Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07MANAGUA1866, 2006 REPORT ON THE POLITICAL CULTURE OF DEMOCRACY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MANAGUA1866.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MANAGUA1866 2007-08-08 17:40 2011-08-19 20:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Managua
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMU #1866/01 2201740
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 081740Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0954
INFO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUMIAAA/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
UNCLAS MANAGUA 001866 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV KDEM NU
SUBJECT: 2006 REPORT ON THE POLITICAL CULTURE OF DEMOCRACY 
IN NICARAGUA 
 
REF: MANAGUA 1750 
 
------- 
Summary 
------- 
 
1. (U) The newly-published 2006 Report on Political Culture of Democracy in Nicaragua presents important data on the long-term patterns of public opinion regarding democracy, corruption, economic well-being, and the effectiveness of national vs. municipal government. Produced under USAID auspices, the report is based on data gathered in June 2006. The data highlights Nicaraguans, low support for democracy and relatively high tolerance for corruption, facts the authors attribute to the constant state of confrontation between the executive and legislative branches that characterized the Bolanos administration, the demoralizing effects of the PLC-FSLN pact, and the lack of understanding of the definition of democracy. At a time when basic freedoms are under assault in several Latin American nations, the report presents important information on the democratic values of Nicaraguan society. Additional events to publicize the information contained in the report are planned for the end of October or the beginning of November in both the capital and other university cities throughout the country. End Summary.
 
------ 
Trends 
------ 
 
2. (U) The data indicates that, in addition to having had one of the lowest levels of preexisting support for the political system, the Nicaraguan people,s support of the country's current political system dipped since the previous study in 2004. Civic participation dropped from 24 percent to 22 percent and overall support for the political system plummeted from 50 percent to 45 percent. Confidence in political parties inched up but confidence in elections dropped.
 
--------------------------------- 
Electoral and Civic Participation 
--------------------------------- 
 
3. (U) Participation in national elections has been reasonably high in Nicaragua, with an average abstention rate of only 21 percent; however, the abstention rate in municipal and departmental elections is generally far higher. Of the respondents who did not participate in the 2001 presidential election, 46 percent said that they did not vote because of lack of an official voter registration card and only 17 percent because of lack of interest. Citizens aged 26 or over were twice as likely to vote as those aged 16-25, and the age group which participated most was 36-45 year olds. Middle class participants out-voted those of lower or higher income. FSLN supporters were slightly more likely to vote than PLC supporters, and members of both groups were significantly more likely to vote than those who supported other parties.
 
4. (U) The incidence of civic participation in Nicaragua is low, with only religious gatherings- which 55 percent of the population attended - showing widespread attendance. Educational meetings were the second most well-attended, with 28 percent participation, but community, political, professional and union gatherings all had a 15 percent participation rate, or less.
 
--------------------- 
Support for Democracy 
--------------------- 
 
5. (U) Figures measuring Nicaraguans, support for democracy were troubling. The report concludes that 25 percent of Nicaraguans consistently supports democracy, 27 percent inconsistently supports democracy, 32 percent would be willing to break with democracy, and 16 percent consistently supports authoritarianism. The authors attributed this disturbing finding to the constant state of confrontation between the executive and legislative branches that characterized the Bolanos administration, as well as the demoralizing effects of the PLC-FSLN pact. 43 percent rated the work of President Bolanos as "bad" or "very bad", and only 8 percent rated it as "good" or "very good". The report also suggests that there is significant confusion about the meaning of democracy: 30 percent had a higher level of understanding of the term and 17 percent an intermediate understanding, but 21 percent had little understanding and 32 percent had no understanding.
 
---------- 
Corruption 
---------- 
 
7. (U) Public consciousness of corruption heightened in recent years, in part because former President Bolanos made fighting corruption, specifically prosecuting former President and now convicted felon Arnaldo Aleman, the centerpiece of his political agenda. Nevertheless, the public perception of government corruption has not improved: 90 percent of Nicaraguans believe corruption is very or somewhat common among public servants, but relatively low levels felt themselves victimized by corruption. Rural inhabitants tended to perceive a slightly lower level of corruption than urban dwellers. The most commonly experienced forms of corruption were bribery by the courts, at 23 percent, with bribery by the municipality at 13 percent. The least experienced forms were bribery by the police, at 7 percent, and bribery by a public employee, at 4 percent. In the last twelve months, on average, 18 percent of participants had been victimized by corruption. The most frequent victims were males and those respondents with the least resources. Participants were more likely to approve of government officials acting outside the law if they themselves had been a victim of a crime or lived in an insecure place.
 
--------------------------------------- 
Confidence in Governmental Institutions 
--------------------------------------- 
 
8. (U) Support for most institutions and overall support for the system dropped since the previous report in 2004. When comparing specific institutions, the Catholic Church received the highest rating, followed by the media, army, national police, and townships. Political parties received the lowest confidence ratings, below the central government, the Supreme Court, Public Prosecutor's office, and National Assembly. The Permanent Commission on Human Rights (DDHH), the Supreme Electoral Council, Attorney General, justice system, and elections, fell in the middle.
 
--------- 
Economics 
--------- 
 
9. (U) Interviewees, opinion of the country's economic situation was closely associated with their overall faith in the system. 66 percent of Nicaraguans rated the country's economy as "bad" or "very bad", while only 29 percent rated it as "neither good nor bad" and 5 percent as "good" or "very good". Out of ten categories, unemployment (27 percent), poverty (25 percent), economic issues (15 percent), and corruption (9 percent) were identified as the gravest problems facing the country, contrasting with the lack of health services (1 percent), protests (1 percent), and transportation (2 percent) as the least important.
 
---------------- 
Local Government 
---------------- 
 
10. (U) Government offices at the municipal level received much higher ratings than the national government: of the 30 percent of citizens who did business at the town level, a relatively high 76 percent felt that they were treated very well, and 86 percent had their business resolved satisfactorily. Nevertheless, scores in some categories, such as the townships' management of funds, did not inspire confidence in the majority of respondents. Residents of medium sized cities tended to give the highest approval ratings and those from rural areas the lowest, likely because of infrequent access to services. Of those surveyed, 11 percent had attended a municipal or town forum within the last year, with smaller communities demonstrating a higher level of participation.
 
------------------------ 
International Comparison 
------------------------ 
 
11. (U) Out of the fifteen Latin American countries included in the survey, Nicaragua showed the same trends of overall interpretations of democracy as Honduras and Guatemala, but varied widely from neighboring Costa Rica, which the report concluded was nearly twice as likely to support a stable democracy. Nicaragua scored within the bottom third of countries surveyed for its citizens' overall support for the system and local government, and also for those who felt victimized by corruption.
 
----------- 
Methodology 
----------- 
 
12. (U)  The 2006 Report on the Political Culture of 
Democracy in Nicaragua was conducted throughout Latin America 
with local partner the University of Central America, with 
direction from the University of Vanderbilt Center for the 
Americas' Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), and 
sponsorship by USAID.  The Nicaraguan project is one of 
fifteen completed by LAPOP biannually throughout Latin 
America.  The margin of error is plus/minus 2.5% percent and 
the level of confidence is 95 percent.  For the purposes of 
this cable the figures cited are rounded to the nearest whole 
number. 
 
--------------------------- 
Composition of Interviewees 
--------------------------- 
 
13.  (U)  The Nicaraguan LAPOP collected data from more than 
1,700 interviews which took place between June 11, 2006 and 
June 28, 2006 with participants who differed in age, gender, 
race, religion, and origin.  A little more than a third of 
those interviewed was aged from 16-25 years old and nearly a 
fourth was aged from 26-35 years old, reflecting the overall 
age distribution of the Nicaraguan population.  35 percent 
had completed primary education, 43 percent secondary 
education, and 12 percent higher education, while 9 percent 
had no formal education.  In terms of religion, 63 percent of 
participants identified themselves as Catholic and 20 percent 
as Evangelical, while 12 percent was not affiliated with any 
religion.  71 percent, 26 percent, 2 percent and 1 percent 
respectively identified themselves as Mestizo, White, Black 
or Afro-Caribbean, and Indigenous.  Monthly household income 
ranged from the 31 percent that earned fewer than 900 
Cordobas, to the 52 percent that earned between 900 and 5300 
Cordobas, to the 8 percent that earned more that earned above 
5,300 Cordobas. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
14. (SBU)  Although the results of the LAPOP study show 
significant long-term trends, we believe that if the study 
were repeated today, with post-election data, much of the 
data would show additional downwards trends in support of the 
political system and faith in democracy.  A SID-Gallup Poll 
based on data gathered from June 5 to June 12, 2007 showed 
that the Nicaraguan public has even less faith in the system 
and that President Ortega,s personal popularity had 
plummeted. (reftel) End Comment. 
TRIVELLI