VZCZCXRO1536
RR RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHIL #1705/01 1210549
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 300549Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6713
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 4202
RUMICEA/USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEHDO/AMEMBASSY DOHA 1521
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3188
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 9637
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 5386
RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 4123

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ISLAMABAD 001705 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN PREL PK
SUBJECT: POVERTY IN PAKISTAN: WHOSE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT? 
 
 
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Pakistani government officials frequently cite 
poverty alleviation as one of President Musharraf's key economic 
legacies.  However, economic analysts frequently dispute the 
Government of Pakistan's (GOP) statistics. Separate studies 
conducted by the GOP and the World Bank indicate different 
estimations of the decline in poverty in Pakistan from 2000 to 2005, 
from which the most recent comprehensive poverty data dates. While 
both studies conclude that poverty decreased during the period in 
question, World Bank estimates point to a decline in poverty from 
34.46 percent of the population to 28 percent, less than the GOP's 
estimation of a decrease in poverty from 34.46 to 23.94 percent. 
World Bank data is likely more accurate and paints a more balanced 
view of the GOP's track record on poverty alleviation. 
 
¶2. (SBU) Summary continued:  A real concern is that approximately 50 
percent of Pakistan's population (80 million people) is clustered 
around the poverty line.   Income inequality has risen during the 
period and, coupled with gender disparity in employment and access 
to education, will continue to represent a significant challenge to 
the GOP's poverty alleviation campaign.  End Summary. 
 
Poverty alleviation under previous government 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
¶3. (SBU) Officials and representatives of President Pervez 
Musharraf's government frequently cite poverty alleviation as one of 
the President's most successful economic legacies.  However, 
economic analysts dispute GOP findings on the issue.  The most 
recent comprehensive poverty estimates date to the 2004-05 time 
period.  Separate calculations by the World Bank and the GOP both 
point to decreasing levels of absolute poverty, although at 
differing rates.  The GOP's Federal Bureau of Statistics estimates 
that the percentage of Pakistanis living below the poverty line 
decreased from 34.46 percent in 2000-01 to 23.94 percent in 2004-05. 
 
 
Differences between World Bank and GOP numbers 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
¶4.  (SBU) During the same period, urban poverty declined by 34 
percent and rural poverty by 28 percent.  According to GOP 
estimates, 36.45 million Pakistanis lived below the poverty line in 
¶2005.  World Bank data analysis also indicated a decrease in 
absolute poverty, dropping from 34.46 percent of the population 
living below the poverty line in 2000-01 to 29 percent in 2004-05, 
less of a decline than the GOP's estimate of 23.94 percent.  The GOP 
currently has no plans to examine more recent data on poverty levels 
this year. 
 
¶5. (SBU) Dr. A.R. Kemal, former Director of the Pakistan Institute 
of Development Economics, cites the use of differing consumer price 
indices as one reason for the discrepancy between GOP and World Bank 
estimates.  The GOP's Federal Bureau of Statistics used a primarily 
urban price-based consumer price index (CPI) to adjust the poverty 
line for inflation.  Dr. Kemal believes that the use of an urban 
price-based CPI cannot be applied to rural areas due to differences 
in consumption patterns and price differentials.  The World Bank, on 
the other hand, constructed its own CPI, incorporating the prices 
for goods in rural areas.  World Bank estimates show that absolute 
national poverty declined by only five percent versus the GOP's 
estimate of over ten percent. 
 
¶6. (SBU) The GOP set the poverty line for the 2000-05 period at Rs 
878.64 (USD 14.9) of personal consumption per month.  The GOP 
defines "extremely poor" as individuals whose monthly consumption is 
less than 50 percent of the poverty line, or below Rs 439 (roughly 
USD 7.44 at an average rupee/dollar exchange rate in the 2004-05 
time period). 
 
¶7. (SBU) Both GOP and World Bank poverty researchers concede that 
the use of 2000-01 as a base year, which incidentally was also a 
drought year, led to an overestimation of the poverty decline. 
World Bank Senior Economist Kasper Richter considers that because 70 
percent of Pakistan's population lives in rural areas, the use of 
2000-01 as a base year overestimates the decline in poverty.  43.37 
percent of Pakistanis work in the agriculture, forestry and fishing 
sectors and are particularly vulnerable to changes in agricultural 
production rates.  Much of Pakistan experienced drought-like 
conditions in 2000-01, increasing the number of Pakistanis 
technically considered below the poverty line.  Richter also 
observed that if 1998-99 was used as a base year instead of 2000-01, 
poverty would not have decreased as much as the GOP estimates. 
 
ISLAMABAD 00001705  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
¶8.  (SBU) Former Director of the Pakistan Institute of Development 
Economics Dr. A.R Kemal also remains skeptical of official poverty 
reduction figures, citing different sampling methods used in 2000-01 
and 2004-05 as a cause for concern.  He believes that data was not 
taken randomly and that the Federal Bureau of Statistics was not 
transparent in its calculations, despite repeated requests from NGOs 
to clarify data analysis procedures.  Many analysts estimate that 
around fifty percent of Pakistan's population is clustered around 
the poverty line; even a small decline in monthly income would push 
the majority of this group below the poverty line.  A threshold of 
2350 calories has been set as the minimum nutritional requirement; 
in Pakistan, cereals account for 50 percent of this requirement. 
 
Increased remittances decrease poverty 
-------------------------------------- 
 
¶9. (SBU) From 2001 until today, remittances increased dramatically, 
rising an average of over 40 percent per year to USD 5.49 billion in 
2006-2007.  While some of this increase was remittances being 
captured in the formal banking system, most experts consider that 
they increased dramatically during this period, playing a pivotal 
part in poverty reduction.  Studies in Pakistan show a statistically 
significant correlation between remittance levels and the overall 
decline in poverty.  Where government poverty alleviation programs 
provide indirect support to Pakistan's poor, remittances serve as 
direct budgetary support to recipients. 
 
Women at greater risk 
--------------------- 
 
¶10. (SBU) Women and children are most vulnerable to falling below 
the poverty line.  Pakistan ranks relatively low in the UN's Gender 
Development Index, scoring 0.468 versus 0.545 for India and 0.664 
for Indonesia.  The World Economic Forum's 2007 Global Gender Gap 
report scores Pakistan 126 out of 128 countries.  Roughly half of 
all women perform work unpaid in the home.  Of the women that do 
work outside of the home, 97.2 percent work in the low-income 
informal sector, concentrated in the agriculture, light 
manufacturing and domestic services sectors.  Young women continue 
to be at a disadvantage in access to education; only 20 percent of 
low-income women complete school up to the fifth grade. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
¶11. (SBU) Comment: While World Bank poverty reduction estimates are 
probably more valid, both institutions indicate that poverty 
declined in the 2000-01 to 2004-05 period.  The choice of 2000-01 as 
a base year likely overestimated poverty reduction, a fact that both 
sides agree on.  The decline in poverty should come as little 
surprise as the country benefited from sound macroeconomic policies, 
high rates of sustained growth, continued investment inflows, world 
economic conditions generally favorable to developing countries in 
the 2001-2005 period, increased foreign assistance and investment 
inflows and a dramatic rise in worker remittances.  End Comment. 
 
PATTERSON