VZCZCXRO0219
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3569/01 2150803
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030803Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6137
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4830
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 2403
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 6003
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 1445
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 3173
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8203
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 4267
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 5286

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 TOKYO 003569 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 08/03/07-2 
 
 
Index: 
 
(4) US asks Japan to extend antiterrorism law 
 
(5) Editorial: Antiterrorism Law: DPJ must become responsible party 
that takes national interests into account 
 
(6) MSDF mission in Indian Ocean a means of defending Japan's 
national interests 
 
(7) American interpretation of Abe's defeat in Upper House election: 
Premature to presume that the administration will collapse 
 
(8) Interview with former Internal Affairs and Communications 
Minister Heizo Takenaka on his opinion of trading of places between 
ruling and opposition camps in Upper House: Good opportunity to 
change bureaucrat-led politics; DPJ should come up with its own 
budget proposal 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(4) US asks Japan to extend antiterrorism law 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
August 3, 2007 
 
The aftermath of the opposition camp trading places with the ruling 
coalition in the House of Councillors is now spreading to Japan-US 
relations, as well. The reason is that Minshuto (Democratic Party of 
Japan) President Ichiro Ozawa made clear the opposition to the 
extension of the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law, which is set to 
expire on November 1, as promised voters in the campaign. US 
Ambassador to Japan Thomas Schieffer sought to constrain Japan, 
saying in the Financial Times August 1 edition: 
 
"Japan is a responsible member of the international community, and I 
would not want Japan to decide that one issue was not important any 
more or that they didn't want to contribute any more." 
 
The Maritime Self-Defense Forces' refueling mission to assist the 
US-led forces' mop-up operation in the Indian Ocean against 
terrorists in Afghanistan is highly valued, with a US Defense 
Department official saying: "The precision of the fueling is high, 
and the refueling support is treasured by the vessels engaging in 
anti-terrorism operations in the Indian Ocean." A Japanese 
government official said: "Since Japan continues to carry out this 
refueling mission, Japan-US relations remain good even after Ground 
Self-Defense Force troops withdrew from Iraq." 
 
If the bill to extend the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law does 
not pass the Diet, the MSDF troop will be withdrawn. Curt Campbell, 
deputy assistant secretary of defense under the Clinton 
administration, said: "If the extension bill is voted down, terrible 
things will happen." 
 
Japan's foreign and defense officials, too, are bewildered. A senior 
Foreign Ministry official said with alarm: "The moment the MSDF 
mission is pulled out due to the expiration of the law, Japan will 
fall into the non-mainstream group in the international community's 
war on terror." A senior Defense Ministry official has explained 
Washington about the Diet rule that even if the Lower House rejects 
the legislation, the Lower House would b able to enact it with a 
 
TOKYO 00003569  002 OF 008 
 
 
two-thirds majority. However, not enough time would be left until 
the law's expiration. 
 
Taku Yamasaki, chairman of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 
Security Research Commission, told reporters on Aug. 2: 
 
"Unless the term of the upcoming extraordinary Diet session, which 
is to convene on Aug. 7, running for four days, is extended until 
November or the prime minister cancels his overseas trip in order to 
resume the extra session after the mid-August O-Bon holiday break, 
we won't be able to take a flexible response." 
 
The DPJ intends to work in line with Ozawa's guidance. Acting 
President Naoto Kan stated in a press briefing on Aug. 2: "I think 
the ruling coalition will ask us to compromise on every issue. But 
there is no way we will make compromises behind the scenes." 
 
Meantime, some in the LDP take the view to let Ozawa do whatever he 
wants to do. 
 
Nobutaka Machimura, who heads a LDP faction from which Prime 
Minister Shinzo Abe hailed, and Masahiko Komura, who also heads a 
faction, met at the end of July after the Upper House race. The two 
former foreign ministers had the following exchange: Let the measure 
be killed in the Upper House with the DPJ's opposition since the 
Lower House will pass the bill eventually. If such happens, it means 
that the DPJ will show how it looks down on relations with the 
United States. 
 
A Japanese diplomat in Washington worried: "The anti-terror law 
extension issue could become a dividing line on whether bilateral 
relations will be hit by a landslide and deteriorate or whether it 
will just be a temporary political phenomenon." 
 
(5) Editorial: Antiterrorism Law: DPJ must become responsible party 
that takes national interests into account 
 
SANKEI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
August 3, 2007 
 
Will the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto), which is now 
the largest party in the House of Councillors, proceed along the 
path to assuming political power? 
 
The Antiterrorism Special Measures Law, which authorizes the 
Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF) to engage in refueling operations 
in the Indian Ocean, is to expire Nov. 1. Attention is being focused 
on what response the DPJ would make to the government's plan to 
extend the law in the extraordinary Diet session this fall. 
 
President Ichiro Ozawa, however, has already indicated his 
opposition to the extension plan, saying, "As we have opposed the 
extension, there is no way for us to shift to supporting it now," 
causing concern in the United States government. 
 
If the main opposition party cannot act in a way that serves Japan's 
national interests in view of the Japan-US alliance and 
international trust in Japan, many of the electorate who voted for 
the DPJ in the Upper House election can be expected to give up on 
the party, based on the judgment that if that is the case, the DPJ 
cannot be allowed to assume power. 
 
 
TOKYO 00003569  003 OF 008 
 
 
Ozawa should try to remove the undeserved label that he gives 
priority to policy over the political situation. 
 
The Antiterrorism Law was enacted based on a UN Security Council 
resolution following the terrorism attacks on the US in September 
¶2001. 
 
The law was extended three times, and each time, the DPJ opposed its 
extension. Under the situation where the ruling coalition has lost 
its majority in the Upper House, if the DPJ continues to oppose the 
extension, the refueling operations will inevitably be suspended. 
 
The mission of the MSDF is to refuel vessels of the multinational 
force participating in the war on terrorism in Afghanistan. Their 
operations are not only for the US. They have refueled naval ships 
from Pakistan, though it is an Islamic nation. In order to keep 
Pakistan in the war on terror, Japan has played a significant role. 
 
Should Japan withdraw from the Indian Ocean, the impact on the 
Japan-US alliance will be serious. 
 
In light of the problem's importance, US Ambassador Thomas Schieffer 
reportedly is eager to meet Ozawa to discuss the issue. But the 
government and the ruling parties should first meet face to face 
with the DPJ. 
 
(6) MSDF mission in Indian Ocean a means of defending Japan's 
national interests 
 
YOMIURI (Page 13) (Abridged slightly) 
August 3, 2007 
 
Now that the opposition camp holds a majority in the House of 
Councillors as a result of its overwhelming victory in the July 29 
poll, a bill to extend the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law might 
be voted down, undermining Japan's national interests as a result. 
This article examines the Maritime Self-Defense Force's ongoing 
fueling operation in the Indian Ocean. 
 
"I think our operation is a passport to the international community 
that is at war with terrorism," an MSDF officer said, looking back 
at the force's activities in the Indian Ocean that started over five 
and a half years ago. 
 
The terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, 
claimed some 3,000 lives, including 24 Japanese. Then German 
Chancellor Schroeder described the event as a declaration of war not 
only against the United States but also against all of civilization. 
The international community soon rose up against terrorism. The 
Japanese government, too, dispatched MSDF destroyers and supply 
ships to the Indian Ocean. They have been refueling vessels and 
seaborne helicopters of US-led coalition forces that are on lookout 
for terrorists and arms transport in Afghanistan and its environs as 
part of Japan's rear-echelon support. 
 
Eleven countries have taken part in the maritime intercept operation 
called Operation Enduring Freedom. At present, 17 vessels from six 
counties are deployed in the area stretching from the Arabian Sea 
north of the Indian Ocean to Africa. Canada and New Zealand have 
announced troop redeployment this fall or later. "Although the 
operation began under the US initiative, it is now an international 
endeavor," the MSDF officer noted. 
 
TOKYO 00003569  004 OF 008 
 
 
 
For instance, the Pakistani Navy joined guard and surveillance 
activities in July 2004. The MSDF refueled Pakistani vessels on 257 
occasions -- the second highest following the US forces' 380 -- as 
of June 21. In addition to fuel, the MSDF has supplied some 6,000 
tons of water to the Pakistani vessels, which have poor capability 
of turning seawater into pure water. Reportedly the Pakistani Navy 
will shortly take command of the coalition forces in place of the 
French Navy. 
 
A Defense Ministry official explained: 
 
"Participation in the war with Islamic extremist groups, such as 
al-Qaeda, by Pakistan, also an Islamic country, carries great 
significance. Anti-American sentiment runs deep in Pakistan, and its 
participation in the war owes much to Japan's assistance." 
 
MSDF Chief of Staff Eiji Yoshikawa, who inspected on July 7 an MSDF 
supply ship refueling the British frigate Richmond, said proudly: 
"Not many counties can deploy supply ships on a long mission. This 
shows Japan's strong national power and the MSDF's high capability." 
Nearly half of the vessels taking part in the maritime intercept 
operation are receiving fuel from the MSDF supply ships. 
 
Hiding out in areas near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, members of 
al-Qaeda and other international terrorist groups are receiving 
training in such countries as Sudan and Somalia. Over 5 tons of arms 
and ammunition have been confiscated in the maritime intercept 
operation. Guarding and surveillance by the United States, Britain, 
France and other countries and the MSDF's ship-to-ship refueling 
operation are indeed "two wheels of a cart." 
 
Self-Defense Fleet Commander Vice Admiral Yoji Koda took this view: 
 
"The coalition forces' activities are similar to yearend police 
special precautions. Activities by terrorist organizations can be 
constrained by keeping watchful eyes." 
 
Apart form the maritime war on terrorism, some 20 countries, 
including the United States and Britain, are engaged in 
search-and-destroy operations against al-Qaeda and the Taliban in 
Afghanistan. The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) 
composed of some 36,000 troops from 37 countries led by the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is conducting security 
operations throughout Afghanistan to help foster the new Afghanistan 
national army in accordance with a UN resolution. 
 
Today, nearly six years after 9/11, over 40 countries are engaged in 
the war on terrorism. The Defense Ministry official noted: 
"Afghanistan is a center of international terrorist groups. A 
failure in nation-building in Afghanistan would force the world to 
live in the shadow of terrorism." 
 
South Korean and German civilians have been abducted by militants in 
recent months, and the death toll of ISAF troops is also on the 
rise. But no one calls for an end to the war on terrorism. Japan's 
departure from this circle of cooperation at this stage would mean 
its withdrawal from the international community. 
 
MSDF assistance (as of June 21, 2007) 
 
Fuel for vessels 480,000 kiloliters (761 times) 
 
TOKYO 00003569  005 OF 008 
 
 
Fuel for helicopters 920 kiloliters (62 times) 
Water 6,090 tons (111 times) 
Total number of ships deployed 59 
Total number of troops deployed 11,280 
 
(7) American interpretation of Abe's defeat in Upper House election: 
Premature to presume that the administration will collapse 
 
SANKEI (Page 3) (Slightly abridged) 
August 3, 2007 
 
Yoshihisa Komori, Washington 
 
Jim Auer, a professor at Vanderbilt University and a former director 
of the Japan Desk at the US Department of Defense, in commenting on 
the campaign for the July House of Councillors election noted that 
the issues that set off the public were the pension mess and 
scandals involving cabinet ministers. He commented: 
 
"I strongly hope Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will not cave in to calls 
growing after his election defeat to drop his basic policy of 
"emerging from the postwar regime. Instead, the prime minister 
should promote this policy with a strong will. The voters did not 
express opposition to it, and his policy, on the contrary, will 
contribute to strengthening the Japan-US alliance and expanding 
Japan's contributions to the international community." 
 
He meant that constitutional revision, educational reform, Japan 
positive commitment to international security, and promotion of 
value-oriented diplomacy - tasks that must be tackled to build a new 
Japan - were not issues in the election campaign. He emphasized that 
voters voiced no opposition to them. 
 
Of course, some offer different views. On any themes, a variety of 
views are presented in the United States. The Los Angeles Times in 
its editorial titled: "Is Abe a Japanese Bush?" cynically noted: 
"Prime Minister Abe, who is reputedly arrogant, called for amending 
the Constitution and Japan playing a broader international security 
role, but the voters did not share his enthusiasm." 
 
The New York Times, noted for its harsh criticism of Abe that 
approaches the bashing level, indicated that since many Japanese 
regard the strengthening of the alliance in cooperation with the 
Bush administration as dangerous, Prime Minister Abe's basic policy 
was rejected in the election 
 
Even so, many political figures in the US, even those who are 
anti-Bush, have expressed support for the Abe administration's 
foreign policy, as seen from House International Relations Committee 
Chairman Lantos' announcement of his support for Prime Minister 
Abe's efforts to revise the Constitution. Democratic presidential 
candidate Sen. Barack Obama also welcomed Japan's war on the terror 
and other major contributions to ensuring international security 
under the lead of Prime Minister Abe, saying that Japan has been on 
the road to becoming an ordinary country. 
 
Michael Green, who until recently was in charge of Japanese and 
Asian policies as senior director for Asian affairs at the National 
Security Council in the Bush White House, commented: 
 
"It is premature to predict that the Abe administration will 
collapse. Some observers anticipate that Abe may be pressed to 
 
TOKYO 00003569  006 OF 008 
 
 
retreat from his ambitious diplomatic policy and national security 
goals as a result of his crushing defeat in the election. But Just 
the opposite may be true. His defeat was not due to his diplomatic 
and security policies." 
 
Green then emphasized the need for Prime Minister Abe to strengthen 
strategic ties with other democratic countries when he visits India 
and attends the annual APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) 
forum and the annual meeting of United Nations general assembly. He 
also proposed coordinating views to enable Japan to exercise the 
right to collective self-defense. 
 
Such positive views among some Americans about the future course of 
Prime Minister Abe also reflect their anxiety about the Democratic 
Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto). Brad Glosserman, an expert on 
security affairs in Asian, said: "The DPJ has yet to have its own 
policy identity. Its immediate domestic policy stance has not been 
revealed, either." The Wall Street Journal in its editorial said: 
"(As a result of the DPJ's domestic policies,) the ongoing reform of 
the civil servant system, including restrictions on amakudari (the 
practice of government officials finding employment in the private 
sector after retirement), might be delayed. In addition, 
expenditures for infrastructure and other public works projects 
might be increased, and the government eventually might become as 
bloated as before." 
 
(8) Interview with former Internal Affairs and Communications 
Minister Heizo Takenaka on his opinion of trading of places between 
ruling and opposition camps in Upper House: Good opportunity to 
change bureaucrat-led politics; DPJ should come up with its own 
budget proposal 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Full) 
August 3, 2007 
 
-- What do you think the causes of the defeat of the LDP in the 
recent Upper House election are? 
 
The LDP was unable to come up with a major campaign issue matching 
postal privatization, which split public opinion into two. Nobody 
will oppose growth strategy or education revitalization. If the LDP 
wants to revitalize education, it could propose privatizing Tokyo 
University so that it would become free of the restrictions set by 
the Ministry of Education. This proposal would split public opinion. 
The LDP, however, tried to do it innocuously. That is why voters' 
policy interest was very low. Then, the Social Insurance Agency 
(SIA) problem sprung up, infuriating the public. 
 
Former Prime Minister Koizumi was criticized for his "one-phrase 
politics", but politics should be administered in simple terms. 
Political policies are complex and difficult. It is impossible to 
have the public understand all policy themes. Political parties are 
being put to the test on their capability to convey the essence of 
policies. In that sense, the DPJ's "missing pension records" was 
successful (as a campaign issue)." 
 
-- Do you mean the Abe administration's message was difficult to 
understand? 
 
"Mr. Koizumi targeted the unaffiliated voters. Once you have changed 
your stance, you must do it thoroughly. Mr. Abe allowed postal 
rebels to return to the LDP. He also relied on organized votes. As a 
 
TOKYO 00003569  007 OF 008 
 
 
result, he lost the LDP's traditional election base as well as 
support from swing voters. He was shunned by unaffiliated voters, 
since he tried to do things innocuously. 
 
-- The LDP lost in rural single-seat constituencies with its 
structural reform policy being criticized. Isn't it the case? 
 
"That is the logic the forces of resistance use. The typical case is 
the Shikoku region, where the LDP was unable to gain even a single 
seat. Among four prefectures in that region, three prefectures had 
postal-rebel candidates. The situation apparently indicates that the 
LDP has changed. The economy has further improved over the past two 
years since the so-called postal election in 2005. If you look at 
the situation from abroad, the defeat of the LDP would look very 
strange. People say that regional districts have become 
impoverished, but the effective demand-supply ratio of labor force 
in regional districts has risen, reflecting the spreading of the 
business uptrend. 
 
-- Opposition parties criticized that stockholders and corporate 
managers have split profits generated by the recovered economy 
between themselves, but corporate employees and sub-contractors have 
not received benefits. What is your view on that? 
 
"It is true that company shares have increased. However, the 
situation was just the reverse in the 1990s with the labor 
distribution rate staying too high. Adjustment to lower that rate is 
now going on. Regional districts have become impoverished not 
because of the reform effort but due to local industries losing 
competitiveness. Opposition parties have not yet come up with a 
solution to settle this situation. Will the situation improve if the 
government scatters subsidies to farmers? If it actually does that, 
the whole state will sink due to the 'balanced decline of the 
national land'." 
 
-- Will Prime Minister Abe continue with the structural reforms? 
 
"I think he will inherit the Koizumi policy agenda. The approaches 
of cabinet ministers and special advisors to the prime minister, 
however, have been insufficient. I hope to see influential figures 
with a reform mindset, such as LDP Diet Policy Committee Chairman 
Toshihiro Nikai and former Secretary General Tsutomu Takebe, play 
active roles. 
 
-- The election this time has also raised basic questions about the 
Upper House itself. 
 
"To begin with, Upper House members must pursue discussions based on 
an approach that is different from the one adopted in the Lower 
House, which is specialized.  However, I see many who became Upper 
House members just because they were unable to gain Lower House 
seats. Many of them are simply members of Diet policy cliques, 
instead of being experts. Another cause of the defeat of the LDP is 
that it picked candidates in an old-fashioned manner. 
 
-- What will become of future Diet deliberations? 
 
"I hope to see the ruling and opposition parties discuss issues in a 
far-reaching manner. The DPJ's policy-making ability will be put to 
the test. It is facing a crucial point. If the DPJ makes 
constructive proposals as it did in the Diet sessions after the 
Upper House election in 1998, which focused on financial issues, the 
 
TOKYO 00003569  008 OF 008 
 
 
LDP should swallow its requests. This is an opportunity to shift 
from the traditional bureaucrat-led policy-making method, meaning 
bureaucrats bringing members of Diet policy cliques into their fold, 
to politics-led policy-making method. 
 
The best policy-making process varies at any given time. When the 
government and the ruling parties have a stable majority, they can 
use the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy. However, when the 
opposition takes control of the Upper House, it will be better to 
set up a forum for talks between the ruling and opposition parties. 
 
-- Do you think DPJ head Ozawa will accept policy talks? 
 
"I would like the DPJ to be wiser. It will not do to change only 
selected policies within the framework provided by the government. 
Since it is the major advantage for the DPJ that it can start with a 
clean slate, it can create any framework it wishes. It can also 
introduce its own budget plan totally different from the 
government's. It can also present its own economic outlook against 
the government's economic outlook. If it does that, a real battle of 
words can take place. 
 
The job of legislators is to write laws. But there is no one who 
joined the Diet in order to write laws. They all want to use their 
power in the administration. That is why bureaucrat-led politics 
exists. If the DPJ introduces good bills, Japan's policy will 
improve. 
 
SCHIEFFER