Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TAIPEI184, Taiwan Biotech: 2008 Outreach Proposals

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TAIPEI184.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TAIPEI184 2008-02-05 05:00 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXRO9420
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHIN #0184/01 0360500
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 050500Z FEB 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8089
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TAIPEI 000184 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE PLEASE PASS TO AIT/W AND EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PD, R, ECA/PE/V/F, 
EEB/TPP/ABT/BTT 
STATE PASS USTR/DAVID KATZ AND JARED RAGLAND 
USDA FAS FOR OSTA - Mike Henney and Melissa Clarkson 
USDA FAS FOR OCRA - Lori Smith 
USDOC FOR 4430/ITA/MAC 
 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD KPAO OEXC OIIP SENV TBIO TW
SUBJECT:  Taiwan Biotech: 2008 Outreach Proposals 
 
Ref: 07 STATE 160639 
 
1. (U) This is an action request. See paragraphs 4, 11, and 18. 
 
Background 
----------- 
 
2.  (SBU) Taiwan is the U.S.'s sixth largest agricultural export 
market.  In 2006, the United States exported more than USD 2.5 
billion of agricultural, fish and forest products to Taiwan, USD one 
billion of which was biotech products.  Taiwan has committed 
significant resources to domestic biotechnology research, but none 
of Taiwan's many locally-developed products have been approved for 
commercial development, due mostly to environmental concerns about 
biotechnology.  In addition, international firms seeking approval 
for biotech products in Taiwan often face requests for information 
that are not pertinent to food safety, and Taiwan's slow biotech 
approval process has sometimes threatened to disrupt trade. 
 
3.  (SBU) AIT/T believes that Taiwan has the potential to become one 
of the world's early adopters, commercializers, and exporters of 
biotechnology.  A biotech-friendly Taiwan would both increase 
overall U.S. exports of biotech products to Taiwan, and reduce the 
likelihood of costly disruptions to Taiwan's imports of U.S. biotech 
products.  To help achieve this goal, post would like to use USD 
37,465 of funds available under the EB Biotechnology Initiative to 
raise awareness of the benefits and safety of biotech products among 
Taiwan's key policy-makers, scientists, agricultural producers, and 
general public. 
 
Part One: U.S. Speaker Program (Workshop) 
----------------------------------------- 
 
4. (U) Proposal: Co-sponsor with a local NGO a one-day seminar or 
workshop on the future importance of biotech to Taiwan's economy, in 
conjunction with the Executive Yuan (EY) Council for Economic 
Planning and Development (CEPD) or similar pro-growth economic 
organization.  Focus would be on the safety of biotech products, 
Taiwan's strong indigenous biotech industry, and the possible 
economic benefits of biotech for high-quality economic growth in 
Taiwan. 
 
5. (U) Cost: USD 21,550.  Including: 
 
--No cost for the venue, which we could hold at the AIT/PAS American 
Culture Center (ACC). 
 
--No extra cost for lunch and refreshments, which will be covered by 
the co-sponsor. 
 
--USD 1000 to defray the cost of travel for researchers from outside 
greater Taipei.  This is essential to ensuring island-wide 
participation, especially from the more agriculture-dependent 
south. 
 
--USD 1250 for one day of simultaneous interpretation services. 
 
--USD 1300 for publications and small commemorative gift, such as 
pens or mugs, which usually cost about USD five per set.  Such gifts 
are customary in Taiwan, and not giving out some small commemorative 
item to the attendees would be unusual. 
 
--USD 18,000 for two speakers on U.S. and world biotech issues, 
including about USD 14,000 for two business-class airline tickets, 
USD 300 for materials allowance for two speakers, USD 1600 for USD 
200 honorarium for each speaker per day for four days (two days of 
travel, one day of speaking, and one rest day), and $1758 for three 
days of lodging and MI&E for two people.  Please note that AIT's 
speaker budget is extremely limited in FY 2008, and it won't be 
possible to fund such speakers without using these special biotech 
funds. 
 
6. (SBU) The target audiences: 20-30 agricultural researchers at key 
universities and institutes; 10-20 key policymakers at the 
Department of Health and the Council of Agriculture, 10 participants 
from regional agriculture institutions. 
 
7. (SBU) Specific agbiotech issues to be addressed: Proven safety 
and efficiency of biotech products, both from the United States and 
(potentially) Taiwan; positive outlook for future growth of Taiwan's 
indigenous biotech research industry; benefits of biotech products 
for Taiwan's food producers; benefits of low-pesticide biotech 
products for Taiwan's environment and public health; benefits of 
agricultural biotechnology and the adoption and development of 
 
TAIPEI 00000184  002 OF 003 
 
 
biotechnology in other countries; helping Taiwan researchers and 
regulators improve the commercialization of research. 
 
8. (SBU) U.S. policy objectives: Our overall effort is focused on 
giving Taiwan a stake in risk-based biotechnology regulation and 
thereby reducing the likelihood of trade disruptions due to concerns 
about biotechnology.   Encouraging Taiwan to commercialize some of 
its promising biotech research may turn Taiwan into an active 
supporter of biotechnology in the WTO and other fora.  Taiwan's 
support for the G-10 may also diminish over the long term if, as is 
likely, the new cultivars reduce area dedicated to rice production. 
 
9. (U) Proposed length of program: One-day seminar 
 
10. (U) Post responsible officers and contact information: Economic 
Officer Matthew O'Connor (o'connorme@state.gov), FAS Officer Alan 
Hallman (Alan.Hallman@usda.gov), and Cultural Affairs Officer Nick 
Papp (pappn@state.gov) 
 
 
Part Two: U.S. Speaker Program (Public Outreach) 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
11. (U) Proposal: Programming speakers from the United 
States--already in Taiwan on Part One of the proposal--to speak on 
biotech and biotech commercialization issues. Programs could include 
round-table discussions with academic and other experts contracted 
by the Taiwan authorities to draft food safety regulations for foods 
derived from microorganisms and/or animals created with modern 
transgenic techniques.  The speakers would share the U.S. experience 
and process of regulating biotech micro-organisms and/or animals, 
answer questions about the safety of these products, speak with 
policy-makers about the commercial outlook for this kind of 
biotechnology, and help instill confidence in the U.S. regulatory 
system. 
 
12. (U) Cost: USD 5900.  No cost for the travel to Taiwan, since we 
will piggyback this on Part One of the proposal.  Additional cost 
for three days of lodging and MI&E for each speaker would be USD 293 
* 3 = USD 879, or for two people = USD 1758, plus USD 200 honorarium 
for two speakers for three days of speaking and travel = USD 1200, 
USD 1250 per day for two days of interpretation = USD 2500, and 
about USD 200 per person for domestic travel expenses = USD 400) 
 
13. (SBU) The target audiences: Broad audiences of agricultural 
researchers at key universities and institutes, food-safety 
regulation experts, local and mid-level government officials, 
agricultural associations, influential scientists, and the general 
public. 
 
14. (SBU) Specific agbiotech issues to be addressed: Proven safety 
and efficiency of biotech products; positive outlook for future 
growth of Taiwan's indigenous biotech research industry; benefits of 
biotech products for Taiwan's food producers; benefits of 
low-pesticide biotech products for Taiwan's environment and public 
health; the importance of science-based safety assessment for GM 
crops; benefits of agricultural biotechnology and the adoption and 
development of biotechnology in other countries; helping Taiwan 
researchers and regulators improve the commercialization of 
research. 
 
15. (SBU) U.S. policy objectives: The overall effort is focused on 
giving Taiwan a stake in risk-based biotechnology regulation and 
thereby reducing the likelihood of trade disruptions due to concerns 
about biotechnology.   In addition, encouraging Taiwan to 
commercialize some of its promising biotech research may turn Taiwan 
into an active supporter of biotechnology in the WTO and other fora. 
 Taiwan's support for the G-10 may also diminish over the long term 
if, as is likely, the new cultivars reduce area dedicated to rice 
production. 
 
16. (U) Proposed length of program: three days of travel and 
events. 
 
17. (U) Post responsible officers and contact information: Economic 
Officer Matthew O'Connor (o'connorme@state.gov), FAS Officer Alan 
Hallman (Alan.Hallman@usda.gov), and Cultural Affairs Officer Nick 
Papp (pappn@state.gov) 
 
Part Three: U.S. Speaker Program ("Teach the Teachers") 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
 
18. (U) Proposal: Bring a Mandarin Chinese speaker well versed in 
agricultural biotechnology and instructional methods to Taiwan to 
 
TAIPEI 00000184  003 OF 003 
 
 
host educational programs and speaking engagements for high-school 
teachers and the general public. Media workshops are also possible. 
 
19. (U) Cost: USD 10,015.  Including about USD 7,000 for 
business-class airline tickets, USD 150 for materials allowance, USD 
1200 for USD 200 honorarium per day for six days (two days of 
travel, three days of speaking, and one rest day), $1465 for five 
days of lodging and MI&E, and about USD 200 for local travel costs. 
Please note that AIT's speaker budget is extremely limited in FY 
2008, and it won't be possible to fund such a speaker without using 
these special biotech funds. 
 
20. (SBU) The target audiences: High-school science teachers, with a 
secondary audience of the general Taiwan public. 
 
21. (SBU) Specific agbiotech issues to be addressed: Proven safety 
and efficiency of biotech products, both from the United States and 
(potentially) Taiwan; benefits of low-pesticide biotech products for 
Taiwan's environment and public health; benefits of agricultural 
biotechnology and the adoption and development of biotechnology in 
other countries. 
 
22. (SBU) U.S. policy objectives: This part of our biotech outreach 
effort would focus on giving Taiwan's secondary-level science 
teachers a better understanding of the science and safety of 
agricultural biotechnology, thereby increasing general knowledge of 
biotech and reducing trade disruptions due to unfounded public 
concerns about biotechnology. 
 
23. (U) Proposed length of program: Five days, including three days 
of programming plus two days of travel and one day of rest. 
 
24. (U) Post responsible officers and contact information: Economic 
Officer Matthew O'Connor (o'connorme@state.gov), FAS Officer Alan 
Hallman (Alan.Hallman@usda.gov), and Cultural Affairs Officer Nick 
Papp (pappn@state.gov).