Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO2025, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/07/07

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO2025.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO2025 2007-05-07 07:58 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7131
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2025/01 1270758
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 070758Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3330
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 3417
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 0979
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 4532
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0242
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 1887
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6902
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2967
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4165
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 002025 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/07/07 
 
 
(18) Poll: 270 candidates ready to run in this summer's Upper House 
election 
 
(19) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties (Nihon Keizai) 2 
 
(20) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties (Mainichi) 3 
 
(21) Majority of Japan War-Bereaved Association amenable to 
unenshrinement of Class-A war criminals from Yasukuni, perhaps 
affected by Emperor Showa's expression of "displeasure" 4 
 
(22) Interview with Vice Defense Minister Moriya on North Korea: 
Japan needs to obtain US confirmation of "nuclear umbrella" 5 
 
(23) Peace and self-defense: 60th anniversary of Constitution; 
Protecting US warships clashes with Article 9; US asks for 
cooperation in dealing with DPRK missiles; Abe's effort to change 
constitutional interpretation gaining momentum 5 
 
(24) IPCC report specifies costs needed to cut CO2 emissions, giving 
momentum to debate on global-warming countermeasures 7 
 
(25) Japan, ASEAN reach agreement in principle to sign EPA: 90% of 
tariffs to be abolished 8 
 
(26) Wavering US policy-From the scene of security (Part 3): Across 
the Pacific; Japan as outpost for US military to expand its 
engagement in Asia 8 
 
(Corrected copy) Yohei Kono should admit that the political decision 
on "comfort women" was a mistake 9 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(18) Poll: 270 candidates ready to run in this summer's Upper House 
election 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Top Play) (Full) 
May 4, 2007 
 
The expectation is that unless the current regular Diet session is 
extended, the official campaign for the 21st House of Councillors 
election will begin on July 5 and the voting will take place on July 
22. According to the survey by the Tokyo Shimbun as of May 3, 270 
candidates are now ready to run, seeking the 121 seats up for grabs 
in the July Upper House election. The 121 include 47 
prefecture-level-constituency seats and proportional representation 
seats. Both ruling and opposition parties will file their candidates 
in almost all constituencies. All political parties began getting 
ready to fight in the Upper House race soon after the April unified 
local elections ended, electing new municipal assembly members who 
will actively support the campaigning for the Upper House election. 
 
The (121) seats not up for reelection include 58 held by the ruling 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), its coalition partner New Komeito, 
and minor groups, and 63 held by the opposition bloc. The highlight 
of the upcoming election is whether the ruling camp or the 
opposition will secure a majority in the Upper House. In order to 
get a majority, the ruling coalition needs to win at least 64 seats, 
while the opposition needs 59. The ruling and opposition parties 
will engage in fierce competition, setting low thresholds for 
victory. 
 
TOKYO 00002025  002 OF 011 
 
 
 
The Upper House race will be the first major national election for 
the Abe administration, which was inaugurated last September. Prime 
Minister Shinzo Abe, who has pushed ahead with constitutional and 
education reforms, as well as reform of the civil servant system in 
order to break away from the postwar regime, will receive the 
judgment of the people. The main opposition party, Minshuto 
(Democratic Party of Japan), has positioned the election as a 
decisive battle for a change of government. Party head Ichiro 
Ozawa's political skills are being tested. 
 
The LDP will field its own candidates in 46 prefectural 
constituencies, excluding Gifu. The party will sponsor one of the 
postal rebels as a candidate in the Gifu constituency. The largest 
opposition party is ready to endorse as its official candidates or 
sponsor candidates for 42 prefectures, excluding Ishikawa, Shimane, 
and Miyazaki. The party intends to wrap up the selection of 
candidates and coordination possibly before the end of May. 
Considering that 29 "single seats" up for grabs hold the key to 
victory in the election, the LDP aims to win 20 seats, while 
Minshuto wants to secure 15. 
 
(19) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties (Nihon Keizai) 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full) 
April 30, 2007 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures shown in percentage. Parentheses denote findings from the 
last survey conducted in March.) 
 
Q: Do you support the Abe cabinet? 
 
Yes                                      53       (43) 
No                                       37       (45) 
Can't say (C/S) + don't know (D/K)       11       (12) 
 
Q: Which political party do you support or like now? 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)                    43       (41) 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto)       21       (18) 
New Komeito (NK)                                   6        (4) 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP)                     4        (5) 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto)          3        (2) 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto)         0        (0) 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon)            0        (0) 
Other political parties                            0        (1) 
None                                              20       (25) 
C/S+D/K                                            4        (4) 
 
(Note) The total percentage does not become 100% in some cases due 
to rounding. 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was taken April 27-29 by Nikkei 
Research Inc. over the telephone on a random digit dialing (RDD) 
basis. For the survey, samples were chosen from among men and women 
aged 20 and over across the nation. A total of 1,559 households with 
one or more voters were sampled, and answers were obtained from 865 
persons (55.5% ). 
 
(20) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties (Mainichi) 
 
 
TOKYO 00002025  003 OF 011 
 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
April 30, 2007 
 
Questions & Answers 
(T = total; P = previous; M = male; F = female) 
 
Q: Do you support the Abe cabinet? 
 
                      T         P         M        F 
Yes                  43       (35)       42       44 
No                   33       (42)       40       28 
Not interested       23       (22)       18       27 
 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the above question) Why? 
 
       T       P       M       F 
Because the prime minister is from the Liberal Democratic Party 
 
14       (20)       18       11 
Because something can be expected of the prime minister's leadership 
 
15       (10)       20       11 
Because there's a young, fresh image about the prime minister 
 
46       (51)       37       52 
Because something can be expected of the prime minister's policy 
measures 
21       (17)       19       22 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the above question) Why? 
 
       T       P       M       F 
Because the prime minister is from the Liberal Democratic Party 
 
11       (6)       11       10 
Because nothing can be expected of the prime minister's leadership 
 
41       (53)       36       46 
Because the prime minister is inexperienced, weak 
13       (19)       11       15 
Because I'm opposed to the prime minister's policies 
32       (21)       36       27 
 
Q: Which political party do you support? 
 
       T       P       M       F 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 
29       (27)       30       27 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 
16       (14)       21       13 
New Komeito (NK) 
5       (5)       2       7 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 
2       (3)       1       3 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 
1       (2)       1       1 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 
1       (0)       1       0 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 
 --       (0)       --       -- 
Other political parties 
 
TOKYO 00002025  004 OF 011 
 
 
1       (2)       2       1 
None 
42       (47)       38       46 
 
Q: Which political party between the LDP and the DPJ would you like 
to see win in this summer's election for the House of Councillors? 
 
                               T       P       M        F 
LDP                           38              38       39 
DPJ                           36              45       30 
Other political parties       18              12       23 
 
(Note) Figures shown in percentage, rounded off. "0" indicates that 
the figure was below 0.5%. "--" denotes that no respondents 
answered. "No answer" omitted. Figures in parentheses denote the 
results of the last survey conducted March 24-25. 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted April 28-29 over the 
telephone with the aim of calling a total of 1,000 voters across the 
nation on a computer-aided random digit sampling (RDS) basis. 
Answers were obtained from 1,085 persons. 
 
(21) Majority of Japan War-Bereaved Association amenable to 
unenshrinement of Class-A war criminals from Yasukuni, perhaps 
affected by Emperor Showa's expression of "displeasure" 
 
MAINICHI (Page 1) (Excerpts) 
May 6, 2007 
 
Takenori Noguchi 
 
The Japan War-Bereaved Association, whose chair is Makoto Koga, 
former secretary-general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party 
(LDP), will hold a first study session at the Kudan Kaikan Hall in 
Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on May 8 to discuss the question of separate 
enshrinement of Class-A war criminals and other issues. A series of 
revelations of the Emperor Showa's remarks and historical documents, 
which have both showed that the Emperor Showa was displeased with 
the enshrinement of Class-A war criminals at Yasukuni Shrine, have 
fueled the association's tilt toward allowing separate enshrinement. 
At this point a majority of the study group favors separate 
enshrinement. If the study sessions continue, it is expected that 
the conclusion will be to countenance separate enshrinement. 
Yasukuni Shrine has rejected separate enshrinement, but once the 
association adopts a policy for separate enshrinement, the shrine 
will be forced to make a decision on the matter. 
 
Last July, former Imperial Household Grand Steward Tomohiko Tomita's 
memos containing the Emperor Showa's remarks "Class A-war criminals 
were enshrined.... Since then I have never visited Yasukuni Shrine" 
were disclosed. Following it, as recently as this April, a diary 
written by former Chamberlain to the Emperor Ryogo Urabe became 
known. The diary backed up the Tomita memo, saying the reason why 
the Emperor stopped visiting the shrine was "because the Emperor was 
dissatisfied with the enshrinement of Class-A war criminals at 
Yasukuni." This revelation shook the association. 
 
(22) Interview with Vice Defense Minister Moriya on North Korea: 
Japan needs to obtain US confirmation of "nuclear umbrella" 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full) 
May 4, 2007 
 
TOKYO 00002025  005 OF 011 
 
 
 
Interviewer: Tatsuya Fukumoto 
 
Over the past 20 years Japan has prepared a variety of laws to meet 
the changing security environment. The primary task facing Japan at 
present is to rebuild the country into a "crisis-resistant state" 
that can cope with such crises as massive terrorist attacks, big 
earthquakes, and destructive activities by armed guerillas. Next, 
Japan needs to establish a system enabling it to respond properly 
under the framework of the alliance with the United States in the 
event it is attacked by such means as ballistic missiles, suspicious 
ships, or guerillas. Specifically, Japan and the US should work out 
joint operation plans, and in addition, the two countries should 
carry out joint drills, check the effectiveness of joint operation 
plans, and revise them as the need arises. South Korea confirms 
through joint drills with the US that it can properly cope with a 
North Korean invasion. Japan also needs to do the same. 
 
I think Japan needs to keep it in mind that when the US has to 
concentrate its forces in the Middle East, as it is having a hard 
time in Iraq, it is difficult for the US to conduct operations on 
two fronts (namely, contingencies involving Japan and the Korean 
Peninsula). Japan needs to make efforts to defend itself instead of 
criticizing the US. Any country that depends on others from the 
beginning is not viewed as a reliable country in the international 
community. 
 
The most important thing for Japan, a country that has the three 
nonnuclear principles and that depends on the US for its nuclear 
deterrent, is to make relations with the US reliable and its nuclear 
deterrent feasible. To that end, Japan must elicit America's real 
intentions about its nuclear weapons at a time when Japan and the US 
carry out joint operation plans. If Japan can actually do so, Japan 
can see whether its dependence on America's nuclear deterrent can be 
kept in place as a policy. 
 
Ahead of doing so, Japan has things to do, namely, building up 
defense capability and put it into operation. In other words, Japan 
must continue efforts to work out plans and carry out training. 
Debate in Japan is still theoretical. We must examine even the three 
nonnuclear principles in order to meet the needs of the times. For 
example, one such principle is not to introduce any nuclear weapons 
onto Japan's territory. One may say, "Introducing such weapons in 
our territory is not so bad." But before saying so, I think it is 
important for Japan to verify together with the US whether we can 
keep in place the policy of depending on America's nuclear 
deterrent. 
 
(23) Peace and self-defense: 60th anniversary of Constitution; 
Protecting US warships clashes with Article 9; US asks for 
cooperation in dealing with DPRK missiles; Abe's effort to change 
constitutional interpretation gaining momentum 
 
MAINICHI (Top play) (Full) 
May 5, 2007 
 
A panel of experts to study the legal foundation for security -- a 
group reporting to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe regarding a review of 
the interpretation of the Constitution -- is scheduled to hold its 
inaugural meeting on May 18. The panel is tasked with studying four 
types of SDF activities that might infringe on Article 9 of the 
Constitution with the aim of producing its conclusion by September. 
 
TOKYO 00002025  006 OF 011 
 
 
Based on their conclusion, Prime Minister Abe is expected to make a 
political decision in the end. It has been 60 years since the 
Constitution of Japan took effect. This article examines 
developments concerning the peace and self-defense of Japan, which 
are now at a major turning point. 
 
Is the Maritime Self-Defense Force allowed to protect US warships on 
the high seas? 
 
The topic has repeatedly been discussed for over a half-century 
since the SDF's establishment, suspecting that such an act 
constitutes an exercise of the right to collective self-defense, 
which is prohibited under the government's interpretation of the 
Constitution. Coming up with an answer to this classic question has 
been a pressing issue for the Japan-US alliance, which has been on 
alert against North Korean missiles. 
 
North Korea launched seven ballistic missiles toward the Sea of 
Japan last July. Noticing signs of the North Korean missile launches 
through its spy satellite, the US military immediately deployed the 
USS Fitzgerald and Curtis Wilbur - Aegis equipped destroyers 
integrated into a missile defense (MD) system - of the Seventh Fleet 
to waters near Japan to monitor the North's moves. Carrying 
high-performance radar capable of acquiring over 200 targets and 
simultaneously attacking more than 10, they are powerful vessels. 
 
They have a weak point, however. The radar's undivided attention in 
one direction for a possible missile launch several hundred 
kilometers away would leave the vessels largely defenseless against 
threats from other directions. Approaching spy ships are 
unnoticeable to the warships. 
 
Under usual circumstances, US warships protect Aegis vessels. What 
took place last July was a contingency. "We are here to defend 
Japan. It is natural for MSDF vessels to defend US warships." This 
reaction from the US military took Japan by surprise. Defending US 
vessels might be an exercise of the right to collective defense. 
 
"Until then, neither Japan nor the US envisaged such a case," a 
senior Defense Ministry official noted. Needs resulting from the 
Japan-US alliance clashed with the principle prescribed in Article 
9. 
 
Washington wondered why Japan, despite having the world's top 
equipment, was not able to defend US warships. Washington was highly 
alarmed by Japan's constitutional constraints that stood in the way 
of the bilateral plan to complete the MD system in five year. The US 
Defense Department conveyed the problem to Ambassador to Japan 
Thomas Schieffer. In a series of behind-the-scenes talks with Japan, 
Washington has urged Tokyo to allow the SDF to defend US Aegis 
vessels as part of the MD system in national contingencies. A set of 
reports has reached Prime Minister Abe as well. 
 
Abe has put the matter at the top of the agenda for the expert 
council tasked with studying the interpretation of Article 9. The 
North Korean crisis has pushed the Abe administration toward a 
review of the government's conventional interpretation of the 
Constitution. 
 
As far as military drills are concerned, the SDF and US forces in 
Japan have been highly integrated. For instance, the two countries 
conducted a joint exercise on the US aircraft carrier Abraham 
 
TOKYO 00002025  007 OF 011 
 
 
Lincoln when it navigated through the high seas off Kyushu and 
Okinawa on March 21-23, 2006. The MSDF Aegis destroyer Kirishima 
took the command of the entire drill. The scenario was for the 
Kirishima to protect the Abraham Lincoln by taking air defense 
command, issuing orders to the carrier-borne US fighters and for 
launching missiles. The US Navy and Japan's MSDF share information 
via the inter-computer data exchange system called Link 16, which 
has been technically trouble-free. The Japan-US military alliance 
has come this far against a backdrop of the ongoing constitutional 
debate. 
 
(24) IPCC report specifies costs needed to cut CO2 emissions, giving 
momentum to debate on global-warming countermeasures 
 
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Excerpts) 
May 5, 2007 
 
The (three) working groups of the United Nations' Intergovernmental 
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released their fourth reports 
yesterday. Chairman Pachauri commented: "The reports propose 
specific countermeasures, and this will surely have a significant 
impact on future international negotiations." The reports announced 
yesterday offer a roadmap and specify the costs needed to cut 
greenhouse gas emissions. The most noticeable point in the report is 
the clarification of projected costs needed to reduce greenhouse gas 
emissions, given such crises facing the world as sharply increasing 
natural disasters apparently caused by global warming. 
 
70% cut in emissions possible by investing 1% of GDP 
 
A study team of the National Institute for Environmental Studies and 
other organizations made a tentative calculation of costs needed for 
Japan to significantly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and 
released the findings this February: If Japan continually invested 
the equivalent of about 1% of its gross domestic product (GDP) in 
developing technologies to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2), the nation 
would be able to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% by 2050. 
Setting nearly 10,000 yen at the maximum as the total cost needed to 
cut a ton of CO2 emissions, the report notes: "This figure is not 
especially higher than that of other countries." 
 
"For climatic stabilization, the world is required to halve CO2 
emissions from the current level by 2050. Industrialized countries 
need to cut such emissions by 60% to 80%." Based on this assumption, 
the study group conducted studies and looked into the possibility of 
whether Japan would be able to achieve a 70% reduction. 
 
The panel envisioned various scenarios about Japanese society in 
2050, for instance, a society in which priority is given to economic 
and technological development (GDP growth per capita at 2% ; 
population at 95 million) or a society with priority given to 
regional economic growth and natural conservation (GDP growth per 
capita at 1% ; population at 100 million). The panel then considered 
what technologies should apply in each case. 
 
As a result of case studies, the panel concluded that it would be 
possible to meet the goal of a 70% cut if Japan invests mainly in 
developing large-scale technologies to generate nuclear power and to 
dump or store CO2 in the ground in an economic-development-oriented 
society and chiefly in developing technologies to generate renewable 
energy, such as biomass energy, in a regional development-oriented 
society. 
 
TOKYO 00002025  008 OF 011 
 
 
 
The panel estimates the total sum of necessary investment funds in 
2050 at 6.7 to 9.8 trillion yen annually, or about 1% of GDP. When 
possible profits taken into consideration, such as cuts in cost due 
to reduced oil demand, the actual total amount is calculated to be 
0.7 to 1.8 trillion yen. 
 
Mizuho Information Research Institute senior manager Hibino, a study 
team member, said: "Some complain that it is overly expensive in 
Japan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but it has been found that 
it would be possible to reduce emissions at almost the same cost 
cited in the IPCC report. It is imperative for Japan to take 
countermeasures from a long-term point of view." 
 
(25) Japan, ASEAN reach agreement in principle to sign EPA: 90% of 
tariffs to be abolished 
 
ASAHI (Page 1) (Excerpts) 
May 5, 2007 
 
Japan and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on May 
4 held an economic ministerial meeting in Bandar Seri Begawan, 
Brunei, and agreed in principle to liberalize trade in goods, a 
central part of the economic partnership agreement (EPA), regarding 
which talks are now underway. Once such an agreement is reached, 
Japan will abolish 92% of tariffs on trade items in terms of import 
value, and ASEAN will scrap 90% of tariffs in the same terms. Both 
parties will decide on items subject to liberalization and sign an 
EPA, which will also incorporate liberalization in investment and 
services, in August with the aim of enacting it next year. 
 
This will be Japan's first EPA with a regional association. The pact 
is expected to move forward economic integration with ASEAN. Japan's 
trade with ASEAN accounted for about 13% in 2006 in terms of value. 
Tariffs will be removed over a period of 10 years once the pact is 
enacted. Coordination is underway with the possibility of allowing 
Vietnam, Cambodia, Burma and Laos - the least developed ASEAN 
members - to extend the deadline up to five years. 
 
Japan will designate 1% of its import amount as an exceptional area 
and impose tariff caps on the remaining 7%. ASEAN is increasing its 
call for further concessions. Chances are, therefore, the percentage 
of items subject to tariff abolition may be increased from 92%. 
 
If trade with ASEAN is liberalized, the current division of labor, 
in which ASEAN members manufacture final products using basic parts 
developed and produced in Japan and distribute them in the region, 
will become tariff-free, enhancing the cost competitiveness of 
Japanese manufacturers of such products as electronics and 
automobiles. ASEAN hopes to see Japan expand investment in the 
region. 
 
(26) Wavering US policy-From the scene of security (Part 3): Across 
the Pacific; Japan as outpost for US military to expand its 
engagement in Asia 
 
KANAGAWA SHIMBUN (Page 4) (Full) 
March 29, 2007 
 
Yuki Takahashi, Masao Ishio 
 
In the State of Washington is a US Navy base. This US naval base is 
 
TOKYO 00002025  009 OF 011 
 
 
called Naval Air Station Whidhey Island, or NAS Whidhey Island for 
short. In late February, NAS Whidhey Island briefed its neighbors on 
a plan to replace aircraft based there. 
 
NAS Whidhey Island keeps an eye on the Pacific Ocean, with P-3C 
antisubmarine patrol planes currently stationed there. The US Navy 
is planning to replace them with the P-8A, a jet plane equipped with 
state-of-the-art surveillance functions. "The noise situation is 
expected to change," says a US Navy officer of the base. "So," this 
officer added, "we've got to explain the plan in detail to local 
communities." P-8As may be deployed in rotation to Misawa or 
Kadena. 
 
Along with the planned realignment of US Forces Japan (USFJ), the US 
military will now step up its functions on the Pacific front, 
starting this year. The US Army's 1st Corps, also known as I Corps, 
is currently headquartered at a base in Fort Lewis in Washington. 
The I Corps will also move its headquarters. Its planned command 
move to Camp Zama, a US Army base in Kanagawa Prefecture, is 
expected to begin within the year. 
 
"They also want to deepen their understanding of Asian societies and 
cultures," says one US expert. Along with USFJ realignment, US 
Forces Korea (USFK), which is now realigning its footprint in South 
Korea, is also presumed to come under the Zama command of I Corps 
after its right to command during emergencies is returned to the 
South Korean forces. 
 
"Let us create friendship across the Pacific," I Corps Commander 
Dubick stressed. Commander Dubick was addressing Japanese and 
American troops participating in an annual session of Japan-US joint 
bilateral training exercises held in February this year at a Ground 
Self-Defense Force Middle Army range in Hyogo Prefecture with I 
Corps troops also participating. In the joint drills this time, the 
GSDF and the US Army also carried out civil-military coordination 
training for the first time in anticipation of public protection 
during emergencies. 
 
In recent years, the US military has been deepening its civil 
engagement in Asia. In February, the USS Blue Ridge, the flagship of 
the US Navy's 7th Fleet based at Yokosuka, visited the Philippines, 
where its crew was engaged in school repairs. "In the Asia-Pacific 
region, there are a number of countries that have islands or long 
coastlines. In the region, the Navy is best qualified to promote 
peace through friendship." So saying, an official of the US Pacific 
Fleet at its headquarters in Hawaii boasted of the US Navy's role. 
 
Shackled by difficult problems in the Middle East, the United States 
is reportedly prone to maintain its Asia strategy as is. However, 
Pacific stability is becoming a matter of life or death for the 
United States in its expanded trade with Asia. Above all, the 
question of how to cope with China's military emergence in the 
region is the biggest challenge to cope with for the present. The 
United States wants to maintain its readiness and influence in the 
Asia-Pacific region. The US military's logistical outposts in 
Kanagawa Prefecture-such as Yokosuka, Zama, and Sagami Depot-will 
inevitably weigh more than ever with the United States. 
 
However, some people in the United States are warning Japan and the 
United States against pushing ahead with only their bilateral 
alliance. In February, former US Deputy Secretary of State Armitage 
and his policy study group released a report on the Japan-US 
 
TOKYO 00002025  010 OF 011 
 
 
alliance. That report suggested the necessity of trilateral 
cooperation between Japan, the United States, and China, while 
urging China to become a "responsible stakeholder." 
 
"The alliance between Japan and the United States is important," 
says Katy Oh, chief researcher at the Institute for Defense Analyses 
(IDA), a US think tank. "But," she adds, "if they push for the 
alliance too dramatically, neighbors could be put on edge." She also 
suggested the need for Japan and the United States to give careful 
explanations in the process of pushing for their alliance. In the 
way ahead, Japan and the United States are going to rebuild their 
alliance, with its foothold at US military bases in Kanagawa 
Prefecture. The two countries, however, will likely be called to 
heed a balance between their alliance in its future image and Asian 
neighbors. 
 
 (Corrected copy) Yohei Kono should admit that the political 
decision on "comfort women" was a mistake 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
May 2, 2007 
 
By Nobuaki Hanaoka, guest editorial board member 
 
Shinzo Abe's first visit to the United States as prime minister was 
taken as a trip for him to make an "apology" for the comfort women 
issue. We wonder why the person who made the prime minister play 
such a humiliating role refuses to talk about his own political 
responsibility. That person is House of Representatives Speaker 
Yohei Kono. 
 
It is widely known that the Kono Statement was issued by a political 
decision based on the request by South Korean authorities, who 
insisted that the bilateral dispute over history would be resolved 
if Japan admitted there was "coercion," without confirming whether 
the government had actually coerced foreign women (to become comfort 
women). 
 
The comfort-women resolution submitted to the US House of 
Representatives by Congressman Mike Honda was drafted based on the 
Kono Statement. Should the Congress adopt the resolution, the 
Japan-US relations will be immeasurably damaged, even though the 
resolution is nonbinding. We were amazed when Mike Honda described 
the comfort women the "largest example of human trafficking in the 
20th century." Since Honda is now known throughout the world, he 
will without a doubt be reelected. We see this as an odious saga of 
a politician who has placed priority on holding on to his seat in 
the Congress no matter how much he slanders another country. 
 
Because of Prime Minister Abe's visit, the situation has changed in 
the United States. In order to prevent the resolution from being 
adopted, however, Kono should admit that the political decision made 
at that time was a mistake (but he doesn't necessarily have to 
announce it). His actions would be complete if he stepped down from 
the Lower House speaker's post and gave up his Diet seat. If so, the 
US government's reaction would be completely changed. Kono would 
then be able to leave his mark on history as a former LDP president 
who saved the nation from a crisis. 
 
Major European and US news media (and Japanese correspondents) show 
a woeful lack of study. The Chinese and South Korean media think 
that hurling abuse purposely is reporting "news." That's nonsense. 
 
TOKYO 00002025  011 OF 011 
 
 
Chinese and South Korean media do not issue newspapers, but they 
publish "organ papers." Therefore, what we need to do is basically 
ignore them. 
 
I had no way to know or understand how terrible the media in 
democratic European countries and the United States are. If you add 
something about "Japan bashing," it sells. The western media lack 
the capability to consider how "war and sex" were handled in their 
own countries. 
 
It is only natural to give serious consideration to the many women 
who were forced into tragic situations during the war. However, many 
correspondents do now know even the basic facts: There existed 
legalized prostitution run by agents; soldiers paid money to the 
comfort women; and since there was a hygienic safety problem, the 
military for that reason oversaw the wartime brothels. This is the 
basis for the worldwide scale "crisis in the media." 
 
I have been a newspaper reporter for about some 30 years. I was 
taught that writing articles based on the facts is a very basic rule 
of news reporting. "Hunting down comfort women," "sexual slaves" and 
the like were fictional productions. If the European and US media 
come to realize that fact, they should issue "corrections." This is 
also a basic principle for the media. 
 
DONOVAN