Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07PARIS4719, FRENCH SUGAR BEET GROWERS SUPPORT BIOTECH

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PARIS4719.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07PARIS4719 2007-12-14 15:24 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
VZCZCXRO2173
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHFR #4719 3481524
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 141524Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1489
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2785
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
UNCLAS PARIS 004719 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BRUSSELS PASS USEU FOR AGMINCOUNSELOR 
STATE FOR OES; EUR/ERA(GRAY); EEB/TPP/ABT/BTT (BOBO); 
STATE PASS USTR FOR MURPHY/CLARKSON; 
OCRA/CURTIS; 
STA/SIMMONS/JONES/HENNEY/SISSON; 
EU POSTS PASS TO AGRICULTURE AND ECON 
GENEVA FOR USTR, ALSO AGRICULTURE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR SENV ECON ETRD EU FR
 
SUBJECT: FRENCH SUGAR BEET GROWERS SUPPORT BIOTECH 
 
1. During its annual conference in Paris on December 4, the French 
Sugar Beet Growers' Association (CGB), representing 35,000 French 
sugar beet growers, openly expressed its support for biotechnology. 
The chairman, Dominique Ducroquet, reiterated that in order to 
remain competitive, French sugar beet growers need to have access to 
all available technological improvements, including biotechnology. 
The farm audience applauded this statement. Ducroquet also urged the 
Minister of Agriculture, who was present, not to listen to the 
"merchants of fear," a term used to describe anti-biotech NGOs. 
2. Ducroquet criticized the attitude of the Government which, in his 
view, listens more to NGOs ("the groups who talk") than to farm 
groups and farm unions ("the groups who act"). In his speech at the 
conference, Ag Minister Barnier did not mention biotech. 
 
3. Seed companies and scientists made presentations on the benefits 
of biotech. The German seed company KWS claimed its biotech programs 
was able increase sugar beet yields, enhance quality and reduce 
costs of production. 
 
4. A specialist from the French Technical Institute for Sugar Beets 
cautioned that, unlike in the U.S., there are wild native plants 
related to the sugar beet in the EU, increasing the risk of pollen 
contamination. He stated that a sterile biotech sugar beet could 
address this problem.  A scientist and deputy General Director from 
INRA (French Agricultural Research Institute) delivered a statement 
supporting biotechnology which the audience applauded, emphasizing 
its potential to increase production and productivity. 
 
5. Comment: This widely-attended (500 plus) conference was 
significant as it demonstrated biotech support beyond the corn 
growers. Until now, the corn farmers' union has been the most 
solidly pro-biotech producers' union. End Comment. 
 
STAPLETON