Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08AITTAIPEI812, MEDIA REACTION: CROSS-STRAIT TALKS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08AITTAIPEI812.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08AITTAIPEI812 2008-06-11 09:27 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0812 1630927
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 110927Z JUN 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9135
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8352
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 9585
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000812 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: CROSS-STRAIT TALKS 
 
 
Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused June 11 
news coverage on the talks between Taiwan's Straits Exchange 
Foundation (SEF) and China's Association for Relations across the 
Taiwan Strait (ARATS), which will formally kick off Thursday; on 
South Korea's cabinet, which offered to resign Tuesday amid massive 
street protests against the import of U.S. beef; and on a Taiwan 
fishing boat, which sank off the Tiaoyutai islands after colliding 
with a Japanese frigate Tuesday.  In terms of editorials and 
commentaries, an editorial in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" 
strongly demanded that Taiwan's sovereignty be asserted during the 
upcoming talks between SEF and ARATS.  An analysis in the 
pro-unification "United Daily News" also urged SEF Chairman Chiang 
Pin-kun to express the Taiwan people's hope for 'reciprocity and 
dignity' during his talks with ARATS.  End summary. 
 
A) "Results of [Cross-Strait] Talks Must Be Put through a Popular 
Vote If They Endanger Taiwan's Sovereignty" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 720,000] 
editorialized (6/11): 
 
"...  In an attempt to maintain Taiwan's status as an independent 
sovereign nation and to safeguard the common interests of the 23 
million people in Taiwan, we demand that [Straits Exchange 
Foundation Chairman] Chiang Pin-kun firmly stand by and defend 
Taiwan's sovereignty status.  He must never endorse any conclusion 
or statement [reached with China] which secretly carries 
self-disparaging [wording] such as "The One China Consensus," 
because only the 23 million people of Taiwan have the final say 
about [Taiwan's] sovereignty.  The process and results of the 
[cross-Strait] talks must also be kept transparent, and there should 
not be any secret deals.  Should [both sides reach any agreement] 
that will jeopardize Taiwan's sovereignty, the Taiwan government 
should reject such a conclusion, or it should put the conclusion to 
a popular vote so as to meet the principle that says 'sovereignty 
lies in the hands of the people.'  President Ma has emphasized more 
than once that Taiwan's future must be determined by the 23 million 
people in Taiwan.  Hasn't he? 
 
B) "Challenge for Chiang Pin-kun:  What to Put on the New Page of 
History?" 
 
Journalist Li Chih-te wrote in the pro-unification "United Daily 
News" [circulation: 400,000] (6/11): 
 
"... The significance of [Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman] 
Chiang Pin-kun's trip [for talks with China's Association for 
Relations across the Taiwan Strait] will certainly not be limited to 
signing the agreements on direct charter flights and opening Taiwan 
to Chinese tourists.  The resumption of 'systematic negotiations' 
[between the two sides] is in reality the common objective pursued 
by both sides of the Taiwan Strait in the wake of Taiwan's 
presidential election in March. ... 
 
"Such a historic opportunity -- offering resumption of 
[cross-Strait] dialogue -- is both precious and fragile.  Thus, the 
mission shouldered by Chiang, besides concluding the already decided 
agreements, also includes the heavy and major responsibility of 
[helping to] 'define the nature' of future talks between the two 
sides.  Given the [amicable] climate for cross-Strait 
reconciliation, there should be room for Chiang to express to the 
Chinese leaders the Taiwan people's expectations of 'reciprocity and 
dignity.'  If Chiang fails on this part in the very beginning [of 
the talks], [Taiwan] might have to pay a higher price if it wants to 
do it next time in the future. ...  What kind of [legacy] does 
Chiang want to leave behind during this trip to Beijing?  This is a 
major issue closely related to his future status in history, and it 
will be a key test of his wisdom." 
 
WANG