Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08AITTAIPEI661, MEDIA REACTION: NATURAL DISASTERS IN CHINA AND BURMA;

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08AITTAIPEI661.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08AITTAIPEI661 2008-05-13 09:53 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0661/01 1340953
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 130953Z MAY 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8910
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8261
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 9504
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000661 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: NATURAL DISASTERS IN CHINA AND BURMA; 
U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage May 13 on the massive earthquake in Sichuan Province, 
China, and on the temporary shutdown of Taiwan's debt-ridden Far 
Eastern Air Transport Corporation (FAT). 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, a column in the 
pro-unification "United Daily News" said the earthquake in Sichuan 
and other recent issues constitute great challenges for China, while 
it eagerly pursues its rise in world politics.  A column in the 
pro-independence "Liberty Times" said the natural disasters in China 
and Burma provide good opportunities for the world to review whether 
the two regimes are civilized or not.  A column in the centrist, 
KMT-leaning "China Times" talked about several issues facing the 
United States, China and Taiwan after Ma Ying-jeou was elected 
Taiwan's new president.  An editorial in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taipei Times" criticized the United States' 
attitude towards Taiwan based on AIT Director Stephen Young's 
remarks in a press conference held on May 8.  End summary. 
 
3. Natural Disasters in China and Burma 
 
A) "May 12 [earthquake in Sichuan, China] Recalls of September 21 
[1999 earthquake in Taiwan] 
 
The "Black and White" column in the pro-unification "United Daily 
News" [circulation: 400,000] wrote (5/13): 
 
"... The earthquake [in Sichuan, China] happened during the power 
transition between the old and new government in Taiwan.  We also 
expect the DPP government could express timely solicitude to the 
Chinese victims based on humanity and should not be reserved or too 
cautious to take action because of its political viewpoint.  After 
all, [Taiwan's President Chen Shui-] bian administration has 
provided aid to [the victims] in Burma's floods [caused by Cyclone 
Nargis].  There is no reason to turn a blind eye to the devastating 
earthquake on the Mainland. 
 
"Although the earthquake is a searing pain to the Chinese victims, 
it even makes the Beijing authorities 'head scorched and forehead 
bruised' [Ed note: meaning it puts them in a very difficult 
position].  The opening of the Olympic Games is less than three 
months away.  Who would have thought that just after the drama of 
boycotting the Olympic torch, a massive earthquake would now occur. 
Troubles from inside and outside make the joyous Olympic Games seem 
like 'the head covered with dust and the face covered with dirt.' 
In the [present] circumstance of 'internal disorder and foreign 
invasion,' the Beijing authorities should experience difficulty with 
their so-called 'rise.'  If the political structure cannot receive 
credit from the world, and the economic infrastructure cannot stand 
the test of incidents such as a massive earthquake, then it will not 
be easy to have a real 'rise.' 
 
"[Chinese Premier] Wen Jiabao issued orders to provide relief to 
victims [when he was] on his plane headed to the disaster area 
yesterday.  He said, 'think of the people and do everything for the 
people.'  If 'the rise of China' can adhere to the highest principle 
of [pursuing] the welfare of 'the people,' China can acquire a more 
rigorous [basis], which will make China more apt at dealing with 
challenges from inside and outside.  The Olympic torch's facing 
boycotts everywhere and the relentless earthquake occurring in the 
pandas' habitat are like major apocalypses on the road to of China's 
rise. 
 
"The Taiwan people who have suffered seriously from the September 21 
(1999) earthquake should express concern to the Chinese victims in 
the May 12 earthquake." 
 
B) "A Touchstone of Civilization" 
 
The "Free Talk" column in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" 
[circulation: 720,000] wrote (5/13): 
 
"There are more and more disasters on the earth.  Hurricanes, 
tsunamis, earthquakes are heard often and [these disasters] easily 
take tens of thousands of lives.  Disasters are able to temper and 
refine human beings' noble souls.  By the same token, disasters can 
also reveal a regime's level of civilization. ... 
 
"Burma victims [suffering from the Cyclone Nargis] lack of food and 
medication.  The junta instead insists that relief from the outside 
can only be put into their hands and distributed by them.  [The 
Burmese junta] tries to take credit for other people's achievements 
and tries to deceive the Burmese people, who are barred from all 
information.  Besides, [the Burmese junta] disallows international 
media to conduct interviews inside the country; tries to hide the 
truth from the public; and covers up such a huge disaster.  When the 
junta's big officials went to give comfort and show concern to 
victims, it was surprising to see those victims lead their whole 
 
U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
families to stand outside the temporary tents to greet those high 
officials.  Such an authoritarian government is extremely brutal and 
ridiculous. 
 
"Unfortunately a massive earthquake occurred in China yesterday. 
The scale [of the earthquake] was not less than the Tangshan 
Earthquake [in 1976].  When the Tangshan Earthquake occurred, Mao 
Zedong was still alive.  People could see the level of [Mao's] 
autocracy and authoritarianism [judging from the reality] that the 
news of a disaster with more than tens of thousands casualties could 
be blocked totally.  The level of China's autocracy at that time was 
about the same as that of the Burmese junta.  A massive earthquake 
has now occurred thirty years later.  By China's performance in 
disaster relief, do people in the world have the chance to review 
whether [China] is more civilized and has made more progress?" 
 
4. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
A) "[Taiwan's President-elect] Ma Ying-jeou Takes Office; New Face 
Appearing in United States, China and Taiwan Relations" 
 
Kuo Chen-lung, the Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the China Times, wrote 
in the "International Column" of the centrist, KMT-leaning "China 
Times" [circulation: 400,000] (5/13): 
 
"... Most people in Taiwan advocate that the economy go first and 
that politics move [more] slowly.  But why the Mainland has to 
release economic [benefits] to Taiwan while there is no political 
gain [from Taiwan].  If there is no mutual understanding between 
each other [Taiwan and China] on future progress, it will be very 
difficult to have further cooperation. 
 
"After Ma Ying-jeou was elected, in the new triangular United 
States, China and Taiwan relations, the Taiwan side has stabilized. 
But [the Taiwan side] cannot be hampered or decided by the other two 
sides [the United States and China].  We, Taiwan, carry small 
weight, so we can only influence the other two sides by having 
bigger movements. 
 
"On the aspect of bringing Taiwan to the edge of danger, [Taiwan 
President] Chen Shui-bian's words and behaviors were not advisable. 
But on the aspect of shaking up the triangular relations, Ma can 
learn some tricks from Chen." 
 
B) "If That's How You Treat A Friend" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] editorialized (5/13): 
 
"No one, not even president-elect Ma Ying-jeou, could have been 
surprised last week when American Institute in Taiwan Director 
Stephen Young informed him that Washington had turned down his 
application to visit the US before his inauguration next Tuesday. 
 
"Despite the upbeat sound bites issued by Washington following Ma's 
victory and its ostensible desire for better and closer relations 
between Taipei and Beijing, last week's rejection was a sign of the 
shape of things to come. 
 
"Closer cross-strait relations or not, the US State Department and 
the White House are not about to change their longstanding policy of 
barring high-ranking Taiwanese government officials from visiting 
the US, which during President Chen Shui-bian's eight-year tenure 
served as a stark, if not humiliating, reminder of the reality of 
great power politics. 
 
"Another aspect of Washington's approach to Taiwan that is unlikely 
to change is the desire to sell it weapons. 
 
"To wit, news that a Ma visit to the US was 'not necessary' had 
barely registered when Young announced that the US remained 
committed to helping Taiwan modernize its military.  To be fair, 
though, one thing did change this time around: It seemed that 
encouraging Taiwan to import US beef was now a top-line policy, as 
Young mentioned it in the same breath as the F-16s. 
 
"What this meant was that Washington could continue to yield to 
Beijing's pressure and humiliate its ally, but please, please, buy 
our weapons and our beef.  We're your friend, as long as you remain 
a market for our goods. 
 
"This position is the result of different branches of government 
vying for different outcomes, and Young's speech was the channel 
through which these contradictory discourses were voiced.  While the 
White House and the State Department seek to mollify Beijing through 
engagement and the avoidance of sensitive issues such as Taiwan, 
others - such as the Pentagon - continue to seek to provide Taiwan 
with appropriate armaments, which is sure to anger Beijing. 
U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
 
"Sadly, while it isn't Washington's intention to humiliate the 
Taiwanese leadership or its people, the consequence of such public 
announcements is that other countries and international 
organizations will have no compunction in treating Taiwanese as 
second-rate global citizens. 
 
"In other words, Beijing's pressure on other countries isn't the 
only factor in how the international community has continued to snub 
Taiwan's efforts to be recognized as an equal. 
 
"Young's diplomatic slap in the face will have repercussions on how 
the WHO, to use one example, will deal with Taipei's application for 
membership or observer status later this month; or sports 
organizations, to use another, will continue to bar Taiwanese 
athletes from participating as Taiwanese or unfurling the national 
flag when they win a medal. 
 
"After all, if the world's only superpower and an ally of Taiwan can 
publicly treat it primarily as a market for its products, why should 
lesser partners care about it?" 
 
YOUNG