Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07PRETORIA4193, DEPFORMIN PAHAD CONDEMNS NEW U.S. ZIMBABWE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PRETORIA4193.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07PRETORIA4193 2007-12-13 14:20 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
VZCZCXRO0953
RR RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHSA #4193 3471420
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 131420Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2970
INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS PRETORIA 004193 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT FOR AF/S S. HILL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL ZI SF
SUBJECT: DEPFORMIN PAHAD CONDEMNS NEW U.S. ZIMBABWE 
SANCTIONS 
 
REF: A. PRETORIA 4154 
 
     B. STATE 161333 
     C. PRETORIA 3425 
 
1. (U) South Africa condemned "till the cows come home" the 
new U.S. targeted sanctions against Zimbabwe.  During a 11 
December press conference, DepForMin Aziz Pahad said that 
imposing sanctions on the children of Zimbabwean leaders is 
"collective punishment of a non-sensical nature" which will 
not help the process.  On the addition of new ZANU-PF 
officials to the targeted sanctions list, Pahad suggested 
this step will not "take us, at this crucial stage, any 
further."  He added that public criticism of the Government 
of Zimbabwe is ineffective, arguing that "the world of 
politics would be very easy if all that was required was 
condemnation." 
 
2. (SBU) During Pahad's press conference, he highlighted the 
progress by the Mbeki-led Southern African Development 
Community (SADC) Zimbabwe facilitation, claiming 
optimistically that "sooner rather than later, annnouncements 
will be made that at last the Zimbabweans . . . are helping 
themselves to find a Zimbabwean solution which can be the 
ONLY lasting solution" (highlight in Department of Foreign 
Affairs transcript of remarks).  (NOTE: Pahad and other SAG 
officials have similarly predicted the positive conclusion of 
the SADC talks for months (see for example ref C).  END NOTE.) 
 
3. (U) On the recently-concluded European Union-Africa Summit 
in Lisbon, Pahad attempted to portray the discussion of 
Zimbabwe as healthy, with both sides putting forward their 
perspectives.  He noted that nearly all the European leaders 
expressed support for President Mbeki's facilitation efforts. 
 
4. (SBU) COMMENT:  Pahad's reaction to the new U.S. targeted 
sanctions is predictable, albeit frustrating.  As a matter of 
policy, South Africa rejects sanctions as a foreign policy 
tool.  Announcement of new sanctions during -- what they 
optimistically hope is -- the sensitive, final days of their 
SADC facilitation effort in Zimbabwe is not welcomed.  END 
COMMENT. 
BOST