Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07SEOUL2096, REGIONALISM: STILL A FACTOR IN KOREAN ELECTIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07SEOUL2096.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07SEOUL2096 2007-07-13 01:05 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Seoul
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUL #2096/01 1940105
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 130105Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5484
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2807
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 8134
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2921
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 2060
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J2 SEOUL KOR
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J5 SEOUL KOR
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA SCJS SEOUL KOR
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC//OSD/ISA/EAP//
UNCLAS SEOUL 002096 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL KS
SUBJECT: REGIONALISM: STILL A FACTOR IN KOREAN ELECTIONS 
 
REF: A. SEOUL 1756 
 
     B. SEOUL 1684 
     C. SEOUL 270 
     D. SEOUL 1841 
     E. SEOUL 1711 
     F. SEOUL 2048 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1.  (SBU) Korean voters have traditionally voted in regional 
blocs for their favored candidate in local and national 
elections.  In the 2002 presidential elections, Roh Moo-hyun 
received over 90 percent support in the southwest Jeolla 
Provinces.  Despite Roh's campaign pledge to rid politics of 
regionalism's "evil influence", it will likely be an 
important, if not the dominant, factor in the December 2007 
presidential elections.  While all of the leading 
presidential candidates have eschewed regionalism in public 
statements, they continue to draw their political base of 
support from their respective regions.  Former President Kim 
Dae-jung has welcomed a steady flow of progressive candidates 
(ref A) seeking his approval and subsequent voter support 
from his traditional base in the southwest.  Even Roh has 
admitted that traditional regional loyalties must be 
exploited for the progressives to have any chance in 
December.  END SUMMARY. 
 
---------------------- 
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 
---------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) Some historians trace regionalism in Korea to the 
Three Kingdom period, two thousand years ago, when Goguryeo 
represented the DPRK, Baekje standing for Honam (Southwest 
Jeolla Provinces) and Silla for Yeongnam (Southeast 
Gyeongsang Provinces).   Many blame the late president Park 
Chung-hee for modern-day regionalism in Korea due to his 
centrally-planned economic measures that heavily favored the 
Gyeongsan Provinces.  Coming from Gumi in North Gyeongsang 
Province, Park actively turned the voters in his home region 
of Yeongnam against his dissident archrival, Kim Dae-jung, in 
the 1971 presidential elections.  Demographically, Honam has 
5,021,548 people and Yeongnam has 12,701,303 people, 
representing 10.6 percent and 26.9 percent respectively of 
the entire population.  The actual numbers are more balanced 
because there are many more Honam people living away from 
home than there are from Yeongnam.  For the past 30 years, 
these two regions have strongly supported the "homegrown" 
candidate with less regard for the candidate's policy goals. 
This loyalty extends to those voters from the Honam or 
Yeongnam region living in Seoul or other regions.  In 
addition to uneven economic development, those from the 
"right" area (Yeongnam) were favored with cabinet positions 
or other influential posts. 
 
3.  (SBU) The Park Chung-hee administration concentrated 
development efforts in the southeast in the 1960s and 70s, 
with projects such as the construction of the Seoul-Busan 
highway, the creation of an industrial complex in Ulsan, and 
the location of POSCO (the world's second largest integrated 
steel mill) at Pohang.  Even the owners of the handful of 
factories that were built in Honam hailed from Yeongnam. 
Chaebols, or family-owned conglomerates, hailing from 
Yeongnam were also favored with more generous tax, foreign 
exchange and licensing benefits.  As a result, the population 
in Jeolla Provinces experienced a chronic decrease in the 
1970s, while that of Gyeongsang province rose sharply.  On 
the personnel front, Cabinet Ministers and Vice Ministers 
since the Chun Doo-hwan administration who hail from Yeongnam 
accounted for 37 percent, while those from Honam accounted 
for only 19 percent.  Particularly during the Chun Doo-hwan, 
Roh Tae-woo and Kim Young-sam administrations, the 
percentages of Youngnam ministers were 43 percent, 41 percent 
and 40.7 percent, respectively.  This era of regional 
favoritism led many to brand the practice of regional 
favoritism as "evil" and a "curse." 
 
4.  (SBU) Several of the key players in the regionalism 
debate surrounding the upcoming presidential election were at 
the center of the same debate during the spring 2004 
parliamentary elections.  GNP candidate Park Geun-hye was 
selected as the party chair in March 2004, and she 
immediately commenced a campaign effort in Daegu and the 
Gyeongsang Provinces (Park's home region) in preparation for 
the April parliamentary elections.  Then Uri Chairman Chung 
Dong-young said, "Park should not stir up regionalism and use 
it in her favor.  I hope the April 15 elections will be a 
turning point of the country's election history by breaking 
regionalism."  Kim Han-gill, leader of a group of Uri 
defectors who became the Moderate Unified Democrats (ref B), 
was also heavily involved in the election as Uri's top 
campaign strategist. 
 
5.  (SBU) The April 2004 elections did not live up to the 
expectations, as representatives were chosen closely along 
regional lines.  Angered by the opposition's attempts to 
impeach Roh in April 2004 just before the National Assembly 
elections, Uri voters responded strongly in the southwest and 
around Seoul, while the GNP received solid support only in 
the southeast.  Given the limited time that Park had to rally 
her party, she relied heavily on support from her traditional 
regional base while the ruling party used anger at the 
opposition camp and their own regional ties to garner 
support. 
 
---------------- 
EAST-WEST DIVIDE 
---------------- 
 
6.  (SBU) Undoubtedly, regionalism persists, although an 
argument can be made that it is less severe now than in the 
recent past.  For example, the 2002 presidential elections 
were also marked by a generational divide.  Younger voters 
turned out in force to support Roh Moo-hyun while older 
voters tended to support his rival, Lee Hoi-chang.  The two 
major political parties today - the GNP and Uri - are at the 
opposing ends of the political spectrum, accurately labeled 
conservative and liberal.  The population density in Seoul 
also continues to increase with no sign of a downturn; 
further taking voters out of politically charged regions and 
into the more neutral voting arena of metropolitan Seoul. 
 
7.  (SBU) Still, a significant number of voters from Honam 
and Yeongnam tend to continue voting along regional lines, 
even after moving to Seoul.  A poll right after the April 
2004 general election shows that, although just 27 percent of 
voters nationwide voted for parties from the same region as 
they hail from, the figure sharply rose for those from Honam 
(53.6 percent) and Yeongnam (45.3 percent) regions.  The 
older the voters, the more they tended to vote based on 
regional loyalty.  Voters in their 40s, 50s, and over were 
more likely than those in their 20s and 30s to vote according 
to regional ties. 
 
8.  (SBU) Experts suggest that it is the middle of the 
country where you can find the most balanced community of 
voters.  A recent news article in the conservative Donga Ilbo 
newspaper suggested that Korea is looking for a voting 
district that could act like New Hampshire and be a barometer 
for how the rest of the nation is likely to vote.  The 
experts suggested that Goesan County in North Choongchung 
province has the best track record of voting for presidential 
candidates who were ultimately successful in being elected. 
The article further suggested that there are also several 
locations in the Seoul Metropolitan area that have 
successfully predicted election outcomes. 
 
----------------------- 
CENTER-LEFT PERSPECTIVE 
----------------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) Uri Party defectors have attempted to use 
regionalism to their advantage since the mass defections 
began in late January.  Many hoped the Jeolla native and 
former PM Goh Kun could gain broad national support in 
addition to strong support in the southwest, but Goh dropped 
out of the presidential race in January.  Next, progressives 
hoped former Seoul National University President Chung 
Un-chan could lead the creation of a Jeolla-Choongchung 
regional party, but this also failed to materialize.  Most 
pundits note that Chung was not attractive as a candidate, 
but had simply had the right regional background, which 
ultimately proved insufficient to make a run at the 
presidency.  Later, they attempted to broker a deal with the 
Choongchung-based People First Party (PFP), but it is unclear 
if the PFP will join the progressives or the conservatives. 
 
 
10.  (SBU) On June 4, the Democratic Party (DP) concluded 
negotiations with Uri defectors led by Rep. Kim Han-gill to 
join forces as the third-largest voting bloc in the National 
Assembly with 34 members (ref B).  The DP remains synonymous 
with former President Kim Dae-jung and his strong support 
base in the Jeolla Provinces.  Given this large and important 
group of voters, several individuals and groups within the 
progressive camp were actively courting the DP.  The new 
combined party, called the Moderate United Democrats (MUD), 
claims to be anti-Roh and anti-GNP (ref D).  President Roh 
spoke out against the formation of a regional-based 
coalition, saying such a coalition meant a return to 
old-fashioned regionalism-based politics.  Roh continues to 
criticize any regional-based coalition, but in May publicly 
stated that if a broad, progressive coalition had to be 
formed, he would not stand in its way. 
 
--------------- 
GNP PERSPECTIVE 
--------------- 
 
11.  (SBU) Former Seoul Mayor and presidential front-runner 
Lee Myung-bak asserts that the era of a politician winning 90 
plus percent in a given district are gone.  In ref E, Lee 
told the Ambassador that he only needed to receive 20 percent 
of the votes in the Jeolla region in order to assure victory 
(he claims he currently has between 25 and 30 percent support 
there).  This is probably wishful thinking because most of 
Lee's support in the Jeolla region will vanish as soon as a 
unified liberal candidate emerges. 
 
12.  (SBU) Former GNP Chairperson Park Geun-hye, who is 
steadily making up ground with Lee in the polls (ref F) will 
continue to rely on her strong support base in the 
southeastern region as she has in the past.  She is even less 
likely than Lee to pick up additional votes in the Jeolla 
region given her perceived weaker economic platform and 
because of the lingering resentment in the region toward 
former president/dictator Park Chung-hee (1961-1979), her 
father. 
 
------------------------ 
KIM DAE-JUNG'S INFLUENCE 
------------------------ 
 
13.  (SBU) In the span of one week in May, former president 
Kim Dae-Jung met separately with three of the leading 
center-left candidates: Sohn Hak-kyu, Chung Dong-young and 
Kim Han gill.  While the former president is said to be 
working to unify the various candidates, the candidates 
themselves sought Kim's endorsement and subsequent voter 
support from the Jeolla provinces where Kim maintains a loyal 
following.  In response to Kim's meetings and related public 
statements, GNP Chairman Kang Jae-sup said, "It does not make 
sense that a person who has claimed to be a victim of 
regionalism is now actively promoting it."  Kim has said 
publicly that he advises the liberals to present a unified 
candidate who can compete strongly against the winner of the 
GNP primary. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
14.  (SBU) Like the elephant in the living room, regionalism 
is an obvious truth that South Korean politicians like to 
pretend to ignore.  Most Koreans are ashamed that there 
should be such a divide between the east and west.  True, a 
good argument can be made that regionalism is becoming less 
pervasive as voters become more concerned with policy issues 
rather than regional issues and as the population continues 
to migrate away from the outlying provinces and into Seoul. 
But all evidence shows that the divide is still very wide.  A 
particularly daunting statistic is that in the 2002 
presidential election, Roh Moo-hyun, who does not come from 
the Jeolla region, won 93 percent of Jeolla votes, just 1 
percent less than Kim Dae-jung won in 1997.  All this support 
was because Roh was the non-GNP (or non-Yeongnam) candidate. 
VERSHBOW