VZCZCXRO8087
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2361/01 1490048
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 290048Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3952
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 3698
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1267
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 4829
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0478
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2138
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7178
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3236
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4392

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 002361 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/25/07 
 
 
INDEX: 
(1) Interviews with political leaders on the right to collective 
defense 
 
(2) Follow-up on Abe cabinet-Collective defense (Part 3): Rushing to 
the rescue of allied troops; Weapons-use guidelines need urgent 
review 
 
(3) 2007 Upper House election: LDP, Minshuto compete for measures to 
revitalize regional economies 
 
(4) Matsuya welcomes OIE designation of US as controlled-risk 
country for BSE but Yoshinoya remains cool 
 
(5) Imperial couple arrive in Estonia 
 
(6) Editorial: Will post-Kyoto framework bring in the US, China? 
 
(7) Abe unveils climate initiative, with aim of playing up Japan's 
environmental contributions 
 
-- There will be no Daily Summary on May 28 - an American holiday. 
-- 
 
ARTICLES: 
(1) Interviews with political leaders on the right to collective 
defense 
 
NIHON KEIZI (Page 2) (Full) 
May 25, 2007 
 
Japanese Community Party Policy Commission Chair Akira Koike 
 
-- What is your view of the four scenarios now under study by the 
government's blue-ribbon panel? 
 
Koike: They have all been asked by the United States. As far as the 
question of missile defense (MD) is concerned, when the government 
deiced to introduce it, then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda 
resealed a statement saying that it would not be used to defend a 
third country and that it would not cause any problem. The Cabinet 
Legislation Bureau was not the only one that did not allow it. 
 
-- The prime minister thinks Japan must be able to respond to a new 
age and new circumstances. 
 
Koike: Any matters connected with the peace and stability of Japan 
fall under the right to individual self-defense, so there is no need 
to change the traditional interpretation. In all four scenarios, 
Japan is not under armed attack, and that leaves no room for a 
study. Japan is naturally not allowed to (exercise its right to 
collective defense) under the current Constitution. 
 
-- Are you saying that the constitutional interpretation should 
follow the Cabinet Legislation Bureau's view? 
 
Koike: Altering the constitutional interpretation concerns the 
authority of the Constitution. The Cabinet Legislation Bureau (CLB) 
exists so as not to allow (the government) to change its 
interpretation at will. Past prime ministers presented the (CLB's 
view) as their own without rejecting it. A country that revises its 
constitutional interpretation every time the prime minister changes 
cannot win international trust. 
 
TOKYO 00002361  002 OF 009 
 
 
 
Social Democratic Party Policy Research Council Chair Tomoko Abe 
 
-- Do you think the expert panel's discussion will have an impact on 
Diet debate? 
 
Abe: Diet deliberations are most important. A private panel does not 
have validity. The panel's discussion will be shallow unless it 
returns to the starting point of civilian control. 
 
-- The national security environment has changed. 
 
Abe: Driven by changes, the discussion centers on reality. For 
instance, no information has been disclosed on what the Self-Defense 
Forces in Iraq have transported. Discussing the collective defense 
right under such circumstances is pointless. 
 
-- The prime minister has ordered the panel to study four 
scenarios. 
 
Abe: Japan is not allowed to exercise its right to collective 
defense in any of the four cases. Article 9 sets an exclusively 
defense-oriented policy. The Constitution, the United Nations, and 
the nonnuclear principles have been Japan's axis throughout the 
postwar period. The government's judgment of the three values is 
always put to the test. 
 
People's New Party Secretary General Hisaoki Kamei 
 
-- Do you think the constitutional interpretation must be reviewed? 
 
Kamei: The question of altering the government's interpretation, 
which reflects a long period of Diet discussions, must be settled 
with constitutional revision. In my view, Article 9 must not be 
altered. Japan should focus on how to protect peace in carrying out 
international cooperation. 
 
-- You think even a discussion must not be conducted? 
 
Kamei: Studying the extent of what Japan can do with the individual 
defense right is not bad. I strongly fear that the government will 
allow the country to exercise collective defense in a piecemeal 
manner. Japan will end up taking part in America's military 
strategy. 
 
-- What is your impression of the blue-ribbon panel? 
 
Kamei: (The prime minister) has arbitrarily selected members who 
have no responsibility to the public. Party politics has turned into 
a mere shell. 
 
(2) Follow-up on Abe cabinet-Collective defense (Part 3): Rushing to 
the rescue of allied troops; Weapons-use guidelines need urgent 
review 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full) 
May 22, 2007 
 
In Iraq, the heat was sticky. The temperature rose to 50 degrees 
Centigrade, and tensions ran high with the fear of shells. Under 
such severe conditions, Ground Self-Defense Force members worked in 
the southern Iraqi city of Samawah. One of them struggled with 
another difficult problem that would never encounter troops there 
 
TOKYO 00002361  003 OF 009 
 
 
from foreign countries. 
 
It was a question from foreign troops. They wondered why GSDF 
personnel sent overseas are not allowed to protect troops from 
friendly countries. Dutch soldiers working with those GSDF members 
looked doubtful. The GSDF members were at a loss for an answer. 
 
Self-Defense Forces personnel are allowed to use weapons when they 
are on duty overseas. However, their use of weapons overseas is 
allowed in a limited number of cases, such as protecting themselves 
in justified self-defense, evacuating in emergencies, and protecting 
their weapons. SDF personnel are not allowed to use weapons for the 
purpose of protecting or guarding foreign troops that come under 
attack during their activities in international cooperation for 
peace. 
 
"Troops from a foreign country work together with those from other 
countries for international peace. If and when they come under 
attack, those who are there from the armed forces of foreign 
countries will try to help their friends out. Only our country's 
personnel cannot do so. I wonder if that's acceptable." 
 
With this, Prime Minister Abe raised a question when the Council for 
Rebuilding the Legal Foundation of National Security, a government 
advisory panel of experts, met on May 18 for the first time. 
 
Masahisa Sato, a retired GSDF colonel, commanded an advance team in 
Iraq. "The Dutch military officers were aware of Japan's 
constraints," Sato said. "But," he recalled, "I felt they were 
expecting us to help them out in a pinch." 
 
Sato cudgeled his brains, and what came across his mind was to get 
involved in an attack. "We have only to say we will go scouting in 
order to gather intelligence or otherwise in order to rescue someone 
injured," Sato said. "And," he added, "we go to a place near the 
Dutch troops, and if we happened to get involved in an attack there, 
then we can fight back." His idea was to induce an attack and fight 
back in the form of justified self-defense. 
 
"As a matter of fact," Sato said, "they would hesitate to do so." He 
also said, "That's a fatal risk there." One former SDF staff officer 
noted that they could be charged later with a violation of the 
weapons use standards-or the rules of engagement (ROE). 
 
In 1992, Japan sent SDF members to Cambodia to engage in United 
Nations peacekeeping operations. Since then, the SDF has constrained 
its personnel's use of weapons overseas while playing it by ear. 
 
According to the government's view, firing back on duty 
overseas-when attacked by foreign military troops-could be 
categorized as the constitutionally prohibited use of armed force. 
However, the SDF is allowed to fight back when attacked by a 
criminal group of unknown nationality. It is very difficult for SDF 
members to tell military troops from criminal or insurgent groups in 
an instant. The government's view has now reached its limit. 
 
Those in the government and many of those concerned take it that the 
question of whether or not to rush to guard friendly troops, as 
noted by an SDF veteran, is not a matter pertaining to the 
advisability of exercising the right to collective self-defense but 
one that intrinsically has something to do with the government's 
guidelines for the use of weapons. That is because they think that 
this matter is for SDF personnel on duty overseas to decide, 
 
TOKYO 00002361  004 OF 009 
 
 
anticipating that SDF members on duty over there may have to use 
weapons to deal with an emerging situation and cannot wait until the 
government goes through procedures, such as making a cabinet 
decision. 
 
The government's current set of regulations for SDF personnel to use 
weapons overseas was shaped under the PKO Cooperation Law of 1992. 
The regulations were later stipulated in various laws, such as the 
Antiterror Special Measures Law, which was enacted in the wake of 
the terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001, and the Iraq 
Reconstruction Assistance Special Measures Law of 2003. 
 
"We didn't know if the situation over there was safe. If they were 
allowed to use weapons under such circumstances, they could have 
eventually been involved in combat. That's why their use of weapons 
was constrained." With this, a senior official of the Cabinet 
Legislation Bureau familiar with the past situation recalled how the 
weapons-use standards were created. 
 
What does Prime Minister Abe have in mind for now? Abe, according to 
one of his aides, is thinking about the SDF's future international 
contributions overseas and is laying emphasis on legislative 
measures to that end. 
 
The question is whether rushing to guard friends is an act of 
exercising the right of collective self-defense. The advisory panel 
is expected to discuss this matter. In addition, the panel is also 
expected to discuss what reason could justify SDF members doing so. 
 
One of the advisory panel's members asserts that using weapons 
within the framework of United Nations activities is not an act of 
using armed force as a sovereign right of the nation. This is the 
idea of collective security. 
 
Meanwhile, in October last year, Abe was asked in the Diet about a 
case where foreign troops acting together with SDF members came 
under attack and those SDF members rush to guard those attacked 
foreign troops. In his reply, Abe categorized this case as "an act 
of policing." This indicated that the SDF, based on police 
authority, would be allowed to use weapons to guard foreign troops 
acting in concert with SDF members. 
 
"Restricting the use of weapons is based on a policy-based 
judgment," says Shigeru Ishiba, former director general of the 
Defense Agency, now the Defense Ministry. "The government should 
ease the standards on guarding friendly troops," Ishiba asserts. 
 
Another member of the advisory panel maintains that the government 
should ease its weapons-use standards, insisting on the necessity of 
creating a permanent law for the Self-Defense Forces' overseas 
activities. 
 
Sato, who has experienced on-site assignments overseas, stressed in 
earnest: "The SDF is working in the national interests of Japan. 
However, the government's guidelines allowing the use of weapons is 
a far cry from the international rules of engagement. I want the 
advisory panel to discuss this matter so that the SDF will be able 
to carry out their missions and ensure safety." 
 
(3) 2007 Upper House election: LDP, Minshuto compete for measures to 
revitalize regional economies 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Almost full) 
 
TOKYO 00002361  005 OF 009 
 
 
May 23, 2007 
 
The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) decided on May 22 to 
propose establishing a "community basic law" (tentative name) as one 
of the measures to stimulate regional economies to be included in 
campaign pledges for the House of Councillors election in July. The 
LDP is considering creating a system to financially support such 
organizations as community associations (jichikai) and fire brigades 
(shobodan), aiming at solidifying the weakening regional support 
base. The largest opposition party Minshuto (Democratic Party of 
Japan) is gearing up to win more votes from farmers. Some may 
criticize the two parties for "wasting public funds." 
 
The LDP Research Commission, chaired by Seiichi Ota, will come up 
with measures for revitalizing regional economies with the Upper 
House election in mind. Besides the establishment of a community 
basic law, the commission will propose 1) introducing a "hometown 
tax system," under which a taxpayer will pay a certain percentage of 
local tax to his or her hometown, 2) promoting a program supporting 
local governments that have made efforts to improve their economies 
on their own by increasing tax allocations, and 3) improving on-site 
education in rural communities for children in urban areas. 
 
A special feature of the planned community basic law is supporting 
regional leaders. The legislation will include plans for the 
government to subsidize activity expenses for neighborhood 
associations through municipalities. Those organizations would be 
given tax breaks. The LDP intends to enact the bill during an 
extraordinary session of the Diet in the fall. "We will get the bill 
through the Diet in the extra Diet session in the fall," said 
Commission Chief Secretariat Yasuhiro Hanashi. 
 
The LDP's moves reflect a sense of alarm toward its weakening 
regional chapters. In the April unified local elections, the LDP 
lost a large number of municipal assembly seats. Local tax grants 
were decreased due to the "trinity reform" of taxation and fiscal 
relations between the central and local governments promoted by the 
former government of Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. As a result, 
many think that the trinity reform accelerated the trend of voters 
abandoning the LDP in provincial areas. 
 
Of the nine bills related to revitalizing regional economies, the 
government submitted to the current Diet session, eight, including a 
bill revising the Regional Revitalization Law, have been enacted. A 
senior Cabinet Office official pointed out: "We will do everything 
that we can do, although some say that's wasting public funds." 
 
The New Komeito has focused on improving regional medical services. 
Local residents are in need of a medical system that will enable 
them to live with peace of mind even in depopulated regions by 
resolving the shortage of medical doctors in rural areas, and by 
promoting the so-called Doctor-Heli system to transport emergency 
patients. 
 
Under the leadership of Ichiro Ozawa, Minshuto (Democratic Party of 
Japan) is intent on expanding its strength in local regions. Its 
manifesto (campaign pledges) proposes the establishment of a system 
to provide farmers with approximately 1 trillion yen in income 
support. In a meeting on May 23 of the Next Cabinet, the largest 
opposition party will decide on measures to support revitalization 
of the forestry industry. It will also include in its manifesto the 
goal of creating 1 million jobs in the wood treating industry and in 
mountainous areas. 
 
TOKYO 00002361  006 OF 009 
 
 
 
The Japanese Communist Party will suggest that tax subsidies 
allocated to local governments not be reduced and that loans to 
agriculture, forestry and fisheries industries be expanded. The 
Social Democratic Party will propose establishing a "regional 
reinvestment law" aimed at creating jobs in provincial areas and 
developing local industries. The People's New Party will propose 
changing the local tax grant system in order to allocate local tax 
grants based on the percentage of elderly population and 
depopulation. 
 
(4) Matsuya welcomes OIE designation of US as controlled-risk 
country for BSE but Yoshinoya remains cool 
 
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full) 
May 24, 2007 
 
The World Organization for Animal Health's (OIE) decision to 
classify the United States as a controlled-risk country for BSE has 
solicited mixed reaction from beef bowl (gyudon) restaurant chains 
and large-scale retail stores, with some voicing expectations for an 
expansion of consumption and others calling for caution. 
 
Matsuya Foods Co., a gyudon chain, put gyudon using US beef on its 
menu again in January. It has welcomed the OIE's decision, with an 
executive saying: "The authorization will help dissolve consumers' 
concerns about the safety of US beef," adding: "We are considering 
using even beef from cattle aged over 20 months, whose import is now 
banned." 
 
Meanwhile, Yoshinoya D&C., the nation's largest gyudon chain, 
remains cool, an executive saying: "We have long desired to see US 
beef imports normalized, but we cannot make too much of the OIE 
authorization." Zensho Co., which operates the Sukiya chain, has 
used Australian beef instead of US beef since September 2004. Its 
spokesman said: "We found in our independent inspections of 
meatpacking plants in the US that the slaughtering process was quite 
lax. No blanket testing has been conducted, either. Until such 
points are rectified, we will never use US beef." 
 
A spokesman of Seven & i Holdings, said: "If the authorization 
serves to dissolve consumers' concerns, it could be a standard." 
Seiyu, which resumed the sale of US beef on March 31, takes the view 
that it remains to be seen if the OIE decision will work to expand 
consumption. A spokesman for Aeon, which has continued to suspend 
the sale of US beef, said: "We have no plans to resume sales in the 
near future." 
 
Consumers' reactions also vary. A male company employee, 20, who 
bought US beef at Seiyu Akabane yesterday, said: "I recognize no 
major differences among beef exported from various countries, so I 
do not care much. If the age-limit restriction is removed, more US 
beef will be placed on the market and its prices will eventually be 
lowered, so I welcome (the OIE's authorization of the safety of the 
US beef)." 
 
A housewife, 57, who bought domestic beef, said: "I have not eaten 
American beef over the past several years because I am worried about 
its safety. I feel that matters have gone as told by the US. I want 
the government to make a cautious response." 
 
(5) Imperial couple arrive in Estonia 
 
 
TOKYO 00002361  007 OF 009 
 
 
SANKEI (Page 30) (Full) 
May 25, 2007 
 
Mao Oshima, Tallinn 
 
The Emperor and Empress, now on a tour of five European countries, 
arrived on April 24 at Tallinn airport in Estonia from Sweden. It is 
the first visit to a former Soviet-bloc state for the Imperial 
couple. 
 
The Imperial couple visited Song Square in the suburbs of Tallinn. 
The chorus festival held once in five years in Song Square is called 
"Singing Revolution" because it became great power for national 
independence. The chorus festival is registered as an intangible 
cultural asset of UNESCO. 
 
The Emperor and Empress watched a chorus practice at the square, 
which can accommodate up to 300,000 people. The couple applauded 
vigorously. 
 
(6) Editorial: Will post-Kyoto framework bring in the US, China? 
 
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full) 
May 25, 2007 
 
It should serve as the starting point for creating an international 
framework to fight against climate change. 
 
Prime Minister Abe announced his basic policy for the "post-Kyoto" 
era, because the Kyoto Protocol, which came into effect in 2008, 
will not cover beyond 2012. Abe's proposal indicated Japan's 
approach of how to build an international framework to replace the 
Kyoto Protocol. Abe is expected to present it to the upcoming Group 
of Eight (G-8) major industrialized nations summit in Germany in 
June. 
 
The Kyoto Protocol set country-specific numerical targets for 
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, Abe's proposal would 
have every country in the world confirm that they will aim for the 
same goal and then discuss how to attain that goal. 
 
One major feature in Abe's proposal is to reduce greenhouse gas 
emissions, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), to half the current levels 
by 2050. Making that target the common world goal, Abe suggests the 
need for technological development to bring about emissions 
reduction and economic growth together. 
 
The United States, the largest emitter in the world, remains outside 
the Kyoto Protocol. And though it is a matter of time until China 
outpaces the US in greenhouse gas emissions, it is not obligated by 
the protocol to reduce emissions. Taking these things into 
consideration, we think Abe's proposal is reasonable and 
appropriate. In order to make a new framework effective, it is 
absolutely required to have the US and China take part. 
 
Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has set its own numerical target 
of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 20 PERCENT  or more from 
1990 levels. 
 
Abe is reportedly determined to aim for "a flexible and diversified 
framework that considers each country's situation." In the process 
of creating the framework, whether to set numerical targets country 
by country must be discussed. In doing so, Japan will likely be 
 
TOKYO 00002361  008 OF 009 
 
 
forced to make a difficult decision, sandwiched among the US, China, 
and the EU. 
 
The three working groups of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change (IPCC) under the United Nations Environment Programme 
released their reports in succession. The reports say that global 
warming has steadily advanced for the past century and predict that 
if society continues relying on fossil fuels, the average 
temperature could rise as much as 6.4 degrees. 
 
The reports also note that global warming could be stopped if 
appropriate measures were taken, urging every country to address 
climate change. 
 
Abe in his proposal mentioned financial and technical assistance to 
developing countries willing to take measures to combat climate 
change. Japan is a world leader in terms of energy-conservation, and 
this technology will serve as an effective tool to combat climate 
change. 
 
Japan is mandated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6 PERCENT 
from 1990 levels. But Japan saw its emissions increase by 8.1 
PERCENT  in 2005. A rise in emissions from office buildings and 
households is noticeable. It is important to continue steady 
efforts, such as turning up the thermostat on air conditioners. 
 
Japan, without making its utmost effort, will find its proposal 
unpersuasive. 
 
(7) Abe unveils climate initiative, with aim of playing up Japan's 
environmental contributions 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
May 25, 2007 
 
Prime Minister Abe unveiled a global-warming initiative yesterday. 
The proposal is apparently aimed at underscoring, ahead of the G-8 
Summit in Heiligendamm starting on June 6, Japan's eagerness to 
address environmental issues. Japan cannot ignore recent 
environmental deterioration in developing countries, such as loess 
from the Gobi Desert blown by wind through China and then to Japan. 
Given this, Japan is willing to make greater contributions in the 
environment area by making use of its cutting-edge technologies. 
 
The prime minister plans to place environmental issues high on the 
agenda for the Lake Toya Summit in Hokkaido next year. The climate 
proposal reflects Japan's desire to take the lead in debate on the 
issue. 
 
Strong appeal to US, China 
 
(Commentary) 
 
Prime Minister Abe proposed setting a global goal of halving 
greenhouse gas emissions across the world by 2050. The 
emission-reduction targets set in the Kyoto Protocol are to end in 
¶2012. Abe's proposal reflects his desire to convey a strong message 
that if such major greenhouse gas emitters as the US and China are 
left outside a post-Kyoto framework, the framework will be 
meaningless. 
 
The total volume of greenhouse gases emitted by industrialized 
countries mandated to cut emissions under the Kyoto Protocol 
 
TOKYO 00002361  009 OF 009 
 
 
accounts for only 30 PERCENT  of total emissions worldwide. The US, 
China, and India - large greenhouse gas emitters - are not mandated 
to cut emissions. Listing these three countries, Abe stressed the 
need for a post-Kyoto framework that involves the entire global 
community. 
 
According to a report by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change (IPCC), it is possible to absorb about 3.1 billion 
tons of greenhouse gases, but 7.2 billion tons have been emitted 
across the world. This means that unless emissions are halved, 
global warming will not be contained. 
 
Abe proposed that the global community should strive to halve 
greenhouse gas emissions from current levels by 2050. The report is 
based on this proposal. Based on the judgment that even if 
country-specific goals are presented the US and China may not accept 
them, Japan aims to have the global community adopt a common goal 
first and then discuss such details as methods to cut greenhouse gas 
emissions and numerical targets. 
 
The prime minister also stressed the need to create a diverse 
framework that takes into account each country's abilities and 
circumstances. Such a view had never been presented before. Abe 
keeps in mind that China, which will be the largest emitter in the 
near future, should bear a heavier burden than other minor 
developing countries. 
 
A senior official of the Environment Ministry confidently said: 
"This is Japan's unique proposal. The US, Europe, and China are 
paying attention to it." However, some observers pose questions, 
wondering if Japan will be able to persuade other countries without 
showing its own long-term goal. Will this proposal be included in 
the G-8 joint statement in Heiligendamm? This will be the first test 
for Japan over whether it will be able to take the lead in future 
talks on global warming. 
 
SCHIEFFER