Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO2841, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/22/07

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO2841.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO2841 2007-06-22 08:08 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO2848
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2841/01 1730808
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 220808Z JUN 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4801
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4117
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1702
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5275
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0828
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2522
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7566
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3619
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4727
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 TOKYO 002841 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/22/07 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Iraq extension unaccounted for 
 
(2) Interim settlement of account on Abe administration - part 6: 
Moving services from government to the private sector; Enthusiasm 
for reform lost steam; Market testing not picking up steam 
 
(3) Interim settlement of account on Abe administration (Part 7 - 
conclusion): Interview with Chief Cabinet Secretary Shiozaki: Pursue 
not "destruction-oriented" but "creation-oriented" reforms 
 
(Corrected copy) Hard to understand opposition: Maher 
 
(Corrected copy) Yonaguni Town Assembly rejects petition opposing US 
minesweepers' visit 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Iraq extension unaccounted for 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Full) 
June 21, 2007 
 
A bill revising the Iraq Reconstruction Assistance Special Measures 
Law to extend the activities of the Self-Defense Forces in Iraq for 
two years cleared the Diet yesterday. The ruling coalition of the 
Liberal Democratic Party and New Komeito has been steering the Diet 
in an overbearing manner. And now, they chose again to bulldoze 
their way through. In Diet deliberations, the government did not 
even account for why the SDF has to stay on in Iraq now. Britain and 
other members of the US-led multinational forces in Iraq are now 
about to retouch their Iraq policy. Yet, the SDF's Iraq mission will 
continue while the local situation is growing even more dangerous. 
 
"What's important now is that the international community will do 
its utmost to help with Iraqi reconstruction." 
 
So saying, Prime Minister Abe again stressed the significance of 
assisting Iraq with its reconstruction when he met reporters at his 
office yesterday evening. 
 
However, Abe weighed his "promise" to the United States, Japan's 
ally. On June 19, the LDP-led coalition steamrollered the bill in a 
meeting of the House of Councillors Foreign Affairs and Defense 
Committee. "It's a big step forward for what I've promised," Abe 
said later in the day. 
 
Abe, since coming into office, has reiterated "cooperation with the 
United States as an irreplaceable ally" about Japan's Iraq aid. The 
government had initially considered extending the SDF's Iraq mission 
for one year. Eventually, however, the government decided to extend 
it for two years. This was in line with US President Bush's decision 
in January this year to send about 21,000 more troops to Iraq. 
 
Meanwhile, the government's public accountability through Diet 
deliberations was insufficient. "Is it all right to leave Iraq as 
is?" This remark came yesterday from Abe over the significance of 
the Air Self-Defense Force's airlift activities in Iraq. However, 
the question is how much the ASDF's activities will help with Iraq's 
reconstruction. The bill was discussed for a total of 31 and a half 
hours, broken down into 16 and a half hours in the House of 
Representatives and 15 hours in the House of Councillors. The law 
 
TOKYO 00002841  002 OF 006 
 
 
came into effect in 2003, and the Diet spent a total of about 73 
hours to deliberate on it before its passage. Ironically, what 
became clear in Diet deliberations was the risk of ASDF activities 
in Iraq. 
 
On May 14, Defense Minister Kyuma stated before a special committee 
of the House of Representatives: "In point of fact, it's 
considerably dangerous for the ASDF to work in Iraq. The ASDF is 
having a hard time of it while studying how to work it out there." 
 
According to an ASDF source, there is an increase in the number of 
cases where the ASDF's C-130 transport planes, which are tasked with 
airlift services, suspend their flights. The C-130's alarm system, 
which is activated when targeted for a missile attack or in other 
eventualities, was rarely activated in the past. These days, 
however, it reacts frequently. Each of the ASDF's C-130 transports 
for the Iraq mission has a watchout window on the upper part of its 
body. The source says an ASDF member sits near that window to look 
around through the window. A number of US military helicopters were 
shot down near Baghdad Airport in particular. As is evident from 
this fact, the security situation in Iraq has gone from bad to 
worse. 
 
The government has been only underscoring safety. Dissatisfied with 
such a posture, one ASDF echelon officer made a direct appeal to 
Kyuma, saying: "Their mission is becoming even more dangerous from 
day to day. I wish to ask for a little more consideration for the 
feelings of those ASDF members working there in Iraq." Kyuma's reply 
before the special committee was in response to such a voice from 
within the ASDF. 
 
Moreover, there is another fact that is evident from the Defense 
Ministry's disclosed information. Actually, the ASDF's activities in 
Iraq are intended for the US-led multinational forces rather than 
humanitarian and reconstruction assistance. The C-130s made a total 
of 150 flights from July last year through the end of March this 
year, including 125 flights for the multinational forces. In the 
breakdown of their payloads, 46.5 tons-or 95 %  --were for the 
multinational forces. 
 
(2) Interim settlement of account on Abe administration - part 6: 
Moving services from government to the private sector; Enthusiasm 
for reform lost steam; Market testing not picking up steam 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Slightly abridged) 
June 20, 2007 
 
On January 25, the day before Prime Minister Abe delivered his first 
policy speech, the Kochi Labor Department and the Nagasaki Labor 
Department closed applications for public bidding for market testing 
to transfer a job-offer boosting project from their public 
employment service agencies to private companies. Neither department 
received any tenders. 
 
Three other labor departments, including one in Hokkaido, closed 
public bidding for similar projects. The Hokkaido office only 
received tenders that exceeded the estimated price. Both the Kochi 
and Nagasaki offices once again held public bidding, but received no 
tenders. As a result, the state is undertaking the projects there as 
before. 
 
Market testing is a system aimed at lowering costs of government 
services and improving the quality of services through public 
 
TOKYO 00002841  003 OF 006 
 
 
bidding joined by the private sector and government. The idea was 
formulated by the Koizumi administration, which advocated the policy 
of transferring services from the government to the private sector. 
It was then incorporated in the Administrative Reform Law and has is 
now underway under the Abe administration. 
 
The Administrative Committee, a vehicle to promote market testing, 
recently carried out a five-grade appraisal of track records of 
market testing by various government agencies. The survey found a 
shocking result with two ministries rated C, the middle grade, five 
rated at D, a slightly low grade, and another five rated E, meaning 
no track records achieved. 
 
This appraisal highlighted the negative stance of various government 
agencies. There is an atmosphere among government agencies of openly 
questioning the Koizumi administration's policy of shifting services 
from the government to the private sector. One official in charge of 
market testing at a certain ministry said: "Private-sector members 
of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (CEFP) under the 
Koizumi administration insisted that government services should be 
shifted to the private sector at any cost. However, the private 
sector cannot necessarily provide good service at a low cost." 
 
Abe himself does not seem to be enthusiastically tackling the task. 
The sluggish submission of bids for the job-offer boosting project 
is the evidence of the bureaucracy leaving such a situation 
unattended. 
 
The Administrative Reform Promotion Law was enacted in May 2006, a 
time when the Koizumi administration was in its final phase. It 
incorporates policy targets that were set in compliance with the 
idea of moving services from the government to the private sector. 
Since many of those targets are mid-term targets, it is difficult to 
evaluate them at the present stage. Even so, the Abe 
administration's effort to meet those policy targets is 
questionable. 
 
A representative example of such is a revision of 
government-affiliated financial institutions, which are being 
criticized as the root cause of a massive amount of postal money 
being poured into wasteful public works. 
 
The point has been made that the bureaucracy has watered-down 
regulations in this process of drafting individual bills out of the 
desire to retain their vested interests. 
 
For instance, regarding Shoko Chukin Bank, which is set to be 
privatized, the law incorporated as an additional clause a measure 
to restrict qualifications to become its shareholders even after 
full privatization. This measure is regarded as a means to limit 
those who are qualified to become its shareholders to small and 
medium business organizations with the aim of countering a possible 
threat from foreign countries. Private-sector members of the CEFP 
questioned about the measure with one member saying, "Is it really 
necessary to restrict shareholders after full liberalization?" 
 
In reforming the public servant system, the Administrative Reform 
Promotion Law stipulates that retirement control should be made 
appropriate and necessary measures to promote personnel exchanges 
with private companies should be taken. In compliance this, the Abe 
administration is aiming at submitting a set of bills reforming the 
public servant system featuring the establishment of a 
government-private sector personnel exchange center (new personnel 
 
TOKYO 00002841  004 OF 006 
 
 
bank) to the current Diet session for enactment. 
 
State Minister for Administrative Reform Yoshimi Watanabe said, "I 
will cut the cords of the golden parachute (amakudari practice)." 
However, the opposition camp is criticizing the envisaged bank, 
which will render job placement services to retired bureaucrats in 
place of the government agencies they used to work for before 
retirement, as an amakudari promotion bank financed with tax money. 
 
The Administrative Reform Promotion Law provided that independent 
administrative agencies should be reviewed from the perspective of 
cutting expenditures. The government in fiscal 2006 revised 23 
agencies. As a result, 32 services were abolished or curtailed. 
However, no agencies have been dismantled. 
 
The Administrative Reform Law is called a program law, because 
whoever becomes prime minister, the Koizumi reform policy would be 
inherited without fail. However, if the situation is left 
unattended, the possibility of the law turning into a situation in 
which the field has been ploughed, but the fact that the seeds to 
sow have been forgotten cannot be ruled out. 
 
(3) Interim settlement of account on Abe administration (Part 7 - 
conclusion): Interview with Chief Cabinet Secretary Shiozaki: Pursue 
not "destruction-oriented" but "creation-oriented" reforms 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full) 
June 22, 2007 
 
-- The Abe administration has two roles to play -- one as successor 
to the Koizumi administration and another to "build a beautiful 
country." How is the administration going to fulfill these two roles 
simultaneously? 
 
In the days of the Koizumi administration, one voter told me: 
"Although I am supportive of reforms, I don't know what will become 
of post-reform Japan." In response, Prime Minister Abe presented a 
future vision of Japan, saying that he had shifted the focus from 
"reforms designed to destroy" under former Prime Minister Koizumi to 
"reforms aimed to create." 
 
-- There seem to be still many parts that must go through 
"destruction-oriented" reforms. 
 
That is why Prime Minister Abe has used the expression "new 
embarkation" after emerging from the postwar regime. There are still 
things that must be broken, and they stand in the way of the Abe 
administration, like bedrock. The administration should destroy the 
bedrock first and then get off to a start. The destinations of its 
course are assertive diplomacy, constitutional revision, and 
permanent status on the United Nations Security Council. The 
government is asking the public for their views about it. 
 
-- The Abe administration apparently takes the stance of setting an 
ideal image of the nation first and then fixing its tasks. 
 
That is exactly right. The idea of establishing a Japanese-version 
national security council (NSC) is a typical case. While envisioning 
the role of Japan under the context of the world and its future 
image, the administration came up with the idea as a measure to 
strengthen the Prime Minister's Official Residence's (Kantei) 
necessary functions. It is impossible to manage this country based 
on an isolated concept within a government office. 
 
TOKYO 00002841  005 OF 006 
 
 
 
-- Has the administration prepared a roadmap for revising the 
Constitution, the last challenge for the Abe administration? 
 
To propose revising the Constitution, it is necessary to obtain 
approval from at least two-thirds of all the members of both 
chambers, so this is a considerably difficult task. The Liberal 
Democratic Party has prepared a draft new constitution, but some 
lawmakers have not joined the compilation process. The people have 
yet to be informed of the draft. Given this, Prime Minister Abe has 
suggested, "Let's consider a future vision of the nation first." 
 
-- Looking at the current administration's approach to short-term 
policy challenges, such as administrative reform, we cannot detect 
such enthusiasm as shown by the Koizumi administration. 
 
In Koizumi reforms, government-affiliated public corporations were 
reorganized into independent administrative corporations, winning 
high marks from the public. But some voice skepticism that 
reorganized corporations might be worse than their predecessors, as 
represented by (the bid-rigging case involving) Japan Green 
Resources Agency. The Abe cabinet, under the lead of State Minister 
in Charge of Administrative Reform Yoshimi Watanabe, is stepping up 
efforts to review such parts. 
 
-- Some observers point out that the drive for fiscal reconstruction 
has also decelerated. 
 
I am fully aware that some groups are trying to take every 
opportunity to have the increased portion in tax revenues to be 
allocated to their budgets, on the premise of increasing taxes. But 
the Abe administration will not easily increase taxes, although it 
will follow the spending-cut policy. 
 
-- What themes have pushing up their positions than those when the 
administration was inaugurated? 
 
It probably is environmental protection. Although this is a very 
hard challenge, we would like to come to grips with this task, prior 
to the G-8 summit in Japan next year. Another is decentralization. 
This theme is directly linked to "forming the state." Government 
agencies, local governments and local assemblies are expected to 
raise objections to decentralization, but Prime Minister Abe has 
said: "We must have the fire of reform continue to burn." To that 
end, the prime minister has poured in considerable energy. 
 
(Corrected copy) Hard to understand opposition: Maher 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 2) (Full) 
June 20, 2007 
 
YONAGUNI-US Naval Forces Japan is planning to have two minesweepers 
make a port call at the island of Yonagunijima. On this plan, US 
Consul General Okinawa Kevin Maher clarified that the two 
minesweepers would call at the island as planned. He also said: "The 
US Navy has contributed to Japan's security. It's hard to understand 
why they are against the planned visit." With this, Maher raised a 
question about the stance of Okinawa Prefecture and Yonaguni Town. 
The Okinawa prefectural government is calling for the US Navy to 
abstain from making port calls at the island, and the Yonaguni 
municipal government has clarified its opposition to the planned 
port call. Maher was replying to a question asked by the Ryukyu 
Shimpo in an interview. 
 
TOKYO 00002841  006 OF 006 
 
 
 
In the face of opposition, the two US minesweepers will visit 
Yonagunijima Island as planned. "Not all local residents are opposed 
to the visit," Maher said, adding: "The US Navy has made more than 
600 port calls in Japan over the past 25 years. Some people 
demonstrate against the port call, but many people come out to see 
the ships. Most visits are overwhelmingly welcomed." With this, 
Maher indicated that he would promote exchanges with local residents 
who are in favor of the port call. 
 
One of the reasons cited by Yonaguni Town for its opposition to the 
port call is that neither of the island's two ports-one in its Sonai 
area and the other in its Kubura area-is an open port. In this 
respect, Maher noted that the Japan-US Status of Forces Agreement's 
Article 5 does not distinguish open ports from closed ones. 
 
It is also feared that the planned visit of a US warship to the 
island will irritate China and Taiwan. Maher stressed: "US naval 
ships have visited here and there in Japan. Just because they visit 
a port in Japan provides no reason for another country to oppose 
it." 
 
Moreover, with local residents in mind, Maher said: "We'd like to 
ask for cooperation and consideration with exchange and friendship. 
I hope they will come out to see the visiting ships." 
 
(Corrected copy) Yonaguni Town Assembly rejects petition opposing US 
minesweepers' visit 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 2) (Abridged) 
June 20, 2007 
 
YONAGUNI-The assembly of Yonaguni Town held a monthly regular 
meeting yesterday, with Sonkichi Sakihara presiding. The assembly 
voted down a petition opposed to the visits of US warships to 
Yonagunijima Island with two of its members for the petition and 
three against the petition. 
 
The Okinawa prefectural government has asked the US Navy to abstain 
from making port calls at the island of Yonagunijima. In addition, 
Yonaguni Mayor Shukichi Hokama has also clarified his opposition. 
The town assembly's response had been noted. 
 
The petition was brought by Hiromoto Komine, a member of the 
Yonaguni Town Assembly. Citing the record of discussions over the 
Japan-US Status of Forces Agreement, Komine noted that US vessels 
are allowed to make port calls only at open ports under the normal 
circumstances. "The port call planned this time is against that," 
Komine said. He added: "Ishigaki City and other municipalities of 
the Yaeyama Islands opposed the visits of US warships, so we should 
keep pace with them. If the US warships make a port call, that will 
give the impression that it is strong action taken on the strength 
of the Japan-US Status of Forces Agreement. It will throw the island 
into confusion." 
 
DONOVAN