Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08AITTAIPEI63, MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08AITTAIPEI63.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08AITTAIPEI63 2008-01-15 02:45 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0014
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0063/01 0150245
ZNR UUUUU ZZH TAO
R 150245Z JAN 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7815
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7666
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8931
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000063 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS, 
U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language and English-language 
dailies all gave significant reporting and editorial coverage 
January 12-14 to Saturday's island-wide legislative elections, in 
which the KMT scored a landslide victory over the ruling DPP, 
winning a two-thirds majority in the newly downsized 113-seat 
Legislature.  The pro-Blue papers all rejoiced at the KMT's victory 
on their front pages, calling the result a no-confidence vote by the 
Taiwan public on the DPP's eight-year rule.  The pro-Green papers, 
on the other hand, said the Green camp's failures in governance led 
to the Blue camp's victory; they also expressed worries that, with 
the KMT being the majority in the legislature, it will mean a 
regression for Taiwan's democracy.  Both the pro-unification "United 
Daily News" and the centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" front-paged 
Monday the results of their latest opinion surveys, which indicated 
that support for the KMT's Ma-Siew ticket for the March presidential 
poll has soared to a new high, while support for the DPP's Hsieh-Su 
ticket has dropped to a new low. 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, a "United Daily News" 
analysis discussed the two referenda held in tandem with Saturday's 
legislative elections, which failed to obtain participation by the 
required fifty percent of all eligible voters to pass the threshold 
for validity.  The article expressed concern that President Chen 
Shui-bian will come up with more "pungent" measures to push for 
Taiwan independence in the run-up to the March presidential poll.  A 
column in the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" said the KMT should 
give some credit to President Chen for winning Saturday's elections. 
 An op-ed in the pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times," 
written by a U.S. professor at Harvard University, said, in contrast 
with the newspaper's normal editorial practice, that "the US does 
not have a national interest in helping Taiwan become a sovereign 
country with a seat at the UN."  End summary. 
 
3. Taiwan's Legislative Elections 
 
A)  "With Referenda Failing to Pass, Will Bian Roll out More 
Measures to Push for Independence?" 
 
Journalist Lee Chih-teh wrote in an analysis in the pro-unification 
"United Daily News" circulation: 400,000 (1/13): 
 
"The legislative elections have just concluded, and the two 
referenda held in tandem with the elections have also failed to pass 
the initial threshold, with less than 30 percent of the voter 
turnout.  The United States and China are both happy and worried to 
see such a result.  They are happy because the defeat of the 
DPP-initiated referendum on 'recovering the ill-gotten KMT party 
assets' may indicate that chances are slim for the 'UN referendum' 
to pass in March.  In the meantime, they are worried whether Chen 
Shui-bian will come up with more pungent measures to incite the 
campaign for the presidential election while fearing that 'UN 
referendum' would fail to achieve what he has desired. ... 
 
"The United States must be the first one to breathe a sigh of relief 
in seeing the defeat of the referenda, because mainland China has 
more than once indicated sternly to Washington that the UN 
referendum has stepped on the red line and that China will surely 
react once it is passed.  Having failed to communicate with the Chen 
administration several times, Washington turned to urge the Taiwan 
people, in the hope of defusing this time bomb in a democratic way. 
Judged by the current situation, the United States can at least feel 
less tense ... about the UN referendum. 
 
"In the wake of the DPP's severe defeat in the legislative 
elections, Washington and Beijing will surely be highly vigilant 
about the upcoming presidential poll.  This is because, given his 
corruption case is still under investigation, Chen is facing 
pressure not to lose.  No one is bold enough to rule out the 
possibility that Chen, with the aid of his trusted subordinates in 
the military and intelligence agencies, will try to create conflicts 
in the Taiwan Strait in exchange for the voters' support for the 
DPP and thereby conveniently impose martial law and extend his term 
of office. ..." 
 
B) "A-bian Has Done Huge Credit to the KMT" 
 
"... The DPP's defeat has not only terrified the pan-Green voters 
but also surprised the KMT.  The KMT has not done many things right 
over the past few years; neither has it come up with any good 
policies or nominated any good candidates.  But it was awarded such 
great kindness by the Taiwan voters Saturday.  It has no one but 
A-bian to thank for its victory.  It is not the KMT that has 
defeated the DPP, which still maintains its basic support rate of 38 
percent.  The DPP was defeated by A-bian this time.  Bian has turned 
this legislative election into his personal campaign; the more he 
threw himself into the campaigning, the stronger the backlash 
against the DPP became. ... 
U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
"This legislative election [result] came as a severe punishment for 
A-bian; it was also good instructional material for democracy.  The 
defeat for the DPP may not necessarily indicate a regression of 
democracy.  Once the system of power transfer is firmly established, 
democracy will become more stabilized.  Democracy and reforms are 
not a monopoly of any political party.  But the test for the KMT has 
yet to start." 
 
4. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
"Taiwan and Fear in US-China Ties" 
 
Joseph S. Nye, a professor at Harvard University, opined in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] (1/14): 
 
"... In principle, cross-strait tensions need not lead to conflict. 
With increasing change in China and growing economic and social 
contacts across the Strait, it should be possible to find a formula 
that allows the Taiwanese to maintain their market economy and 
democratic system without a placard at the UN.  The US has tried to 
allow for this evolution by stressing two themes: no independence 
for Taiwan and no use of force by China. But given the danger that 
could grow out of political competition in Taiwan or impatience in 
the People's Liberation Army, the US would be wise to encourage more 
active contacts and negotiations between the two sides.  The US has 
a broad national interest in maintaining good relations with China, 
as well as a specific human rights interest in protecting Taiwan's 
democracy. But the US does not have a national interest in helping 
Taiwan become a sovereign country with a seat at the UN, and efforts 
by some Taiwanese to do so present the greatest danger of a 
miscalculation that could create enmity between the US and China. 
Some Chinese already suspect the US of seeking an independent Taiwan 
as an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" against a future Chinese enemy. 
They are wrong, but such suspicions can feed a climate of enmity. 
..." 
 
YOUNG