Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO444, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/20/08

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO444.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO444 2008-02-20 08:08 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO2198
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0444/01 0510808
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200808Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1857
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 8574
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 6182
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9847
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 4759
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6785
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1758
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7826
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8424
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 TOKYO 000444 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/20/08 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
AMERICAN EMBASSY, TOKYO 
PUBLIC AFFAIRS SECTION 
OFFICE OF TRANSLATION AND MEDIA ANALYSIS 
INQUIRIES:  03-3224-5360 
INTERNET E-MAIL ADDRESS: otmatokyo@state.gov 
DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 
February 20, 2008 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Editorial: Defense Minister Ishiba's MOD reform plan raises 
questions (Nikkei) 
 
(2) China indicates no willingness to concede on gas field 
development despite plan for president's visit to Japan (Sankei) 
 
(3) LDP research commission approves in general outline bill 
amending AML: Administrative surcharge to target false labeling; 
Government stance of protecting consumers becomes clear (Nikkei) 
 
(4) Parliamentary league "Sentaku" to have 60 participants: Founders 
to meet today (Sankei) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Editorial: Defense Minister Ishiba's MOD reform plan raises 
questions 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
February 18, 2008 
 
Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba explained his plan to reorganize the 
Ministry of Defense (MOD) to the ministry's blue-ribbon reform 
panel, chaired by Tokyo Electric Power Co. advisor Nobuya Minami. 
His plan raised questions and concerns. 
 
Ishiba's plan is basically designed to reorganize the ministry into 
an organization of three functions -- (1) building up defense 
capabilities, (2) employment, and (3) accountability to the Diet and 
the public -- by integrating the MOD internal bureaus (non-uniform 
group) and the four staff offices (uniformed group) in order to 
establish a system in which the two groups cooperate in assisting 
the minister. 
 
The first question concerns the plan's weak connection to measures 
to prevent a recurrence of the bribery scandal involving former 
Vice-Defense Minister Takemasa Moriya. 
 
Moriya's dictatorial power coming from his ties to lawmakers was the 
primary cause of the scandal. Mr. Ishiba, as the person who 
appointed Moriya vice minister, must know it the best. There is no 
guarantee that another Moriya will not emerge if MOD is reorganized 
based on his plan. 
 
Second, can an organization reorganized by function by integrating 
the MOD bureaucrats and the Ground, Maritime, and Air Self-Defense 
Forces in uniform actually function? Cultural differences exist not 
only between the non-uniform and uniform groups but also between the 
Ground, Maritime, and Air Self-Defense Forces. Although the Joint 
Staff was established two years ago for integrated operations of the 
 
TOKYO 00000444  002 OF 005 
 
 
three forces, it has yet to produce any visible effects. 
 
Third is the possible effect on the SDF's international cooperation 
activities. An integration of the non-uniformed group and the three 
forces would increase the influence of the Ground Self-Defense 
Force, the largest of the three forces. Precedents tell that control 
of the reorganized by the GSDF, which is the least international 
among the three forces, will result in hesitance to conduct 
international cooperation activities. 
 
Fourth, the plan runs the risk of "GSDF bureaucrats" wielding 
significant influence by taking advantage of their numerical 
strength. Internal bureau civilian officers, the MSDF, and the ASDF 
would bow to them. If they forge ties to lawmakers, like Moriya did, 
it would be difficult to restrain them. 
 
The emergence of an elite group in Tokyo putting a slight on field 
troops might result in a second coming of the Imperial Headquarters 
that does not know the front line. That is apparently why the U.S. 
Defense Department, the world's largest bureaucratic organization, 
has two separate bodies: the organ to support the defense chief and 
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 
 
What is necessary now is not tinkering with the organization but 
bold personnel exchanges, including high-level officials of the 
internal bureaus and the four staff offices. That, too, never came 
to fruition, however. Organizational restructuring must not take 
place by capitalizing on the Moriya scandal. 
 
(2) China indicates no willingness to concede on gas field 
development despite plan for president's visit to Japan 
 
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
February 16, 2008 
 
The Chinese government has indicated that it has no intention of 
making a concession on the issue of gas exploration rights in the 
East China Sea simply for the reason that President Hu Jintao is 
planning to visit Japan, an informed source revealed yesterday. A 
Chinese representative said in working-level talks held late last 
year: "We don't want to link a settlement of the issue to the 
presidential visit to Japan." The governments of Japan and China are 
engaged in final coordination in a bid to bring about a settlement 
in vice-minister-level talks to be held on Feb. 20, but it remains 
to be seen whether both sides will be able to find common ground. 
 
Observers speculate that the Chinese government might be afraid that 
if it quickly reached an agreement for the reason of the planned 
presidential visit to Japan, its people could criticize the 
administration, claiming that the government had compromised with 
Japan. 
 
Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda and Premier Wen Jiabao agreed in their 
meeting late last year to grope for a solution at an early date over 
the gas field development row. The Japanese government has expressed 
its desire to reach a settlement by the time of the Chinese 
presidential visit to Japan in April. 
 
On the boundary line between Japan and China, Japan and China remain 
divided. Japan regards a line equidistant from the land territory of 
Japan and China as the boundary line, but China insists that the 
Okinawa Trough should be the boundary line. 
 
TOKYO 00000444  003 OF 005 
 
 
 
In the working-level talks prior the Japan-China summit late last 
year, China sounded out Japan on a plan to jointly develop gas 
fields in the waters near the Japan-claimed median line and on the 
Japanese side, showing its willingness to compromise for the first 
time. Japan, however, did not agree to this proposal, asserting that 
China should promise the development of gas fields in the oceanic 
areas on the Chinese side and near the median line. But China, which 
has deemed the Okinawa Trough as the boundary line, reportedly 
assailed that its people might lash out at even the joint 
development proposal in waters on the Japanese side, complaining 
that the government made a compromise. 
 
In the Japan-China talks, a Japanese representative proposed that 
the issue be brought into the International Court of Justice or the 
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, but China has refused 
this proposal. A Foreign Ministry source explained: "In recent 
precedent cases, the median line has been adopted in demarcating a 
border, so if the case is put on the trial, China's assertion might 
be denied." 
 
Foreign Ministry Vice Minister Mitoji Yabunaka is scheduled to visit 
China on Feb. 20 to discuss the issue with Chinese Foreign Ministry 
Vice Minister Wang Yi. But a final decision is now likely to be made 
in the planned between Prime Minister Fukuda and President Hu. 
 
(3) LDP research commission approves in general outline bill 
amending AML: Administrative surcharge to target false labeling; 
Government stance of protecting consumers becomes clear 
 
NIKKEI (Page 1) (Excerpts) 
February 15, 2008 
 
A bill amending the Antimonopoly Law, which the government will 
present to the regular Diet session, has been confirmed in general 
outline. The Fair Trade Commission (FTC) on Feb. 14 submitted it to 
the Research Commission on Antimonopoly Laws of the Liberal 
Democratic Party (LDP) and obtained its approval. As a feature, the 
bill is aimed at strengthening measures against an increase in 
bid-rigging activities in construction works. Administrative 
surcharges will be imposed on false labeling with the aim of 
thoroughly protecting consumers and small and medium-size 
businesses. Some in business circles are alarmed about the move. The 
challenge to the FTC will be how to secure transparency in imposing 
administrative surcharges and improve the system of filing a 
complaint against a ruling. 
 
According to the amendment bill, the amount of administrative 
surcharge imposed on companies that played a leading role in 
bid-rigging activities and cartels will be raised 50 PERCENT , 
compared with the present level. The FTC intends to curb the number 
of violations of the AML, by imposing heavy punishments on companies 
that play a leading role in unfair trade practices. One executive of 
a leading general construction contractor said, "An increase in 
antimonopoly surcharge rates would be unavoidable. However, a 
question remains on how to distinguish offending companies that 
played a leading role in unfair trade practices remains." 
 
In the meantime, the FTC also plans to improve a system of reducing 
administrative surcharges imposed on companies that voluntarily 
admit to unfair trade practices. The FTC hopes to toughen watchful 
eyes by increasing companies subject to the surcharge system so that 
 
TOKYO 00000444  004 OF 005 
 
 
it can secure more information on unfair trade practices. 
 
Unfair trade practices subject to surcharges are currently limited 
to bid-rigging activities and cartels. The coverage of the amendment 
bill, which attaches importance to the protection of consumers, will 
be expanded to include false labeling intended to deceive consumers 
with incorrect information. The rate of the surcharge will be 3 
PERCENT  of sales of the goods subject to the punishment. 
 
The abuse of preferred position, in which major companies force 
unfavorable trading on their subcontractors, will become subject to 
surcharges. The auto industry, where there are many sub-contractors, 
consists of primary parts manufacturers that directly trade with 
finished car-manufacturers, second-tier and third-tier parts 
manufactures. The auto industry's stance is that it would be 
necessary for group companies as a whole to tackle preventing unfair 
trade practices. 
 
Concerning unfair trade practices that will become subject to 
administrative surcharges in the revised law, Attorney Ishida, who 
is versed in the AML, expressed concern, "Unlike bid-rigging 
activities or cartels, the scope of unfair trade practices is 
unclear." 
 
Chances are that if administrative surcharges as well as orders to 
end unfair trade practices are imposed on offending companies, more 
complaints would be filed against FTC rulings. At present, the FTC 
is responsible for determining whether protests are justifiable or 
not. Industrial circles are unhappy with the situation with one 
source saying, "The present judge system, in which the FTC serves 
both as a public prosecutor and a judge should be done away with." 
Since a plan to reform the judge system cannot be prepared in time 
for inclusion in the amendment bill, the bill will be attached with 
an additional clause stipulating that the system is to be fully 
reviewed. The system will be reviewed within fiscal 2008. 
 
Many DPJ members are calling for the total abolition of the judge 
system. The dominant view in the LDP is to change the system into 
one under which complaints regarding unfair trade practices, such as 
bid-rigging activities, cartels and dumping, can be filed with a law 
court. Ishida said, "If the possibility of legal disputes increases, 
the FTC would be urged to be careful in determining facts. Should 
that occur, the overall number of investigations might decrease." 
 
(4) Parliamentary league "Sentaku" to have 60 participants: Founders 
to meet today 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
February 20, 2008 
 
Founders of a non-partisan parliamentarian league to support 
"Sentaku" (double meaning of "choice" and "cleaning up"), which is 
short for the "National Congress for Cleaning up (and making choices 
for) Japan from the Local Community and Working People's View 
(established by former Mie Prefectural Governor Masayasu Kitagawa 
and Miyazaki Prefectural Governor Hideo Higashikokubaru) will meet 
today at a hotel in Uchisaiwai-cho, Tokyo. The league is expected to 
be launched formally on March 2. The founders want to gather around 
60 members from both the ruling and opposition camps.  They are 
aiming at such efforts as completing a manifesto in cooperation with 
Sentaku.  However, the prevalent view in political circles is that 
the move is connected with political reorganization. 
 
TOKYO 00000444  005 OF 005 
 
 
 
The founders include eight Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) members, 
such as former Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and 
Technology Takeo Kawamura, Deputy Policy Research Council Chairman 
Hiroyuki Sonoda and Vice Election Committee Chairman Yoshihide Suga, 
eight Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) members, such as 
former Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Yoshihiko Noda and former 
Secretary General Yukio Edano, and two lawmakers from the New 
 
SIPDIS 
Komeito. Kawamura and Noda will likely be appointed joint 
representatives when the group is launched formally. 
 
One of the founders said, "It is a policy-oriented parliamentary 
league to reflect the views of local areas in the manifesto." 
However, many participants from the DPJ are lawmakers who have 
distanced themselves from President Ozawa. 
 
Sentaku is a private policy group launched on Jan. 20 by Kitagawa. 
Its aim is to bring about regional decentralization and policies 
that reflect the views of average citizens. 
 
SCHIEFFER