Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON771, NZ VOTES IN LOCAL ELECTIONS AMID LACK OF EXCITEMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON771.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07WELLINGTON771 2007-10-23 03:20 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXRO6515
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0771 2960320
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 230320Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4823
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1509
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5003
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0586
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS WELLINGTON 000771 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP 
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: NZ VOTES IN LOCAL ELECTIONS AMID LACK OF EXCITEMENT 
 
Reftel:  Auckland 118 
 
1. (SBU) Summary.  Characterized by voter apathy and predictable 
results, local government elections were held across New Zealand 
over the weekend of October 13-14.  The most noteworthy result was 
in New Zealand's biggest and most politically important metropolitan 
area, Auckland, where the one term centre-left incumbent mayor of 
Auckland City was defeated by the center-right candidate.  Local 
election results are historically no harbinger of national political 
results.  Therefore, the ruling center-left Labour Party would have 
noted Auckland's election of a center-right mayor but it would not 
have been excessively troubled by it.  End Summary. 
 
Results in Key Races 
-------------------- 
 
2. (U) Over the weekend, cities and town across New Zealand elected 
mayors and local councils.  Overall, there were few surprises with 
most results tracking pre-election polling and predictions.  In 
Auckland City, the country's biggest city, incumbent center-left 
Auckland Mayor Dick Hubbard was ousted by the very man who he 
replaced in the previous election, John Banks.  The center-right 
Banks, a former National Party Minister of Police, regained the 
Auckland mayoralty by a very comfortable 10,000 votes.  In the 
nation's capital, sitting Wellington Mayor Kerry Prendergast 
retained her seat, but lost her deputy Alick Shaw who was voted out 
of local government.  In Christchurch, former TV personality Bob 
Parker rode his strong name recognition to victory. 
 
Voter Apathy a Hallmark of Elections 
------------------------------------ 
 
3. (U) Most noteworthy in these elections was the low voter turnout. 
 A record low 42.5% of eligible voters cast votes in this year's 
elections, down from 46% three years ago.  During New Zealand's last 
general election in 2005, eligible voter turnout was 77% (compared 
to 60% in the United States in 2004).  Local Government New Zealand, 
an organization that represents the national interests of all 85 
councils of New Zealand, is to investigate the downward trend in 
local government voter turnout.  For many municipalities that 
witnessed the defeat of incumbents, the most oft-heard reason 
centered on homeowners' concerns over taxes. 
 
Labour Watchful of Auckland Result 
---------------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) As there is little correlation between local politics and a 
national politics, these election results cannot be regarded as a 
portent for next year's general election (reftel).  Labour, 
nonetheless, would have watched the Auckland mayoral race with 
interest, as Labour has traditionally had strong support in 
Auckland.  Given that Auckland provides New Zealand's biggest voting 
pool, any party that expects to win the general election needs to do 
well in Auckland.  Labour is currently trailing National in 
Auckland, however, with 50.3% of Aucklanders favoring National, and 
29% supporting Labour, according to the August Herald Digipoll. 
 
5. (SBU) However, post believes the result in Auckland was driven by 
local issues and personality rather than by national politics. 
Aucklanders cast their votes for Banks, not out of support for his 
center-right political values, but rather for his more authoritative 
and forceful personality, characteristics that Hubbard lacked. 
Aucklanders were also disenchanted with Hubbard's stand on some 
local issues, such as tax increases and the debacle over the 
proposed construction of a new sports stadium. 
 
McCormick