Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08KHARTOUM351, FRANCE, EUFOR ISSUE CONFLICTING STATEMENTS ON FALLEN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08KHARTOUM351.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08KHARTOUM351 2008-03-10 14:15 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Khartoum
VZCZCXRO0371
OO RUEHGI RUEHMA RUEHROV RUEHTRO
DE RUEHKH #0351 0701415
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 101415Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0155
INFO RUCNFUR/DARFUR COLLECTIVE
RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/CJTF HOA
UNCLAS KHARTOUM 000351 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR AF/SPG 
ADDIS ABABA ALSO FOR USAU 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS KPKO UNSC AU SU CD EU
SUBJECT: FRANCE, EUFOR ISSUE CONFLICTING STATEMENTS ON FALLEN 
SOLDIER IN DARFUR 
 
 
1. (SBU) The European Union repatriated the body ofQoldier from 
the EU peacekeeping force in Chad, EUFOR, on March 7, as French 
President Sarkozy and EUFOR commander Patrick Nash issued 
conflicting statements on the events leading to the soldier's death. 
 While Nash apologized to Sudan for his peacekeepers "accidentally" 
crossing into Sudanese territory, Sarkozy condemned the Sudanese 
military for using "disproportionate force."  EU Special 
Representative for Sudan and EUFOR political representative Torben 
Brylle is "associating himself" with Nash's statement, Brylle's 
political advisor told Poloff on March 9. 
 
2. (SBU) The French Embassy in Khartoum has characterized Sudan as 
"relatively cooperative" in investigating the circumstances of the 
death.  Brylle, who met with Sudanese officials in Khartoum on March 
7, considers the issue with Sudan "closed," said his political 
advisor.  EUFOR positively identified the body on March 7 and is 
awaiting an autopsy in France before making any further 
determination, according to a French political officer in Khartoum. 
 
3. (U) On March 9, the "Sudan Tribune" reported that Sudan submitted 
a request to the EU for compensation pertaining to the incident. 
This would presumably include compensation for the families of the 
nomads who reportedly died when they were trying to place the body 
of the fallen soldier on a camel and a grenade exploded. 
 
4. (SBU) Comment: Sudan is seeking to gain maximum benefit from this 
incident to ensure that EUFOR respects Sudan's border.  Mistakes 
will occur, though, and it is somewhat alarming (though not 
surprising given Sudanese sensitivities) that Sudanese troops 
apparently are under orders to fire without question at Western 
soldiers who cross the border into Darfur.  Several questions 
remain, such as why the Sudanese soldiers did not assist the fallen 
French soldier after incapacitating him, and how the remaining 
members of the French EUFOR patrol returned to Chad without their 
vehicle, which reportedly was disabled and has not yet been 
recovered from Western Sudan. Certainly, the whole sorry incident 
seems to show a EUFOR force struggling to get itself established and 
acclimated to a new and difficult task. 
 
FERNANDEZ