Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON791, SUPPORTING ARGENTINA'S REQUEST FOR INTERPOL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON791.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07WELLINGTON791 2007-11-02 04:21 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHWL #0791 3060421
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 020421Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4852
INFO RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 0044
C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000791 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/ANP; NEA/IR - REBECCA HUMMEL; WHA/BSC: JANINA 
SLATTERY, CAROLINE CROFT; S/CT ARNOLD SIERRA; L/LEI HEATHER 
MCSHAIN 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/02/2017 
TAGS: PTER KJUS PREL NZ
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING ARGENTINA'S REQUEST FOR INTERPOL 
APPROVAL OF RED NOTICES 
 
REF: SECSTATE 147320 
 
Classified By: Pol/Econ Counselor Margaret McKean; Reason:  1.4 (b) and 
 (d) 
 
 1.  (C)  In response to reftel demarche, Pol/Econ Counselor 
spoke with an Argentine Embassy official, who related that 
the Government of Argentina's Ministry of Foreign Affairs had 
discussed the issue of the red notices with the New Zealand 
Embassy in Buenos Aires.  The Argentine Embassy in Wellington 
was unaware that its government had asked the USG or any 
other foreign mission to support its position, but they did 
not have any objections if the U.S. mission weighed in.  In 
discussion with the French DCM, Pol/Econ Counselor learned 
that he had not been asked by Paris to assist.  The U.S. 
Embassy did ascertain that the GNZ would be represented at 
the Interpol General Assembly meeting, but that the New 
Zealand position on this issue would be determined in Morocco 
based on their representative's discussions with colleagues 
at the GA and the dynamic established during the meeting. 
 
2.  (C)  Pol/Econ Counselor met on October 31 with MFAT 
Director of the Americas Division, Carl Worker, to deliver 
the demarche.  Worker confirmed that the New Zealand Embassy 
had been approached by the Government of Argentina.  Worker 
noted that the GNZ sense was to be supportive in this 
situation.  Nevertheless, as a former ambassador to 
Argentina, Worker said that the Argentine judiciary and 
police investigations in general leave much to be desired; 
however, he understood that the Argentine government was 
trying to make a proper case in this instance.  He asked if 
the USG had information bearing on the investigation and its 
quality; Pol/Econ Counselor responded that such information 
had not been included in the demarche request. 
McCormick