Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TELAVIV1051, ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TELAVIV1051.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TELAVIV1051 2008-05-19 10:10 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tel Aviv
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTV #1051/01 1401010
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 191010Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6718
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEADWD/DA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CNO WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 3842
RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 0479
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 4122
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 4645
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 3855
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 2137
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 4605
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1474
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1918
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 8466
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 5947
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 0857
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 4976
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 6926
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 9717
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT  PRIORITY
UNCLAS TEL AVIV 001051 
 
STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD 
 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM 
NSC FOR NEA STAFF 
 
SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA 
HQ USAF FOR XOXX 
DA WASHDC FOR SASA 
JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA 
CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR 
COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD 
COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 
 
JERUSALEM ALSO ICD 
LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL 
PARIS ALSO FOR POL 
ROME FOR MFO 
 
SIPDIS 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS
 
SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION 
 
 
-------------------------------- 
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: 
-------------------------------- 
 
Mideast 
 
------------------------- 
Key stories in the media: 
------------------------- 
 
The Jerusalem Post reported that even as Defense Ministry officials 
said Sunday that Israel was likely to accept the Gaza cease-fire 
deal brokered by Egypt, Defense Minister Barak in a meeting with a 
high-level US congressional delegation talked only about a 
large-scale military incursion.  Ha'aretz added that Barak is 
skeptical about the chances of achieving long-term quiet with Hamas, 
and that his feelings are shared by PM Olmert and FM Livni.  The 
Jerusalem Post quoted defense officials as saying that Barak, who 
will hold talks in Sharm el-Sheikh today, is expected to push Egypt 
for a two-stage deal that would begin with a cessation of terrorist 
activity and IDF military operations and then be followed by the 
opening of the border crossings in exchange for the release of Gilad 
Shalit. Yesterday The Jerusalem Post quoted a senior Hamas official 
in Gaza as saying that Hamas has not ruled out including Shalit's 
release as part of the cease-fire.  The Jerusalem Post quoted GOI 
sources in Jerusalem as saying that such a change would make it 
difficult for Israel to turn down the truce.  The officials were 
also quoted as saying that Israel was likely to accept the 
cease-fire deal even if it does not include Shalit's immediate 
release.  Ha'aretz reported that Israel will not publicly endorse 
the cease fire but rather treat it as a series of steps beginning 
with a lull in hostilities, followed by gradual relaxation of the 
financial blockade of Gaza.  Ha'aretz added that if the deal 
includes Shalit, possibly in exchange for Israel's release of 450 
prisoners, Israel would also agree to reopen the Rafah crossing. 
Ha'aretz quoted security sources as saying that the gap on the 
prisoner swap is slightly smaller than it was a few months ago. 
Ha'aretz reported that GOI officials are slowly coming to realize 
that a large-scale military operation in Gaza does not serve Israeli 
interests right now. In addition to meeting Mubarak and Suleiman, 
Barak will meet with Turkish FM Ali Babacan and then have dinner 
with Egyptian Defense Minister Muhammad Hussein Tantawi. 
 
Ha'aretz quoted a senior Israeli official familiar with the talks 
with Hizbullah as saying that Israel has recently informed the 
Lebanese organization that it will not release Palestinian prisoners 
in exchange for its two kidnapped soldiers.  The official also told 
Ha'aretz that if Hizbullah continues to insist that Palestinians be 
included in the deal, Israel may break off the negotiations.  In 
that case, the official was quoted as saying, Israel would have to 
evaluate whatever intelligence it has about the two soldiers and 
decide whether it justifies declaring them dead. 
 
Visiting House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was quoted as saying yesterday 
in an interview with The Jerusalem Post that Washington must make 
clear to the world that if they want America's friendship then they 
need to do more to keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.  Pelosi 
was quoted as saying that the U.S. needed to be more "proactive" in 
saying to the countries of the world -- including Russia, China, and 
the Muslim countries in Asia -- that "one of the pillars of U.S. 
foreign policy is to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass 
destruction to anyone."  Pelosi added that the U.S. cannot stop 
nuclear proliferation alone, and that "if these weapons proliferate, 
they are a threat to everyone, not just to the U.S., and not just to 
Israel."  Israel Radio quoted Pelosi as saying that no option can be 
rued out in stopping Iran's nuclear program except -- at this time 
-- a military attack against Iran.  Yesterday Yediot reported that 
Deputy Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Dan Harel met over the weekend with 
the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen 
to discuss Iran.  The meeting took place at the NATO Chiefs of Staff 
Conference in Brussels. 
 
All media reported that the High Court of Justice is scheduled to 
hold a hearing this afternoon to decide whether the police should 
take preliminary testimony from American financier Morris Talansky 
next week in the bribery case against PM Olmert. Leading media 
reported that Olmert is wavering on this issue, if not obstructing 
the investigation.  Ha'aretz reported that law enforcement officials 
told the newspaper yesterday that new evidence obtained in the 
latest probe of Olmert has uncovered several new offenses with which 
the premier could be charged. 
All media reported that the Knesset House Committee is due today to 
discuss the application of two MKs who quit the Pensioners Party and 
signed an agreement with Arkady Gaidamak's Social Justice Party to 
set up a new Knesset faction.  Leading media quoted the Knesset's 
legal adviser, Nurit Elstein, as saying that in the agreement 
between the MKs and Arkady Gaidamak, there are grounds to suspect 
that the Election Law and the Party Funding Law were violated.  This 
morning Israel Radio reported that the police are investigating 
Gaidamak about the long-standing Bank Hapoalim fraud probe. 
 
Maariv quoted Labor Party chairman Ehud Barak as saying at a meeting 
of the Labor Party faction yesterday that he believes that general 
elections will take place by December.  Yesterday Maariv reported 
that the "rebellion" within Kadima has fizzled. 
 
Major media cited President Bush's call for democracy in the Arab 
countries at the World Economic Forum in Sharm el-Sheikh yesterday. 
Yesterday The Jerusalem Post quoted the President as saying at a 
roundtable discussion with young Israelis on Friday at Jerusalem's 
Bible Lands Museum that young people can bring peace. 
 
Major media reported that Likud Knesset Member and former education 
minister Limor Livnat has embarked on a campaign to knock down the 
status of the Arabic language in Israel. 
 
Ha'aretz and Israel Radio reported that Palestinians have recently 
and repeatedly destroyed a vineyard and fields cultivated by 
settlers in the West Bank. 
 
Maariv reported that Iraqi members of parliament are demanding an 
investigation into why dozens of Iraqi children have been sent to 
Israel for operations to cure heart defects.  These operations save 
the lives of the children and are carried out at Wolfson Hospital in 
Holon, but the opponents argue that Israel is an enemy country.  The 
protesters are headed by Ahmed Saadawi, one of the representatives 
of the young Shi'ite leader Sheikh Muktada Sadr, a supporter of Iran 
and an enemy of the United States. 
 
The Jerusalem Post reported that the IDF is about to build a "Jewish 
heritage" campus in Jerusalem. 
 
Over the weekend Maariv and other media reported that next month 
Emuni University will be inaugurated in Slovenia.  It is described 
as the first European-Mediterranean university.  Students from 
Israel, the PA, Lebanon, Syria, Morocco, Libya, and other countries 
will be studying together in the new institution. 
 
Yesterday Ha'aretz reported that Google co-founder Sergey Brin told 
the newspaper over the weekend that the Israeli firm Ormat is one of 
the companies that Google is talking to about alternative energy. 
 
Channel 10-TV and Makor Rishon-Hatzofe published the results of a 
Maagar Mohot poll (responses by residents of southern Israel, from 
Ashkelon and southwards, including Sderot, Netivot, Ofakim and the 
Gaza periphery communities, in parentheses): 
Q: What would you prefer for the Israeli government to do today: 
Reach a cease-fire agreement with Hamas or continue the war against 
it? 
Israel should reach an arrangement: 33% (39%). 
Israel should continue the war: 56% (51%). 
11% (10%) were undecided. 
Q: Do you think the Israeli government should sign a cease-fire 
agreement with Hamas today, even without Gilad Shalit's release? 
The government shouldnQt sign such an agreement: 57% (52%). 
It should sign the agreement: 24% (31%). 
19% (17%) were undecided. 
Q: Should the IDF launch a large-scale ground operation in Gaza, 
despite the possibility of casualties among IDF soldiers? 
It shouldnQt launch an operation: 38% (36%). 
It should launch an operation: 51% (58%). 
11% (5%) were undecided. 
 
-------- 
Mideast: 
-------- 
 
Summary: 
-------- 
 
Defense commentator Amir Oren wrote in the independent, left-leaning 
Ha'aretz: "The diplomatic payback [Ariel] Sharon demanded ... will 
vanish once John McCain or Barack Obama take office." 
 
Liberal columnist and anchor Ofer Shelach wrote in the popular, 
pluralist Maariv: "Removing the Hamas government by force will 
accomplish nothing and ... we must talk with it not only with force 
but also by all possible means, since force will not bring quiet." 
 
Dov Weisglass, who was former prime minister Ariel Sharon's top 
diplomatic advisor, wrote in the mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot 
Aharonot: "According to [Bush's Masada] statement, the guarantee of 
Israel's security is not only of the administration, but also of the 
entire nation: a personal obligation of every single American 
citizen." 
 
Senior columnist Nahum Barnea wrote on page one of the 
mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "It would be more 
correct to treat the United States as an ally, a partner in peace, a 
helper in war, rather than an apron to hide behind at the critical 
moment." 
 
Columnist Amos Gilboa wrote in Maariv: "Who will help [the Lebanese 
communities arm and set up militias]?  The West?  The Sunni Arab 
states that are for some reason called 'moderate'?  Nobody has 
lifted a finger for Siniora's government." 
 
The conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized: "The 
Saudis still need to overhaul their own fundamentally flawed 2002 
peace plan to make it a genuine starting point for improving 
Arab-Israel relations." 
 
Block Quotes: 
------------- 
 
I.  "The No-Return Point of a Return to Gaza" 
 
Defense commentator Amir Oren wrote in the independent, left-leaning 
Ha'aretz (5/19): "One thousand days after the disengagement, the 
'point of no-return' that the instigators of the withdrawal wished 
to establish has disappeared.  Instead, a new 'point of no-return' 
has emerged, pointing in the other direction: a 'return' to Gaza. 
The diplomatic payback [Ariel] Sharon demanded -- Bush's consent to 
leave the settlement clusters in the West Bank, along with the 
dubious interpretation of an American blessing for their further 
expansion -- all these will vanish once John McCain or Barack Obama 
take office.  Hamas's conditions for a cease-fire are nowhere near 
those set by Israel.  So far, Israel's military entry into Gaza has 
been delayed because of IDF demands that the political echelon first 
formulate an 'exit strategy.'  Now the General Staff has stopped 
waiting for a reply.  If the disengagement was the strategy for 
exiting Gaza, the only plan now really being put together is the 
strategy for exiting the exit strategy." 
 
II.  "To Talk, Not Just Use Force" 
 
Liberal columnist and anchor Ofer Shelach wrote in the popular, 
pluralist Maariv (5/18): "What remains?  It remains to wait -- until 
Hamas, which is under heavy pressure of its own, blinks first. Or, 
Heaven forbid, perhaps we cannot say that for fear of being accused 
of cynicism but what can we do -- something will happen after which 
we will have to act in the name of our boiling blood.  That is what 
happened in Operation Defensive Shield (which did not stop the 
terrorism either, and it was necessary to repeat it over and over), 
and was interpreted afterwards as Ariel Sharon waiting wisely for 
the right time for legitimization.  It remains to wait until the 
last traces of reasonable doubt disappear, as happened to us so many 
times in the past, and ended badly.  And only the alternative 
insight -- that removing the Hamas government by force will 
accomplish nothing, and that we must talk with it not only with 
force but also by all possible means, since force will not bring 
quiet -- only that insight has no takers.  When, among us, did it 
ever?" 
 
III.  "When the (American) President Makes a Promise" 
 
Dov Weisglass, who was former prime minister Ariel Sharon's top 
diplomatic advisor, wrote in the mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot 
Aharonot (5/18): "[In his address to the Knesset], in order to 
magnify the weight of American commitment to Israel's security, Bush 
mentioned Masada -- the prominent symbol of the heroic struggle of 
the few against the many -- and said, 'Masada shall not fall again,' 
since when the day comes that Israel must defend itself, 'IsraelQs 
population may be just over seven million.  But when you confront 
terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because the United 
States of America stands with you.'  According to this statement, 
the guarantee of Israel's security is not only of the 
administration, but also of the entire nation: a personal obligation 
of every single American citizen.  This is not only official policy, 
but also -- and perhaps primarily -- an expression of the Americans 
desire for Israel's secure existence as a consequence of profound 
ethical-moral recognition.  I would not be exaggerating if I were to 
say that no American president has ever made such statements before. 
 Although Bush is still in office, we should not make light of the 
significance of his statements.  In American political culture, an 
important presidential speech is not thrown into the wastebasket, 
but rather 'filed away' as part of the entire political-diplomatic 
legacy, and preserved for generations." 
 
IV.  "Words, Words, Words" 
 
Senior columnist Nahum Barnea wrote on page one of the 
mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (5/19): "In other days, 
the Americans would have sent the Sixth Fleet to anchor at Beirut 
harbor or bombed Hizbullah strongholds from the sea.   Not now. 
America is tired, emasculated, torn from within.  All it can give 
its proteges in the Middle East at the moment are words....  If the 
IAF strike -- according to foreign sources -- on the Syrian reactor 
on September 6, 2007 was intended to convey a message to Iran that 
it is not immune to a military blow, the paralysis that has taken 
hold of the U.S. and its allies in light of the Hizbullazation of 
Lebanon has conveyed the opposite message.  The deterrence was 
ruined.  From the standpoint of countries such as Egypt and Jordan, 
the outcome is harsh.  For Israel, it is destructive.  The lesson is 
simple, and it is as old as is the state: We have no one to rely on 
but ourselves.  Three hundred million Americans will only stand 
behind us if we do the job before them.   If we shun responsibility, 
we will find that the Americans, not to mention the Europeans, are 
fleeing much quicker than we are.  Therefore, it would be more 
correct to treat the United States as an ally, a partner in peace, a 
helper in war, rather than an apron to hide behind at the critical 
moment." 
 
V.  "If I Don't Take Care of Myself, Who Will?" 
 
Columnist Amos Gilboa wrote in Maariv (5/19): "[Hizbullah's show of 
force] was meant to tell all of us that it is the only force in 
Lebanon.... It must be remembered that since 1990 the communities in 
Lebanon do not have armed militias, except Hizbullah.  The lesson 
imparted on the other communities is the need to arm and set up 
militias.... Who will help them do so?  The West?  The Sunni Arab 
states that are for some reason called 'moderate'?  Nobody has 
lifted a finger for Siniora's government.  That was a reminder, and 
not only for the government and the communities of Lebanon: If I 
don't take care of myself, who will?" 
 
 
 
 
VI.  "Oil and the Saudis" 
 
The conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized (5/19): 
"The Saudis have come a long way from the days, after the 1973 Yom 
Kippur War, when they orchestrated the 1973 Arab oil embargo; and 
1979, when they opposed Egypt's peace treaty with Israel.... Gone 
are the days when the Saudis could single-handedly bring down oil 
prices and solve [energy-cost] problems.  Nor can we expect them to 
contain Iran by themselves. Still, they could be far more helpful on 
Lebanon, Hamas and Arab-Israel relations.  This newspaper has 
applauded the King for launching an interfaith dialogue among 
monotheistic religions and urged him not to boycott the Jewish state 
in this endeavor.  We have also applauded Saudi efforts to tear down 
the edifice of religious justification for Muslim terrorism.  With 
Lebanon's rivals meeting in Qatar, we'd like to see the Saudis 
leveraging their clout within the Arab League, against Hizbullah. 
And with Hamas again seeking a rapprochement with Fatah, the Saudis 
should insist the League embrace the Quartet's conditions for 
including Hamas in the Palestinian Authority.  Of course, the Saudis 
still need to overhaul their own fundamentally flawed 2002 peace 
plan to make it a genuine starting point for improving Arab-Israel 
relations.  Given the regime's origins, it is ironic that the 
inheritors of Wahhabism are today uniquely positioned to help bridge 
the civilizational gap between Islam and the West. Failing to do so 
will ultimately cost them, and us all, dear." 
 
JONES