VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBU #2207/01 3190752
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 150752Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9693
INFO RHMFISS/CDR USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL//SCJ2//
RULGPUA/USCOMSOLANT

UNCLAS BUENOS AIRES 002207 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR INR/R/MR, I/GWHA, WHA, WHA/PDA, WHA/BSC, 
WHA/EPSC 
CDR USSOCOM FOR J-2 IAD/LAMA 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KPAO OPRC KMDR PREL
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION; IRAQ WAR; PAKISTAN; IBERO-AMERICAN SUMMIT; 
11/14/07 
 
¶1. SUMMARY STATEMENT 
 
Today's leading international stories cover the allegedly 'hidden 
costs' of the war in Iraq; the Pakistani crisis; and the outcome of 
the Ibero-American summit. 
 
¶2. OPINION PIECES AND EDITORIALS 
 
- "The 'hidden costs' of Bush's war" 
 
Ana Baron, leading "Clarin's" Washington-based correspondent, writes 
(10/14) "The wars of Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost 20,900 
dollars to every two-children US family... According to a report 
submitted yesterday to Congress by the Democratic opposition, the 
cost of the two wars amounted to 1.5 trillion dollars, which is 
twice as much as the Bush administration calculated. 
 
"The difference is basically due to the so-called 'hidden costs,' 
which include interests on loans taken to afford the cost of war, 
losses in failed investment, and long-care medical care of veterans, 
as well as the always increasing value of the oil barrel. 
 
"US Senator Harry Reid for Nevada, the Senate Majority leader, said 
that the report is the best evidence that Bush's strategy on the 
Iraq war is mistaken. Meanwhile, the White House termed the report 
'politically motivated.' 
 
"... The (Joint Economic Committee) report (on the Iraq War) is not 
naove. It was released in the context of the Democrats' initiatives 
both at the House and the Senate to pass a draft bill that will 
grant 50 billion dollars requested by Bush to finance the war as 
long as the White House agrees to set a date for the return of 
troops. However, this does not mean that the information provided by 
the report is not true. Harry Reid said: 'This is a new reminder of 
how Bush's denial to change his policy on Iraq has had real 
consequences for Americans.'" 
 
- "Danger" 
 
Marcelo Cantelmi, international editor of leading "Clarin," opines 
(11/14) "When the Pakistani crisis was already in its current 
irreversible road, US analyst Moises Naim, head of Foreign Affairs, 
had a daring idea. He wondered whether Pervez Musharraf ran the risk 
of becoming another Sha of Iran..., who had been supported by the 
West just like the Pakistani is. 
 
"... The former Persian strong man was defeated by a impoverished 
and fanatic population, which was kindled by years of repression and 
mistreatment. 
 
"What the US cannot see in Pakistan is that this risk is extremely 
present but much more seriously than in the Iranian case. This 
nuclear power has a huge population that supports the Taliban... 
Musharraf can no longer manage this crisis... Only if he distances 
himself can transition start, which is what the opposition demands. 
The doubt is whether this alternative political structure has enough 
power to avoid an insurrection. The mistakes made are huge, and lack 
of perspective has not been the less important one." 
 
- "The nerves-on-edge summit" 
 
Daily-of-record "La Nacion" (11/14) editorializes "Spanish King John 
Charles did well when he put Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez at 
bay... Chavez had been disrespectful with former Spanish President 
Jose Maria Aznar, whom he publicly called 'a fascist.'... 
 
"In defense of Chavez, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega accused 
Spain of conspiring with the US in the region. 
 
"Only Chilean Michele Bachelet, Peruvian Alan Garcia and Salvadorian 
Elias Saca supported the King and criticized Chavez. The others 
stayed aloof, which implies a position. 
 
"... In the eyes of the world, Latin America showed it is on two 
different political roads and confirmed that scandals of this kind, 
to which Chavez often contributes, are increasingly frequent. 
 
"Both the Venezuelan President and Ortega, supported by Fidel Castro 
and Evo Morales, have made it clear that they feel much more 
comfortable at parallel, summits (the so-called summit of the 
peoples), which places the region at opposed scenarios, just like 
happened in 2005 Mar del Plata Summit... Who understand a president 
that discusses free trade on one side and proclaims the 21st century 
Socialism on the other?.. 
 
"... The question to be made by the leaders that were not involved 
in the incident is whether the region or their countries themselves 
 
 
obtained some benefits from the total of offenses left by the 
Summit." 
 
To see more Buenos Aires reporting, visit our 
classified website at: 
http://www.state.sqov.gov/p/wha/buenosaires 
 
WAYNE