Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07MEXICO5462, LEADER OF SUGAR WORKERS UNION ENJOYS THE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MEXICO5462.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MEXICO5462 2007-10-15 22:14 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Mexico
VZCZCXRO0041
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHM RUEHHO RUEHJO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHPOD
RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #5462/01 2882214
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 152214Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9221
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 MEXICO 005462 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR DRL/AWH AND ILCSR, WHA/MEX, USDOL FOR ILAB 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB EAGR ECON ENRG PGOV PINR MX
SUBJECT:  LEADER OF SUGAR WORKERS UNION ENJOYS THE 
SWEETNESS OF LIFE 
 
REF: REF: (A) MEXICO 0278 (B) MEXICO 0352 
 
 1.  SUMMARY: Observers of Mexico,s organized labor sector 
and media commentators have both reviled and hailed, Enrique 
Ramos Rodriguez, the leader of the country,s largest sugar 
workers union.  In many ways Ramos typifies everything 
average Mexicans most sharply criticize about their 
country,s labor leaders (such as unexplained wealth, no 
accountability, perpetual re-election, etc.). On the other 
hand, he recently negotiated the first major reform in the 
legal framework that establishes the relationship between 
sugar cane workers and sugar mill owners since 1936.  The 
deal he brokered has significant flaws, not the least of 
which is that it openly ensures Ramos will continue to 
exploit, for personal gain, his union leadership position. 
Nevertheless, the deal commits the union to accepting a 25 
percent cut in jobs industry-wide and commits mill owners to 
paying to upgrade worker skills.  Overall, there is no 
question that the deal is much better for Ramos and Mexico,s 
sugar mill owners than it is for most sugar cane workers.  At 
best the deal could be considered very much a glass half 
empty/glass half full kind of arrangement in that it 
preserves many of the average workers, more extravagant 
benefits.  However, given the slow pace of any type of 
meaningful reform of Mexican labor unions, it could be argued 
that limited reform is better than no reform at all.  This is 
the first of two reports on the current state of affairs 
within Mexico,s largest sugar cane workers union, the 
Workers Unions of the Mexican Sugar Industry (STIASRM).  END 
SUMMARY. 
 
 
A SWEET LIFE AT THE TOP 
----------------------- 
 
2.  Labor leaders in Mexico are commonly thought of as being 
more interested in their own well being than they are in 
looking out for the welfare of the workers.  One rarely finds 
average Mexicans willing to say anything good about the 
leaders of the country,s organized labor sector.  This 
ill-will most definitely extends to Enrique Ramos Rodriguez, 
the Secretary General of Mexico,s largest sugar cane workers 
union, the Workers Unions of the Mexican Sugar Industry 
(STIASRM).  Ramos has been the Secretary General of the 
STIASRM since 1995 and a leading figure in the union since 
roughly 1975.  The STIASRM is a part of the Confederation of 
Mexican Workers (CTM), the country,s largest federation of 
labor unions, and Ramos serves on its National Executive 
Committee; he is also the CTM,s Secretary General for the 
southeastern state of Veracruz.  Like many labor federations 
in Mexico, the CTM is famous for perpetually re-electing 
union leaders.  Once in union leadership positions, CTM 
officials seldom step down in life and Ramos appears to be 
doing his best to maintain this union tradition. 
 
3.  One of the advantages of being a de facto union leader 
for life is that you can get in on the ground floor of many 
arrangements.  In the case of Enrique Ramos, he was a member 
of the STIASRM,s senior leadership in 1976 when the GOM 
expropriated 69 hectares (about 170.5 acres) of land 
belonging to one of the indigenous groups in the western 
state of Jalisco.  This land was then transferred to the 
STIASRM.  The union,s then Secretary General (now deceased) 
established a trust to manage the property for the benefit of 
the members of the sugar cane workers union and their 
families.  When the trust was established, at the request of 
the STIASRM,s senior leadership, sugar mill owners across 
Mexico began deducting a small amount each week from the 
workers, union dues to develop the land as recreational 
property. 
 
4.  Once Enrique Ramos became the STIASRM Secretary General, 
he assumed responsibility for administering the land.  In 
time two up-scale hotels were constructed on the property, 
the Blue Bay Village-Los Angles Locos and the Punta Serena. 
Initially the income from these hotels was used to cover any 
outstanding union financial obligations but at present, 
according to an attorney representing dissidents within the 
sugar cane workers union, all proceeds are deposited into 
bank accounts owned by Enrique Ramos.  The first of these 
hotels, the Blue Bay Village-Los Angles Loco has 284 rooms, a 
lobby bar, restaurant, cafeteria, an auditorium, tennis 
 
MEXICO 00005462  002 OF 004 
 
 
courts and a horse riding area.  The other hotel, the Punta 
Serena, has an ocean view, a health spa with a steam room and 
sauna, a gym, tennis courts and a dock area for water sports. 
 The average daily rate for these hotels is approximately USD 
140.00; considerably more than the USD 37.50 a day earned by 
even the most highly paid sugar cane worker. 
 
5.  The recent revelation that the profits from these hotels 
is going into bank accounts owned by Ramos have prompted 
calls in some quarters for the GOM,s equivalent of the US 
Attorney General,s Office to launch an investigation into 
his management of union assets.  In addition to controlling 
the income from the hotels Enrique Ramos is also said to 
either control or own outright two sports clubs, two sugar 
mills, two office building and 15 homes in Mexico City as 
well as an undetermined number of warehouses.  An 
investigation of Ramos by the Mexican Attorney General,s 
Office, if it happens, should prove interesting as the 
STIASRM is reportedly the owner of the building that houses 
that GOM agency,s Mexico City Regional office (on the same 
street but several blocks away from Embassy Mexico City). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RAMOS NEGOTIATES A SIGNIFICANT NEW DEAL 
--------------------------------------- 
 
6.  On an individual basis labor relations between employers 
and employees in Mexico are governed by the country,s 
Federal Labor Law which establishes a base of permanent rules 
and regulations.  On a broader level Mexico also has what it 
calls &Contract Laws8 which establish the rules for labor 
relations on an industry-wide basis.  Contract Laws (CL) are 
a type of collective bargaining agreement negotiated by 
industry, union and government representatives.  Since CLs 
are negotiated arrangements they are established for fixed 
periods of time and vary significantly from industry to 
industry.  CLs establish minimum standards that both 
employers and employees are expected to follow over and above 
the permanent guidance contained in Mexico,s Federal Labor 
Law. In theory CLs are periodically renegotiated like any 
collective bargaining agreement but in practice they contain 
any meaningful change.  Until now, Mexico,s sugar industry 
has been operating on a CL that has not been significantly 
changed since 1936. 
 
7.  Observers of Mexico,s sugar industry have long pointed 
out that Mexican sugar is one of the expensive sugars in the 
world.  Mexico,s sugar industry is often unfavorably 
compared to the sugar industry in Brazil.  The average cost 
of producing sugar in Brazil is said to be approximately USD 
15.00 per ton whereas the cost of producing that same ton of 
sugar in Mexico is put at approximately USD 40.00 per ton. 
Much of the blame for this substantial price difference is 
placed on the sugar industry,s Contract Law which 
artificially raises the price of producing sugar in Mexico 
over and above the cost of normal market factors. 
To the extent that the sugar industry CL is, in fact, 
responsible for the high cost of producing Mexican sugar, a 
chance now exists to implement a significant change. 
 
8.  Approximately nine months ago the STIASRM union, the 
sugar mill owners and the GOM (represented by the Secretariat 
of Labor) began an extended series of discussion to 
significantly change the sugar industry,s Contract Law. 
These discussions ultimately turned into serious negotiation 
and on August 29, 2007 the three sides reached agree on the 
terms of a major revision of the sugar industry,s Contract 
Law.  A successful agreement could not have been possible 
without concessions and compromises on all sides but the one 
person with almost absolute veto power was Enrique Ramos 
Rodriguez.  By most accounts Ramos took the negotiations 
seriously right from the start, and he made sure that if the 
union was being asked to accept genuine change then the mill 
owner would also have to acknowledge that they could no 
longer do business as usual. Ramos made real concessions but 
he obtained something real in return of the members of the 
sugar cane workers union.  Alas, he also made sure to look 
out for number one. 
 
MEXICO 00005462  003 OF 004 
 
 
 
 
A NEW CONTRACT LAW FOR MEXICO,S SUGAR INDUSTRY 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
9.  Under the terms of the sugar industry,s new CL, the 
STIASRM agreed to allow mill owners to permanently cut jobs 
by up to 25 percent. Depending on the source consulted this 
will translate into a reduction of somewhere between 7-10,000 
jobs among unionized workers in the Mexico,s sugar industry. 
 The union also agreed to the establishment of more flexible 
work hours (meaning mill owners can require work on Saturdays 
and Sundays), when needed the mill owners will now be allowed 
to hire non-union workers (outsourcing) and the union and 
mill owners agreed to implement a new wage scale based on 
worker productivity and not just seniority as it now the case. 
 
10.  In return the mill owners agreed to accept the union,s 
terms for the conditions of retirement of some 3,000 workers. 
 This issue was supposedly resolved earlier this year 
(Reftel) but it came up again in the CL discussions.  The 
mill owners also agreed to invest USD 1 billion over the next 
five years in plant modernization and to upgrade worker 
skills, particularly with regard to ensuring that workers are 
cross-trained to perform a variety of jobs; in addition the 
mill owners agreed to an across the board 4.5 percent wage 
increase for all STIASRM members and to continue the current 
practice of granting three months of paid vacation. 
 
 
UNION LEADER GETS EXTRA HELPING OF SUGAR 
----------------------------------------- 
 
11.  In addition to practice of three months of paid vacation 
that Ramos was able to keep as a standard benefit for the 
workers, he also maintained an annual cash payment from the 
mill owners to the union of 50 million pesos (approximately 
USD 4.6 million). Supposedly these funds are to be used for 
the operation of a hospital for the exclusive use of STIASRM 
members.  So far there is no firm evidence to document the 
existence of this hospital, nor is there any accounting of 
what is done with the money given by the mill owners to the 
union. 
 
12.  Finally, the new Contract Law allows Ramos to charge, on 
behalf of the STIASRM, a fee for all outside workers 
contracted by the mill owners.  The fee established was 2.5 
percent of the monthly wages of any non-union worker hired by 
the mill owners.  At the currently anticipated wages for 
these workers, this would mean that if the mill owners 
ultimately filed 10,000 outsourced positions the union would 
receive 2-3 million pesos a month (approximately USD 
278,000.00).   Reportedly these funds would be used by the 
unions national executive committee for the benefit of the 
workers but since neither Mexican Federal Labor Law nor the 
Contract Law require unions or their leaders to account for 
the use of union funds there is no way to know if this money 
will in fact be used for its intended purpose. 
 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
13.  Although (as yet) there is no court room quality 
evidence to definitively indicate that Enrique Ramos 
Rodriguez has abused his union leadership position for 
personal gain there are certainly a significant number of 
credible allegations.  To date Ramos has done little to 
dispute these allegations, which further adds to the 
widespread speculation that he is just another corrupt labor 
leader looking out for himself.  That said, Ramos has at 
least attempted to spread the wealth to a limited degree 
among the members of the sugar cane workers union.  Moreover, 
Ramos has committed himself and the union to the first real 
changes in the sugar industry,s Contract Law since 1936. 
The changes are not perfect and there is much that could have 
been done.  Nevertheless, the promise of work hour 
flexibility by the union and commitment to invest in both new 
plants and work skill upgrade creates a very real possibility 
that Mexico,s sugar industry may become more competitive. 
These changes are unlikely to put Mexico sugar production on 
a par with that of Brazil,s but they do appear to be steps 
 
MEXICO 00005462  004 OF 004 
 
 
in the right direction. 
 
 
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity and the North American 
Partnership Blog at http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap / 
GARZA