Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07HELSINKI878, FINLAND: VIEWS TO RESOLVE KOSOVO STATUS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07HELSINKI878.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07HELSINKI878 2007-12-13 13:10 2011-04-24 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Helsinki
VZCZCXYZ0005
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHHE #0878 3471310
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 131310Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3955
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE
RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE 0042
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0084
RUEHPS/USOFFICE PRISTINA 0040
C O N F I D E N T I A L HELSINKI 000878 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/12/2017 
TAGS: PREL PGOV YI FI
SUBJECT: FINLAND: VIEWS TO RESOLVE KOSOVO STATUS 
 
REF: STATE 165486 
 
Classified By: PolChief Greg Thome for reasons 1.4 (b) & (d) 
 
 1. (C) PolChief delivered subject demarche to Finnish MFA 
Balkans Office Director Juha Ottman.  Ottman said that the 
GoF fully shares US views on nearly all points, including the 
need to return to full implementation of the Ahtisaari 
proposals in the likely event that Kosovo's final status 
cannot be resolved at the UN Security Council.  Finland will 
join the US and a preponderance of EU member states in 
recognizing an independent Kosovo in the event of a 
unilateral declaration of independence. 
 
2. (C) Ottman highlighted three problematic issues that have 
arisen in the EU's internal discussions and emphasized that 
the GoF supports none of them.  These include (1) a call from 
certain MS for extending the Troika-led negotiating period; 
(2) arguments from some that recognizing a Kosovar 
declaration of independence could have a destabilizing effect 
in Bosnia or elsewhere; and (3) calls by some for the ESDP 
Mission in Kosovo to proceed even while the final status 
question remains unresolved.  Finland shares none of these 
views.  In particular, Ottman emphasized, final status must 
be resolved in order for the ESDP and the ICO missions to 
have any hope of success.  Finland also views UNSCR 1244 as 
providing sufficient authority for a international presence 
even after a declaration of independence. 
 
3. (C) Ottman did mention that the EU is likely to urge 
Pristina not to unilaterally declare independence prior to 
the Serb presidential elections Feb. 3.  Initially Finland 
was suspicious of this approach, aware that it would have to 
be handled with enormous care in order to avoid creating any 
gray areas for Belgrade to further exploit.  However, Ottman 
said, the EU has concluded that if any Serb manipulation 
beyond the Feb. 3 date appears evident, the EU will simply 
"give Pristina the green light."  Based on this, Finland will 
not block consensus on this point. 
 
WARE