Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08KHARTOUM262, GOSS OFFICIAL DISCUSSES OIL PIPELINES, WAR AND PEACE WITH

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08KHARTOUM262.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08KHARTOUM262 2008-02-23 14:21 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Khartoum
VZCZCXRO5503
PP RUEHROV
DE RUEHKH #0262/01 0541421
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 231421Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0016
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/CJTF HOA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 000262 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR AF/SPG, S/CRS, AF SE WILLIAMSON 
DEPT PLS PASS USAID FOR AFR/SUDAN 
DEPARTMENT PLS PASS TREASURY FOR OFAC 
ADDIS ABABA FOR USAU 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON ENRG UNSC SU
SUBJECT:  GOSS OFFICIAL DISCUSSES OIL PIPELINES, WAR AND PEACE WITH 
THE NORTH 
 
1. (SBU) (Summary) Consul General Juba met on February 20 with 
George Achor, Undersecretary in the Ministry of Presidential 
Affairs, to discuss the GoSS desire to attract American business 
interests to South Sudan, especially for the construction of a new 
oil pipeline to the south.  The discussion quickly turned to issues 
of war and peace, in which he expressed the strong opinion that war 
with the North was a near certainty after 2011, if not sooner.  End 
Summary. 
 
U.S. Investment in an Oil Pipeline Will Benefit the South 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 - - - - - - - - - 
2. (SBU) Achor opened the discussion by expressing his strong desire 
to see an American oil company develop Southern oil fields and build 
a new oil pipeline along the Ethiopian-Kenyan border to either 
Mombasa or Djibouti.  When told that current U.S. sanctions do not 
permit an American company to participate in such a venture, Achor 
expressed his dismay.  (Note:  According to the November 1, 2007 
OFAC "Final Rule," sanctions regulations prohibit participation by 
U.S. firms in any transaction relating to Sudan's petroleum or 
petrochemical industries, in any part of the country.  End Note.) 
Such a venture would only benefit the South, he said, not the 
national government.  A prohibition on Southern economic development 
of this kind forces the South to remain dependant on the North and, 
in the end, actually works to increase oil revenues to the NCP since 
all new oil found in the South will have to flow through the single 
existing pipeline to Port Sudan, where the NCP can continue to 
benefit from profits made on the new development of Southern mineral 
resources.  Developing an alternate Southern oil pipeline would deny 
the benefits of future oil development to the North, and it would 
only fully benefit the people of the South. 
 
3. (SBU) Such a Southern pipeline would be expensive, and not as 
economical as the already existing northern route, the Congen 
pointed out.  Achor agreed, but stated his opinion that war with the 
North is coming and that the existing pipeline was not viable in the 
long run.  With American expertise, he said, they could build a new 
one south in a matter of two years.   Congen responded that a war 
would mean the end of oil revenues for both sides since no business 
would risk working in a war zone where their facilities were sure to 
be bombed. 
 
"We Will Take the War to Khartoum" 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
4. (SBU)The Congen asked Achor why he was so sure war would break 
out.  Achor responded that the NCP would never let the South's 
mineral wealth go without a fight, for which, he said, the South is 
ready.  "This time we will take the war to Khartoum so that the NCP 
finally suffers the consequences of its actions."  When asked how 
that would happen, Achor expressed his confidence that other 
marginalized groups in the East and West of Sudan would join the 
fight, and that the SAF was weaker than most people realized. 
 
The South Will Secede, Whatever the Results in 2009 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - 
5. (SBU) The Congen asked if Achor had any hope that the elections 
in 2009 would take place.  Achor responded that if they did not, 
that would be the trigger for war.  If they did take place, he said 
Kiir would run and likely win the Presidency.  Asked if that didn't 
mean a unified Sudan, he said probably not because it was almost 
certain that the people of the South would vote for independence in 
2011 anyway.  He recounted how in a conversation with a German 
business delegation, Kiir was asked what he would do if elected 
President and the South voted for separation.  Kiir, he said, 
responded that he would resign the Presidency to stay with the 
South.  There was simply too much bitterness and distrust in the 
South to stay unified with the North. 
 
Comment 
- - - - 
6. (SBU) As is obvious, Achor is a hard liner on the issue of 
Southern independence.  However, his opinion is widely shared that 
long-standing Southern bitterness and distrust toward the North 
(exacerbated by the perceived continued NCP maneuvering to undermine 
the CPA) will result in a vote for independence come 2011 no matter 
what happens in the 2009 election. 
 
7. (SBU) Comment continued: As to the oil issue, it might well be 
worth considering whether the current policy banning American oil 
interests from doing business in the South actually does work to the 
NCP's advantage.  Allowing an American firm to at least bid on 
building a pipeline to Mombassa, were one to be built, would free 
the GoSS and any future independent Southern state from having to 
share new oil field revenues with a Northern government. 
 
KHARTOUM 00000262  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
 
FERNANDEZ