Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07AITTAIPEI1891, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07AITTAIPEI1891.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07AITTAIPEI1891 2007-08-20 09:08 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #1891/01 2320908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 200908Z AUG 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6441
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7140
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8394
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001891 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage August 18-20 on Typhoon Sepat, which hit Taiwan Saturday 
morning and caused severe damage to Taiwan's agriculture; on the 
Taiwan government's controversial decision on the use of ractopamine 
in pork; on the 2008 Taiwan presidential election; and on the U.S. 
sub-prime lending crisis and its impact on Taiwan's stock market. 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, an editorial in the 
pro-independence "Liberty Times" discussed the calls for signing a 
free trade agreement (FTA) between the United States and Taiwan. 
The article criticized the U.S. executive branch and its officials 
stationed in Taiwan for bowing to China's pressure regarding 
Taiwan's UN referendum and failing to act proactively to push for 
the signing of the U.S.-Taiwan FTA.  The "Liberty Talk" column in 
the "Liberty Times" also implicitly criticized AIT Director Stephen 
Young for apologizing for the sub-prime lending crisis only, but not 
for the U.S. opposition to Taiwan's holding a UN referendum nor for 
Washington's decision to allow President Chen Shui-bian to transit 
in Alaska only [Note:  the "apology" for the sub-prime lending 
crisis was not a part of the Director's 8/16 speech to which the 
newspaper attributed the "apology."]  An editorial in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" discussed former 
U.S. ambassador to the UN John Bolton's recent trip to Taiwan, in 
which he voiced his strong support for Taiwan's UN bid.  An 
editorial in the conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
"China Post" also discussed President Chen Shui-bian's upcoming 
transit stops in Alaska to and from Central America.  The article 
said Washington's decision to allow Chen to stop over in Anchorage 
only was aimed at expressing the U.S. frustration with Chen's 
"insistence on changing the status quo in the Taiwan Strait."  End 
summary. 
 
A) "Respond Proactively to the Calls for Liberalization of 
Taiwan-U.S. Trade and Economics" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 720,000] 
editorialized (8/20): 
 
"Almost on the same day, voices were heard in both the United States 
and Taiwan calling for the two countries to sign a free trade 
agreement (FTA).  Despite the fact that the U.S. government has yet 
to make an official response regarding this issue, the efforts to 
push for economic liberalization, including the signing of FTAs with 
the island's trade partners, remains an important subject for Taiwan 
in its pursuit of economic prosperity. ...  Heritage Foundation 
senior research fellow John Tkacik, Jr., however, holds a different 
view from that of the U.S. officials in Taiwan.  He said in an 
article published on August 15 the U.S.-Taiwan FTA has been stalled 
for too long and that for its own interests, the United States 
should sign an FTA with Taiwan as early as possible. ... 
 
"Discourses and analyses similar to that of Tkacik could also be 
found in the U.S. private sector over the past few years, and the 
U.S. Congress has also voiced support for the realization of the 
FTA.  But the fact that the U.S. executive branch and AIT have not 
been acting proactively enough, plus China's obstruction, have 
resulted in stagnation on the signing of a U.S.-Taiwan FTA.  [An 
FTA] is an important objective that the office in charge of Taiwan's 
trade talks should strive to achieve.  In fact, the U.S. executive 
branch has bowed to China's pressure with regard to political issues 
such as Taiwan's holding a referendum on its UN bid, opposing the 
Taiwan people's expression of their free will.  All the more, it has 
become an accomplice encouraging the international community to 
impose political apartheid on Taiwan.  Officials in the U.S. 
executive branch, including those stationed in Taiwan, advocate that 
Taiwan expand economic opening to China.  They have overlooked the 
fact that Taiwan's economics and trade have been seriously tilted 
toward China, and they have disregarded China's obvious scheme to 
annex Taiwan.  The Taiwan people cannot help but wonder whether the 
United States has ever practiced what it preaches when it said it 
wants to promote freedom and democracy to the world. ..." 
 
B) "Is Stephen Young's Apology Enough?" 
 
The "Liberty Talk" column in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" 
[circulation: 720,000] stated (8/20): 
 
"AIT Taipei Director Stephen Young recently apologized to Taiwan - 
not for the U.S. opposition to Taiwan's holding a UN referendum, nor 
for [Washington's] decision to allow President Chen Shui-bian to 
transit in Alaska only, a move which has 'indirectly humiliated the 
dignity of all the Taiwan people' - but for the sub-prime lending 
crisis in the United States, which has resulted in a plunge of the 
Taiwan stock price index, causing severe losses for the Taiwan stock 
holders. ... 
 
"If this [sub-prime lending crisis] is simply a natural phenomenon 
of capitalism, it would not seem necessary for Young to apologize. 
But Young knows very clearly that it is not a natural disaster, but 
 
a man-made crisis created by the Americans. ...  As a result, when 
the Americans cannot afford to pay for their sub-prime loans, those 
who cannot sleep at night are not the American bankers or Federal 
Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke but the investment companies and stock 
holders of other countries. ...  Young said he was sorry, but can 
that make up for the losses of the Taiwan people?" 
 
C) "When China Is Taiwan's Friend" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] editorialized (8/18): 
 
"The trip to Taiwan by former U.S. ambassador to the UN John Bolton 
shows there are at least a few people in the upper tiers of 
Washington who are prepared to speak in support of Taiwan and to act 
on their words by visiting and affording respect to the office of 
Taiwanese president.  So, more strength to him and those like him. 
But Bolton knows, as much as any informed friend or foe of Taiwan, 
that Taiwan's bid to join the UN is about the performance, not the 
result.  When conclusions are foregone, sometimes there is hay to be 
made from the ritual of failure.  Regrettably, all too often this 
hay is left in the barn, so to speak, by diplomats who simply do not 
know how to communicate with Washington's jumpier officials. ... 
 
"... China has threatened to introduce a motion to the UN to affirm 
that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China, an 
action that would be as strategically inept as any that Beijing has 
come up with in recent years.  And this come just as many begin to 
wake up to Beijing's attitude toward the rest of the world:  If you 
have what we want, then we can be friends; if you dare cast light on 
our atrocities and neglect, then we can not.  If Beijing is stupid 
enough to up-end the 'status quo' that pro-China forces in the US 
use to keep Taiwan in line, it will find little joy. ...  China's 
problem lies in the majority that remains.  Most countries have been 
happy to follow along with China's blustering and demagoguery 
because most of it has seemed to be hot air.  Humor Beijing a little 
and keeps things calm, so the reasoning goes, and economic benefits 
will be there for everyone. 
 
"But in demanding that this pragmatism turn into support for a 
symbolic statement that would authorize Chinese violence, Beijing 
will likely discover that many countries - possibly most - will be 
less tolerant.  The result: a humiliating majority of abstentions 
and a number of 'no' votes sprinkled among them, and a severe blow 
to the credibility of China's claim to Taiwan both at home and 
abroad.  Advocates of Taiwanese independence must be salivating at 
the thought of it: an international repudiation of Beijing's 
imperial agenda sparked by China's own stupidity.  Some in China 
must realize that there is this risk, and the whole affair may 
quietly disappear.  But it remains tempting to say to China, and to 
its UN cheer squad:  Bring it on, you oafs.  Do your worst." 
 
D) "Chen Makes Another Voyage" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" 
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (8/20): 
 
" ... However, the U.S. government has been careful to choose the 
places where Taiwan leaders may transit, and the place chosen for 
the transit stops has been interpreted to reflect the current state 
of ties between Taipei and Washington.  At present, it appears that 
Alaska has been chosen to express Washington's frustration with 
President Chen's insistence on changing the status quo in the Taiwan 
Strait.  Despite repeated protests and warnings from Washington, 
President Chen has pressed on with his plan to hold a referendum on 
our government's efforts to rejoin the United Nations under the name 
'Taiwan.'  It is clear that Washington is displeased with this 
policy and is making Chen stop in a faraway place in order to 
demonstrate its displeasure. 
 
"By refusing to get off his aircraft, President Chen is trying to 
make the same kind of protest that [former] President Lee made many 
years ago.  However, unlike President Lee's actions more than a 
decade ago, we believe President Chen's protest is likely to fall on 
deaf ears in Washington.  After all, the U.S. government is no 
longer refusing to let Taiwan's democratically elected leader 
transit in American territory.  Instead, Washington is merely 
retaliating against President Chen for his repeated efforts to break 
down the status quo in a highly sensitive region of the world. ... 
Unlike in the past, when U.S. public opinion was deeply impressed by 
our democracy, these days our American friends are likely to say 
'suit yourself' when President Chen refuses to step out of his 
plane." 
 
YOUNG