Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07ISTANBUL987, A PROFESSOR OF GENERALS SPEAKS OF THE OBLIGATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07ISTANBUL987.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07ISTANBUL987 2007-11-14 08:41 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Istanbul
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIT #0987 3180841
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 140841Z NOV 07
FM AMCONSUL ISTANBUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7666
INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 7261
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0041
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS ISTANBUL 000987 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PTER TU IZ
SUBJECT: A PROFESSOR OF GENERALS SPEAKS OF THE OBLIGATION 
TO ATTACK KURDISH IRAQ 
 
1.(SBU)  At a lunch meeting, on October 30, professor Ercan 
Citlioglu spoke to poloffs of the need to appease the Turkish 
population-at-large, who increasingly demand that the GOT 
take military action against the Kurdistan Workers Party 
(PKK) in Iraq.  Citlioglu, a terrorism expert and president 
of the Strategic Research Center at Bahcesehir University, 
claimed that intense domestic pressure on the government, 
both from the military and from frequent street protests, has 
pushed the current Justice and Development Party (AKP) 
government to the point where a decision to launch a 
significant cross-border operation (CBO) into Iraq is 
inevitable.  Citlioglu claimed domestic pressure is now 
steering Turkish foreign policy.  He said the military, still 
feeling somewhat threatened by the election of President Gul, 
dares not appear ineffective against the terrorist threat. 
And, the current AKP administration simply does not have the 
political capital to keep the military -- pressed to appear 
relevant and effective -- from giving the people what they 
are demanding. 
 
2. (SBU)  While the professor thought a CBO would be 
ineffectual with regards to military objectives (destroying 
or even seriously degrading the PKK's military capabilities) 
he felt it was unavoidable if the GOT wanted to prevent 
public outrage from boiling over.  "Nothing short of a 
full-scale incursion would satisfy the people."  His fear is 
that public anger and hatred towards the PKK, which has begun 
to morph into anger at and hatred of Kurdish Regional 
Government (KRG) President Barzani, may further mutate into 
public anger and hatred towards Kurds in general.  One 
possible consequence, should the government fail to act, 
could be an increase in anti-Kurdish internal conflict (e.g., 
bombings of Democratic Society Party (DTP) offices; massive, 
commerce-choking protests in the streets, etc.).  He 
acknowledged that the benefits of undertaking a significant 
CBO into Iraq would be largely symbolic.  Even so, Citlioglu 
felt the Turkish public was prepared to withstand casualties 
resulting from such an operation.  "It does not matter if 
1,000 soldiers are lost in the offensive.  The people will 
gladly accept this to the handful of soldiers that would 
continue to die at home should we do nothing." 
 
3. (SBU)  COMMENT   As a former diplomat, and more 
importantly as a professor currently teaching a security 
issues seminar for some 25 Turkish general officers, 
Citlioglu's opinions could hold considerable sway with senior 
military officials.  Citlioglu is savvy and experienced 
enough to acknowledge that a military effort, geared towards 
ending PKK violence, must be coupled with both economic and 
social policies to persuade the local population to withdraw 
support from the PKK and thus "win" the fight against 
terrorism in the long-run.  But he is convinced that the GOT 
has no choice but to accede to the Turkish military's, and 
Turkish population's, demand for a CBO in the very near term. 
 Although recent reports of a U.S. agreement to provide 
"real-time intelligence sharing" and other operational 
support in the fight against PKK terrorism have tempered 
calls for a large scale CBO, Citlioglu's comments reflect the 
intensity of the pressure felt by the Turkish military in the 
run up to the November 3 Iraq Neighbors Meeting and the 
November 5 POTUS-PM Erdogan meeting.  END COMMENT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WIENER