Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07THEHAGUE984, NETHERLANDS/NSG: CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED MEETING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07THEHAGUE984.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07THEHAGUE984 2007-05-24 14:52 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy The Hague
VZCZCXYZ0044
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTC #0984 1441452
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 241452Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9248
INFO RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP  PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0129
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 000984 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR ISN/RA, EUR/UBI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KNNP MNUC IR NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/NSG: CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED MEETING 
 
REF: A. STATE 69283 
     B. STATE 69315 
 
1.  Summary: The GONL is interested in attending the proposed 
open-ended seminar in national capacities to discuss 
implementation of UNSCRs 1737 and 1747 during the week of 
June 4, 2007, in Vienna.  However, GONL subject matter 
experts will be engaged with the Australia Group Plenary in 
Paris that same week, and are not able to attend the Vienna 
meeting.  The GONL will attempt to pass information on export 
denials to Iran by the proposed deadline, and is comfortable 
with initially sharing such information with the IAEA 
Secretariat and the UNSCR Iran Sanctions Committee.  However, 
 
SIPDIS 
the Dutch have reservations regarding sharing this 
information with non-Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG) states. 
MFA Senior Advisor for Nuclear Affairs and Nonproliferation 
Ceta Noland discussed reftels with polmiloff on May 23.  End 
summary. 
 
2. Noland said the GONL is very interested in attending the 
proposed open-ended seminar in national capacities to discuss 
implementation of UNSCRs 1737 and 1747.  However, the 
proposed meeting date during the week of June 4 in Vienna is 
problematic, as all Dutch subject matter experts will be tied 
up with the Australia Group Plenary in Paris that same week. 
"We just do not have the staff or experts as other, bigger 
countries, and given the short notice, will have to 
prioritize," she said.  She hoped that a member from the 
Dutch delegation in Vienna might be able to attend, but noted 
that Dutch FM Verhagen will visit Vienna on June 5, and most 
Dutch delegation members will be involved with the visit. 
She suggested other, smaller EU member states might have the 
same conflict with the Australia Group, and questioned 
whether the meeting might be pushed back to after the next 
IAEA Board of Governors meeting. 
 
3. Noland confirmed that the Dutch are comfortable with 
sharing confidential information pertaining to export denials 
to Iran with the IAEA Secretariat and the UNSC Iran Sanctions 
Committee, provided such information was not/not circulated 
to all IAEA member states.  She said, however, that the GONL 
does not support at present sharing such information with 
non-NSG states.  "It depends on which non-NSG states are 
included," she said -- any release would require review by 
Dutch intelligence agencies.  She was hopeful the Dutch could 
provide export denial information by the May 30 deadline as 
requested reftels. 
ARNALL