Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07KHARTOUM2048, HSP DELAYS REQUIRE LEADERSHIP

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07KHARTOUM2048.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07KHARTOUM2048 2007-12-27 11:58 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Khartoum
VZCZCXRO0193
OO RUEHGI RUEHMA RUEHROV
DE RUEHKH #2048/01 3611158
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 271158Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9618
INFO RUCNFUR/DARFUR COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/CJTF HOA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 002048 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR AF/SPG, S/CRS 
DEPT PLS PASS USAID FOR AFR/SUDAN 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO SOCI AU SU UNSC
SUBJECT: HSP DELAYS REQUIRE LEADERSHIP 
 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: United Nations (UN) and African Union (AU) 
officials must rapidly address key issues required for ensuring that 
the Chinese and Bangladeshi HSP units become operational.  While 
there will always be some excuse for delay, the units have the 
equipment necessary to do their jobs in the immediate term; the only 
thing lacking is the leadership to make them go out and do it.  At 
its current pace, the UN-AU Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) will have 
little to show for itself on January 1 and may have difficulty 
absorbing additional troops given delays in construction of the 
"supercamp." END SUMMARY. 
 
"THEY ALREADY HAVE WHAT THEY NEED" 
--------------------------------- 
2. (SBU) Based on a December 22 conversation between FieldOff and 
UNAMID Chief of Integrated Support Services (CISS), the UN estimates 
that the Chinese engineering unit of the HSP could start work in 
Nyala using the equipment it presently possesses.  According to the 
CISS, the advance party of Chinese engineers currently in Nyala has 
equipment, vehicles and camp support stocks sufficient to manage 
operations until its heavy equipment - which consists of one grader 
and one bulldozer - arrives.  This equipment, traveling over land 
via commercial contractor, was supposed to have reached Nyala ten 
days ago. 
3. (SBU) The CISS said that equipment deficits are merely an excuse 
for Chinese inactivity, rather than the bona fide cause of it.  He 
attributed the failure of the Chinese unit to execute its mandate to 
several factors.  First, he noted the Chinese contingent commander's 
(understandable) insistence on area protection for the unit's 
movements between the PAE Forward Operating Base where it is lodged 
and the site of the "supercamp" it is to construct (called the 
"Green Field"). 
 
4. (SBU) The Nigerian battalion that would provide this area 
protection presents a second problem, according to the CISS.  These 
troops claim they are insufficiently equipped to provide proper 
protection, but the CISS insists they are not short of anything 
which "isn't already in PAE stores" (including tents and radios) and 
which could not have been provided to them by AMIS.  The CISS noted 
there is a general reluctance to be "the first to the Green Field" 
among elements intended to deploy there.  He alleged that this 
sentiment is shared by the Bangladeshi Formed Police Unit (FPU) in 
Nyala, which despite lacking only one APC, a water truck and some 
small equipment, refuses to deploy before the Chinese "test the 
waters." 
 
5. (SBU) The final problem, according to the CISS, comes from the 
absence of an Operational Order instructing the Chinese and 
Bangladeshis to move.  The CISS noted that this should be a routine, 
two-day process: the Force Commander (FC) should issue the order, it 
should be co-signed by the Police Commissioner, and then issued to 
the Nigerian battalion, the Chinese engineers and the Bangladeshi 
FPU.  Issuance of this order, however, has been complicated by what 
the CISS characterizes as a "debate" among the various command and 
control structures at play.  Because the Chinese and Bangladeshi 
units are part of the Heavy Support Package, they technically fall 
under the authority of the UNMIS FC, vice the AMIS/UNAMID FC.  He 
said this has created friction across the chains of command and 
resulted in delays.  The CISS reports that similar tensions exist 
between the AMIS Sector South Commander and the Chinese contingent 
commander.  The CISS predicted that none of these players, 
especially the "multi-hatted Force Commander," will move on getting 
those units deployed before January 1. 
 
AMIS DEPUTY FC: NO DEPLOYMENT PLAN 
---------------------------------- 
6. (SBU) The lack of a deployment plan is another factor delaying 
deployment of these units.  The UNAMID Deputy Force Commander told 
FieldOff December 22 that the UNAMID deployment plan was a 
prerequisite for issuance of any Operational Order.  He said the 
original plan submitted to UN Headquarters in New York must be 
revised to reflect the re-structuring of the area of operations from 
eight to three sectors.  The Deputy FC confessed that this revised 
plan has not yet been re-submitted to New York for authorization and 
is not likely to be submitted until after January 1, when the UNAMID 
Chief of Operations and FC are back in El Fasher.  The Deputy FC 
insisted that UNAMID leadership will not wait for the entire 
deployment plan to be approved before implementing priority parts of 
it, but noted that nothing will start until the Chinese are fully 
equipped and staffed.  He said he did not expect the Chinese to 
begin work in earnest until March 2008. 
 
7. (SBU) The Deputy FC opined that area protection should not be an 
obstacle to Chinese deployment.  He said such protection need not be 
more sophisticated than an infantry battalion cordoning off the 
Chinese area of operations, and he assured FieldOff that the 
Nigerians are ready and able now to carry out this task. 
 
8. (SBU) COMMENT: With the Force Commander absent from El Fasher, 
 
KHARTOUM 00002048  002 OF 002 
 
 
the types of decisions required to move deployment forward will not 
be made until sometime in January or later.  The FC did not chair a 
planned December 22 AMIS-UNAMID meeting on transition due to a late 
return from his U.S. visit.  He is now in Addis Ababa and is 
expected to return in early January.  The FC is the last word on 
every document that authorizes the steps involved in deployment - 
from finalizing the deployment plan to signing off on the 
operational orders.  Leadership is required to ensure that UNAMID 
actually deploys the assets it currently has at its disposal.  At 
its current pace UNAMID will have little to show for itself on 
January 1, and will be hard pressed to be able to absorb additional 
troops before March due to delays in construction of the supercamp. 
 
9. (SBU) Tripoli minimize considered. 
 
POWERS