VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #2643/01 3600932
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260932Z DEC 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7665
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7583
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8854

UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 002643 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: SECRETARY RICE'S STATEMENT ON TAIWAN'S UN 
BID REFERENDUM 
 
¶1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused 
December 22-26 news coverage on Secretary of State Condoleezza 
Rice's criticism of Taiwan's referendum on a bid to enter the UN 
under the name of "Taiwan" as "provocative," and President Chen 
Shui-bian's response.  Meanwhile, where the mausoleums of Chiang 
Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo should be moved to also attracted much 
media attention as it may become another campaign issue for the 
upcoming elections. 
 
¶2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, an editorial in the 
pro-independence "Liberty Times" urged the U.S. to pay more 
attention to China's moves aimed at changing the status quo.  The 
pro-independence, English-language daily "Taiwan News" questioned in 
an editorial U.S. support for Taiwan's democracy.  A commentary in 
the pro-independence, English-language daily "Taipei Times" said the 
UN referendum can be a bargaining chip for Taiwan.  The centrist, 
KMT-leaning "China Times" editorialed that the U.S. has been 
ignoring the changes in Taiwan public opinion as its self-identity 
grows.  Another commentary in "China Times" speculated that the U.S. 
is holding bargaining chips to compel Chen Shui-bian to submit [to 
U.S. pressure].  The conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
daily "China Post" said in an editorial that both the Taiwan 
representative in Washington and the U.S. representative in Taipei 
should go home because they failed to accomplish their missions 
regarding the UN referendum.  End Summary. 
 
A) "How can the U.S. Be Indifferent to China's 'Changing the Status 
Quo' across the Taiwan Strait" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation 720,000] 
editorialed (12/25): 
 
"... The U.S. is concerned about the referendum on Taiwan's bid to 
enter the UN because of worries that the cross-Strait status quo 
would be disrupted.  There is agreement about this between the U.S. 
and Taiwan.  However, we believe the U.S. has made a mistake over 
the object of its concern.  It is not Taiwan but China, which has 
constantly kept changing the status quo.  One of the moves is 
the...new air route only 4.2 nautical miles away from the center 
line of the Taiwan Strait.  This is constraining Taiwan's national 
defense depth.  In order to maintain the status quo, shouldn't the 
U.S. express its concern [over this] more actively?  The purpose of 
the 'Taiwan Relations Act' is to 'help maintain the peace, security, 
and stability of the West Pacific.'  As the U.S. is concerned about 
the 'four-noes,' should it in fact be more concerned about the 
premise: 'as long as China does not intend to use force against 
Taiwan'?" 
 
B) "U.S. Must Respect Strategic Value of Taiwan Democracy" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language daily "Taiwan News" 
[circulation: 20,000] editorialized (12/25): 
 
"... Regretfully, Rice repeated Washington's misunderstanding that 
the referendum on whether to join the UN under the name of 'Taiwan' 
is a government 'policy' and ignores the fact that the initiative is 
being put on the ballot together with the presidential election on 
March 22 because of signatures of 2.72 million Taiwan citizens and 
not because of a decision by President Chen Shui-bian. 
 
"... Indeed, Rice's statement confirms suspicions that Washington 
does not actually take the promotion or the consolidation of 
democracy as a serious foreign policy priority. Apparently for the 
sake of Bush's illegal war in Iraq and misguided 'war on terrorism,' 
Washington has now willingly transformed itself from being the 
world's most important advocate of democracy and freedom into a 
parrot of the PRC's Taiwan Affairs Office. 
 
"... The U.S. may indeed need greater cooperation from the PRC, but 
Washington should not naively ignore the very real possibility that 
the PRC is using its growing economic, military and diplomatic clout 
to revamp the world community in its own authoritarian image and 
turning the Bush administration into a tool for the consolidation of 
PRC neo-authoritarian dominance in Asia. We urge rational voices in 
the U.S. government and Congress and other informed opinion leaders 
to carefully consider the long-term interests of the democratic camp 
in Asia and the world and cease further actions to 'contain' Taiwan 
democracy before it is too late." 
 
C)"Let's Deal with Our Own Problems" 
 
Professor Lee Hsiao-feng, Graduate School of Taiwan Culture, 
National Taipei University of Education, wrote in the 
pro-independence, English-language daily "Taipei Times" 
[circulation: 30,000] (12/24): 
 
"... The US has the same problem. Though they claim not to support 
Taiwanese independence, they cannot avoid intervention if China 
BID REFERENDUM 
 
invades Taiwan. This is why the US does not want Taiwan to 'make 
trouble.' What Washington really means is that Taiwan should not 
make trouble for the US. 
 
"Should we try to lighten the burden on the US and China by leaving 
Taiwan in a situation where it is continually oppressed or should we 
manage our own plight, leaving the US and China to deal with their 
own problems? 
 
"The answer is the latter, and the referendum is a great solution: 
It expresses the desire of the Taiwanese for formal independence, 
but does not immediately sink China and the US into an extremely 
problematic situation. 
 
"... They would, though, have to ask: 'What's next?' 
 
"And when they start asking us for the next move, it indicates that 
we are no longer in the passive position of being oppressed. Hence 
the referendum also functions as a bargaining chip, allowing us to 
secure our ground and advance as we choose. ..." 
 
D) "After the 'Provocative' Disturbance, Will the U.S.-Taiwan Rift 
Become Even Wider?" 
 
The centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 400,000] 
editorialized (12/26): 
 
"Four or five years ago, if one said the U.S. would strongly 
criticize Taiwan again and again, probably neither the U.S. nor 
Taiwan would believe it.  Yet today the U.S. has been stepping up 
its criticism against Taiwan, and the rank of the official leveling 
the criticism is getting higher.  But Taiwan seems to be getting 
used to it and has repeatedly talked back.  If this continues, will 
U.S.-Taiwan relations see some fundamental changes? 
 
"... The U.S. government does not pay attention to public opinion in 
Taiwan at ordinary times.  It underestimates the political effects 
resulting from the growth of Taiwan's self-identity and lacks a 
forward-looking cross-Strait policy.  It only resolves immediate 
problems.  When problems appear, it often asks Taiwan to compromise 
and make concessions.  When things calm down, it presumes there is 
no longer any problem.  The Taiwan people therefore feel betrayed by 
the U.S. and have less good feeling for and trust in the U.S. 
 
"... How can the U.S., which has been Taiwan's largest support and 
encouragement, from maintaining its security to its freedom and 
democracy, explain to Taiwan that it can only proceed with its 
democratization to a certain extent and cannot have the same status 
and dignity as other countries?  For the people of Taiwan this is 
unacceptable discrimination and hypocrisy.  The reason for the 
Taiwan people's disappointment and dissatisfaction comes from not 
only the event of the referendum, but the fact that Taiwan's 
national development and interest are now in conflict with those of 
the U.S. 
 
"However, the U.S. seems to care little about this more fundamental 
and far-reaching issue.  Therefore, even if the referendum 
disturbance passes without any complications, U.S.-Taiwan relations 
will continue to face undercurrents.  Compared to places like the 
Middle East, there is, in fact, more room for flexibility in 
designing a new cross-Strait policy.  However, if the U.S. cannot 
think of a new cross-Strait policy with a future perspective and 
only tries to delay a resolution as long as possible by following 
the old thinking, then there will continue to be one sharp 
disturbance after another in the U.S.-China-Taiwan relationship." 
 
E) "Does the U.S. Have Bargaining Chips to Force Chen Shui-bian to 
Submit?" 
 
Professor Edward I-hsin Chen, Graduate Institute of American 
Studies, Tamkang University, commented in the centrist, KMT-leaning 
"China Times" [circulation: 400,000] (12/24): 
 
"... The bargaining chips of the U.S. include Chen Shui-bian's 
family's accounts in U.S. banks, his private promises to the U.S., 
(which may be unfavorable for his becoming the head of the Green 
camp), and the U.S. commitment and arrangements for Chen after he 
leaves office.  However, the U.S. will show the cards one by one 
rather than all at once to force Chen Shui-bian to submit.  This 
step-by-step approach is clearly reflected in remarks made by AIT 
Chairman Raymond Burghardt during his visit in Taiwan.  In addition, 
one can also see signs that the U.S. is pressuring Bian in the 
statements made by Central Election Committee officials on the 
one-step or two-step voting format. 
 
"... If the Blue and the Green camps can reach a compromise 
regarding the one or two-step dispute and Ma Ying-jeou and Frank 
Hsieh can walk out of the shadow of lawsuits against them and 
BID REFERENDUM 
 
concentrate on campaigning, these will be proof that the U.S. does 
have the bargaining chips to interfere in an election in Taiwan that 
may have been unfair in the first place [i.e., unfair until the U.S. 
allegedly used its bargaining chips to interfere]." 
 
F) "Wu, Young Should Go Home" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language daily "The China 
Post" [circulation: 30,000] editorialized (12/25): 
 
"President Chen Shui-bian has hit back at U.S. Secretary of State 
Condoleezza Rice's criticism of his plan to hold a referendum on 
joining the United Nations as Taiwan as being 'provocative.' 
 
"The president's unprecedented rebuke of the U.S. secretary of state 
will further strain relations between Taipei and its mentor and 
protector, the U.S. 
 
"... Rice is the highest-level U.S. official to have warned Taipei 
against holding the referendum alongside the presidential elections 
on March 22. Since August, Washington has repeatedly cautioned Chen 
against his plan to stage the vote in conjunction with presidential 
polls. 
 
"Joseph Wu and Stephen Young should go home for missions 
unaccomplished." 
 
WANG