Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07AITTAIPEI2012, MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S UN REFERENDUM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07AITTAIPEI2012.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07AITTAIPEI2012 2007-08-31 09:34 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0004
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #2012/01 2430934
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 310934Z AUG 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6626
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7198
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8452
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 002012 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S UN REFERENDUM 
 
 
1. Summary:  As Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies continued to 
report on the aftermath of U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John 
Negroponte's TV interview on Taiwan's UN referendum, news coverage 
on August 31 also focused on the DPP Central Executive Committee's 
passage of the party's "normal country" resolution draft Thursday; 
on the 2008 president poll; and on a Mainland Affairs Council 
decision to allow Chinese-born NBA star Yao Ming to visit Taiwan in 
September.  All major Chinese-language papers carried on inside 
pages a story by "The Nelson Report" saying if Taiwan insists on 
holding a UN referendum, Washington is likely to change its 
ambiguous policy of "not supporting" Taiwan independence. 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, Columnist Antonio Chiang 
noted in the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" that Taiwan's UN 
referendum, which caused strong repercussions on the triangular 
relationship among Washington, Beijing and Taipei, is a game of 
crisis in virtual reality and also a test of the United States and 
China's joint management of Taiwan.  A separate "Apple Daily" op-ed, 
however, said no matter whether the UN referendum bodes well or ill 
for Taiwan, President Chen's ability to turn the issue of de jure 
Taiwan independence from a taboo for Taiwan into a hot potato or a 
potential fuse between the United States and China has helped him 
build the foundation for his future political position in Taiwan. 
An editorial in the pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" 
criticized Negroponte and said he has no right to scold Taiwan's 
democracy.  An op-ed in the conservative, pro-unification, 
English-language "China Post," on the other hand, urged Washington 
to take effective step to make President Chen "halt his irrational 
and risky course on Taiwan independence."   End summary. 
 
A) "A Game of Crisis in Virtual Reality" 
 
Columnist Antonio Chiang noted in his column in the mass-circulation 
"Apple Daily" [circulation: 530,000] (8/31): 
 
"... The Taiwan issue will surely become a major agenda to be 
discussed during [Chinese President] Hu Jintao's meeting with [U.S. 
President] George W. Bush when the APEC summit is held in Australia 
in early September. The Chinese Communist Party's 17th National 
Congress, which will kick off in October, is essential for 
stabilizing Hu's power.  Before that, [China's Taiwan Affairs Office 
Director] Chen Yunlin will set out for the United States to lobby 
the State Department, the National Security Council, major think 
tanks and overseas Chinese associations [on Taiwan's UN referendum]. 
 Beijing regards [Taiwan's] UN referendum as a test to its 
'Anti-Secession Law;' the referendum is also a test on the joint 
management of Taiwan by Washington and Beijing.  Beijing has 
obviously worked out an all-out plan, trying every way it can to 
stop the referendum. ... 
 
"In early September, A-Bian will have a dialogue with U.S. think 
tanks via the digital videoconference, in which former U.S. National 
Security Council official Michael Green is ready to challenge Bian. 
...  This will be a great chance for both sides [i.e. Taipei and 
Washington] to communicate and find a way out of their current 
standoff.  If the Bian administration can handle this issue as a 
major crisis like Beijing does, there will still be chances to stop 
the trains from colliding with each other." 
 
B) "A-Bian Toying with the United States and China Stubbornly" 
 
Professor Emerson Chang, director of Nan Hua University's Department 
of International Studies, opined in the mass-circulation "Apple 
Daily" [circulation: 530,000] (8/31): 
 
"... President Chen Shui-bian's calculated layout for the UN 
referendum and his unbending resistance to U.S. pressure indicate 
that the United States has lost its authority to define the status 
quo across the Taiwan Strait, and that it might as well think about 
how it can employ its power to make Chen make up his mind. ...  The 
United States' feeling of incapability was also reflected in the way 
[Deputy Secretary of State John] Negroponte dodged two critical 
questions [during the interview]:  First, how is the United States 
going to stop Taiwan from continuing to push for the referendum? 
Second, what is the United States' possible reaction if Taiwan's UN 
referendum triggers conflicts across the Taiwan Strait? 
Negroponte's original intent was perhaps to retain strategic 
ambiguity [to these questions] so that he can enjoy more elbow room. 
 But the consequence is that [such ambiguity] might mislead both 
China and Taiwan and make people believe that the United States is 
at its wits' end or that it is still testing China's bottom line. 
Such misunderstanding will encourage Taiwan, while China may be 
forced to adopt a tougher stance, a move that will significantly 
squeeze Washington's room for ambiguity. ... 
 
"...  The real concern of the United States and China lies in the 
fact that, once the referendum is passed and before the new 
president in Taiwan is sworn in, Chen may continue to step on the 
red line of de jure independence, for instance by linking in one way 
 
or another the day on which the referendum is held with Taiwan 
Independence Day.  Should this happen, the problems and grudges 
between Washington and Beijing will become more serious than they 
are now.  Regardless of whether it bodes well or ill for Taiwan, 
Chen's ability to turn the issue of de jure Taiwan independence from 
a taboo or red line for Taiwan into a hot potato or a potential fuse 
between the United States and China has helped to build the 
foundation for his political standing in the post-Bian era." 
 
C) "Negroponte Has No Right to Scold Taiwan's Democracy" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" [circulation: 
20,000] editorialized (8/31): 
 
"U.S. President George W. Bush took an unfortunate step Tuesday in 
his 'war against referendum' aimed at the initiative launched by the 
governing Democratic Progressive Party for a nationwide citizens' 
vote on whether to use the name of 'Taiwan' to apply to join the 
United Nations. ...  We should add that Negroponte grossly distorted 
the so-called 'four noes' by turning them from a pledge to refrain 
from four specific actions into a blank check and by ignoring the 
fact that Beijing has trampled on Chen's precondition that the 'four 
noes' would be valid 'so long as the PRC government bears no 
intention to use military force against Taiwan' through its 
threatening deployment of hefty offensive forces and missiles 
opposite Taiwan and by the enactment in March 2005 of an 
'Anti-Secession Act,' which authorizes the use of 'non-peaceful 
means,' if Taiwan does not 'behave' and persists in refusing 
unification. ... 
 
"The choice of Negroponte as the messenger should have dispelled any 
illusions about Bush's commitment to democratic values.  No other 
U.S. leading diplomat has anything approaching Negroponte's rich 
experience as a hit-man for Washington's 'wars' against democracy 
and social justice under the catch-curse of 'communism' in Asia, 
Latin America and the Middle East and as a specialist in covering up 
gross abuses of human rights by death squads organized by 
U.S.-supported dictatorships. ... 
 
"It is no small irony that Negroponte's arrogant warning to the DPP 
government to "behave" took place almost simultaneously with the 
endorsement of the proposed U.N. referendum as a legitimate exercise 
in 'direct participatory democracy' by 'communist' Nicaraguan 
President Daniel Ortega, whose Sandinista government had been the 
target of the vicious and ultimately successful 'contra' war which 
Negroponte helped to stage-manage from Tegucigalpa.  We urge the 
Bush administration to cease acting as Beijing's 'enforcer' and 
return to support democratic values by accepting President Chen's 
invitation and engage in direct and equal dialogue on the question 
of Taiwan's U.N. membership, instead of sending paternalistic 
warnings through the media of an authoritarian PRC and a notorious 
defender of military dictatorship who has no right whatsoever to 
speak to us about how to "behave" as a democratic nation." 
 
D) "What's the U.S.' Next Step If the Referendum Passes?"" 
 
Dr. William Fang opined in the conservative, pro-unification, 
English-language "China Post" [circulation: 30,000] (8/31): 
 
"... Taipei will file another formal membership application with the 
world body, only this time on an even stronger basis -- the 
unequivocal support of the majority of Taiwan residents, as 
indicated by the results of the referendum.  Of course it is a 
foregone conclusion, which is clear even to 'pan-green' leaders, 
that in the present world situation the application will fail again. 
 Such behavior has been jeered by knowledgeable people as 
'head-bumping diplomacy' which will only bring humiliation and other 
bitter fruit in foreign affairs to Taipei.  So what?  The political 
climate in Taiwan has already become one in which defeats and 
humiliation are a plus for President Chen, in terms of winning 
sympathy votes at polls, as long as he dares to openly assert and 
re-assert the sovereignty of Taiwan against all odds.  On this 
matter, many native Taiwanese care more about the process than the 
outcome.  There are already indications that the stronger the U.S. 
opposition, the greater solidarity displayed by the 'pan-green' 
camp.  No matter what, in the eyes of large numbers of native 
Taiwanese, President Chen is destined to be a hero, either 
triumphant or tragic. 
 
"The real question should be directed to the United States:  What is 
the next step it will take to effectively stop President Chen from 
further moving toward Taiwan independence to which Washington has 
voiced its firm opposition?  It is generally acknowledged that the 
most important reason that Chen and his supporters have gone so far 
in pursuit of their goal of an independent Taiwan is the tolerance 
and conniving of the U.S. government over the years, as Americans 
believe the island existing outside the sphere of Beijing's 
influence complies with their national interest. ...  Negroponte 
told Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV that the U.S. believed Taiwan 
 
authorities should display a responsible attitude in enhancing 
Taiwan's interest, while at the same time not trying to undermine 
regional stability.  It was well said.  But, Washington should lose 
no time in taking effective steps to make Chen halt his irrational 
and risky course on Taiwan independence." 
 
WANG