VZCZCXRO8027
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2944/01 1790820
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 280820Z JUN 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4996
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4193
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1780
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5357
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0902
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2597
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7640
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3699
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4800

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 TOKYO 002944 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/28/07 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Upper House election: Will Abe step down from the prime 
minister's post if LDP fails to win more than 44 seats? Uno resigned 
with 36 seats, Hashimoto with 44 
 
(2) 2007 Upper House election: Abe's "friends" groping in the dark 
 
(3) Editorial: Comfort-women resolution - There is also a problem 
with Abe's diplomatic stance 
 
(4) Editorial: Prime Minister should perceive the seriousness of US 
House comfort-women resolution 
 
(5) Ex-Prime Minister Miyazawa dies: senior LDP member 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Upper House election: Will Abe step down from the prime 
minister's post if LDP fails to win more than 44 seats? Uno resigned 
with 36 seats, Hashimoto with 44 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full) 
June 28, 2007 
 
A tug-of-war has been intensifying in the ruling Liberal Democratic 
Party (LDP) over the number of Upper House seats won by the LDP that 
will force Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to resign from his post to take 
responsibility for the result. LDP members, who are critical of Abe, 
have asserted that if the party suffers a crashing defeat, he should 
naturally step down, with an eye on the 44 seats that the LDP 
obtained in the 1998 Upper House election, forcing then Prime 
Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto to resign after accepting responsibility 
for the loss. Lawmakers close to Abe have taken precautions against 
the above assertion, noting, "There would no need for Prime Minister 
Abe to resign even if the ruling coalition is defeated." Criticism 
of Abe will inevitably grow as long as he does not make any headway 
due to the pension record mismanagement fiasco. 
 
After the current regular Diet session was extended under the 
initiative of Abe, who aims to enact bills amending the National 
Civil Service Law to clamp down on the practice of amakudari or 
placing retired bureaucrats into high-paying posts at private firms 
in the industries they oversaw, calls for Abe to assume 
responsibility for the results of the July Upper House election have 
been raised, with Taku Yamasaki, former LDP vice president, saying, 
"He should take due responsibility if the ruling coalition suffers a 
major defeat." 
 
In contrast to Yamasaki's view, former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, 
Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa, members of the Machimura 
 
SIPDIS 
faction, to which Abe used to belong, and former Prime Minister 
Junichiro Koizumi, former member of the faction, have insisted: 
"There would be no need for Abe to resign as prime minister in case 
the ruling camp is defeated. 
 
Mori stressed in a speech on June 25: "The Upper House election is 
like a midterm test (for the administration). It will not be an 
election to risk the reins of government." 
 
However, Sosuke Uno was forced to quit the prime minister's post to 
assume responsibility for the result of the 1989 Upper house 
election, in which the LDP won only 36 seats; and Prime Minister 
 
TOKYO 00002944  002 OF 007 
 
 
Hashimoto had to resign to take responsibility for the result of the 
1998 election. 
 
Regarding the results of the upcoming election, the dominant view in 
the LDP is that if the party suffers a crushing defeat, it is 
impossible for Abe to remain in office. Observers see the view in 
the Machimura faction as a "pickoff throw" to decrease the number of 
seats that would force Abe to quit the prime minister's post. 
 
In order for the ruling coalition to keep its majority in the Upper 
House, they must win 64 seats. Even if the New Komeito keeps its 13 
seats, which it won in the 2001 election, the LDP will have to 
secure 51 seats. 
 
Should the LDP fall short of a majority, it still has an option to 
uphold the rains of government by allying with the People's New 
Party (two seats up for grabs and two seats not up for reelection), 
which has implied a possibility of corporation with the LDP, as well 
as with independent lawmakers. Since the LDP has not found any 
candidates to replace Abe, chances are that the view calling for Abe 
to assume responsibility will not become stronger. 
 
However, should the LDP end up with many seats short of a majority, 
calls for Abe to assume responsibility will inevitably become 
stronger. 
 
Referring to the results of the Upper House election in 1998, when 
he was serving as secretary general of the LDP,  Koichi Kato stated 
at a press conference on June 26: "Both Prime Minister Hashimoto and 
I submitted resignations as a matter of course." He indicated in his 
remarks that the 44-seat line that put an end to the Hashimoto 
government is the dividing line for Abe. An LDP source also pointed 
out: "Chances are that if the LDP ended up with less than 45 seats, 
the prime minister will be replaced." 
 
Abe has not mentioned his responsibility, emphasizing that the LDP 
will win in all electoral districts. There seems to be no doubt that 
winning only 44 seats would determine the fate of the Abe 
administration. 
 
(2) 2007 Upper House election: Abe's "friends" groping in the dark 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Abridged slightly) 
June 28, 2007 
 
Seiichi Eto and other "friends" of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who are 
running in the upcoming House of Councillors election as Liberal 
Democratic Party-sponsored proportional representation candidates 
have been pushing against all odds Abe's priorities, such as 
educational reform and the abduction issue. Whether or not their 
efforts result in votes remains to be seen. 
 
Seiichi Eto prioritizes Constitution over pension 
 
"We have been working hard, believing that rescuing the victims 
kidnapped by North Korea is the state's responsibility. I want to 
make Japan into a beautiful country which everyone can be proud 
of." 
 
This video message by Seiichi Eto was shown to some 300 supporters 
at his fund-raising party held in a Fukuoka hotel yesterday. 
 
Eto lost his House of Representatives seat in the general election 
 
TOKYO 00002944  003 OF 007 
 
 
in 2005 when he ran as an independent after having being expelled 
from the LDP as a result of his opposing the postal privatization 
plan. Eto was allowed to rejoin the LDP this March owing to Abe's 
strong push. Changing hats, he is going to seek an Upper House seat 
in the upcoming election. Abe once described Eto as a close friend 
basically sharing the same views. Eto was introduced in the 
videotape shown at the party as Abe's comrade who has fought with 
him for constitutional revision and other matters essential to the 
country. "Prime Minister Abe has handpicked Mr. Eto under a 
difficult situation," a support group executive said in a speech. 
 
Eto's campaign style is clearly distinct from that of other LDP 
candidates. 
 
He neither focuses on the pension issue nor works closely with the 
New Komeito. The Since the New Komeito feared Eto's candidacy would 
cause disarray in campaign cooperation with its coalition partner, 
the LDP, it reacted negatively. This forced the LDP leadership to 
warn Eto not to conduct campaign activities in Oita, though this is 
his home turf. The LDP leadership even urged Eto not to attend 
yesterday's party. 
 
This can explain why Eto has focused on Abe's original policy 
agenda. Nippon Kaigi (Japan Conference) Chairman Toru Miyoshi and 
other conservative group executives showed up at Eto's party held in 
Tokyo on June 11. Eto's supporters consist mainly of social welfare 
organizations, political groups comprised of academics close to Abe, 
and religious organizations. 
 
Eto declared at the June 11 party: "Our goal is to review the 
education system as soon as possibly, begin nation-rebuilding to 
make Japan into an ideal country, and establish a new constitution. 
To that end, I will risk everything in the upcoming election." 
 
Ex-delinquent now charismatic educator Hiroyuki Yoshiie prepared to 
face uphill battle 
 
Hiroyuki Yoshiie, known as "bad boy teacher" and a high-ranking 
member of the Education Rebuilding Council, has also decided to run 
in the proportional representation bloc. 
 
In response to Abe's request on June 25 to run in the race to 
display his charismatic leadership in the political scene, Yoshiie 
said: "A headwind is blowing. The Abe cabinet is also facing a 
headwind. I will do my best to protect the children." 
 
Votes for Kyoko Nakayama as positive assessments of Abe's abduction 
policy 
 
Kyoko Nakayama, advisor to the prime minister on the abduction 
issue, told a pep rally held for her in Tokyo yesterday: "North 
Korea is closely watching how the upcoming election turns out. I 
will run in the race in which the public will make a decision on the 
prime minister's top priority issue." 
 
Nakayama was also the responsible official for the abduction issue 
when Abe served as chief cabinet secretary under the Koizumi 
cabinet. As prime minister, Abe appointed Nakayama as one of his 
five advisors and asked her to run in the race on the LDP ticket. 
Votes for Nakayama would be taken as positive assessments of Abe's 
North Korea policy. 
 
On June 11, Nakayama explained the reason for her candidacy this 
 
TOKYO 00002944  004 OF 007 
 
 
way: "I hope a lot of people will express their support for the 
abduction issue by voting for me. It will be a strong message to 
North Korea." Abe also delivered the following video message in 
Kainan City, Wakayama Prefecture, on June 16: "Resolving the 
abduction issue is my cabinet's top priority. I will aim at rescuing 
all abductees with the help of advisor Nakayama." 
 
Focusing merely on the abduction issue might not put Nakayama at an 
advantage. Talks on the abduction issue between Japan and North 
Korea remain stalled, while the international community's move for 
resolving the nuclear issue is gaining momentum. 
 
"Her candidacy can be a double-edged sword. If she can collect a 
large number of votes, it would be seen as pressure on North Korea. 
But it could end up the other way around," warned Nariaki Nakayama, 
Kyoko Nakayama's husband and a former education and science 
minister, on June 4 in response to his request. Not discouraged, Abe 
successfully convinced Nakayama, saying, "I'm aware of that, but 
education and the abduction issue are my top priorities." 
 
The LDP has not assigned any support groups to Nakayama. Flyers 
prepared by her supporters association carry a picture of Nakayama 
descending the plane in 2002 along with five repatriated abductees 
from North Korea. On the list of her supporters are families of 
victims of kidnapped by North Korea. "Her failure to win a large 
number of votes might embolden North Korea," a former cabinet 
minister said. 
 
(3) Editorial: Comfort-women resolution - There is also a problem 
with Abe's diplomatic stance 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
June 28, 2007 
 
The US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee has 
adopted a resolution demanding an apology from the Japanese 
government in connection with the wartime comfort-women issue. The 
resolution says: "The Japanese government should officially 
apologize for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women 
into sexual slavery." 
 
On the comfort-women issue, this is the second resolution adopted by 
the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, following 
the one in September of last year. This time, with House Speaker 
Nancy Pelosi throwing her weight behind it, the resolution is likely 
to be adopted by the full House next month for the first time. 
 
In the 1993 statement by then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono, 
the Japanese government admitted the Japanese Imperial Army's 
coercion of young women into sexual slavery, saying: "Japan extends 
its sympathy and regrets (to the comfort women)." 
 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe upholds the Kono statement. He offered an 
apology when he met President Bush and congressional members during 
his visit to the US this April. In the US, there are some who defend 
Japan, like Senator Daniel Inoue saying: "Seeing the recent moves in 
the US in connection with the comfort-women issue, I feel it is 
regrettable. Despite repeated apologies by Japanese prime ministers, 
I wonder why an affair of this sort happens constantly. " 
 
Nonetheless, Japan's position was not understood, and the resolution 
was adopted. It is extremely regrettable. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002944  005 OF 007 
 
 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki said: "We should not make 
any comments on a resolution adopted by another country's 
parliament." 
 
Although it is certainly a resolution of another country's 
parliament, we must seriously take what the lawmakers representing 
the American people expressed in their vote. Under the current 
situation, the relationship between Japan and the US might be 
adversely affected. Japan is required to make a proper response so 
that bilateral relations will not be damaged. 
 
Prime Minister Abe's remarks were also one factor that led to the 
current situation. In Diet replies in March, Abe denied the 
government's "coercion in a narrow sense," saying: "There was no 
evidence (in the data) to prove coercive recruitment by military 
personnel or constituted authorities." 
 
The prime minister had expressed a view critical of the Kono 
Statement before assuming office. Given this, the prime minister's 
remarks were taken as expressing his support for reviewing the Kono 
Statement, and Abe eventually came under heavy fire mainly from the 
US media. When he visited the US this April, the prime minister 
expressed his feelings of apology, but the words did not work 
effectively to persuade the Congress to drop the resolution. 
 
In addition, lawmakers, including former Minister of Economy, Trade 
and Industry Takeo Hiranuma, and commentators posted an 
advertisement in the June 14 issue of an American newspaper in which 
they denied the allegation of government's coercion in the 
recruitment of comfort women. This move resulted in prompting the 
Congress to adopt the resolution, with committee Chairman Tom Lantos 
refuting: "These are ridiculous assertions that counter the facts." 
 
Hiranuma released a statement yesterday stating: "The resolution 
based on an erroneous perception of the facts could create a major 
fissure in the bilateral relationship." But it is also true that 
their assertions denying coercive recruitment were not understood by 
the US Congress. 
 
The Asia Women's Fund, which was disbanded at the end of March, 
continued to send compensation money and prime ministers' letters of 
apology to comfort women. The Japanese government, however, has not 
made similar efforts to solicit understanding from the global 
audience. It is now necessary for the prime minister, without 
dismissing the comfort-women issue as "another country's matter," to 
take the lead in explaining in a sincere manner Japan's position, 
based on the Kono Statement. 
 
(4) Editorial: Prime Minister should perceive the seriousness of US 
House comfort-women resolution 
 
ASAHI (Page 3) (Full) 
June 28, 2007 
 
The US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee has 
adopted a resolution on the comfort-women issue by 39-2 calling on 
the Japanese government to officially acknowledge and take full 
responsibility, and apologize. The resolution is likely to be 
approved by the full House in July. 
 
The US Congress has denounced before the international community 
that Japan has not reflected on its past conduct. This criticism 
carries a heavy meaning. 
 
TOKYO 00002944  006 OF 007 
 
 
 
The Asahi Shimbun has asserted that politicians should squarely 
tackle issues connected with historical views, such as the prime 
minister's visits to Yasukuni Shrine and the comfort-women issue. 
Our assertion is based on the judgment that words and actions that 
could be interpreted as intended to justify Japan's prewar deeds and 
values may affect international trust in Japan. 
 
It is truly regrettable that things have come to this serious pass. 
We feel ashamed and vexing that Japan has been viewed as such a 
country (as described in the resolution). 
 
Even so, the resolution does not refer to the fact that successive 
prime ministers have sent letters of apologies to the former comfort 
women. It does not clarify how it has interpreted the Kono 
Statement, in which the government admitted the government's 
coercion and apologized, either. In this sense, there are some 
doubts about the resolution. 
 
As said in the resolution, it is true that there were moves to 
criticize the Kono Statement and deliberations on proposed changes 
in wording. Japan must seriously take a message from the resolution 
criticizing the inhumanity of the comfort-women issue. 
 
Some observers point out a failure in Japan's strategic move. An 
advertisement refuting the comfort-women resolution was posted in 
the Washington Post this month. This move reignited the receded 
dispute on the issue. 
 
The advertisement criticized the resolution as "intentionally 
distorting the facts," with the names of about 40 lawmakers 
belonging to ruling or opposition parties, as well as diplomatic 
commentators who are advisors to the prime minister attached to it. 
The full-page ad was certainly strange. It might be true that the ad 
spoiled the apology offered by the prime minister when he visited 
the US in April. 
 
Japanese politics has skirted its wartime history properly. This is 
indisputably the essence of the problem. 
 
Prime Minister Abe said: "This is one of the many resolutions that 
the US Congress has passed," and "I do not intend to make any 
comment." This stance is outrageous. Japan has been under fire and 
has been dogged by doubts. Detailing the Kono Statement and the 
efforts made by the Asia Women Fund, the government should speak of 
its historical views. 
 
The prime minister has stressed "common values" as the foundation of 
the Japan-US alliance. But Abe does not understand that the adoption 
of the resolution by the US House is a problem that concerns its 
values. 
 
After the end of WWII, Japan made efforts and grew itself into a 
democratic country respecting freedom and human rights. It also 
deeply self-reflected on its acts of aggression and colonial rule. 
But if Japan gives an impress that its self-reflection is swaying, 
(the international community) may harbor doubts about its values. 
 
The international community has stern eyes toward Japan's effort to 
address its past deeds since former Prime Minister Koizumi visited 
Yasukuni Shrine. We wonder if Japan's democracy is remaining steady. 
The US resolution should be taken as a warning to Japan. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002944  007 OF 007 
 
 
(5) Ex-Prime Minister Miyazawa dies: senior LDP member 
 
TOKYO, June 28 KYODO 
Former Japanese Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa has died, a senior 
member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party said Thursday. 
He was 87. 
 
SCHIEFFER