Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TELAVIV3398, ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TELAVIV3398.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TELAVIV3398 2007-11-29 12:03 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tel Aviv
VZCZCXYZ0003
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTV #3398/01 3331203
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 291203Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4378
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEADWD/DA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CNO WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 3073
RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 9744
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 3231
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 3850
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 3097
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 1186
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 3821
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0683
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1152
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 7725
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 5183
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 0103
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 4239
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 6178
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 8503
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT  PRIORITY
UNCLAS TEL AVIV 003398 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD 
 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM 
NSC FOR NEA STAFF 
 
SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA 
HQ USAF FOR XOXX 
DA WASHDC FOR SASA 
JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA 
CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR 
COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD 
COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 
 
JERUSALEM ALSO ICD 
LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL 
PARIS ALSO FOR POL 
ROME FOR MFO 
 
SIPDIS 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS
 
SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION 
 
-------------------------------- 
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: 
-------------------------------- 
 
Annapolis Conference 
 
------------------------- 
Key Stories in the Media: 
------------------------- 
 
All media reported that President George Bush, Prime Minister Ehud 
Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas have symbolically 
launched the renewing negotiations on a permanent agreement on 
Wednesday. 
 
Ha'aretz reported that in an interview with PM Olmert the latter 
said that Annapolis is not an historic point but that it can assist 
in progressing forward. 
 
Leading media reported that Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni will 
continue to head the Israeli team and will lead the negotiations 
with the Palestinians. The media noted that the talks between the 
sides will open on December 12. 
 
Yediot Aharonot reported that PM Olmert met President Bush again in 
order to discuss the Iranian threat. 
 
Maariv revealed that Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander 
Sultanov has been forwarding messages in recent weeks between Israel 
and Syria in a Russian attempt to renew negotiations between Israel 
and Syria. The newspaper reported that Prime Minister Ehud Olmerts' 
recent urgent trip to Russia was also related to these attempts. 
All media reported that the US has agreed to the Russian request to 
host a continuous conference to Annapolis in three months in Moscow. 
 
 
Ha'aretz noted that the nomination of General James Jones as the 
adviser of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on security issues 
related to the peace negotiations between Israel and the 
Palestinians is bad news for Israel. The newspaper quotes Israeli 
sources that Jones is not a favorable choice because of his 
blatantly cool attitude to Israel. 
 
Israel Radio quoted President Shimon Peres as saying that Annapolis 
was a huge success for its four leaders: President Bush; PM Olmert; 
PA President Abbas and Secretary of State Rice. 
 
Israel Radio this morning reported that four Palestinians were 
killed in two IAF strikes in the Gaza Strip. According to the IDF 
the four were attempting to execute terrorist activity against 
Israel. Ha'aretz Internet site reported that since Sunday 20 
Palestinians were killed most of them Hamas activists. 
 
All media reported that the police is expected to present its 
recommendations regarding PM Olmert's involvement in the sale of 
bank Leumi's controlling interest on Thursday. Estimations are that 
the police will recommend closing the case against him 
 
Yediot presented the results of a Mina Zemach (Dahaf Institute) poll 
after the Annapolis Conference: 
When asked if they believe that a final status peace agreement will 
be signed with the Palestinians by the end of 2008? 
83 percent of questioned said no; 16 percent said yes; 1 percent 
didn't know. 
50 percent believe that the Annapolis conference was a failure; 18 
percent thought it was a success; 32 percent didn't know. 
To the question should Israel enter negotiations with Syria? 
62 percent said yes; 35 percent said no; 3 percent didn't have an 
opinion. 
 
Ha'aretz published the results of a Dialog poll conducted after the 
Annapolis Conference which found that 53 percent of the Israeli 
public will support a permanent agreement based on a two-state 
 
solution; 38 percent do not support such an agreement and 9 percent 
didn't know. Sixty two percent believe that the Annapolis Conference 
did not progress the chances of a permanent agreement; 24 percent 
said it did not; 14 percent didn't know. To the question whether the 
conference was a success or a failure, 42 percent thought it was a 
failure; 24 percent said it was neither; 17 percent thought it was a 
success and 17 percent didn't know. 
 
--------------------- 
Annapolis Conference: 
--------------------- 
 
Summary: 
-------- 
 
Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: "It is a mistake 
to assume that a new American administration or a new president will 
have a different agenda.  The American interest in the Middle East 
is to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as soon as possible." 
 
Senior diplomatic correspondent Aluf Benn wrote in the Ha'aretz: 
"Only if [Rice] stubbornly nags Israel and the Palestinians by 
frequent visits, by pressing through mediating proposals, and if 
Bush constantly reiterates that he is backing his secretary of 
state, will it be possible to make progress.  If the administration 
lifts its hands off the process once again, the Annapolis summit 
will join the pile of diplomatic events that vanished without a 
trace." 
 
Nationalist Makor Rishon-Hatzofe editorialized: "Instead of the 
unequivocal demand from the Palestinians to halt violence as a first 
condition for continuing the road map process, Israel is requesting 
'reciprocity' of a new kind: It too has a part in terrorism.... This 
concession is critical.... It is a moral concession." 
 
Op-ed commentator Yael Paz-Melamed wrote in the popular, pluralist 
Maariv: "My prayer is that there will be enough people in this 
country that will give a chance to the process that opened two days 
ago in Annapolis. Only a chance. Just a try." 
 
Block Quotes: 
------------- 
 
ΒΆI. "Forward" 
 
Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (11/29): "The 
purpose of the [Annapolis] meeting was to jump-start the dormant 
process, and it has been achieved completely.  The conditions for 
pushing forward have been created.  The pressure applied by George 
Bush and Condoleezza Rice, up to the last minute, in order to reach 
a joint political declaration, promises strict American supervision 
and unwillingness to tolerate wasting of time.  The argument being 
raised, that the time table is too tight (by the end of 2008), is 
ridiculous.... A tough American approach, essentially pressuring 
both sides to discuss the core issues, could have positive results. 
Both sides know the details of a possible agreement, but are worried 
they lack the mandate to sign such a deal. Because of this, they 
must welcome American pressure.  It is a mistake to assume that a 
new American administration or a new president will have a different 
agenda.  The American interest in the Middle East is to solve the 
Israeli-Palestinian conflict as soon as possible." 
 
II. "Only Bush Can" 
 
Senior diplomatic correspondent Aluf Benn wrote in the independent, 
 
left-leaning Ha'aretz (11/29): "If there is one lesson to be learned 
from the Annapolis summit, it is that American leadership in the 
peace process between Israel and its Arab neighbors is essential. 
Only the stubbornness of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the 
backing she received from U.S. President George W. Bush succeeded in 
bringing here the foreign ministers of most Arab countries and the 
world's leading diplomats.... However, with all due respect to the 
Bush-Rice success at Annapolis, their real test is still before 
them, and it all depends on their determination and perseverance.... 
The only chance the process has for success, or at least for 
significant progress on the way to an agreement, lies in continued 
American leadership. Only if [Rice] stubbornly nags Israel and the 
Palestinians by frequent visits, by pressing through mediating 
proposals, and if Bush constantly reiterates that he is backing his 
secretary of state, will it be possible to make progress.  If the 
 
SIPDIS 
administration lifts its hands off the process once again, the 
Annapolis summit will join the pile of diplomatic events that 
vanished without a trace." 
 
III. "Moral Concessions" 
 
Nationalist Makor Rishon-Hatzofe editorialized (11/29): "Prime 
Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Livni are now causing a 
deterioration of the most profound moral foundations upon which the 
State of Israel stands.  Instead of the unequivocal demand from the 
Palestinians to halt violence as a first condition for continuing 
the road map process, Israel is requesting 'reciprocity' of a new 
kind: It too has a part in terrorism.... This concession is 
critical.... It is a moral concession.  The Israeli leadership did 
not owe anyone a concession of this type, after what was discovered 
this past summer in Syria, and following years of rocket fire 
against civilians." 
 
IV. "Prayer and Hope" 
 
Op-ed commentator Yael Paz-Melamed wrote in the popular, pluralist 
Maariv (11/29): "Yes, we do not like peace conferences... That is 
because we have bad experience with them and disappointments, but 
also because conferences that do lead to some sort of process oblige 
us to make decisions we don't have the power to make.  Who wants to 
start discussing settlement evacuation.... Let us live quietly. We 
got used to the situation and developed a mechanism to deal with 
it.... But in front of all this stand war and its victims.... There 
is so much agony on both sides that maybe after all this attempt is 
worth a huge effort.... My prayer is that there will be enough 
people in this country that will give a chance to the process that 
opened two days ago in Annapolis. Only a chance. Just a try." 
MORENO