a policy] is that 
Taiwan's relations with Washington and Tokyo remain resolute and 
impregnable.  If the foundation of [Taiwan's] relations with 
Washington and Tokyo is dismantled, China will surely do whatever it 
pleases with Taiwan.  [Should that happen,] what bargaining chips 
will Taiwan still have?  The grand strategy for Taiwan should be 
that it maintain a close relationship with the United States and 
Japan while befriending China." 
 
C) "Why Not Demonstrate a Broader Strategic Perspective?" 
 
Lai I-chung, former director of the DPP's International Affairs 
Department and currently a member of the executive board of the 
Taipei-based public policy research institute Taiwan Thinktank, 
opined in the centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 
400,000] (6/16): 
 
"... In fact, proper handling of the issue of the Tiaoyutai Islands 
will reinforce mutual trust between Taiwan and Japan, and Taiwan and 
the U.S.  Taiwan will be able to face China on a strong and solid 
base and increase its strategic bargaining chips for negotiation 
[with China], which will not only expand Taiwan's interests during 
negotiations, but also help to establish a stable interaction 
framework across the Strait.  This will also necessitate 'the 
U.S.-Japan security alliance' leaning towards Taiwan.  Then, the 
scene that [former U.S. Secretary of State] Henry Kissinger created 
in the 1970s, in which the Soviet Union and China competed to 
maintain relations with the United States, might be replayed in a 
scene in which the 'U.S.-Japan security alliance' and China compete 
to maintain relations with Taiwan. 
 
"This also implies that when China tries to maintain its relations 
with the 'U.S.-Japan security alliance' by restraining itself in 
[meddling in] the issue of the Tiaoyutai Islands, Taiwan should not 
reverse and fall into a predicament of facing the United States, 
Japan and China simultaneously.  By handling the issue of the 
Tiaoyutai Islands prudently and creatively and creating a scenario 
in which China and the U.S.-Japan security alliance both maintain 
good relations with Taiwan, it is also very likely that the issue of 
the Tiaoyutai Islands will be resolved in a way which benefits 
Taiwan. ..." 
 
YOUNG