Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07BEIJING5042, CHINA SHOWS INTEREST IN DETAILS OF 123 AGREEMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BEIJING5042.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07BEIJING5042 2007-08-02 09:09 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXRO9040
OO RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #5042 2140909
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 020909Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0385
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVE
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 6572
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 4386
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 2056
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS BEIJING 005042 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: BEXP ENRG ETTC MNUC PARM PREL TRGY KNNP
SUBJECT: CHINA SHOWS INTEREST IN DETAILS OF 123 AGREEMENT 
WITH INDIA 
 
REF: STATE 104171 
 
1.  (SBU) Emboffs met with MFA Department of Arms Control 
Nuclear Division Deputy Director Xia Tian to deliver reftel 
nonpaper and a copy of the U.S.-India Joint Statement 
regarding the United States-India Agreement for Peaceful 
Nuclear Cooperation (123 Agreement).  DOE China Executive 
Director placed special emphasis on India's commitment under 
the 123 Agreement to establish a new civilian national 
enrichment facility under International Atomic Energy Agency 
(IAEA) safeguards dedicated to reprocessing safeguarded 
nuclear material.  Emboffs urged Xia to treat the nonpaper as 
"NSG Confidential." 
 
2.  (SBU) Xia, using notes prepared in advance, slowly and 
deliberately commented that "While China in principle 
supports such international cooperation, there remains some 
divergence in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) for which 
time will be needed to discuss the details of this agreement. 
The next meeting of the NSG Advisory Group will be critical." 
 Continuing to refer to his prepared notes, Xia then raised 
several concerns.  Specifically, he asked: 
 
--Does the Agreement include the transfer of enrichment or 
reprocessing technology or equipment? 
--What happens if India tests again? 
--Is the right-of-return written into the Agreement? 
--Will the Agreement be voted on by the U.S. Congress before 
being presented to the NSG Advisory Group? 
 
Xia noted that discussions in the NSG could be "problematic" 
if the 123 Agreement is not first approved by the U.S. 
Congress.  Emboffs were able to answer all questions on the 
basis of reftel guidance, the U.S.-India Joint Statement, and 
Under Secretary Burns' On-The-Record Briefing. 
RANDT