Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07OTTAWA2036, CANADIAN VIEWS ON ADVANCING THE DEMOCRACY AGENDA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07OTTAWA2036.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07OTTAWA2036 2007-11-05 22:36 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ottawa
VZCZCXRO8442
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #2036 3092236
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 052236Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6859
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0345
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1258
UNCLAS OTTAWA 002036 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR G-FERRARO, DRL/MLGA-JORDAN, AND IO/RHS-OSTERMEIER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL KDEM PHUM UNGA CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN VIEWS ON ADVANCING THE DEMOCRACY AGENDA 
AT THE CD MINISTERIAL 
 
REF: A. STATE 151024 
     B. OTTAWA 1828 
 
 1.  (SBU)  In a discussion with PolMinCouns on November 5, 
Ben Rowswell, Manager of the Democracy Unit in the Department 
of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), expressed 
appreciation for reftel views on the upcoming 4th Community 
of Democracies Ministerial in Bamako.  He said that 
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs 
Deepak Obhrai (Member of Parliament from the ruling 
Conservative Party) would lead the delegation, accompanied by 
Liberal MP Mark Eyking, the Canadian Ambassador in Mali, and 
a DFAIT Deputy Director General.  The Canadians generally 
support the draft declaration and share our views on the 
importance of democratic governance and rule of law as well 
as the vital role of NGOs and civil society.  (He noted that 
the Canadian Ambassador in Caracas had even recently 
persuaded the Venezuelan government to back down on proposed 
new restrictions on NGOs there.)  At the invitation of the 
Government of Mali, the Canadians will chair a discussion on 
the Americas, but do not at present plan to raise Cuba or 
Venezuela directly.  Rowswell promised to make sure Obhrai 
was at least aware of U.S. hopes that Canada and other 
participants do discuss the state of democracy or lack 
thereof in these countries at this meeting. 
 
2.  (SBU)  Rowswell noted that the Canadians plan to cite as 
an example of tangible programs their funding for a new 
handbook for diplomats (ref b).  They look forward to 
discussions in Bamako about the Asia Pacific Democracy 
Partnership, but Foreign Minister Bernier has not yet 
formally accepted the DFAIT recommendation that Canada join. 
On the UN Democracy Caucus, Rowswell cited its 
"heterogeneity" as a limitation on real effectiveness, while 
noting that it still had the potential to serve as a useful 
forum between the G-77 and the North.  Canada is awaiting 
assessments due in February or March about the initial 
programs of the UN Democracy Fund before making decisions 
about future funding.  DFAIT will also look into the 
possibility of funding from either DFAIT or CIDA for the CD 
Secretariat; Rowswell expressed appreciation for the generous 
 
SIPDIS 
USG contributions to this over the past year and a half. 
 
Visit our shared North American Partnership blog (Canada & Mexico) at 
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap 
 
WILKINS