Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07SAOPAULO988, SUMMER WORK TRAVEL PROGRAM CONTINUES TO BE SUCCESSFUL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07SAOPAULO988.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07SAOPAULO988 2007-12-18 14:16 2011-07-11 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Sao Paulo
VZCZCXRO4596
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHSO #0988/01 3521416
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 181416Z DEC 07
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7757
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 8900
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 8494
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 3925
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 2989
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 3235
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2549
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0637
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 2246
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ 3635
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAO PAULO 000988 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR CA/P, CA/VO/F/P, ECA/EC/PS, ECA/EC/CU, WHA/BSC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: CVIS KFRD OEXC ELAB SMIG BR
SUBJECT: SUMMER WORK TRAVEL PROGRAM CONTINUES TO BE SUCCESSFUL 
 
1. SUMMARY.  Congen Sao Paulo attended an estimated 7726 students in 
this year's Summer Work Travel (SWT) season, a 10 percent increase 
over last year.  The vast majority of the students were 
well-prepared and qualified for the program.  Brazilian exchange 
agencies predict that growth will continue next year.  Congen Sao 
Paulo found that the best way to adapt to the growing SWT market was 
increased outreach and organization, which allowed agencies and 
sponsors to better understand the visa process and regulations and 
the Consulate to better track participants.  End Summary. 
 
------------------------------------------- 
SWT Program Grows While Maintaining Quality 
------------------------------------------- 
 
2. In this year's SWT season, Congen Sao Paulo adjudicated the 
applications of 7226 students over twelve days allocated only to 
these students and another 500 SWT students scheduled on regular 
days.  This was a 10 percent increase over last year's 7026 
students.  While Congen Sao Paulo expected to adjudicate 8900 
students this year, this estimate proved too high.  Brazilian 
exchange agencies believe that the fall in the exchange rate between 
the Brazilian real and the U.S. dollar discouraged students, as it 
was less cost-friendly. 
 
3. The majority of the students' SWT visa applications (98.5 
percent) were approved.  The main reason for visa denials was weak 
English kills, cited in 63 percent of all denials.  Weak uiversity 
ties, either older students just starin school or students who had 
skipped several semesers, accounted for 40 percent of all 
refusals. 
4. Beginning this year, Mission Brazil enforced standard 
participation dates from 15 November to 15 March.  Congen Sao Paulo 
experienced good compliance with these dates, with only 18 students 
denied visas because of dates outside of this range.  Conoffs had 
performed a large amount of outreach to both Brazilian agencies and 
U.S. sponsors to explain these dates and believe that this was a 
major factor in increasing compliance. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
Brazilian Market is Organized and Booming 
----------------------------------------- 
 
5. Brazil has a very organized exchange agency market.  This year 
Congen Sao Paulo interviewed students from 34 different agencies 
located throughout the country.  The agencies ranged from small, 
sending only 11 students, to large, sending over 1700 students. 
Overall they did an excellent job prescreening students, as 
evidenced by the 98.5 acceptance rate.  The variation in refusal 
rates by agency was only 2 percentage points. 
 
6. Brazilian exchange agencies believe that the SWT program will see 
the most growth of all exchange programs.  Demand for the program 
has been growing strongly over the past 5 years.  Many agencies 
found that they reached the maximum number of students that they 
could attend this year while maintaining the quality screening and 
customer service.  As the more established agencies begin to slow 
the pace of recruitment, they predicted that other, possibly less 
responsible, agencies will open to meet the growing demand. 
 
7. While many agencies expect the SWT market to continue growing, 
they note that other opportunities are opening in other countries. 
Employers in Australia and Canada, in particular, are entering the 
Brazilian market looking to fill work and travel positions.  In 
addition, with the strict enforcement of the November 15 to March 15 
dates this year, many employers moved away from J1 programs to H2B 
programs.  Agencies predict, however, that this move was temporary 
and that employers will return to J1 programs because of the 
difficulty in obtaining H2B positions. 
 
--------------------------------------------- 
Outreach Clarifies Process and Qualifications 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
8. Conoffs in charge of the J portfolio focused heavily this year on 
outreach.  Officers attended job recruitment fairs, orientations, 
and information meetings and held meetings with U.S. sponsors and 
Brazilian agency representatives, reaching approximately 2000 
students, 35 U.S. sponsor and employer representatives, and 12 
different exchange agencies.  At each opportunity, Conoffs explained 
the importance of exchange programs to the U.S. government and our 
 
SAO PAULO 00000988  002 OF 002 
 
 
excitement about the SWT program, as well as how the visa process 
works and how officers evaluate candidates for this program. 
 
9. Feedback on outreach efforts was very positive.  Agencies and 
students noted that the visa process was much more transparent this 
year, students were less nervous, and there was an open channel for 
communication with the Consulate.  Repeated outreach efforts showed 
tangible results with the third largest exchange agency, which sent 
over 700 students this year.  Last year, this agency had a ten 
percent refusal rate, this year the rate was only 3.7 percent. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
Date Restrictions: Much Ado About Nothing 
----------------------------------------- 
 
10. This year Mission Brasilia implemented standard participation 
dates from 15 November and 15 March.  While Brazilian exchange 
agencies, U.S. sponsors and employers were initially very worried 
about the enforcement of the standard participation dates, most 
agencies agree that they had little impact on the program overall. 
Alan Pakes, the director of Invista em Voce, an agency that 
processed about 200 students, said, "The enforcement of these dates 
helps us convince students to return to classes at the beginning of 
the next semester." 
 
11. The main impact of the date restriction was that ski lodges, 
which had previously recruited heavily in Brazil, decreased the 
number of positions for Brazilians, as their high season stretches 
into April.  Agencies met Brazilian demand, however, by increasing 
their spots in other areas, i.e, fast food.  Nevertheless, several 
agencies remain concerned that any further date restrictions could 
cause a severe decline in demand for Brazilians. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
Increased Organization Improves Processes 
----------------------------------------- 
 
12. Congen Sao Paulo also increased its oversight of SWT agencies. 
In July, we met with the agencies and required them to register and 
provide contact information and information about recruiting 
processes in order to participate this year.  We also required them 
to bring two representatives to guide their students through the 
process. Agencies were given sample folders that showed all required 
and recommended documents.  Congen Sao Paulo also required that each 
student bring a letter from their agency, which helped Conoffs to 
track issuances and refusals.  Conoffs gave tours to agency 
representatives before their interview days, so that they were 
familiar with the process and could explain it to their students. 
 
13. As a result, students were better prepared for their interviews, 
with the majority of them arriving with documents in order.  This 
allowed for a faster process and less stress.  One student 
commented, "The interview was super calm, not a seven-headed 
monster." 
 
14. Interviewing Conoffs also had more information about individual 
agencies and their screening processes and monitored refusal rates 
by agency as the season progressed.  We contacted agencies when we 
noticed a rise in refusal rates and explained why students were 
refused.  Congen Sao Paulo also requires that each agency send a 
report in April showing how many students applied to their program, 
how many they accepted, how many received visas, and how many 
returned at the end of the program.  Agencies must account for the 
status of each student who did not return to Brazil.  The Consulate 
hopes that this encourages agencies to be more accountable for their 
students. 
 
15. COMMENT.  The growing SWT program presents a challenge for 
Congen Sao Paulo, which must accommodate a large number of students 
in a short period of time.  Increased organization and outreach 
greatly improved this year's season.  Students, agencies, and U.S. 
employers and sponsors had better understanding of the regulations 
that guide the visa process.  Conoffs were able to organize the 
reserved days to better accommodate agencies and provide increased 
agency oversight.  This contributed to better prescreening and 
organization by agencies, a decrease in the refusal rate, and an 
easier work flow.  Conoffs hope that these efforts will allow the 
Consulate to meet the needs of the program as it continues to grow 
in Brazil.  End Comment. 
 
#White